High throughput screening identifies repurposable drugs for modulation of innate and acquired immune responses.

A balanced immune system is essential to maintain adequate host defense and effective self-tolerance. While an immune system that fails to generate appropriate response will permit infections to develop, uncontrolled activation may lead to autoinflammatory or autoimmune diseases. To identify drug candidates capable of modulating immune cell functions, we screened 1200 small molecules from the Prestwick Chemical Library for their property to inhibit innate or adaptive immune responses. Our studies focused specifically on drug interactions with T cells, B cells, and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Candidate drugs that were validated in vitro were examined in preclinical models to determine their immunomodulatory impact in chronic inflammatory diseases, here investigated in chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Using this approach, we identified several candidate drugs that were highly effective in preclinical models of chronic inflammatory disease. For example, we found that administration of pyrvinium pamoate, an FDA-approved over-the-counter anthelmintic drug, suppressed B cell activation in vitro and halted the progression of B cell-dependent experimental pemphigoid by reducing numbers of autoantigen-specific B cell responses. In addition, in studies performed in gene-deleted mouse strains provided additional insight into the mechanisms underlying these effects, for example, the receptor-dependent actions of tamoxifen that inhibit immune-complex-mediated activation of PMNs. Collectively, our methods and findings provide a vast resource that can be used to identify drugs that may be repurposed and used to promote or inhibit cellular immune responses.

Comparing the risk of death, major adverse cardiac events, and relapse in bullous pemphigoid patients treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: According to current guidelines, systemic or topical corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatments for bullous pemphigoid (BP). There is evidence suggesting that topical application may be associated with a lower risk of mortality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive large-scale data comparing mortality rates, as well as the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), infections, and relapse, between systemic and topical corticosteroid treatments. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of death, MACE, infections, and relapse in BP patients treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed in the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. As a measure against bias, propensity-score matching for age, sex, ten diseases and six medications, and three sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: All-time risk of death was increased in US BP patients exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids (n=2,917) compared to topical clobetasol propionate treated patients (n=2,932, hazard ratio [HR], 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.58, p<0.0001). This was consistent in time-stratified analysis (1- and 3-year mortality rates), and in analysis contrasting prednisone (equivalent) does of 1-10 mg (low) or 30-100 mg (medium-high) systemic corticosteroid to topical treatment. The increased risk of death in US BP patients exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids compared to topical treatment was accompanied by increased risks for MACE (HR 1.33, CI 1.08-1.64, p=0.0075) and infections (HR 1.33, CI 1.15-1.54, p=0.0001). The risk of continued disease or relapse was decreased in patients treated with systemic as opposed to topical corticosteroid (HR 0.85, CI 0.77-0.94, p=0.0016). Results regarding mortality and continued disease or relapse persisted in three of three sensitivity analyses. Potential limitations are the retrospective data collection, bias for treatment selection and miscoding. CONCLUSION: Pending validation in prospective studies, where feasible, and despite the heightened risk of relapse, topical corticosteroid treatment may be advantageous compared to systemic corticosteroid treatment due to its significantly lower risk of death.

State-of-the-art diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases.

Autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of approximately a dozen entities comprising pemphigus and pemphigoid disorders and dermatitis herpetiformis. The exact diagnosis of AIBDs is critical for both prognosis and treatment and is based on the clinical appearance combined with the detection of tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies. While blisters and erosions on the skin and/or inspectable mucosal surfaces are typical, lesions may be highly variable with erythematous, urticarial, prurigo-like, or eczematous manifestations. While direct immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) of a perilesional biopsy is still the diagnostic gold standard, the molecular identification of the major target antigens opened novel therapeutic avenues. At present, most AIBDs can be diagnosed by the detection of autoantigen-specific serum antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or indirect IFM when the clinical picture is known. This is achieved by easily available and highly specific and sensitive assays employing recombinant immunodominant fragments of the major target antigens, i.e., desmoglein 1 (for pemphigus foliaceus), desmoglein 3 (for pemphigus vulgaris), envoplakin (for paraneoplastic pemphigus), BP180/type XVII collagen (for bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, and mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin 332 (for mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin ß4 (for anti-p200 pemphigoid), type VII collagen (for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and mucous membrane pemphigoid), and transglutaminase 3 (for dermatitis herpetiformis). Indirect IFM on tissue substrates and in-house ELISA and immunoblot tests are required to detect autoantibodies in some AIBD patients including those with linear IgA disease. Here, a straightforward modern approach to diagnosing AIBDs is presented including diagnostic criteria according to national and international guidelines supplemented by long-term in-house expertise.

Differential risks of psoriatic arthritis development in patients with varied psoriasis manifestations: a sex- and ethnicity-specific analysis.

Objectives: This study investigated psoriatic arthritis (PsA) risk across varied psoriasis manifestations, considering sex and ethnicity. Methods: Using TriNetX, a federated database encompassing over 120 million electronic health records (EHRs), we performed global retrospective cohort studies. Psoriasis vulgaris (Pso), pustulosis palmoplantaris (PPP), and generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) cohorts were retrieved using ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching, incorporating age, sex, and ethnicity, was employed. An alternative propensity matching model additionally included established PsA risk factors. Results: We retrieved data from 486 (Black or African American-stratified, GPP) to 35,281 (Pso) EHRs from the US Collaborative Network. Significant PsA risk variations emerged: Pso carried the highest risk [hazard ratio (HR) 87.7, confidence interval (CI) 63.4-121.1, p < 0.001], followed by GPP (HR 26.8, CI 6.5-110.1, p < 0.0001), and PPP (HR 15.3, CI 7.9-29.5, p < 0.0001). Moreover, we identified significant sex- and ethnicity-specific disparities in PsA development. For instance, compared to male Pso patients, female Pso patients had an elevated PsA risk (HR 1.1, CI 1.1-1.2, p = 0.002). Furthermore, White Pso patients had a higher likelihood of developing PsA compared to their Black or African American counterparts (HR 1.3, CI 1.04-1.7, p = 0.0244). We validated key findings using alternative propensity matching strategies and independent databases. Conclusion: This study delineates nuanced PsA risk profiles across psoriasis forms, highlighting the pivotal roles of sex and ethnicity. Integrating these factors into PsA risk assessments enables tailored monitoring and interventions, potentially impacting psoriasis patient care quality.