Risk of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Following Early-Onset Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Treatment.

PURPOSE: To estimate incidence rates of suicidal ideation and behavior following treatment initiation with gabapentinoids or dopamine agonists (DAs) in patients with newly diagnosed early-onset idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) and to examine suicidal behavior risk, comparing between those receiving gabapentinoids and DAs. METHODS: A new user retrospective cohort study using MarketScan claims data from 2012 to 2019 was conducted. Exposures were monotherapy gabapentinoids or DAs initiated within 60 days of new RLS diagnosis. Three varying outcome measures of suicidality were examined and incidence rates were calculated for each. A log-binomial regression model the estimated relative risk (RR) of the outcomes with gabapentinoids. Propensity score weighting adjusted for baseline covariates, including age, substance use disorders, hyperlipidemia, antipsychotic use, hypnotic/sedative use, and mood stabilizer use, which were most imbalanced before weighting. RESULTS: The cohort included 6672 patients, with 4986 (74.7%) initiating a DA and 1686 (25.3%) initiating a gabapentinoid. Incidence rates for all outcome measures were higher in the gabapentinoid group (suicidality: 21.6 vs. 10.7 per 1000 person-years; suicidality with self-harm: 23.0 vs. 11.1 per 1000 person-years; overdose- and suicide-related events: 30.0 vs. 15.5 person-years). Associated risk of suicidality (adjusted RR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.86-1.88]); suicidality with self-harm (adjusted RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.89-1.90]); or overdose- and suicide-related events (adjusted RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.93-1.80]) was not significant with gabapentinoids. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence rates for suicidal ideation and behavior were higher among the gabapentinoid group, although increased risk was not detected after adjustment. A possible signal cannot be ruled out given limitations of the data and rarity of the outcome.

High-throughput screening for prescribing cascades among real world statin initiators.

PURPOSE: Statins are among the most prevalent medications prescribed and associated with adverse events that may prompt additional treatment (i.e., a prescribing cascade). No comprehensive assessment of statin-related prescribing cascades has been performed to our knowledge. METHODS: We utilized sequence symmetry analysis to iteratively screen prescribing sequences of all therapeutic classes ("marker" classes) based on Level 4 Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes among adult statin initiators, using IBM Marketscan commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases (2005-2019). Order of initiation and secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were calculated for each statin-marker class dyad, among marker class initiators ±90 days of statin initiation. Among signals classified as prescribing cascades, we calculated naturalistic number needed to harm (NNTH) within 1 year as the inverse of the excess risk among exposed. RESULTS: We identified 2 265 519 statin initiators (mean ± SD age, 56.4 ± 12.0 years; 48.7% women; 7.5% with cardiovascular disease). Simvastatin (34.4% of statin initiators) and atorvastatin (33.9%) were the most commonly initiated statins. We identified 160 significant statin-marker class dyad signals, of which 35.6% (n = 57) were classified as potential prescribing cascades. Of the top 25 strongest signals (lowest NNTH), 12 were classified as potential prescribing cascades, including osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH, 44, 95% CI 43-46), opioids + non-opioid combination analgesics (81, 95% CI 74-91), and first-generation cephalosporins (204, 95% CI 175-246). CONCLUSIONS: Using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis screening, we identified previously known prescribing cascades as well as potentially new prescribing cascades based on known and unknown statin-related adverse events.

Concomitant use of levothyroxine and interacting medications in U.S. ambulatory care visits.

BACKGROUND: Levothyroxine (LT4) is the third most commonly prescribed medication in the United States. It is a narrow therapeutic index medication, and thus can be impacted by drug-drug interactions, which are primarily available over-the-counter. The prevalence and associated factors with concomitant interacting drugs with LT4 is limited since over-the-counter products are not routinely captured in many drug databases. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the concomitant use of LT4 with interacting drugs at ambulatory care visits in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2006 to 2018 was completed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory care visits in the United States involving adult patients with a LT4 prescription were included in the analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was initiation or continuation of a selected concomitant interacting drug which impacts LT4 absorption (e.g., proton pump inhibitor) in a patient visit in conjunction with LT4. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 372,942,000 visits (weighted from a sample of 14,880) with a reported LT4 prescription. Concomitant use of interacting drugs with LT4 occurred in 24.4% of visits in which 80% of interacting drugs were proton pump inhibitors. Ages 35-49 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59), 50-64 years (aOR, 2.27), and ≥65 years (aOR, 2.87) compared to 18-34 years, female (aOR 1.37) versus males, and visits in 2014 or later (aOR, 1.27) versus 2006-2009 were associated with increased odds of concomitant interacting drug use in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: At ambulatory care visits between 2006 and 2018, concomitant use of LT4 and interacting drugs impacted one-quarter of patient visits. Increased age, females, and visits later in the study period were associated with increased odds for concomitant interacting drugs. Additional work is needed to identify downstream consequences of concomitant use.

