The Influence of the Socioeconomic Status and the Density of the Population on the Outcome After Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status (SES) and living in a rural environment are associated with poorer health and a higher number of amputations among the population at large. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of low SES and of the degree of urbanization on the short-term and long-term results of patients after revascularization for peripheral artery disease. METHODS: An observational retrospective follow-up study of 770 patients operated on for peripheral artery disease at three university centers in north-western Spain from January 2015 to December 2016. The events studied were Rutherford classification of severity upon admission, direct amputation, amputations in the follow-up period, new revascularization procedures, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and overall mortality. Mean personal income and income of the household associated with the street in which each patient lived and the degree of urbanization in three areas as per Eurostat criteria: densely populated areas, intermediate density areas, and thinly populated areas. Comorbidity, surgical, and follow-up variables were also collected. Descriptive analysis and Cox regression were used. Approval was obtained from the regional ethics committee. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 47.5 months. MACE occurred in 21.5% of the series and overall mortality was 47.0%. Living in a thinly populated area is associated with a lower risk of MACE (adjusted subhazard ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.91). Overall survival is lower in intermediate density area patients (adjusted Hazard Ratio = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.07-2.00). The third quartile of mean personal and household income is associated with a higher risk of major amputation at follow-up (adjusted Odds Ratio 1.92, 95% CI: 1.05-3.52 and adjusted Odds Ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.0.3-3.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who live in a densely populated area run a higher risk of MACE. SES is neither associated with worse outcomes after surgery nor with MACE in long-term follow-up.

Effect of antiplatelet therapy on aneurysmal sac expansion associated with type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has gained widespread use through a solid reputation of safety and effectiveness. However, some issues, such as endoleaks and sac growth over time, still arise as important concerns. Antiplatelet therapy, mandatory as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, may play a role in both phenomena by interfering with blood clotting properties and the inflammatory process associated with AAA. We analyzed whether different antiplatelet therapies were independent risk factors for type II endoleak (T2E) persistence and midterm sac growth after EVAR. METHODS: All patients with T2E detected in the first post-EVAR control were included, except those without at least 1 year of complete follow-up. Data for demographics, clinical comorbidities, EVAR devices, and antiplatelet therapies were recorded. All patients underwent routine follow-up with contrast-enhanced tomography at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter. A three-dimensional rendering of each endoleak was performed for detailed volumetry. Main outcomes were endoleak persistence at 6 months and sac growth >5 mm at end of follow-up. RESULTS: During a 9-year period, 87 patients with initial T2E were monitored for a mean of 41.5 months. On discharge, salicylates were prescribed to 50, clopidogrel to 16, and multiagent therapy or anticoagulation to 9; no therapy was given to 12. No significant differences in comorbidities or baseline AAA characteristics were found between groups. At 6 months thereafter, 59% (n = 51) of the initial T2Es persisted. At end of follow-up, 32 patients had sac growth >5 mm (37%). Sac growth was significantly less frequent in the group treated with salicylates (26% vs 60%; P = .004). Cox proportional hazards model reinforced the role of salicylates as protectors for sac growth over time (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.87; P = .024), whereas T2E nidus volume and endoleak complexity behaved like independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet therapy with salicylates appears to be linked to a decreased risk of sac growth >5 mm over time in patients with T2Es detected right after EVAR. Population-based cohort studies are mandatory to confirm this finding and to guide a potential recommendation.

Clinical predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Those patients who undergo a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) will present a higher cardiovascular risk during follow-up than the general population. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic factors and validate the accuracy of 3 cardiovascular risk scores as predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during long-term follow-up after CEA. METHODS: Observational retrospective follow-up study with 416 CEAs conducted consecutively in 385 patients from 1994 to 2011. The primary end point was MACE, single event including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Preoperative risk factors and medical treatment at discharge were collected. A general cardiovascular risk score, the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), was used, and 2 scores specific for CEA (Halm and Tu). Descriptive analysis and Cox regression were conducted. Informed consent from patients was obtained and approval by the ethics committee. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.94 years. MACEs appeared in 22.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-26.2%) of the series during follow-up. The MACEs rate at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, was 3.1%, 9.3%, and 15.8%, respectively. In the Cox regression model, the MACE predictor variables were: the presence of peripheral artery disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% CI, 1.06-2.70) and RCRI (HR,1.61; 95% CI, 1.04-2.50). The RCRI area under the curve for predicting events, with a 2.5 cutoff point, was 0.59 with 85.9% sensitivity and a positive predictive value of 25.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral artery disease and high RCRI have an independent effect on predicting MACEs. The 3 different scores have a low ability for predicting MACEs during long-term follow-up.

Endograft limb trimming and resheathing can be an alternative for emergent aortic repair without adequate stent graft availability.

Endograft limb trimming can be an easy customization to perform in some emergent setups and when alternative adequate covered stents are lacking. A man aged 74 years presented with aortoenteric fistula and hemodynamic instability years after an aortobifemoral bypass, and a 56-year-old woman was admitted with acute ischemia due to an aortic ulcer-like lesion. In both cases, tabletop deployment and removal of two stents from an Endurant iliac limb (Medtronic, Fridley, Minn), followed by resheathing and deployment, allowed successful repair as a bridging therapy for open surgery. Both patients are alive and without walking impairment 8 and 6 months later, respectively.