RESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients seeking care for medically unexplained physical symptoms pose a major challenge at primary care sites, and there are very few well-accepted and properly evaluated interventions to manage such patients. METHODS: We tested the effectiveness of a cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-type intervention delivered in primary care for patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the intervention plus a consultation letter or usual clinical care plus a consultation letter. Physical and psychiatric symptoms were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. All treatments and assessments took place at the same primary care clinic where patients sought care. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients in the intervention group had physical symptoms rated by clinicians as "very much improved" or "much improved" compared with those in the usual care group (60% vs 25.8%; odds ratio = 4.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-8.8; P<.001). The intervention's effect on unexplained physical symptoms was greatest at treatment completion, led to relief of symptoms in more than one-half of the patients, and persisted months after the intervention, although its effectiveness gradually diminished. The intervention also led to significant improvements in patient-reported levels of physical symptoms, patient-rated severity of physical symptoms, and clinician-rated depression, but these effects were no longer noticeable at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This time-limited, CBT-type intervention significantly ameliorated unexplained physical complaints of patients seen in primary care and offers an alternative for managing these common and problematic complaints in primary care settings.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Transtornos Somatoformes/terapia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Ansiedade/etnologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Depressão/etnologia , Depressão/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey , Psicoterapia Breve , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos Somatoformes/etnologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Serviços Urbanos de SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the relationship between pseudoneurological symptoms (PNS) and somatic and psychiatric symptom severity, physical functioning, and psychiatric comorbidity. METHODS: Interview and questionnaire data were obtained from 120 patients with somatization who participated in a study assessing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Measures elicited information on psychiatric diagnoses, anxiety and depressive symptom levels, somatic symptoms, and physical functioning. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between PNS and the diagnosis of somatization disorder, physical and psychiatric symptom severity, and psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: Roughly half of the sample had a history of four or more PNS. Results showed that having four or more PNS was not predictive of somatization disorder. However, having four or more PNS was found to be significantly correlated with the severity of anxiety, depression, somatic complaints, and physical dysfunction. These associations were identified while controlling for the symptom count of nonpseudoneurological symptoms, the presence of somatization disorder, and the presence of chronic painful physical conditions. In addition, having four or more PNS was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of major depression, dysthymia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS: A history of four or more PNS is common among somatizing patients in primary care and associated with a more severe clinical presentation, even after controlling for other factors known to be associated with severity. Four or more PNS may identify a distinct subgroup of somatization and serve as a clinical indicator for identifying psychiatric disorders in primary care. Future studies should explore the assessment of PNS using briefer measures. Furthermore, PNS should be evaluated with samples more representative of US primary care populations, as well as samples that include adequate representation from other ethnic backgrounds (eg, African-American, Asian, etc.).