RESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the residency selection process becoming more competitive and programs receiving unprecedented numbers of applications, some specialties have introduced preference signaling in an attempt to help applicants target programs of interest. In the 2022-2023 application cycle, obstetrics and gynecology also introduced a 2-tiered system with a limited number of gold signals (n=3) and silver signals (n=15). OBJECTIVE: Given the novelty of preference signaling in the obstetrics and gynecology residency application process, this study aimed to (1) assess the effect of signals on interview offers and match and (2) discuss applicant attitudes toward this preference signaling system. STUDY DESIGN: This was a voluntary cross-sectional survey study conducted in April 2023 that was open to all fourth-year medical students who applied to an obstetrics and gynecology residency in the United States. Self-reported demographics, signaling, interview, and match data were collected. In addition, students were asked about attitudes toward signaling on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of the 1507 applicants who entered an obstetrics and gynecology residency via match or Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program process, 969 (64.3%) completed the survey. Moreover, an additional 22 applicants who did not match responded to the survey. More respondents used all 3 gold tokens (98.3%) and all 15 silver tokens (94.3%). The mean number of applications sent was 74.3±35.1, and the mean number of interviews received per applicant was 12.8±6.6. The interviews or token yields were 64.0%±31.5% for gold tokens, 43.8%±23.1% for silver tokens, and 9.8%±10.0% for no token. Of the survey respondents, 340/951 (35.8%) matched to a gold token program, 338/951 (35.5%) matched to a silver token program, and 244/951 (25.7%) matched to a nontoken program. Furthermore, 499/951 applicants (52.5%) reported feeling slightly positive or very positive about signaling. CONCLUSION: Most obstetrics and gynecology applicants in this survey participated in preference signaling. Gold and silver tokens were associated with high ratios of interview invitations compared with no token. However, the overall number of applications did not decrease in the 2022-2023 cycle, and only half of survey respondents reported feeling positive about the signaling process. These results can inform program directors and students about application number and strategy in upcoming cycles.
Assuntos
Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Ginecologia/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is little agreement on clinically useful criteria for identifying real-world responders to biologic treatments for asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in adults with severe asthma. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, cohort study across 22 countries participating in the International Severe Asthma Registry (https://isaregistries.org/) between May 2017 and January 2023. Change in 4 asthma domains (exacerbation rate, asthma control, long-term oral corticosteroid [LTOCS] dose, and lung function) was assessed from biologic initiation to 1 year post-treatment (minimum 24 weeks). Pre- to post-biologic changes for responders and nonresponders were described along a categorical gradient for each domain derived from pre-biologic distributions (exacerbation rate: 0 to 6+/y; asthma control: well controlled to uncontrolled; LTOCS: 0 to >30 mg/d; percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [ppFEV1]: <50% to ≥80%). RESULTS: Percentage of biologic responders (ie, those with a category improvement pre- to post-biologic) varied by domain and increased with greater pre-biologic impairment, increasing from 70.2% to 90.0% for exacerbation rate, 46.3% to 52.3% for asthma control, 31.1% to 58.5% for LTOCS daily dose, and 35.8% to 50.6% for ppFEV1. The proportion of patients having improvement post-biologic tended to be greater for anti-IL-5/5R compared with for anti-IgE for exacerbation, asthma control, and ppFEV1 domains, irrespective of pre-biologic impairment. CONCLUSION: Our results provide realistic outcome-specific post-biologic expectations for both physicians and patients, will be foundational to inform future work on a multidimensional approach to define and assess biologic responders and response, and may enhance appropriate patient selection for biologic therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ISAR database has ethical approval from the Anonymous Data Ethics Protocols and Transparency (ADEPT) committee (ADEPT0218) and is registered with the European Union Electronic Register of Post-Authorization studies (ENCEPP/DSPP/23720). The study was designed, implemented, and reported in compliance with the European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP) Code of Conduct (EUPAS38288) and with all applicable local and international laws and regulation, and registered with ENCEPP (https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=38289). Governance was provided by ADEPT (registration number: ADEPT1220).
