Resident self-assessment of operative experience in primary total knee and total hip arthroplasty: Is it accurate?

BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for a valuable surgical case log is the ability to perform an accurate self-assessment. Studies have shown mixed results when examining residents' ability to self-assess on varying tasks. We sought to examine the correlation between residents' self-assessment and staff surgeons' evaluation of surgical involvement and competence in performing primary total knee (TKA) and hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We used the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate interobserver agreement between residents' self-perception and staff surgeons' assessment of involvement. An assessment of competency was performed using a categorical global scale and evaluated with the κ statistic. We piloted a structured surgical skills assessment form as an additional objective appraisal of resident involvement. RESULTS: We analyzed assessment data from 65 primary TKA and THA cases involving 17 residents and 17 staff surgeons (93% response rate). The ICC for resident involvement between residents and staff surgeons was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.88), which represents substantial agreement. The agreement between residents and staff surgeons about residents' competency to perform the case had a κ value of 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.84). The ICC for resident, staff surgeon and third-party observer using the piloted skills assessment form was 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.88), which represents substantial agreement. CONCLUSION: This study supports the ability of orthopedic residents to perform self-assessments of their degree of involvement and competency in primary TKA and THA. Staff surgeons' assessment of resident involvement correlated highly with the surgical skills assessment form. Self-assessment is a valuable addition to the surgical case log.

Orthopedic surgery core curriculum hip and knee reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a core curriculum for orthopedic surgery and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of 281 curriculum items. Attention was focused on 55 topics pertaining to hip and knee reconstruction. METHODS: A 281-item curriculum was developed. We completed a content review and cross-sectional survey of a random selection of orthopedic surgeons whose primary affiliation was nonuniversity. We analyzed the data descriptively and quantitatively, using histograms, a modified Hotelling's T2 statistic with the p value determined by a permutation test, and the Benjamini- Hochberg/Yekutieli procedure. Our analyses assumed that each respondent answered questions independently of the answers of any other respondent but that the answers to different questions by the same respondent might be dependent. RESULTS: Of 156 orthopedic surgeons, 131 (84%) participated in this study. Of 55 items ranked by all respondents, 42 received an average mean score greater than 3.5/4.0, and 51 received an average mean score equal to or greater than 3.0/40 (the standard deviation for each item ranged from 0.00 to 0.08), suggesting that 92.7% of the items are important or probably important to know by the end of residency. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates agreement that it is important to include 92.7% of the items that pertain to hip and knee reconstruction in a core curriculum for orthopedic surgery. Residency training programs may need to ensure that appropriate educational opportunities focusing on complex primary and revision surgery are available to meet the future needs of orthopedic surgeons whose primary affiliation is nonuniversity.

Orthopaedic surgery core curriculum: the spine.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a core curriculum for orthopaedic surgery and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of 281 items in the curriculum. Attention was focused specifically on 24 items pertaining to the curriculum that are pertinent to the spine. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of orthopaedic surgeons whose primary affiliation was non-academic, representing the provinces and territories of Canada METHODS: A questionnaire containing 281 items was developed. A random group of 131 (out of 156) orthopaedic surgeons whose primary affiliation is non-academic completed the questionnaire. The data were analysed quantitatively using average mean scores, histograms, the modified Hotelling's T2 test and the Benjimini-Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: 131 of 156 (84%) orthopaedic surgeons participated, in this study. 14 of 24 items were ranked at no less than 3 out of 4 thus suggesting that 58% of the items are important or probably important to know by the end of residency (SD< or =0.07). Residents need to learn the diagnosis and principles of managing patients with common conditions of the spine. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows, with reliable statistical evidence, that orthopaedic residents are no longer expected to be able to perform spinal fusions with proficiency on completion of residency. Is the exposure to surgical spine problems and the ability to be comfortable with operating expectations specific to the fellowship level? If so, the focus during residency or increasing accredited spine fellowships needs to be addressed to ensure that enough spine surgeons are educated to meet the future healthcare demands projected for Canada.

What orthopaedic surgery residents need to know about the hand and wrist?

