The Alarming Rate of Malnutrition after Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass. A single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a modification of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SASI as a primary metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 30 patients who underwent SASI bypass from January to December 2021. All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 30 patients, 93.3% were women, the mean age was 37.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.6 kg/m2. The percentage of total body weight loss (TWL%) was 42.7%, the percent excess body weight loss (EWL%) was 92.7%, and the mean BMI at 12 months went from 45.6(35.2-58.4) to 25.8 kg/m2 (19.2-33.4). The obesity-associated complications remission rate was 87.5% for type 2 diabetes (T2D), 71.4% for hypertension (HTN) and 100% for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Thirteen patients (43.3%) had diarrhea, 7 (23.3%) had hypoalbuminemia, defined as serum albumin < 3 g/dl, and 6 (20%) underwent reversal of their index SASI. As for other nutritional issues, iron deficiency anemia was present in 21 patients (70%), while 19 patients (63.3%) had vitamin D, and 2(6.6%) had vitamin B12 deficiency. CONCLUSION: Despite good short-term weight loss and improvement of obesity-associated complications, SASI is accompanied by high alarming malnutrition, even in short-term follow-up. Novel MBS should be judged for their long-term effects and compared to well-tested standard operations before they are used in routine clinical practice.

Observations of Ramadan fasting in the initial year after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ramadan is considered to be the holiest month of the Islamic religion. Hundreds of millions of Muslims practice the commitments of Ramadan, which include the abstinence from eating and drinking during daylight hours. Although there are exemptions to fasting for medical reasons, there is very limited guidance in terms of the safety of fasting in the postoperative period after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes and impact of fasting on patients who underwent bariatric surgery within the year leading up to Ramadan 2023. SETTING: Community hospital health system. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records and direct patient contact for 376 study participants. RESULTS: Of the 376 participants who underwent bariatric surgery in the year before Ramadan, only 8 patients (2.1%) reported they did not intend to fast during Ramadan. Patients who ended up having to break fasting were closer to their surgery date, at 4.3 months from surgery, than patients who were able to fast for the entire month of Ramadan, who were 5.1 months out from surgery. There was no difference between the number of patients needing to break fasting on the basis of what type of bariatric surgery they had performed. The number of patients needing to go to the emergency department and receive intravenous fluids was small, at 11 patients (2.9%), and these patients were also closer to surgery than those not needing to go to the emergency department or receive intravenous fluids. Side effects experienced during Ramadan, including abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, and hypoglycemia, were more common in patients that were closer to their surgery, notably within 4 months of their surgery date. Patients who lost weight during Ramadan were closer to their surgery date at 4.9 months from surgery compared with those who maintained or gained weight, who were 7.0 months out from surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There are a limited number of studies examining the safety and patient outcomes in those who fast for religious purposes after bariatric surgery. In this study, 376 participants who were within 1 year of undergoing surgery were followed throughout the month of Ramadan. Patients closer to surgery were more likely to break fasting, present to the emergency department, and experience side effects. However, the overall rate of complications was low, suggesting that fasting in the setting of a religious tradition in the carefully chosen patient with counseling and supervision may be a safe option.