First-in-man report of transsubclavian venous implantation of the Aveir leadless cardiac pacing system.

INTRODUCTION: Transsubclavian venous implantation of the Aveir leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) has not been previously reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three cases of transsubclavian implantation of the Aveir LCP are reported. Two cases were postbilateral orthotopic lung transplant, without appropriate femoral or jugular access due to recent ECMO cannulation and jugular central venous catheters. In one case, there was strong patient preference for same-day discharge. Stability testing confirmed adequate fixation and electrical testing confirmed stable parameters in all cases. All patients tolerated the procedure well without significant immediate complications. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of transsubclavian implantation of the Aveir LCP.

Breast Cryoablation, From the AJR "How We Do It" Special Series.

Breast cryoablation is a minimally invasive image-guided percutaneous procedure to treat fibroadenomas and early-stage breast cancer utilizing liquid nitrogen or argon gas to create extremely cold temperatures that devitalize targeted tissue. Although more long term data are needed, this outpatient procedure is well tolerated and carries minimal risks, including non-target thermal injury that can be mitigated by careful planning and proper technique. Building a sustainable breast cryoablation service in a radiology practice poses several practical considerations, such as training proceduralists, purchasing equipment, recruiting patients, and understanding the revenue cycle. This article describes aspects of the radiologist's role in this procedure, including implementation of a breast ablation program, patient selection, technical details related to intervention, and expected postprocedural outcomes.

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Minimally invasive locoregional therapies have a growing role in the multidisciplinary treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Factors contributing to the expanding role of ablation for primary breast cancer include earlier diagnosis, when tumors are small, and increased longevity of patients whose condition precludes surgery. Cryoablation has emerged as the leading ablative modality for primary breast cancer owing to its wide availability, the lack of need for sedation, and the ability to monitor the ablation zone. Emerging evidence suggests that in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer, use of locoregional therapies to eradicate all disease sites may confer a survival advantage. Evidence also suggests that transarterial therapies-including chemoembolization, chemoperfusion, and radioembolization-may be helpful to some patients with advanced liver metastases from breast cancer, such as those with hepatic oligoprogression or those who cannot tolerate systemic therapy. However, the optimal modalities for treatment of oligometastatic and advanced metastatic disease remain unknown. Finally, locoregional therapies may produce tumor antigens that in combination with immunotherapy drive anti-tumor immunity. Although key trials are ongoing, additional prospective studies are needed to establish the inclusion of interventional oncology in societal breast cancer guidelines to support further clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes.

Cryoablation of Primary Breast Cancer in Patients Ineligible for Clinical Trials: A Multiinstitutional Study.

Background: Breast cancer cryoablation clinical trials have strict inclusion criteria that exclude patients with potentially treatable disease. Objective: This study's purpose was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of breast cancer cryoablation without surgical excision in patients ineligible for prospective cryoablation clinical trials due to unfavorable patient or tumor characteristics. Methods: This retrospective study included women who underwent cryoablation of biopsy-proven unifocal primary breast cancer with locally curative intent, without surgical excision, despite being ineligible for (and thus excluded from) cryoablation clinical trials, across seven institutions between January 1, 2000 and August 26, 2021. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Cryoablation procedures were classified as technically successful if they were not prematurely terminated and achieved intended treatment parameters and the first imaging follow-up showed no evidence of residual disease. Results of follow-up biopsies were recorded. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) diagnosed during follow-up were identified and classified as true recurrence or new primary disease. A competing-risk model was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of IBTR accounting for death before IBTR. Results: The final study sample included 112 patients (median age, 71 years). A total of 7/112 (6.3%) patients had a minor AE; no moderate or major AE occurred. A total of 110/112 (98.2%) cryoablation procedures were technically successful. During median follow-up of 2.0 years, 22/110 (20.0%) patients underwent biopsy for suspicious imaging findings in the ipsilateral breast, yielding benign concordant findings in 9/22 (40.9%) and IBTR in 12/22 (54.5%). Overall, 12/110 (10.9%) patients experienced IBTR, including 7 with true recurrence and 5 with new primary disease; 3/12 (25.0%) patients with IBTR had received earlier adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. When accounting for death as a competing risk, the cumulative incidence of IBTR was 5.3%, 12.2%, and 18.2% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Conclusion: In select individuals with unfavorable patient or tumor characteristics, breast cancer cryoablation provides a safe alternative to surgery with good outcomes. These findings may be particularly relevant in patients who are also poor surgical candidates. Clinical Impact: Breast cancer cryoablation can be safely applied in a larger patient population than defined by clinical trial inclusion criteria.