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Humanos , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Longitudinais , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Registros , IdosoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator designed to reduce the risk of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion during vaginal delivery. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled nulliparous participants planning vaginal delivery. During the first stage of labor, participants were randomized to receive the intravaginal device or standard-of-care labor management. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the presence of full LAM avulsion on transperineal pelvic-floor ultrasound at 3 months. Three urogynecologists performed blinded interpretation of ultrasound images. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) through 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 214 women were randomized to Device (n = 113) or Control (n = 101) arms. Of 113 Device assignees, 82 had a device placed, of whom 68 delivered vaginally. Of 101 Control participants, 85 delivered vaginally. At 3 months, 110 participants, 46 Device subjects who received full device treatment, and 64 Controls underwent ultrasound for the per-protocol analysis. No full LAM avulsions (0.0%) occurred in the Device group versus 7 out of 64 (10.9%) in the Control group (p = 0.040; two-tailed Fisher's test). A single maternal serious AE (laceration) was device related; no neonate serious AEs were device related. CONCLUSIONS: The pelvic floor dilator device significantly reduced the incidence of complete LAM avulsion in nulliparous individuals undergoing first vaginal childbirth. The dilator demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and was well received by recipients. Use of the intrapartum electromechanical pelvic floor dilator in laboring nulliparous individuals may reduce the rate of LAM avulsion, an injury associated with serious sequelae including pelvic organ prolapse.
RESUMO
We sought to determine the subspecialty interests of fourth-year medical students (MS4s) matched to Ob/Gyn and evaluate their attitudes towards residency tracking. Matched MS4s completed a survey regarding subspecialization, confidence in that choice, and desire for tracking. A total of 922 MS4s completed the survey. Of these, 474 (51.4%) desired subspecialty training, but were less confident in their choice compared with those desiring generalist careers (60.0/100 vs. 64.9/100, P =0.003). Those seeking subspecialty training were more likely to desire tracking (15.2% vs. 39.5%, P <0.001). In conclusion, 51% of MS4s desired subspecialty training over generalist careers. Almost 40% of these students are interested in tracking.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Ginecologia , Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Ginecologia/educação , Obstetrícia/educação , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Adulto , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe asthma may present with characteristics representing overlapping phenotypes, making them eligible for more than one class of biologic. Our aim was to describe the profile of adult patients with severe asthma eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R and to compare the effectiveness of both classes of treatment in real life. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that included adult patients with severe asthma from 22 countries enrolled into the International Severe Asthma registry (ISAR) who were eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R. The effectiveness of anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R was compared in a 1:1 matched cohort. Exacerbation rate was the primary effectiveness endpoint. Secondary endpoints included long-term-oral corticosteroid (LTOCS) use, asthma-related emergency room (ER) attendance, and hospital admissions. RESULTS: In the matched analysis (n = 350/group), the mean annualized exacerbation rate decreased by 47.1% in the anti-IL5/5R group and 38.7% in the anti-IgE group. Patients treated with anti-IL5/5R were less likely to experience a future exacerbation (adjusted IRR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.89; p < 0.001) and experienced a greater reduction in mean LTOCS dose than those treated with anti-IgE (37.44% vs. 20.55% reduction; p = 0.023). There was some evidence to suggest that patients treated with anti-IL5/5R experienced fewer asthma-related hospitalizations (IRR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38, 1.08), but not ER visits (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61, 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: In real life, both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R improve asthma outcomes in patients eligible for both biologic classes; however, anti-IL5/5R was superior in terms of reducing asthma exacerbations and LTOCS use.