Does formative assessment help students to acquire prescribing skills?

PURPOSE: Formative assessments can help motivate students and ease students' learning through feedback. There is a pressing need for improvement of clinical pharmacotherapy (CPT) education since junior doctors make many prescribing errors. The aim of this study was to determine whether a formative assessment with personalized narrative feedback helps medical students to increase their prescribing skills. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among masters' medical students at Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Students made a formative and a summative skill-based prescription assessment, both during clerkships as part of their regular curriculum. Errors in both assessments were categorized by type and possible consequence and compared with each other. RESULTS: A total of 388 students made 1964 errors in the formative assessment and 1016 in the summative assessment. Most improvements after the formative assessment were seen for mentioning the weight of a child on the prescription (n = 242, 19%). Most new and repeated errors in the summative assessment were missing usage instructions (n = 82, 16% and n = 121, 41%). CONCLUSIONS: This formative assessment with personalized and individual narrative feedback has helped students to increase the technical correctness of their prescriptions. However, errors repeated after the feedback were predominantly errors showing that only one formative assessment has not yet enhanced the clinical prescribing enough.

The effect of combining therapeutic drug monitoring of antihypertensive drugs with personalised feedback on adherence and resistant hypertension: the (RHYME-RCT) trial protocol of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) is important for adequate blood pressure control. Not taking these drugs as prescribed is one of the main underlying causes for resistant hypertension (RH), which in turn leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular events, stroke and kidney damage. Therefore, correct identification of patients that are non-adherent to AHDs is crucial to improve clinical outcome. For this goal, therapeutic drug monitoring is the most reliable method. The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether monitoring of drug concentrations with a dried blood spot (DBS) sampling method combined with personalised feedback leads to a decrease in prevalence of RH after 12 months due to an increase in adherence. Secondary objectives include the difference over time in the number of required AHDs as well as the defined daily dose (DDD). Lastly, the cost-utility of SoC versus the intervention in RH is determined. METHODS: This is a multi-centre single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RHYME-RCT). First, at an eligibility visit, DBS sampling, to monitor drug concentrations in blood, and a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (24-h ABPM) are performed simultaneously. Patients with a daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 135 and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 85 mmHg are randomised to SoC or intervention + SoC. The intervention is performed by the treating physician and includes information on drug concentrations and a comprehensive personalised feedback conversation with the use of a communication tool. The follow-up period is one year with visits at 3, 6 and 12 months randomisation and includes 24-h ABPM and DBS sampling. DISCUSSION: This will be the first trial that focusses specifically on patients with RH without taking into account suspicion of non-adherence and it combines monitoring of AHD concentrations to identify non-adherence to AHDs with a comprehensive feedback to improve non-adherence. Furthermore, if this trial shows positive outcomes for the intervention it can be directly implemented in clinical practice, which would be a great improvement in the treatment of RH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RHYME-RCT is registered in the Dutch Trial Register on 27/12/2017 (NTR6914) and can be found in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

Lessons learned from conducting a randomized controlled trial to improve non-adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment.

PURPOSE: Hypertension significantly contributes to cardiovascular diseases and premature deaths. Effective treatment is crucial to reduce cardiovascular risks, but poor adherence to antihypertensive drugs is a major issue. Numerous studies attempted to investigate interventions for identifying non-adherence, but often failed to address the issue effectively. The RHYME-RCT trial sought to bridge this gap by measuring non-adherence by determining antihypertensive drug concentrations in blood through a dried blood spot (DBS) method in patients with resistant hypertension. This measurement was followed by personalized feedback to improve adherence. During the course of this trial several challenges emerged, including selection bias, the gatekeeper role of physicians, the Hawthorne effect and the role of randomization. AIM: This communication aims to inform fellow researchers and clinicians of challenges that can arise when conducting clinical trials to improve adherence and offer insights for refining study designs to avoid these issues in forthcoming adherence studies.

Purpose: High blood pressure is a serious problem that can lead to heart and kidney problems and early deaths. Treating high blood pressure is therefore crucial. Initially, lifestyle changes are recommended, but if they don't work, medications are needed. However, taking these drugs daily can be challenging, and many patients miss doses which is called non-adherence. Despite numerous studies, a perfect solution hasn't been found to solve non-adherence to blood pressure lowering drugs.In the RHYME-RCT study, researchers aimed to improve drug adherence in patients with resistant hypertension. They monitored drug intake by measuring drug concentrations in the blood alongside 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. These data allowed healthcare providers to offer personalized advice to patients. The study encountered some important challenges in its design, including selection bias, where some participants shouldn't have been included or excluded in the study, and the Hawthorne effect, where patients changed their behavior because they knew they were being observed.Aim: This message is to inform fellow scientists and doctors about issues that can arise when conducting clinical trials to improve adherence and to encourage the exchange of ideas between scientists to improve future studies on medication adherence, which is essential for managing conditions like high blood pressure.