Can incorrect artificial intelligence (AI) results impact radiologists, and if so, what can we do about it? A multi-reader pilot study of lung cancer detection with chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether incorrect AI results impact radiologist performance, and if so, whether human factors can be optimized to reduce error. METHODS: Multi-reader design, 6 radiologists interpreted 90 identical chest radiographs (follow-up CT needed: yes/no) on four occasions (09/20-01/22). No AI result was provided for session 1. Sham AI results were provided for sessions 2-4, and AI for 12 cases were manipulated to be incorrect (8 false positives (FP), 4 false negatives (FN)) (0.87 ROC-AUC). In the Delete AI (No Box) condition, radiologists were told AI results would not be saved for the evaluation. In Keep AI (No Box) and Keep AI (Box), radiologists were told results would be saved. In Keep AI (Box), the ostensible AI program visually outlined the region of suspicion. AI results were constant between conditions. RESULTS: Relative to the No AI condition (FN = 2.7%, FP = 51.4%), FN and FPs were higher in the Keep AI (No Box) (FN = 33.0%, FP = 86.0%), Delete AI (No Box) (FN = 26.7%, FP = 80.5%), and Keep AI (Box) (FN = to 20.7%, FP = 80.5%) conditions (all ps < 0.05). FNs were higher in the Keep AI (No Box) condition (33.0%) than in the Keep AI (Box) condition (20.7%) (p = 0.04). FPs were higher in the Keep AI (No Box) (86.0%) condition than in the Delete AI (No Box) condition (80.5%) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Incorrect AI causes radiologists to make incorrect follow-up decisions when they were correct without AI. This effect is mitigated when radiologists believe AI will be deleted from the patient's file or a box is provided around the region of interest. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: When AI is wrong, radiologists make more errors than they would have without AI. Based on human factors psychology, our manuscript provides evidence for two AI implementation strategies that reduce the deleterious effects of incorrect AI. KEY POINTS: • When AI provided incorrect results, false negative and false positive rates among the radiologists increased. • False positives decreased when AI results were deleted, versus kept, in the patient's record. • False negatives and false positives decreased when AI visually outlined the region of suspicion.

New Frontiers in the Role of Locoregional Therapies in Breast Cancer: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel.

Emerging evidence regarding the effectiveness of locoregional therapies (LRTs) for breast cancer has prompted investigation of the potential role of interventional radiology (IR) in the care continuum of patients with breast cancer. The Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation invited 7 key opinion leaders to develop research priorities to delineate the role of LRTs in both primary and metastatic breast cancer. The objectives of the research consensus panel were to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities pertaining to the treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer, establish priorities for future breast cancer LRT clinical trials, and highlight lead technologies that will improve breast cancer outcomes either alone or in combination with other therapies. Potential research focus areas were proposed by individual panel members and ranked by all participants according to each focus area's overall impact. The results of this research consensus panel present the current priorities for the IR research community related to the treatment of breast cancer to investigate the clinical impact of minimally invasive therapies in the current breast cancer treatment paradigm.

Image-guided Microinvasive Percutaneous Treatment of Breast Lesions: Where Do We Stand?

Treatment of breast lesions has evolved toward the use of less-invasive or minimally invasive techniques. Minimally invasive treatments destroy focal groups of cells without surgery; hence, less anesthesia is required, better cosmetic outcomes are achieved because of minimal (if any) scarring, and recovery times are shorter. These techniques include cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, high-intensity focused US, laser therapy, vacuum-assisted excision, and irreversible electroporation. Each modality involves the use of different mechanisms and requires specific considerations for application. To date, only cryoablation and vacuum-assisted excision have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of fibroadenomas and have been implemented as part of the treatment algorithm by the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Several clinical studies on this topic have been performed on outcomes in patients with breast cancer who were treated with these techniques. The results are promising, with more data for radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation available than for other minimally invasive methods for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Clinical decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, according to the availability of the technique. MRI is the most effective imaging modality for postprocedural follow-up, with the pattern of enhancement differentiating residual or recurrent disease from postprocedural changes. ©RSNA, 2021.