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Produtos Biológicos , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/induzido quimicamente , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review key literature on asthma biologic therapeutics-currently available and under investigation-to inform a rational approach to select biologics for the management of people with severe asthma by precision medicine. DATA SOURCES: We used the PubMed database to review literature on biologic therapeutics in asthma. STUDY SELECTIONS: We included published randomized control trials and real-world studies on biologic therapeutics, available in English, through September 2021. RESULTS: Increased understanding of asthma endotypes and the roles of various inflammatory mechanisms has led to therapeutic agents that inhibit specific cytokines or immune pathways. Currently available biologic therapeutics target type 2-high asthma. Grouped by mechanisms of action, there are the following 3 types: (1) anti-immunoglobulin E, (2) anti-interleukin (IL)-5 or IL-5 receptor, and (3) anti-IL-4 receptor α. There are also various potential future biologic therapeutics currently under investigation. Although there remains a paucity of data regarding prospective direct head-to-head comparisons of biologic therapeutics in asthma, there are some retrospective and indirect comparison data available. CONCLUSION: Precision medicine guides selection of biologic therapeutics along with shared decision-making. Biomarkers, although not comprehensive, allow approximations of likely mechanisms. Use of biomarkers, to include historical levels and trends, in addition to consideration of key clinical characteristics and comorbidities can greatly help guide biologic selection. Efficacy, safety, potential adverse effects, indications for other key comorbidities, and logistics should also be considered.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Produtos Biológicos , Antiasmáticos/farmacologia , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Medicina de Precisão , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and adult and childhood asthma outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic literature review using 4 databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Ovid PsycINFO) with asthma and IPV-associated terms. STUDY SELECTIONS: We included published studies, available in English, to October 2021, which included IPV as an exposure and asthma as an outcome. Both adult and pediatric populations were included in the following settings: community, health care, and home. RESULTS: There were 37 articles identified. There was evidence among multiple studies to support increased prevalence of asthma in adults exposed to IPV and prevalence and incidence in children with parental IPV exposure. There were fewer studies evaluating IPV exposure and adult asthma morbidity, but they found statistically significant associations between IPV and increased rate of asthma exacerbations and worsened asthma control. There was sparse evidence evaluating a relationship between IPV and adult asthma mortality. There were no studies identified evaluating IPV and childhood asthma morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION: The association between IPV and increased asthma prevalence, incidence, and worsened morbidity merits recognition and further investigation into potential mechanisms. Health care providers can implement practical strategies to help mitigate the negative effects of IPV on health and asthma. These include addressing potential impactful biopsychosocial factors and comorbidities, implementing routine screening and referrals, and partnering with community advocacy organizations. Given their positions of respect and power in society, health care providers can have lasting impacts on the lives of pediatric and adult patients affected by IPV.
Assuntos
Asma , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo , Adulto , Asma/epidemiologia , Criança , Humanos , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/prevenção & controle , Violência por Parceiro Íntimo/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento , PrevalênciaRESUMO
Counseling the uterus transplant patient requires an enhanced knowledge of unique genetic challenges that include an understanding of the spectrum of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Patients should understand their options for genetic screening and testing including preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, genetic screening, and diagnostic testing. This patient population is potentially at risk for fetal anomalies due to the increased susceptibility to infections, such as cytomegalovirus. There are management strategies to minimize this risk. The risk of teratogenicity from mycophenolate is eliminated by a washout period before embryo transfer.