BACKGROUND: To develop a Core Curriculum for Orthopaedic Surgery; and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of curriculum items as judged by orthopaedic surgeons with primary affiliation non-academic. Attention for this manuscript was focused on determining the importance of topics pertaining to adult hand and wrist reconstruction. METHODS: A 281-item questionnaire was developed and consisted of three sections: 1) Validated Musculoskeletal Core Curriculum; 2) Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) Specialty Objectives and; 3) A procedure list. A random group of 131 [out of 156] orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively using histograms, a Modified Hotel ling's T2-statistic 1 with p-value determined by a permutation test, and the Benjamini-Hochberg/Yekutieli procedure RESULTS: 131/156 (84%) orthopaedic surgeons participated in this study. 27/32 items received an average mean score of at least 3.0/4.0 by all respondents thus suggesting that 84% of the items are either "probably important" or "important" to know by the end of residency (SD range 0.007-0.228). The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure demonstrated that for 80% of the 32 x 31/2 = 496 possible pairs of hand and wrist questions did not appear to demonstrate the same distribution of ratings given that one question was different from that of another question. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates with reliable statistical evidence, agreement on the importance of 27/32 items pertaining to hand and wrist reconstruction is included in a Core Curriculum for Orthopaedic Surgery. Residency training programs need ensure that educational opportunities focusing on the ability to perform with proficiency procedures pertaining to the hand and wrist is taught and evaluated in their respective programs.

Orthopaedic surgery core curriculum: foot and ankle reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a core curriculum for orthopaedic surgery and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of 281 curriculum items. Attention was focused on 45 items pertaining to the foot and ankle. METHODS: A 281-item curriculum was developed. A content review and cross-sectional survey of a random selection of orthopaedic surgeons with primary nonacademic affiliations was completed. Data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively using histograms, modified Hotelling's T(2)-statistic, and the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Our analyses assumed that each respondent answered questions independently of the answers of any other respondent but that the answers to different questions by the same respondent might be dependent. RESULTS: Of the 156 orthopaedic surgeons contacted, 131 (86%) participated in this study. Eighty-two percent (37 of 45) of the items were ranked by respondents with an average mean score higher than 3.5/4.0 and 42 higher than 3.0/40, thus suggesting that 93% of the items are important or probably important to know by the end of residency (p

The Core Competencies for General Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: With the changing delivery of orthopaedic surgical care, there is a need to define the knowledge and competencies that are expected of an orthopaedist providing general and/or acute orthopaedic care. This article provides a proposal for the knowledge and competencies needed for an orthopaedist to practice general and/or acute care orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Using the modified Delphi method, the General Orthopaedic Competency Task Force consisting of stakeholders associated with general orthopaedic practice has proposed the core knowledge and competencies that should be maintained by orthopaedists who practice emergency and general orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: For relevancy to clinical practice, 2 basic sets of competencies were established. The assessment competencies pertain to the general knowledge needed to evaluate, investigate, and determine an overall management plan. The management competencies are generally procedural in nature and are divided into 2 groups. For the Management 1 group, the orthopaedist should be competent to provide definitive care including assessment, investigation, initial or emergency care, operative or nonoperative care, and follow-up. For the Management 2 group, the orthopaedist should be competent to assess, investigate, and commence timely non-emergency or emergency care and then either transfer the patient to the appropriate subspecialist's care or provide definitive care based on the urgency of care, exceptional practice circumstance, or individual's higher training. This may include some higher-level procedures usually performed by a subspecialist, but are consistent with one's practice based on experience, practice environment, and/or specialty interest. CONCLUSIONS: These competencies are the first step in defining the practice of general orthopaedic surgery including acute orthopaedic care. Further validation and discussion among educators, general orthopaedic surgeons, and subspecialists will ensure that these are relevant to clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These competencies provide many stakeholders, including orthopaedic educators and orthopaedists, with what may be the minimum knowledge and competencies necessary to deliver acute and general orthopaedic care. This document is the first step in defining a practice-based standard for training programs and certification groups.

Removal of well-fixed cementless components.

Removal of stable, osseointegrated cementless components can be a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Careful preoperative planning to assess the location and extent of the bone ingrowth or ongrowth as well as ensuring that the appropriate instrumentation is available in the operating room can help minimize complications when performing these procedures.

Management of acetabular bone loss.

Acetabular bone loss is a common complication associated with revision total joint replacement. Successful surgical management is enhanced by a systematic classification of bony defects. A variety of implants, fixation strategies, surgical techniques, and graft materials are required to address the spectrum of reconstructive complications encountered at revision surgery.

Musculoskeletal education in medical school: deficits in knowledge and strategies for improvement.

➤ Improvements in medical student physical examination skills and performance on validated musculoskeletal competency examinations correspond with undergraduate curricular reform.➤ Curricular reform success in the United States has been achieved by multidisciplinary collaboration.➤ International efforts are focused on improving medical student physical examination skills through patient partners and structured clinical examinations.➤ Technologies such as simulators and online learning tools are effective and well received.