Prescription Patterns of Adjuvant Pain Medications Following an Opioid Supply Restriction Law: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Florida House Bill 21 (HB21) was implemented in July 2018 to limit prescriptions of Schedule II opioids for acute pain patients, but it is unclear whether such restrictions have a collateral influence on the utilization of commonly prescribed adjuvant pain medications. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether this law was associated with a change in use patterns of gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants. METHODS: We obtained prescription claims for medications dispensed from January 1, 2015, to June 31, 2019, from a health plan serving a large Florida employer. Interrupted time series analyses were conducted to compare pre-HB21 and post-HB21 implementation changes in the mean monthly number of users and prescriptions for gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, and muscle relaxants. RESULTS: There was a 6% immediate increase (relative risk: 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.11) in the monthly proportion of gabapentinoid users, and an 11% immediate increase in the monthly proportion of gabapentinoids prescriptions (relative risk: 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.18) per 1000 patients following law implementation. However, after the law, we observed a significant reduction in trend for the monthly proportion of muscle relaxants and benzodiazepine users. CONCLUSIONS: An increased number of patients and prescriptions were observed for gabapentinoids, while fewer patients received benzodiazepines and muscle relaxants after HB21. In previous studies, opioid prescription restriction laws are shown to reduce opioids, but this work suggests that these laws may also have unintended consequences for the use of adjunctive medications that were not intended to be affected.

Changes in Prescribing by Provider Type Following a State Prescription Opioid Restriction Law.

BACKGROUND: Many states have implemented opioid days' supply restriction policies, leading to reductions in opioid prescribing. Although research within certain provider types exist, no study has evaluated a restriction policy by various provider types. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in opioid utilization following a days' supply restriction policy stratified by provider type: surgery, emergency medicine, primary care, specialty care, and dentistry. DESIGN: Interrupted time series (ITS) PARTICIPANTS: Opioid prescription claims of patients in a private health plan serving a large Florida employer from 1/1/2015 to 3/31/2019. Provider types were determined using the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Code associated with the national provider identifier (NPI). INTERVENTIONS: Florida's opioid restriction policy implemented on July 1, 2018. MAIN MEASURES: Changes in mean morphine milligram equivalent (MMEs), mean days' supply, and mean number of units dispensed per opioid prescription before and after policy implementation. KEY RESULTS: There were 10,583 opioid initial prescriptions dispensed. Treating providers were classified as surgery (16.4%; n = 1732), emergency care (14.3%; n = 1516), primary care (21.2%; n = 2241), specialty care (11.4%; n = 1207), and dentistry providers (23.7%; n = 2511). Significant reductions in mean days' supply were observed across most provider types ranging from 14% reduction for dentistry providers to 41% reduction for specialty care providers. Significant changes were observed for emergency care and specialty care providers with a 30% (p = 0.001)and 29% (p < 0.001) reduction in mean MME, respectively, and a 27% (p = 0.040) reduction in mean number of units dispensed in emergency care providers, after implementation. Pre-implementation trends in opioid prescribing varied by provider type impacting the effects of the opioid days' supply restriction policy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-policy opioid prescribing varied by provider type with a differential impact on mean MMEs, mean days' supply, and mean number of units dispensed per prescription following implementation.