Assuntos
Transtornos 46, XX do Desenvolvimento Sexual , Anormalidades Congênitas , Transtornos 46, XX do Desenvolvimento Sexual/genética , Feminino , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Teratogênicos/toxicidade , Útero/anormalidades , VaginaRESUMO
We offer consensus recommendations for the antepartum management of the uterus transplant pregnancy based on our experience at 3 US centers. Patient access to accurate information is important to manage expectations and make informed decisions. Unique aspects of medical management include monitoring tacrolimus levels and performing cervical biopsies for rejection. Low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia is routinely used. Vigilant screening for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia allows for the prompt diagnosis and treatment of these common complications. We aim to deliver patients at 37 to 38 weeks by cesarean section. Shared decision making dominates whether to consider future pregnancies and timing of hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Cesárea , Pré-Eclâmpsia , Aspirina , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , ÚteroRESUMO
PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on our health systems and delivery of care and on the disruption of medical education. It has forced hospitals to move to a telehealth model for prenatal and postpartum visits and expedite discharges for postpartum patients in order to reduce exposure. We describe our medical school and hospital system initiative to employ medical student volunteers for postpartum telehealth calls during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. DESCRIPTION: Ten medical students conducted phone interviews with postpartum patients within 72 h of discharge at three hospitals in a large NYC health system, with faculty preceptors at each site who provided daily call assignments and oversight. Students called patients to screen for risk factors for postpartum complications, including preeclampsia and postpartum depression; provide additional contraception counseling; and address newborn care and health. One week and 2 week post-discharge calls were also made for COVID-19 positive patients for ongoing symptom monitoring and counseling. ASSESSMENT: We found numerous opportunities for intervention in postpartum health via telehealth, including addressing pharmacy-related needs, patient counseling, improving pain management, and identifying patients in need of emergent re-evaluation. CONCLUSION: As this pandemic continues to evolve, our model demonstrates the feasibility of telehealth and medical student involvement in postpartum care and its benefits to patients, medical student learning, and alleviation of burden on obstetric staff.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estudantes de Medicina , Telemedicina , Assistência ao Convalescente , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Pandemias , Alta do Paciente , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic rapidly overwhelmed global health care systems in 2020, with New York City (NYC) marking the first epicenter in the United States. High levels of stress amongst health care workers have been reported in pandemics, but less is known about stress amongst Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) providers. We sought to describe levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and other aspects of mental health among OB/GYN health care workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional electronic survey of a wide range of OB/GYN clinicians in a large NYC hospital system in the spring of 2020. We used both original survey questions and validated screening tools to assess stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout. We calculated median scores for these tools and compared median score between provider types. We also adapted questions on pandemic-related stressors from the MERS and SARS pandemics to fit the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and OB/GYN providers. RESULTS: A total of 464 providers met study inclusion criteria, and 163 providers completed the survey (response rate = 35.1%). Approximately 35% of providers screened positive for anxiety and 21% for depression. Scores for depression, burnout, and fulfillment varied by provider type, with nurses scoring higher than physicians (p <0.05). The majority of respondents reported stress from pandemic and OB-specific stressors, including the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to friends and family (83.9%, [95% confidence interval or CI 78.0-89.8%]), uncertainty regarding the pandemic's trajectory (91.3% [86.7-95.8%]), and frequent policy changes on labor and delivery (72.7% [65.1-80.3%]). CONCLUSION: OB/GYN providers reported high levels of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. The stress of caring for laboring patients during a pandemic may disproportionately affect nurses and trainees and highlights the need to provide interventions to ameliorate the negative impact of a pandemic on the mental health of our OB/GYN health care workers. KEY POINTS: · COVID-19 led to stress amongst OB/GYN providers.. · Some stressors were unique to providing obstetric care.. · Nurses and trainees were more affected by this stress..