Effects of multiphase versus single-phase CT angiography for the detection of distal cerebral vessel occlusion.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine whether the benefits of multiphase CTA (mCTA) over single-phase CTA (sCTA) for the detection of proximal cerebrovascular occlusions similarly extend to the distal cerebral vasculature. METHODS: Four attending radiologists, two neuroradiologists and two emergency radiologists, contributed as readers to this retrospective study. For each reader, two sessions were conducted, one using sCTA and one using mCTA. During each session, the reader interpreted the studies of 104 patients who underwent imaging for suspicion of acute ischemic stroke, resulting in a total of 832 interpretations. Changes in diagnostic accuracy, time to render final decision, and reported levels of reader confidence were quantitatively assessed. Further analysis comparing the effects for neuroradiologists versus emergency radiologists was additionally conducted. RESULTS: Using mCTA resulted in a significant 5.0% absolute increase in sensitivity (91.6% vs. 96.6%, p = .004) and an insignificant increase in specificity (99.5% vs. 99.7%, p = .39). A significant reduction in reading time (66.7 s vs. 59.6 s, p = .001) and an increase in diagnostic confidence (2.26 vs. 2.58, p < .001) were observed. Using sCTA, higher sensitivity was achieved by neuroradiologists than emergency radiologists (96.0% vs. 86.9%, p = .002); using mCTA resulted in an absolute increase in sensitivity of 0.9% (97.4%, p = .44) for neuroradiologists and 9.6% (96.5%, p < .001) for emergency radiologists, eliminating significant differences between the groups (p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: The use of mCTA results in increased sensitivity and negative predictive value, decreased reading time, increased diagnostic confidence, and the elimination of differences in accuracy between neuroradiologists and emergency radiologists.

Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

Importance: Improved screening methods for women with dense breasts are needed because of their increased risk of breast cancer and of failed early diagnosis by screening mammography. Objective: To compare the screening performance of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women with dense breasts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up at 48 academic, community hospital, and private practice sites in the United States and Germany, conducted between December 2016 and November 2017 among average-risk women aged 40 to 75 years with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts undergoing routine screening. Follow-up ascertainment of cancer diagnoses was complete through September 12, 2019. Exposures: All women underwent screening by both DBT and abbreviated breast MRI, performed in randomized order and read independently to avoid interpretation bias. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the invasive cancer detection rate. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, additional imaging recommendation rate, and positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy, using invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to define a positive reference standard. All outcomes are reported at the participant level. Pathology of core or surgical biopsy was the reference standard for cancer detection rate and PPV; interval cancers reported until the next annual screen were included in the reference standard for sensitivity and specificity. Results: Among 1516 enrolled women, 1444 (median age, 54 [range, 40-75] years) completed both examinations and were included in the analysis. The reference standard was positive for invasive cancer with or without DCIS in 17 women and for DCIS alone in another 6. No interval cancers were observed during follow-up. Abbreviated breast MRI detected all 17 women with invasive cancer and 5 of 6 women with DCIS. Digital breast tomosynthesis detected 7 of 17 women with invasive cancer and 2 of 6 women with DCIS. The invasive cancer detection rate was 11.8 (95% CI, 7.4-18.8) per 1000 women for abbreviated breast MRI vs 4.8 (95% CI, 2.4-10.0) per 1000 women for DBT, a difference of 7 (95% CI, 2.2-11.6) per 1000 women (exact McNemar P = .002). For detection of invasive cancer and DCIS, sensitivity was 95.7% (95% CI, 79.0%-99.2%) with abbreviated breast MRI vs 39.1% (95% CI, 22.2%-59.2%) with DBT (P = .001) and specificity was 86.7% (95% CI, 84.8%-88.4%) vs 97.4% (95% CI, 96.5%-98.1%), respectively (P < .001). The additional imaging recommendation rate was 7.5% (95% CI, 6.2%-9.0%) with abbreviated breast MRI vs 10.1% (95% CI, 8.7%-11.8%) with DBT (P = .02) and the PPV was 19.6% (95% CI, 13.2%-28.2%) vs 31.0% (95% CI, 17.0%-49.7%), respectively (P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with dense breasts undergoing screening, abbreviated breast MRI, compared with DBT, was associated with a significantly higher rate of invasive breast cancer detection. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between screening methods and clinical outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02933489.