Changes in overactive bladder medication following bariatric surgery: segmented regression analysis.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery has shown reductions in overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms; however, the impacts on OAB treatment is unknown. The goal of our study is to evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on OAB medication utilization. METHODS: We used IBM® MarketScan® commercial databases from 2005 to 2018. We included patients aged ≥ 18 years with 360 days of continuous enrollment before and after bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy) with at least one fill of an OAB medication in the 360 days prior to bariatric surgery. We evaluated all included patients and stratified by surgery type and patient sex. Segmented regression analyses were used to assess the proportion of patients on OAB medications before and after bariatric surgery. We replicated our findings using hip or knee replacement surgery as a negative control. RESULTS: Among the included patients (n = 3069), 92.2% were females, 58.6% underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Immediately following bariatric surgery, the proportion of patients treated with an OAB medication reduced from 34.8 to 14.1% (p < 0.001) resulting in a 59.5% relative reduction. Patients who underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy (63.8% vs. 55.1%) relative reduction (p = 0.009)) and females versus males [62.3% vs. 52.9% relative reduction (p < 0.001)] had a more pronounced reduction in OAB medication use. There was slight decrease in OAB medication use in the negative control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in OAB medication use following bariatric surgery may be associated with a reduction in OAB symptoms suggesting an additional benefit of bariatric surgery.

Association between gabapentinoids and oedema treated with loop diuretics: A pooled sequence symmetry analysis from the USA and Denmark.

AIMS: To assess the gabapentinoid-oedema-loop diuretic prescribing cascade in adults using large administrative health care databases from the USA and Denmark. METHODS: This study used a sequence symmetry analysis to assess loop diuretic initiation before and after the initiation of gabapentinoids among patients aged 20 years or older without heart failure or chronic kidney disease. Data from MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims databases (2005 to 2019) and Danish National Prescription Register (2005 to 2018) were analyzed. Use of loop diuretics associated with initiation of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) was used as a negative control. We assessed the pooled temporality of loop diuretic initiation relative to gabapentinoid or SNRI initiation across the 2 countries. Secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios (aSRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using data from 90 days before and after initiation of gabapentinoids. Pooled ratio of aSRs were calculated by comparing gabapentinoids to SNRIs. RESULTS: Among the 1 511 493 gabapentinoid initiators (Denmark [n = 338 941]; USA [n = 1 172 552]), 20 139 patients had a new loop diuretic prescription 90 days before or after gabapentinoid initiation, resulting in a pooled aSR of 1.33 (95% CI 1.06-1.67). The pooled aSR for the negative control (i.e., SNRI) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94), which resulted in a pooled ratio of aSRs of 1.58 (95% CI 1.23-2.04). Pooled estimated incidence of the gabapentinoid-loop diuretic prescribing cascade was 8.14 (95% CI, 1.92-34.49) events per 1000 patient-years. CONCLUSION: We identified evidence of the gabapentinoid-oedema-loop diuretic prescribing cascade in 2 countries.

Evaluation of the key prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption using the calcium channel blocker: Loop diuretic prescribing cascade.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption regarding balance between marker drug (i.e., medication used to treat a drug-induced adverse event) initiation rates before and after initiation of an index drug (i.e., medication that is potentially associated with the drug-induced adverse event) in the absence of prescribing cascades, we used a well-described example of loop diuretic initiation to treat dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH CCB)-induced edema. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository from June 2011 and July 2018 was used to assess temporal prescribing of DH CCB and loop diuretics within the prescription sequence symmetry analysis framework. Validation of the prescribing cascade was performed via clinical expert chart review. RESULTS: Among patients without heart failure who were initiated on DH CCB, 26 and 64 loop diuretics initiators started within 360 days before versus after DH CCB initiation, respectively, resulting in an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) of 2.27 (95% CI, 1.44-3.58). Overall, 35 (54.7%) patients were determined to have a prescribing cascade. Removing patients who experienced a prescribing cascade resulted in an aSR of 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.78). CONCLUSION: Loop diuretic initiation rates before and after DH CCB initiation for reasons other a prescribing cascade were similar, thus confirming the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption.

Co-utilization of opioids and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic drugs in U.S. ambulatory care visits, 2006-2016.