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , COVID-19 , Ginecologia , Obstetrícia , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pandemias , Gravidez , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Blood Banks recommends single-unit red cell transfusion protocols across medicine to reduce transfusion complications and the use of a scarce resource. There are minimal data regarding single-unit protocols in obstetrics. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare single-unit vs multiple-unit transfusion protocols for treatment of hemodynamically stable postpartum anemia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized trial comparing initial transfusion with 1 unit of packed red blood cells (single-unit protocol) to 2 units of packed red blood cells (multiple-unit protocol) from March 2018 to July 2019. Women who required transfusion >6 hours postpartum were approached for consent. Unstable vital signs, hemoglobin level <5 g/dL, hemoglobinopathy, and cardiomyopathy were exclusion criteria for enrollment. Hemoglobin assessment and standardized clinical evaluation were performed 4 to 6 hours posttransfusion; additional packed red blood cells were given if indicated. The primary outcome was total units transfused. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, endometritis, wound separation or infection, venous thromboembolism, and intensive care unit admission within 30 days postpartum. Breastfeeding, depression, maternal attachment, and fatigue scores were assessed at 4 to 9 weeks postpartum. A total of 66 women were required to detect a 20% reduction in units transfused with a single-unit protocol (power=80%; α=0.05). RESULTS: A total of 66 women were randomized (33 per arm). There were no differences between groups in demographic or clinical characteristics, including delivery mode, blood loss, and randomization hemoglobin levels. The mean number of units transfused was lower in the single-unit protocol than in the multiple-unit protocol (1.2 U vs 2.1 U; P<.001). Only 18.2% of women in the single-unit arm required additional packed red blood cells. At posttransfusion assessment, women in the single-unit arm had lower hemoglobin levels (7.8 g/dL vs 8.7 g/dL; P<.001), but there were no differences in vital signs or symptoms between groups. There were also no differences in length of stay, 30-day complications, or 4 to 9 week postpartum outcomes. CONCLUSION: In women with hemodynamically stable postpartum anemia, a single-unit protocol avoided a second unit of packed red blood cells in >80% of women without significant impact on morbidity. Our work supports the use of single-unit initial transfusion in this population.
Assuntos
Anemia/terapia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Puerperais/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Gravidez , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Asylum seekers report exposure to human rights violations associated with a range of psychological and medical sequelae. Clinical evaluators can provide forensic evaluations that document evidence associated with their reports of persecution. The aim of this study was to characterize the forms of abuse experienced by asylum seekers, the psychological consequences of abuse, and the frequency with which clinician-evaluators found evidence that corroborated asylum seekers' reports. METHOD: We completed a retrospective chart review of 121 asylum seekers who received pro bono medical-legal evaluations through a human rights program and analyzed data using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the clients reported experiencing multiple human rights abuses. Ninety-one percent of the clients who received psychological evaluations presented with symptoms associated with depression, anxiety, or trauma and stressor-related disorders. Clinician-evaluators found physical or psychological evidence consistent with the clients' reports in 97% of cases. Forms, perpetrators, and psychological consequences of abuse varied significantly by gender and geographic region. DISCUSSION: Asylum seekers report diverse forms of persecution in their countries of origin that differ by gender and geographic region. Clinician-evaluators overwhelmingly found physical and psychological evidence consistent with the asylum seekers' accounts of persecution.
Assuntos
Exposição à Violência , Violação de Direitos Humanos/classificação , Abuso Físico , Trauma Psicológico , Refugiados/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Documentação , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Violação de Direitos Humanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Físico , Refugiados/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The East Harlem Health Outreach Partnership (EHHOP) is a medical student-run and attending-supervised clinic that provides primary care to predominantly Spanish-speaking, uninsured patients living in East Harlem, New York. In 2010, the clinic launched a Women's Health Clinic (WHC), to offer comprehensive gynecologic and reproductive healthcare under the guidance of faculty gynecologists. In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed WHC data from January 2018 to March 2021. Over this period, 59 individual patients were seen over 39 clinical sessions through a total of 164 clinical encounters staffed by 43 medical students and 19 faculty preceptors from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Mount Sinai. The most common reasons for referral to the EHHOP WHC were abnormal uterine bleeding, contraception counseling, and management of abnormal Pap smears; the most common procedures performed were Pap smears, long-acting reversible contraception placements and removals, and colposcopies. We discuss the critical role that student-run, physician-supervised reproductive health clinics play in reducing disparities in gynecologic care for uninsured women.
