[Promoting mental health recovery through metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT): A systematic literature review]. / Favoriser le rétablissement des troubles psychiques par une thérapie intégrative centrée sur l'élaboration métacognitive (MERIT) : une revue systématique de la littérature.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the effects of a metacognitive reflection and insight therapy (MERIT) in people suffering from psychiatric disorders. METHOD: A systematic review was carried out on PubMed, PsychInfo, Psycharticles and Psychological and Behavioral Science Collection from 1980 to 2024. RESULTS: The review included five randomized controlled studies, four observational group studies and 22 case studies with quantitative measures. Analyses indicated that MERIT significantly increases metacognitive abilities to reflect on oneself and others, as well as mastery of one's strategies. In addition, some studies found an improvement in insight and symptomatology. Most studies included participants with psychotic disorders. CONCLUSION: MERIT is an effective therapy for promoting subjective recovery by improving metacognitive abilities in people with psychotic disorders. However, further studies are needed to generalize this result to other psychiatric disorders.

Part of the solution yet part of the problem: factors of schizophrenia stigma in mental health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Stigma is highly prejudicial to persons with schizophrenia, their families, the society and the health care system. Mental health professionals (MHP) are considered to be one of the main sources of schizophrenia stigma. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify individual and contextual factors associated with stigma in MHP in its three dimensions (stereotypes, prejudices, discrimination, Fiske, 1998). METHODS: An online survey was conducted with specific measures of MHP stigma (stereotypes, prejudices and discrimination). Four categories of potential associated factors were also measured: sociodemographic characteristics, contextual characteristics (e.g., Work setting), individual characteristics (e.g., Profession, Recovery-oriented practices) and theoretical beliefs (e.g., Biological beliefs, Perceived similarities, Continuum versus Categorical beliefs). RESULTS: Responses of 357 MHP were analysed. Factors that were the most strongly associated with MHP stigma were Perceived similarities, Categorical beliefs, Biological beliefs, Recovery-oriented practice and Work setting (independent practice). Conversely, Gender, Specific trainings in stigma or recovery and Cognitive aetiology beliefs showed no association with any of MHP stigma dimension. Remaining factors show associations with a weak effect size. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest that MHP stigma is more influenced by individual factors such as theoretical beliefs and recovery-oriented practices than contextual factors. These original results provide perspectives for reducing stigma in mental health practices.Key pointsMental health professionals (MHP) considering they share similarities with persons with schizophrenia or believing that schizophrenia is not a discrete social category but rather the extreme on a continuum between 'normal' and 'pathologic' reported less stigmatisation.MHP holding higher professional utility beliefs and using recovery-oriented practice reported fewer stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination.Other factors such as age, academic level, contact frequency, familiarity and multidisciplinary practice show associations with a weak effect size.

How internalised stigma reduces self-esteem in schizophrenia: the crucial role of off-line metacognition.

Introduction: Stigma is widely recognised as a major barrier to recovery. In schizophrenia, internalised stigma (IS) strongly impacts self-esteem, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain poorly understood. In this study, we suggest that IS alters self-esteem by leading people to perceive their cognitive functioning as inefficient. We investigated whether off-line metacognitive complaints mediate the effect of IS on self-esteem in schizophrenia.Methods: We included 78 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. IS was measured with the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness scale, self-esteem by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale, and off-line metacognitive complaints with the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia.Results: Mediation analysis revealed that the effect of IS on self-esteem was mediated by off-line metacognitive complaints.Conclusion: Results suggest that IS reduces self-esteem by negatively impacting metacognition, such as perception of cognitive difficulties. We suggest that taking metacognition into account in the form of metacognitive complaints may be relevant in interventions aiming at reducing IS in psychosis.

When mental health care is stigmatizing: A participative study in schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES: Mental health care has been identified as a major source of mental illness stigmatization. Detailed information about these stigmatization experiences is thus needed to reduce stigma in mental health practices. The study aimed to (a) identify the most relevant stigmatizing situations in mental health care encountered by users with schizophrenia and their families; (b) characterize the relative importance of these situations in terms of frequency, experienced stigmatization, and associated suffering; and (c) identify contextual and individual factors associated with these experiences. METHOD: An online survey was conducted in France among users and family members to characterize situations of stigmatization in mental health care and identify associated factors. The survey content was first developed from a participative perspective, through a focus group including users. RESULTS: A total of 235 participants were included in the survey: 59 participants with schizophrenia diagnosis, 96 with other psychiatric diagnoses, and 80 family members. The results revealed 15 relevant situations with different levels of frequency, stigmatization, and suffering. Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia experienced more situations of stigmatization, with a higher frequency. Moreover, contextual factors were strongly associated with experienced stigmatization, including recovery-oriented practices (negatively associated) and measures without consent (positively associated). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These situations, as well as associated contextual factors, could be targeted to reduce stigmatization and related suffering in mental health practices. Results strongly underscore the potential of recovery-oriented practice as an instrument to fight stigma in mental health care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

How continuum beliefs can reduce stigma of schizophrenia: The role of perceived similarities.

Growing evidence has shown continuum beliefs as a promising tool to reduce psychiatric stigma in the general population, but data still lack regarding mechanisms underlying this effect. This study aims at testing the hypothesis that continuum beliefs affect public stigma and self-stigma by increasing perceived similarities between oneself and people with schizophrenia. Perceiving such similarities may reduce public stigma and increase self-stigma in the general population. The current study was preregistered on OSF. Data were collected via an on-line survey (N = 565). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three experimental conditions. Continuum beliefs were induced with short videos supporting either a continuum viewpoint of schizophrenia, a categorial viewpoint of schizophrenia, or a neutral video. A scale of Perceived similarities between oneself and people with schizophrenia was administered. Public stigma was measured with an Essentialism scale and Self-stigma with a scale of self-stereotype association. Mediation analyses showed that the effects of categorial and continuum beliefs on essentialism and self-stereotype association were mediated by perceived similarities. Our results suggest that continuum beliefs about schizophrenia act as a recategorization mechanism, by enhancing perceived similarities with the stereotyped group.