OBJECTIVE(S): This study aimed to characterize the co-utilization of non-benzodiazepine sedative 'Z'-drugs with opioids at ambulatory care visits in the United States. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2006 to 2016 was completed. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Ambulatory care visits in the United States involving adult patients with an opioid prescription were included in the analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was initiation or continuation of a Z-drug (zolpidem, eszopiclone, or zaleplon) in a patient visit in conjunction with an opioid medication. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 564,090,296 visits (weighted from a sample of 28,773) with a reported opioid prescription. Co-utilization of opioids with Z-drugs fluctuated during the study period beginning at 4.0% in 2006 (95% CI 2.2%-5.7%), 6.3% in 2012 (3.7%-8.9%), and 4.7% in 2016 (2.8%-6.5%). Among all opioid visits in the study period, co-utilization with a Z-drug was not significantly different among female patients compared with male patients (5.26% vs. 4.63%, P = 0.26). Among visits with concomitant opioid and Z-drugs, 7.0% reported new initiation of both medications in the same visit. CONCLUSION: At ambulatory care visits between 2006 and 2016, co-utilization of opioids and Z-drugs fluctuated with some differences by sex. Major regulatory advisories and policy changes during this period may have contributed to these varying rates of utilization. Additional work is needed to identify predictors of co-utilization and downstream consequences more widely.

Use of negative controls in a prescription sequence symmetry analysis to reduce time-varying bias.

PURPOSE: There is an increased use in the (prescription) sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA); however, limited studies have incorporated a negative control, and no study has formally quantified and controlled for within-patient time-varying bias using a negative control. Our aim was to develop a process to incorporate the effect of negative controls into the main analysis of a PSSA. METHODS: Using a previously assessed dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DH-CCB) and loop diuretic PSSA, we directly compared the adjusted sequence ratios (aSRs) of DH-CCBs to each of the two negative control index drugs (levothyroxine and angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor/angiotensin-2 receptor blocker [ARB]) using the ratio of the aSRs to estimate a relative aSR with a Z test. Further, we utilized the relative aSR in stratum-specific analyses and varying exposure windows. RESULTS: The relative aSR of DH-CCBs decreased from 1.87 to 1.72 (95% CI 1.66-1.78) using levothyroxine as a negative control index drug. ACE inhibitor/ARB negative control index drug resulted in an aSR of 1.27 thus reducing the relative aSR for DH-CBB from 1.84 to 1.45 (95% CI 1.41-1.49). When restricting the exposure window to 180 and 90 days, the relative aSR of DH-CCBs increased to 1.68 (95% CI 1.62-1.74) and 1.86 (95% CI 1.78-1.94), respectively, relative to the ACE inhibitor/ARB negative control index drug. CONCLUSION: We illustrated how to incorporate negative control index drugs into a PSSA and generate relative aSRs. Stratum-specific assessments and varying the exposure windows while using negative control index drugs can yield more informative results.

Changes in Quantity of Opioids Dispensed following Florida's Restriction Law for Acute Pain Prescriptions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of Florida's 3-day opioid prescription supply law, effective July 2018, on opioids dispensed for acute pain patients. METHODS: Pharmacy claims from a health plan serving a large Florida employer from January 2015 through March 2019 were analyzed. We used an interrupted time series study design accounting for autocorrelation of trends before and after policy change. Acute pain patients met inclusion criteria if they had not received any opioid containing medications in the past 180 days. Patients could contribute to additional new use time if subsequent opioid claims occurred ≥180 days since the previous claim. Outcomes included mean number of units dispensed of the initial opioid prescription, mean morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day of initial prescription by month, and mean total MMEs per initial prescription by month. RESULTS: A total of 8,375 enrollees had 10,583 unique opioid starts in the given timeframe. Following the policy, there was an immediate significant decrease in the units dispensed per prescription of 4.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.95, -.82 units). Additionally, there was a significant immediate reduction in total MMEs dispensed per prescription of 25.6 (95% CI -44.76, -6.44 MMEs). CONCLUSIONS: Among a group of privately-insured plan enrollees in Florida, and as a result of the law, there were significant decreases in the number of units dispensed, and total MMEs of opioid prescriptions. The immediate reduction in new opioid utilization following policy implementation suggests effective policy; however, impacts on chronic pain patients were not assessed.