Assuntos
Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes , Estudantes de Medicina , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Saúde ReprodutivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe asthma exerts a disproportionately heavy burden on patients and health care. Due to the heterogeneity of the severe asthma population, many patients need to be evaluated to understand the clinical features and outcomes of severe asthma in order to facilitate personalised and targeted care. The International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) is a multi-country registry project initiated to aid in this endeavour. METHODS: ISAR is a multi-disciplinary initiative benefitting from the combined experience of the ISAR Steering Committee (ISC; comprising 47 clinicians and researchers across 29 countries, who have a special interest and/or experience in severe asthma management or establishment and maintenance of severe asthma registries) in collaboration with scientists and experts in database management and communication. Patients (≥18 years old) receiving treatment according to the 2018 definitions of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 5 or uncontrolled on GINA Step 4 treatment will be included. Data will be collected on a core set of 95 variables identified using the Delphi method. Participating registries will agree to provide access to and share standardised anonymous patient-level data with ISAR. ISAR is a registered data source on the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance. ISAR's collaborators include Optimum Patient Care, the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) and AstraZeneca. ISAR is overseen by the ISC, REG, the Anonymised Data Ethics & Protocol Transparency Committee and the ISAR operational committee, ensuring the conduct of ethical, clinically relevant research that brings value to all key stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: ISAR aims to offer a rich source of real-life data for scientific research to understand and improve disease burden, treatment patterns and patient outcomes in severe asthma. Furthermore, the registry will provide an international platform for research collaboration in respiratory medicine, with the overarching aim of improving primary and secondary care of adults with severe asthma globally.
Assuntos
Asma , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess whether institution of a postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) bundle could improve maternal morbidity in our population. STUDY DESIGN: Preintervention data (PRE) was collected on all deliveries at Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between October 15, 2013 and December 15, 2013. A two-pronged, multidisciplinary educational and procedural intervention related to PPH was instituted from March 2015 to June 2015. Postintervention data (POST) was collected on all deliveries from October 20, 2015 to December 20, 2015. RESULTS: Note that 592 of 626 (95%) PRE and 583 of 613 (95%) POST deliveries were included. The rates of PPH by estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥ 1,000 mL and by 3 g hemoglobin drop were not significantly different from PRE to POST (9.0% versus 12.2%, p = 0.07 and 10.5% versus 13.5%, p = 0.10, respectively). There was no significant change in transfusion rate (3.4% versus 5.1%, p = 0.13). Use of uterotonics was reduced from 9.8 to 6.3% from PRE to POST (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: While institution of a PPH bundle is designed to improve the morbidity of PPH, our data demonstrate that it cannot be expected to do so within 6 months of implementation. Further studies will need to assess the long-term effects of such a resource-intensive protocol, including perceptions of improved safety by all providers, nurses, and staff.
Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Protocolos Clínicos , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Feminino , Testes Hematológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In 2016, China officially ended the 'one-child' policy permitting all couples to have two children for the first time since 1979. While the policy was relaxed due to demographic concerns, it simultaneously provided many women with a new reproductive opportunity. The goal of this study was to qualitatively understand the childbearing decision process in the new era of the two-child policy. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 45 postpartum women at two hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China. The interviews explored women's views on the two-child policy and reproductive decisions and how they decided to have their first or second child. Most women approved of the lifting of the one-child policy; however, many were hesitant or uncertain about their own decisions to have second children. Many felt pressured to have two children for the good of, or as an obligation to, the family. However, they also felt that caring for two children was burdensome, and that they would have to sacrifice a lot in terms of freedom, energy and money. Their responses to the new reproductive opportunity highlight the complexity of childbearing decision-making in modern Chinese society, against a background of persisting traditional values.
