What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review.

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral cancer patients seems beneficial in terms of early start of oral rehabilitation and limiting additional surgical interventions. Guidelines on the ideal timing of implant placement in oral cancer patients are missing. OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping literature review on studies examining the timing of dental implant placement in oral cancer patients and propose a clinical practice recommendations guideline. METHODS: A literature search for studies dealing with primary and/or secondary implant placement in MEDLINE was conducted (last search December 27, 2019). The primary outcome was 5-year implant survival. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 808 studies were considered eligible. Both primary and secondary implant placement showed acceptable overall implant survival ratios with a higher pooled 5-year implant survival rate for primary implant placement 92.8% (95% CI: 87.1%-98.5%) than secondary placed implants (86.4%, 95% CI: 77.0%-95.8%). Primary implant placement is accompanied by earlier prosthetic rehabilitation after tumor surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with oral cancer greatly benefit from, preferably primary placed, dental implants in their prosthetic rehabilitation. The combination of tumor surgery with implant placement in native mandibular bone should be provided as standard care.

Prosthodontic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients-Challenges and new developments.

Head and neck cancer treatment can severely alter oral function and aesthetics, and reduce quality of life. The role of maxillofacial prosthodontists in multidisciplinary treatment of head and neck cancer patients is essential when it comes to oral rehabilitation and its planning. This role should preferably start on the day of first intake. Maxillofacial prosthodontists should be involved in the care pathway to shape and outline the prosthetic and dental rehabilitation in line with the reconstructive surgical options. With the progress of three-dimensional technology, the pretreatment insight in overall prognosis and possibilities of surgical and/or prosthetic rehabilitation has tremendously increased. This increased insight has helped to improve quality of cancer care. This expert review addresses the involvement of maxillofacial prosthodontists in treatment planning, highlighting prosthodontic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients from start to finish.

Three-Dimensional Guided Zygomatic Implant Placement after Maxillectomy.

Zygomatic implants are used in patients with maxillary defects to improve the retention and stability of obturator prostheses, thereby securing good oral function. Prosthetic-driven placement of zygomatic implants is even difficult for experienced surgeons, and with a free-hand approach, deviation from the preplanned implant positions is inevitable, thereby impeding immediate implant-retained obturation. A novel, digitalized workflow of surgical planning was used in 10 patients. Maxillectomy was performed with 3D-printed cutting, and drill guides were used for subsequent placement of zygomatic implants with immediate placement of implant-retained obturator prosthesis. The outcome parameters were the accuracy of implant positioning and the prosthetic fit of the obturator prosthesis in this one-stage procedure. Zygomatic implants (n = 28) were placed with good accuracy (mean deviation 1.73 ± 0.57 mm and 2.97 ± 1.38° 3D angle deviation), and in all cases, the obturator prosthesis fitted as pre-operatively planned. The 3D accuracy of the abutment positions was 1.58 ± 1.66 mm. The accuracy of the abutment position in the occlusal plane was 2.21 ± 1.33 mm, with a height accuracy of 1.32 ± 1.57 mm. This feasibility study shows that the application of these novel designed 3D-printed surgical guides results in predictable zygomatic implant placement and provides the possibility of immediate prosthetic rehabilitation in head and neck oncology patients after maxillectomy.

The use of 3D virtual surgical planning and computer aided design in reconstruction of maxillary surgical defects.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review describes the latest development of 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer aided design (CAD) for reconstruction of maxillary defects with an aim of fully prosthetic rehabilitation. The purpose is to give an overview of different methods that use CAD in maxillary reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: 3D VSP enables preoperative planning of resection margins and osteotomies. The current 3D VSP workflow is expanded with multimodal imaging, merging decision supportive information. Development of more personalized implants is possible using CAD, individualized virtual muscle modelling and topology optimization. Meanwhile the translation of the 3D VSP towards surgery is improved by techniques like intraoperative imaging and augmented reality. Recent improvements of preoperative 3D VSP enables surgical reconstruction and/or prosthetic rehabilitation of the surgical defect in one combined procedure. SUMMARY: With the use of 3D VSP and CAD, ablation surgery, reconstructive surgery, and prosthetic rehabilitation can be planned preoperatively. Many reconstruction possibilities exist and a choice depends on patient characteristics, tumour location and experience of the surgeon. The overall objective in patients with maxillary defects is to follow a prosthetic-driven reconstruction with the aim to restore facial form, oral function, and do so in accordance with the individual needs of the patient.

Patient compliance: a determinant of patient satisfaction?

Recent studies have shown that there is a distinct relationship between patient satisfaction and patient compliance in orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patient compliance, as noticed and recorded by the orthodontist during treatment, can be used as a determinant of patient's satisfaction in the long run. Documentation of 100 patients who completed active orthodontic treatment in the year 2000 at the Academic Centre of Dentistry Amsterdam was analyzed, and compliance scores for patients were computed. Three years after completion of active orthodontic treatment, a questionnaire about satisfaction was sent to all subjects. Items were divided over six subscales on the basis of item content. Compliance and satisfaction scores of both sexes were compared, and correlations between compliance and satisfaction were explored. Regression analyses were done to examine the predictive value of sex and compliance on patient satisfaction. No significant correlations between compliance and satisfaction scores were found. Sex, but not compliance, predicted the patient's satisfaction with the doctor-patient relationship and the situational aspects of the treatment. Compliance, as noticed and recorded by the orthodontist during treatment, is not a decisive determinant of patient satisfaction in the long run. Sex, however, is a predictor of patient satisfaction with regard to the doctor-patient relationship and the situational aspects of the orthodontic treatment.