Spinal surgery fellowship education in Canada: evaluation of trainee and supervisor perspectives on cognitive and procedural competencies.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of spine surgery fellowship educators and trainees. OBJECTIVE: To determine educator and trainee perspectives on the relative importance of core cognitive and procedural competencies in fellowship training. To determine perceptions of confidence in competencies by trainees near the end of their fellowship. Finally, to determine potential differences comparing surgeons by background specialty training (neurosurgical or orthopedic) of their views on competencies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery is a growing subspecialty with increasing collaboration among specialists of varied specialty backgrounds involved in education. With the recent implementation of competency-based curricula during specialty training, opportunities may exist in enhancing fellowship education. METHODS: A questionnaire on cognitive and procedural competencies was administered (online and paper) to fellowship educators and trainees across Canada. A follow-up questionnaire was administered to nonresponders 3 months later. Survey results were summarized using qualitative and descriptive statistics with comparative analyses performed. RESULTS: Of the identified respondents, the response rate was 91%, (15/17 fellow trainees; 47/51 educators). Twelve of the 13 core cognitive skill categories were rated as being important to acquire by the end of fellowship. Trainees were not comfortable performing, and requested additional training in 8 of the 29 less common and technically demanding procedural skills. There were different perceptions on the relative importance of competencies comparing trainees by specialty background as well as different perceptions on the types of competencies where additional training was desired to achieve competency (P < 0.05). Fellowship educators and trainees possessed similar perceptions on the relative importance of core cognitive and procedural competencies required for successful training. CONCLUSION: Background specialty influenced the perceptions of both fellowship educators and trainees. This study identified potential gaps or perceived deficiencies in the competency of current fellows. Improvements in spine fellowship education should target these areas through developing evidence-based curriculum changes.

Canadian multidisciplinary core curriculum for musculoskeletal health.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of agreement among the Bone and Joint Decade Undergraduate Curriculum Group (BJDUCG) core curriculum recommendations for musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions targeted for undergraduate medical education and what the physicians and surgeons of Canada thought to be important at the postgraduate level of education. METHODS: An 80-item questionnaire was developed. A cross-sectional survey of educators representing 77 Canadian accredited academic programs representing 6 disciplines in medicine that manage patients with MSK conditions was completed. Histograms, Kruskal-Wallis, and principal component analyses were computed. RESULTS: In total, 164/175 (94%) respondents participated in the study. All 80 curriculum items received a mean score of at least 3.0/4.0. Sixty-four out of 80 items were ranked to be at least 3.5/4.0, and 35 items were ranked to be at least 3.8/4.0, suggesting that these items may be core content for all disciplines. CONCLUSION: The World Health Organization declared the years 2000 to 2010 as The Bone and Joint Decade. The main goal is to improve the quality of life for people with MSK disorders worldwide. One aim of the BJD is to increase education of healthcare providers at all levels. The BJDUCG established a set of core curriculum recommendations for MSK conditions. Our study gives reliable statistical evidence of agreement among what the BJDUCG recommended for an MSK core curriculum for medical schools and what the physicians and surgeons of Canada thought to be important for residency education in several disciplines.

Positive predictive value of maximal posterior joint-line tenderness in diagnosing meniscal pathology: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of the point of maximal posterior joint line tenderness (JLT), as a clinical sign, to diagnose underlying meniscal tears. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients requiring arthroscopic surgery, who consecutively presented to the University of Calgary's Sport Medicine Centre. The femurotibial joint line was palpated for the point of maximal tenderness. We recorded the data on the arthroscopy report. A second examiner (orthopedic sport medicine surgical fellow or sport medicine physician) performed the same protocol. An arthroscopist documented the site of pathology as detected by arthroscopy. RESULTS: We found a PPV of 60.0% and a negative predictive value of 62.5%, suggesting that maximal posterior JLT may be predictive of meniscal pathology. The sensitivity and specificity were 84.6% and 31.2%, respectively (p = 0.155), with Fisher's exact test. The kappa score assessed interobserver reliability and was good at 0.48. Patients with maximal posterior JLT but no meniscal pathology did have other confounding pathology and patients with no maximal posterior JLT who had meniscal pathology usually had confounding knee pathology. CONCLUSIONS: We found a PPV of 60.0% of maximal posterior JLT and meniscal pathology located at the same anatomical site on arthroscopic examination.