RESUMO
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancer worldwide. Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis persist as the most common risk factors, typically linked to instances of alcohol abuse or viral infections, notably hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection. Diagnosis can be made using patient history and image studies as there is no need for pathological confirmation. The only curative treatment is surgical resection, and in cases where the tumor is unresectable, as the one presented in this case, and when there are no contraindications, the only option is an orthotopic liver transplantation. This malignancy is not only associated with high mortality but also high morbidity associated with severe complications, such as hemorrhage, necrosis, and infection of the tumor. The significant relevance of this case lies in its capacity to illustrate that despite remaining in non-surgical management for months when an acute complication presented, it was timely identified and surgically treated. The emergence of complications, such as necrosis accompanied by abscess formation and intratumoral hemorrhage, represents an indication for prompt surgical management.
RESUMO
Hollow viscus perforation poses a significant diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for the majority of clinicians. It is vitally important that in cases of gastrointestinal perforation, the tissue that was perforated is always evaluated, since a malignant tumor can cause this complication as a presentation form. Here, we present the case of a patient whose first manifestation of a malignant gastric tumor was its perforation and the presence of septic shock secondary to this. This case exemplifies the importance of innovative thinking in facilitating a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic strategy, leading to the timely identification and management of a malignant tumor by the oncology team; such interventions not only enhance patient outcomes but also mitigate morbidity and mortality rates.
RESUMO
Pancreas transplant (PTx) is the only treatment that establishes normal glucose levels for patients diagnosed with diabetes types 1 and 2. The paper aims to review and analyze graft survival, patient survival, and the impact on diabetic complications. We describe that the graft survival was 82-98% at 1 year, 90% at 5 years, and 75-54% at 10 years for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipient; 71% pancreas after kidney (PAK), and 62% PTx alone at 1 year. Patient survival: At 1 year for recipients was 96.9% simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK); for PAK transplantation recipients, 96.3%; and for PTx alone recipients, 98.3%. In general, the pancreas transplantation improves and reverses diabetic complications. Finally, the pancreatic transplant is a morbid procedure and emerges as a significant alternative in diabetes management, directly competing with conventional insulin therapies. Results so far suggest that the most effective transplant model is the SPK. While more patients could benefit from this procedure, surgical complications and the need for immunosuppression pose significant challenges.
El trasplante de páncreas es el único tratamiento que estabiliza los niveles normales de glucosa en los pacientes diagnosticados con diabetes tipo 1 o tipo 2. En esta revisión se analizan la supervivencia del injerto, la supervivencia del paciente y el impacto en las complicaciones diabéticas. Se describe la supervivencia del injerto: 82-98% al año para los receptores de trasplante simultáneo de páncreas y riñón, 71% para trasplante páncreas después de riñón y 62% para trasplante de páncreas solitario al año. Supervivencia de los pacientes a 1 año: 96.9% para los receptores de trasplante simultáneo de páncreas y riñón, 96.3% para los receptores de trasplante de páncreas después de riñón y 98.3% para los receptores de páncreas solitario. En general, el trasplante de páncreas mejora y revierte las complicaciones diabéticas. Finalmente, el trasplante de páncreas, un procedimiento mórbido, surge como una alternativa significativa en el manejo de la diabetes, compitiendo directamente con las terapias convencionales de insulina. Hasta ahora, los resultados indican que el modelo de trasplante más efectivo es el simultáneo de páncreas y riñón. Aunque más pacientes podrían beneficiarse de este procedimiento, las complicaciones quirúrgicas y la necesidad de inmunosupresión plantean desafíos significativos.