Ultrasound-Guided Breast Cancer Cryoablation.

OBJECTIVE. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided breast cryoablation is a minimally invasive technique that kills targeted tissue with extreme cold, requires only local anesthesia, and takes less than 45 minutes to complete. CONCLUSION. We discuss the indications for breast cryoablation, the mechanism of cell death, and types of commercially available devices; illustrate procedural technique; and review expected follow-up imaging findings in treated primary breast cancer.

Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.

OBJECTIVES: To compare interobserver variability (IOV), reader confidence, and sensitivity/specificity in detecting architectural distortion (AD) on digital mammography (DM) versus digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). METHODS: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant reader study used a counterbalanced experimental design. We searched radiology reports for AD on screening mammograms from 5 March 2012-27 November 2013. Cases were consensus-reviewed. Controls were selected from demographically matched non-AD examinations. Two radiologists and two fellows blinded to outcomes independently reviewed images from two patient groups in two sessions. Readers recorded presence/absence of AD and confidence level. Agreement and differences in confidence and sensitivity/specificity between DBT versus DM and attendings versus fellows were examined using weighted Kappa and generalised mixed modeling, respectively. RESULTS: There were 59 AD patients and 59 controls for 1,888 observations (59 × 2 (cases and controls) × 2 breasts × 2 imaging techniques × 4 readers). For all readers, agreement improved with DBT versus DM (0.61 vs. 0.37). Confidence was higher with DBT, p = .001. DBT achieved higher sensitivity (.59 vs. .32), p < .001; specificity remained high (>.90). DBT achieved higher positive likelihood ratio values, smaller negative likelihood ratio values, and larger ROC values. CONCLUSIONS: DBT decreases IOV, increases confidence, and improves sensitivity while maintaining high specificity in detecting AD. KEY POINTS: • Digital breast tomosynthesis decreases interobserver variability in the detection of architectural distortion. • Digital breast tomosynthesis increases reader confidence in the detection of architectural distortion. • Digital breast tomosynthesis improves sensitivity in the detection of architectural distortion.

Role of Interventional Radiology in Managing Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Percutaneous image-guided locoregional therapies are emerging in the treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cryoablation has emerged as the dominant ablative approach as an alternative to surgery for primary breast cancer in patients who do not wish to have surgery or are poor surgical candidates. Cryoablation is well tolerated and provides excellent local control and cosmesis. Thermal ablation may also be used in the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer, allowing patients to achieve long disease-free intervals. Transarterial therapies have been studied in the treatment of oligoprogressive hepatic metastasis, though further supportive data would be helpful to demonstrate its efficacy.

Cryoablation for the Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Review of the Current Landscape and Future Possibilities.

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Traditional treatment options for breast cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. However, cryoablation, a minimally invasive technique, has emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. This article aims to provide an overview of cryoablation, focusing on incorporation into practice, patient selection, procedural technique, imaging follow-up, post-treatment radiopathological findings, and current and ongoing research in the field. The current evidence suggests that cryoablation offers a safe and effective treatment option for selected patients, providing comparable oncological outcomes to traditional treatments while minimizing invasiveness and preserving breast aesthetics.

Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia.

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and less commonly, mortality in patients with structurally normal hearts. Appropriate diagnosis and management are predicated on an understanding of the mechanism, relevant cardiac anatomy, and associated ECG signatures. Catheter ablation is a viable strategy to adequately treat and potentially provide a cure in patients that are intolerant to medications or when these are ineffective. In this review, we discuss special approaches and considerations for effective and safe ablation of VT arising from the right ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular fascicles, papillary muscles, and moderator band.

Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Non-Re-Entrant Tachycardia.

A patient presented with symptoms of palpitations. Her standard 12-lead electrocardiogram captured 3 potential causes of her symptoms (premature atrial contractions, junctional rhythm, and narrow complex tachycardia). Further workup uncovered dual atrioventricular node physiology with 1:2 sinus conduction and resultant alternating QRS from a slow and fast conduction pathway. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).