Effects of hydrocodone rescheduling on opioid use outcomes: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate opioid prescribing, dispensing, and use in relation to hydrocodone-containing product (HCP) rescheduling. METHODS: Seven biomedical databases and grey literature sources were searched with keywords and database-specific controlled vocabulary relevant to HCP rescheduling for items published between January 2014 and July 2019. We included English-language quasi-experimental studies that assessed changes in HCP and other opioid prescribing, dispensing, utilization, and opioid-related health outcomes before and after HCP rescheduling. A data extraction sheet was created for this review. Two authors evaluated risk of bias for each included study. Two of 4 authors each independently extracted patient demographics and opioid-related outcomes from the included studies. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. RESULTS: All studies identified (n = 44) were quasi-experimental in design with 10 using an interrupted time series approach. A total of 24 studies reported a decrease in HCP prescribing by 3.1%-66.0%. Six studies reported a decrease in HCP days' supply or doses by 14.0%-80.8%. There was increased prescribing of oxycodone-containing products by 4.5%-13.9% in 5 studies, tramadol by 2.7%-53.0% in 9 studies, codeine-containing products by 0.8%-1352.9% in 8 studies). Five studies reported a decrease in morphine equivalents by at least 10%, whereas 2 studies reported an increase in morphine equivalents. Differences in populations, sample sizes, and approaches did not allow for a meta-analysis. Details regarding approach and findings were limited in published conference abstracts (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Hydrocodone rescheduling was associated with reductions in prescribing and use of HCPs but was also associated with increased prescribing and use of other opioids, both schedule II and nonschedule II.

Twelve-year trends in pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes among patients with heart failure in the United States.

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using a database from commercial health plans in the United States to describe trends in the use of antidiabetic medications among patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure (HF) from 2006 through 2017. We used loop diuretic dose as a surrogate for HF severity (mild HF 0-40 mg/day, moderate-severe HF >40 mg/day). We assessed antidiabetic medication dispensing in the 90 days following HF diagnosis. Over the 12-year period, we identified an increase in the use of metformin (39.2% vs. 62.6%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) (0.5% vs. 17.1%) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) (0.0% vs. 9.0%), but a decrease in the use of sulphonylureas (47.8% vs. 27.8%) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) (31.7% vs. 5.3%). In 2017, patients with moderate-severe HF more commonly used insulin (43.1%); a majority of mild HF patients used metformin (62.8%). A proportion of patients with moderate-severe HF used TZDs (4.4%). Among patients with diabetes and HF, the use of metformin and DPP-4i rapidly increased, but a proportion of patients with moderate-severe HF continued to use TZDs. Despite their promising cardiovascular safety profile, SGLT-2i use remains limited.

Scoring, Clinical Utility, and Psychometric Properties of the In-Home Medication Management Performance Evaluation (HOME-Rx).

IMPORTANCE: Forty percent to 75% of community-dwelling older adults are not able to adhere to their medication routine. A medication management assessment can correctly identify the reasons for nonadherence and the barriers contributing to it. OBJECTIVE: To further develop the HOME-Rx, an in-home medication management assessment, by modifying scoring metrics, improving clinical utility, and establishing psychometric properties. DESIGN: In Phase 1, the scoring metrics were modified, and the clinical procedures were evaluated. In Phase 2, the psychometric properties were established. SETTING: The homes of older adults. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults who took three or more medications, managed their own medications, and lived in their own home were eligible. Older adults with cognitive impairment were ineligible. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We assessed concurrent validity with the Performance Assessment for Self-Care Skills (PASS) and Medication Management Instrument for Deficiencies in the Elderly (MedMaIDE) and established interrater reliability. RESULTS: The PASS was positively correlated with the HOME-Rx Performance and Safety subscales; the MedMaIDE was negatively correlated with the HOME-Rx Performance subscale and positively correlated with the Barriers subscale. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICCs = .87-1.00). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: All relationships were as predicted: The HOME-Rx is a valid and reliable performance-based assessment that provides clinicians and researchers with a measure of older adults' actual medication management ability in the home using their medications. The results can potentially be used to guide treatment planning and improve medication management. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Occupational therapy practitioners can use the HOME-Rx to adequately determine performance problems, safety concerns, and environmental barriers and potentially to guide treatment planning and improve medication management for older adults.