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement.

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

Effects of training physicians in electronic prescribing in the outpatient setting on clinical, learning and behavioural outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.

AIMS: Electronic prescribing systems may improve medication safety, but only when used appropriately. The effects of task analysis-based training on clinical, learning and behavioural outcomes were evaluated in the outpatient setting, compared with the usual educational approach. METHODS: This was a multicentre, cluster randomized trial [EDUCATional intervention for IT-mediated MEDication management (MEDUCATE trial)], with physicians as the unit of analysis. It took place in the outpatient clinics of two academic hospitals. Participants comprised specialists and residents (specialty trainees, in the UK) and their patients. Training took the form of a small-group session and an e-learning. The primary outcome was the proportion of medication discrepancies per physician, measured as discrepancies between medications registered by physicians in the electronic prescribing system and those reported by patients. Clinical consequences were estimated by the proportion of patients per physician with at least one missed drug-drug interaction with the potential for causing adverse drug events. A questionnaire assessed physicians' knowledge and skills. RESULTS: Among 124 participating physicians, primary outcome data for 115 (93%) were available. A total of 1094 patients were included. A mean of 48% of registered medications per physician were discrepant with the medications that their patients reported in both groups (P = 0.14). Due to registration omissions, a mean of 4% of patients per physician had one or more missed drug-drug interactions with the potential to cause a clinically relevant adverse drug event in the intervention group, and 7% in controls (P = 0.11). The percentages of correct answers on the knowledge and skills test were higher in the intervention group (57%) compared with controls (51%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The training equipped outpatient physicians with the knowledge and skills for appropriate use of electronic prescribing systems, but had no effect on medication discrepancies.

[Hypertension en orthostatic hypotension during use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors]. / Hypertensie en orthostatische hypotensie bij gebruik van monoamine-oxidase(MAO)-remmers1.

Monoamine oxidase (mao) inhibitors are antidepressants with potentially severe side-effects. For this reason, the registration of this drug was suspended for some time when safer alternatives became available. However, mao inhibitors can be very effective in cases where depression has proved to be treatment resistant. Consequently, last year tranylcypromine was re-registered for use in the Netherlands. Since mao inhibitors have been used only sporadically in the Netherlands over the last few years, health professionals have only limited knowledge about the side-effects. On the basis of a recent case, we discuss the two most important side-effects of using mao inhibitors, namely hypertension and orthostatic hypotension. We discuss the possible causes and suggest ways on which these two side-effects can be prevented, or treated, should they arise.

Reporting of sex-specific outcomes in trials of interventions for cardiovascular disease: Has there been progress?

In the past decade, the leading international cardiology societies have released statements that emphasize the importance of sex-specific reporting of the findings of clinical trials in cardiovascular research. To find out whether this has led to improvement, we compared sex-specific reporting of efficacy and safety outcomes for trials of cardiovascular drug interventions presented at the major clinical trials sessions of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) before and after publication of these statements. We found that sex-specific efficacy and safety outcomes of the most influential cardiovascular intervention trials are still not systematically presented.

Symptomatic rebound methaemoglobinaemia after treatment with dapsone.

A 28-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with severe dyspnoea and hypoxemia due to methaemoglobinaemia caused by dapsone. The patient recovered completely after repeated infusions of methylene blue and cessation of dapsone. However, 12 days after cessation of dapsone, the patient was readmitted due to recurrence of symptoms based on a relapse of methaemoglobinaemia. Toxicological analysis revealed a toxic dapsone level at readmission and no other explanation for methaemoglobinaemia. Several possible mechanisms as explanation for the recurrence of methaemoglobinaemia are listed and additional tests were performed. In addition to supportive care, treatment consisted of methylene blue; furthermore, cimetidine and ascorbic acid were added. An overview of the pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment, and possible explanations for this relapse of methaemoglobinaemia caused by dapsone are given. This case shows the importance of considering the possibility of a late rebound methaemoglobinaemia after discontinuation of dapsone.

New diagnostic and treatment strategies in renal artery stenosis: a promising pursuit or disappointment foretold?

Clinical management of renal artery stenosis has seen a major shift, after randomised clinical trials have shown no group benefit of endovascular intervention relative to optimal medical control. However, the inclusion criteria of these trials have been criticised for focusing on a subset of patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis where intervention was unlikely to be beneficial. Moreover, new imaging and computational techniques have become available, which have the potential to improve identification of patients that will respond to interventional treatment. This review addresses the challenges associated with clinical decision making in patients with renal artery stenosis. Opportunities for novel diagnostic techniques to improve patient selection are discussed, along with ongoing Dutch studies and network initiatives that investigate these strategies.