Assuntos
Atitude , Tomada de Decisões , Política de Planejamento Familiar/legislação & jurisprudência , Período Pós-Parto , Comportamento Reprodutivo , Adulto , China , Feminino , Maternidades , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The National Partnership for Maternal Safety released a postpartum hemorrhage bundle in 2015 recommending quantification of blood loss (QBL) for all deliveries. We sought to determine whether QBL more accurately predicts hemoglobin (Hb) drop than visually estimated blood loss (EBL). STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study. Preintervention data (PRE) were collected on all deliveries between October 15, 2013 and December 15, 2013. Deliveries were included if EBL, admission Hb, and 12-hour postpartum Hb (12hrCBC) were available. QBL was implemented in July 2015. Postintervention data (POST) were collected between October 20, 2015 and December 20, 2015. A total of 500 mL EBL was predicted to result in 1 g/dL Hb drop at 12hrCBC. Student's t-test was used to compare the means. RESULTS: A total of 592 of 626 (95%) PRE and 583 of 613 (95%) POST deliveries were included. Overall, 278 (48%) POST deliveries had QBL recorded. In both PRE and POST, actual Hb drop differed from predicted by 0.6 g/dL in both groups of deliveries. When evaluating deliveries with EBL > 1,000 mL, QBL in POST was slightly better at predicting Hb drop versus EBL in PRE, although not statistically significant (0.2 vs. 0.5 g/dL, p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: In all deliveries, QBL does not predict Hb drop more accurately than EBL. The decision to perform QBL needs to balance accuracy with a resource intense measurement process.
Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Hemoglobinas/análise , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Parto , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2010, China's cesarean delivery (CD) rates increased to one of the highest in the world, a significant proportion of which were without medical indication. However, recent studies have indicated some declines, coinciding with national and local efforts to promote vaginal birth, as well as the relaxation of the one-child policy. Considering these trends, we aimed to qualitatively explore attitudes towards childbirth and experiences of delivery decision-making among women and physicians. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 45 postpartum women and 7 healthcare providers at one county-level and one provincial-level maternity hospital in Zhejiang Province. We also collected routine data from 2007 to 2016 and observed doctor-patient interactions and hospital facilities as context for the interviews. Interviews were recorded, translated and transcribed into English, and then analyzed using a framework approach. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2016, cesarean delivery rates at the county-level and provincial-level hospital decreased from 46% to 32% and 68% to 44%, respectively. For low-risk women, vaginal birth was the primary choice of delivery method, encouraged by doctors and nurse-midwives. Elective CD was not as widely accepted, in contrast to previous years. Women were aware of and took into consideration the consequences of CD for future pregnancies. Among those who delivered vaginally, women viewed the existing pain relief methods, epidurals and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, with caution or uncertainty. Even when requested, epidurals were only given under certain circumstances. For multiparas with previous CD, repeat CD remains the norm. Both women and professionals were cautious about vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) given the associated risks. CONCLUSION: In China, changes in family planning policy and efforts to promote vaginal birth have greatly changed the culture of delivery decision-making, leading to decreased CD rates. This demonstrates the powerful role social factors and public policy can play, and provides a model for other countries with high CD rates. Further research should explore changes in other reproductive decisions during this new multiparous era, particularly across provinces.
Assuntos
Cesárea/psicologia , Comportamento de Escolha , Tomada de Decisões , Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Características da Família , Política de Planejamento Familiar , Adulto , China , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parto/psicologia , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Background Obstetrical hemorrhage is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, yet is inconsistently defined. In 2014, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) reVITALize program redefined postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) as greater than 1,000 mL blood loss regardless of the mode of delivery (MOD). Objective We sought to assess the reVITALize definition's validity by understanding whether the definition of PPH should, as proposed by ACOG, be one value regardless of MOD. Study Design This is a retrospective study of all women who delivered at the hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from October 15, 2013 through December 15, 2013. Results A total of 592 of the 626 (95%) women were included. The average reported estimated blood loss (EBL) for vaginal delivery (VD) was significantly lower than for cesarean delivery (CD) ([350 ±170 mL) and [880 ± 360 mL]; p < 0.001). The average hemoglobin (Hb) drop was only slightly lower for VD compared with CD ([1.4 ± 1.0 g/dL {11.5% drop}] and [1.9 ± 1.2 g/dL {16.2% drop}], respectively, p < 0.001). The association between EBL and observed Hb drop differed in accuracy by MOD. Conclusion Likely based on historic perceptions, obstetric providers estimate blood loss for VD as less than half that of CD. However, using objective measures, blood loss is more similar than perceived between VD and CD, supporting the ACOG reVITALize single definition of PPH regardless of MOD.