An evaluation of a potential calcium channel blocker-lower-extremity edema-loop diuretic prescribing cascade.

OBJECTIVES: Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH-CCB) are associated with lower-extremity edema (LEE). Loop diuretics have been used inappropriately to treat DH-CCB-associated LEE, constituting a prescribing cascade (PC). The aim of this work was to identify the prevalence and factors associated with potential DH-CCB-LEE-loop diuretic PC. METHODS: The 2014 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to identify patient visits in which a DH-CCB was continued. The definition of a potential PC was the continuation or initiation of a loop diuretic in the absence of congestive heart failure, cancer, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease, obesity, or resistant hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors related to a potential PC, including demographic information, number of medications, number of patient visits in the previous 12 months, and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Among the estimated 47.5 million patient visits in which a DH-CCB was continued, 4.6% had a potential PC. Visits in patients 65 to 84 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 2.56, 95% CI 1.20-5.43) and 85 years of age and older (OR 3.89, 95% CI 1.76-8.61) were more likely to have potential PC compared with patients 18 to 64 years of age. Visits in patients with 5 to 7 (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.72-8.19), 8 to 11 (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.09-4.44), and 12 or more (OR 5.23, 95% CI 2.29-11.94) medications were more likely to have potential PC compared with patients with 4 or fewer medications. CONCLUSION: A potential DH-CCB-associated LEE loop diuretic PC was present in approximately 2.2 million patient visits in which DH-CCB was continued. Older age and an increasing number of concomitant medications were associated with this potential PC.

Changes in Mood in New Enrollees at a Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in mood after nine months of enrollment in a Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Alexian Brothers PACE, St. Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Newly enrolled patients 55 years of age and older, living in the PACE service area, eligible for nursing facility care and able to live safely in the community, with continuous care, for at least nine months (N = 182). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-15 score at the pre-admission evaluation (PAE) and the nine-month evaluation (9ME). RESULTS: Of the 182 patients evaluated, 27% (n = 49) met the definition of depression as defined by the GDS-15 score of ≥ 6 at the PAE. At the 9ME, only 11% of patients met the depression criteria (P < 0.001). Of the patients who met the criteria for depression at the PAE, 80% of patients (n = 39) no longer met these criteria at the 9ME (P = 0.029). Similar findings were observed by age, gender, and race. Greater improvement was observed among those who were depressed at the PAE; the depressed cohort improved by 5.0 points (P < 0.001) on the GDS-15 scale from the PAE to the 9ME, whereas the nondepressed cohort improved by 0.6 points (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The use of PACE as an alternative intervention may be a good option to improve mood in older adults.

Use of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder with concomitant warfarin.

The symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) can be treated with oral medications using a variety of antimuscarinic medications and, more recently, mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist. However, the use of these medications may be limited for patients because of adverse drug reactions, contraindications, and those who are refractory to oral medications. Recently, intravesical injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNTA) have been proven to be safe and effective as an alternative to oral OAB medications. Although this procedure is typically thought to be outside the realm of a consultant pharmacist, there are incidences in which a pharmacist can make a substantial impact on patient care. The patient, a 71-year old female, presents to her urologist for evaluation to assess appropriateness of intravesical onaBoNTA injections. She has failed multiple oral medications for the treatment of her OAB with urge incontinence. The procedure is further complicated by the patient's past medical history of atrial fibrillation (A fib), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) that require anticoagulation with warfarin therapy. This case demonstrates the use of onaBoNTA for OAB in a patient concomitantly receiving warfarin for A fib, PE, and DVT. Specifically, it demonstrates discontinuation, bridge therapy, and reinitiation of warfarin on a patient undergoing intravesical injections of onaBoNTA for OAB, and a collaborative approach to care between a pharmacist and a urologist.