Diagnostic and (new) therapeutic options for resistant hypertension: a short review.

Hypertension is a major risk factor for ischaemic heart disease and stroke. Despite the availability of numerous pharmacological treatment options, blood pressure (BP) targets are often not achieved. The inability to reach BP levels below 140/90 mmHg despite the use of three or more antihypertensive drugs is defined as resistant hypertension (RH). The etiology for RH is multifactorial. First, BP should be appropriately measured. In order to improve BP control, lifestyle modification should be recommended, adherence should be carefully assessed to exclude pseudo-resistance, and efforts should be made to exclude secondary causes of hypertension before initiating new drugs or considering device-based treatment strategies. This short review will highlight several aspects of RH management along with a focus on several new treatment options. act available.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): a common but unfamiliar syndrome.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a condition in which a change from a supine to an upright position causes an abnormally large increase in heart rate which may be accompanied by a variety of physical complaints. We report two cases illustrating the heterogeneity of this syndrome. We give an update on the etiology of POTS, which is still poorly understood, and its overlap with other syndromes such as chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinicians should be aware of POTS, a fairly common clinical entity, that can result in significant impairments to a patient's quality of life. Lifestyle measures (under which adequate fluid and salt intake, exercise) are a first line of treatment; if insufficient, pharmacotherapy can be considered to improve quality of life.

Acute calcium channel blocker withdrawal-induced cardiac arrest.

Acute withdrawal of calcium channel blockers can lead to the so-called calcium channel blocker withdrawal phenomenon, in particular, when high dosages are used. In the case presented, inadequate drug substitution led to this phenomenon which resulted in a serious course of events. Careful monitoring the process of drug substitution with respect to equal therapeutic dosages is therefore a necessity, especially in vulnerable patients.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in the treatment of the elderly patient with hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is an important risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases. It is more prevalent in the elderly population. Recently updated American and European guidelines recommend treating every elderly patient with hypertension independent of age, starting with a low dose of antihypertensive drugs. However, little information is available on the optimal dosages of antihypertensive drugs to treat the elderly safely. Areas covered: Comorbidities, co-medication and frailty status can alter the clinical outcome of drug treatment and can cause adverse events in the elderly. Also, due to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes the interpatient variability when using antihypertensive drugs is considerable. In this review, an overview is given on the extent to which the previously mentioned parameters are changed in elderly patients and what this means for the exposure to antihypertensive medication. Also, recommendations on the starting dose of the most frequently used antihypertensive drugs are given based on literature data. Expert opinion: We believe that recommendations on starting dosages followed by a stepwise increase of dosages will lead to improved blood pressure control and less adverse drug reactions in the elderly patient. This may improve adherence to antihypertensive therapy.

Cascade screening of familial hypercholesterolemia must go on.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the success of the recently terminated Dutch nationwide cascade screening by examining whether children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) were identified through family screening or due to cardiovascular (CVD) events in the FH parent. METHODS: We collected clinical information of all children (0-18 years) with FH with a pathogenic variant at our outpatient lipid clinic between 1992 and 2014 and their FH parents and FH grandparents. RESULTS: We analysed 292 FH children from 205 parents with FH. A history of premature CVD was present in 20% of the parents (29% of the fathers, 9% of the mothers) and 49% of the FH grandparents. CONCLUSION: The fact that CVD is still a presenting event of FH in especially fathers shows that nationwide screening might have been terminated too early. Therefore we recommend to proceed the cascade screening.

No accumulation of a prophylactic dose of nadroparin in moderate renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency, especially in therapeutic dosages. Although no appropriate studies have been conducted for prophylactic dosages of nadroparin, dose reduction is sometimes recommended, especially for high prophylactic dosages. We assessed accumulation of a prophylactic dose of 5700 IU subcutaneous nadroparin once daily in patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study and measured peak anti-Xa activity four hours after subcutaneous nadroparin injection on day 1, 3, 5 and if possible day 10 in adults with and without renal insufficiency defined as a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) below or above 50 ml/min/1.73 m2. Patients with a GFR below 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 were excluded. RESULTS: We included 14 patients in each group. In the group with renal failure 12 patients had a GFR between 30 and 50 ml/min/1.73 m2. Peak anti-Xa activity showed a high interindividual variability, but was fairly constant within each patient. There was no rise in peak anti-Xa activity on day 3 and 5 after consecutive administration. In the group with normal renal function, peak anti-Xa activity declined on day 5 compared with day 1 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic dosages of nadroparin showed no accumulation in patients with a GFR between 30-50 ml/min/1.73 m2. Dose reduction in this group could lead to suboptimal thromboprophylaxis. Due to underrepresentation of patients with a GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 2), we cannot give recommendations for this group.