Mirabegron: a Beta-3 agonist for overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed) prior to December 31, 2013, using the terms "mirabegron" and "randomized-controlled trial." STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: All published, double-blind, randomized-controlled trials assessing mirabegron were included. Articles were reviewed and included if mirabegron was used as monotherapy and if the primary outcome analyzed drug efficacy. DATA SYNTHESIS: The efficacy of mirabegron for the treatment of OAB has been demonstrated in the selected five randomized, placebo-controlled trials. The majority of these trials lasted 12 weeks and compared various doses of mirabegron with placebo and/or tolterodine extended-release (ER). Primary efficacy outcomes for the trials included mean number of micturitions per 24 hours and mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours. Included trials showed statistically significant reductions in both efficacy outcomes for various doses of mirabegron when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Based on the trials reviewed, mirabegron has been efficacious in reducing mean number of micturitions and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, as well as in improving other secondary outcomes such as OAB symptoms and quality-of-life measures. Common adverse drug events seen with mirabegron include: hypertension, nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infections, headache, constipation, upper respiratory tract infection, arthralgia, diarrhea, tachycardia, abdominal pain, and fatigue. Given the efficacy and safety data currently available, mirabegron represents a reasonable alternative to antimuscarinics for patients with OAB. Future studies are needed to determine the utility of mirabegron for OAB in a variety of demographics.

Trends and Components of Thyroid Status Evaluation in Commercially Insured Adults in the United States, 2006-2020.

CONTEXT: Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is one of the most ordered laboratory tests. OBJECTIVE: Determine trends of TSH testing rates and components of thyroid function testing. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adults 18-64 years old without evidence of thyroid disease with at least 365 days of continuous enrollment between 2006 and 2020 in the IBM MarketScan Claims Database. The main outcome measures were trends of TSH tests/1000 eligible patient-months stratified by age, sex, and region and composition of thyroid function testing. RESULTS: Among 67 353 280 patients meeting eligibility criteria, we identified 25 606 518 TSH tests and 15 138 211 patients with ≥1 TSH test. Patients contributing an episode of TSH testing were most commonly 45-54 years old (29.8%) and female (63.6%). TSH testing rates remained consistent throughout the study period with 11.4 and 11.7 TSH tests/1000 person-months in the first and last study months, respectively (mean 12.2 TSH tests/1000 person-months). TSH testing rates dropped sharply in the spring of 2020 (4.2 TSH tests/1000 person-months). Females showed a nearly 2-fold higher rate of TSH testing than males (16.1 TSH tests/1000 person-months vs 8.6 TSH tests/1000 person-months). TSH testing rates increased with age (8.2 TSH tests/1000 person-months among individuals 18-34 years old vs 15.4 TSH tests/1000 person-months among individuals 55-64 years old). No difference in TSH testing rates was noted between regions. Thyroid function testing episodes included only TSH in most cases (70.8%). CONCLUSION: TSH testing rates among commercially insured individuals without known thyroid disease appears stable over time, with higher frequency in females and with increasing age.

Evaluating Provider and Pharmacy Discordance in Potential Calcium Channel Blocker-Loop Diuretic Prescribing Cascade.

BACKGROUND: Prescribing cascades occur when a drug-induced adverse event is treated with a new medication. Identifying clinical scenarios in which prescribing cascades are more likely to occur may help determine ways to prevent prescribing cascades. OBJECTIVE: To understand the extent to which discordant providers and discordant pharmacies contribute to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DH CCB)-loop diuretic prescribing cascade. STUDY POPULATION AND DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using Medicare Fee-For-Service data (2011-2018) of adults aged ≥ 66 years. EXPOSURES: Patients who initiated DH CCB with subsequent initiation of loop diuretic (DH CCB-loop diuretic dyad) within 90 days or patients who initiated angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with subsequent initiation of a loop diuretic (ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyad; control). MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were provider and pharmacy discordance for prescribing cascades and control drug pairs. Baseline clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. RESULTS:  Overall, we identified 1987 DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 3148 ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads. Discordant providers occurred in 64% of DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 55% of ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads, while discordant pharmacies occurred in 19% of DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 16% of ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads. After adjustment, the risk of having discordant providers was 20% {Relative Risk (RR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.26]} higher in the DH CCB-loop diuretic dyad compared with the ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyad. Moreover, pharmacy discordance was 17% (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.02-1.33]) higher. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that discordant providers and discordant pharmacies were more commonly involved in the potential prescribing cascade when compared with a similar control dyad of medications. Opportunities for enhanced care coordination and medication reconciliation should be explored to prevent unnecessary polypharmacy.