Revisiting delusion subtypes in schizophrenia based on their underlying structures.

A clear understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and related spectrum disorders has been limited by clinical heterogeneity. We investigated whether relative severity and predominance of one or more delusion subtypes might yield clinically differentiable patient profiles. Patients (N = 286) with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) completed the 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI-21). We performed factor analysis followed by k-means clustering to identify delusion factors and patient subtypes. Patients were further assessed via the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Brief Negative Symptom Scale, Digit Symbol and Digit Substitution tasks, use of cannabis and tobacco, and stressful life events. The overall patient sample clustered into subtypes corresponding to Low-Delusion, Grandiose-Predominant, Paranoid-Predominant, and Pan-Delusion patients. Paranoid-Predominant and Pan-Delusion patients showed significantly higher burden of positive symptoms, while Low-Delusion patients showed the highest burden of negative symptoms. The Paranoia delusion factor score showed a positive association with Digit Symbol and Digit Substitution tasks in the overall sample, and the Paranoid-Predominant subtype exhibited the best performance on both tasks. Grandiose-Predominant patients showed significantly higher tobacco smoking severity than other subtypes, while Paranoid-Predominant patients were significantly more likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of Cannabis Use Disorder. We suggest that delusion self-report inventories such as the PDI-21 may be of utility in identifying sub-syndromes in SSD. From the current study, a Paranoid-Predominant form may be most distinctive, with features including less cognitive impairment and a stronger association with cannabis use.

Inpatient Early Intervention for Serious Mental Illnesses Is Associated With Fewer Rehospitalizations Compared With Treatment as Usual in a High-volume Public Psychiatric Hospital Setting.

OBJECTIVE: High-acuity publicly funded inpatient psychiatric settings usually feature short lengths of stay and high readmission rates. This study examined the influence of an early intervention program for serious mental illnesses (SMI) on readmissions at 6 and 12 months postdischarge at a high-volume, urban public inpatient psychiatric hospital. METHODS: The Early Onset Treatment Program (EOTP) is a cost-free, 90-day inpatient multidisciplinary service intervention program for uninsured patients who are within 5 years of SMI onset, funded as a pilot program by the Texas state legislature. Rehospitalization rates at 6 and 12 months were extracted from electronic medical records for EOTP participants (n=165) and comparison patients matched on demographics and diagnosis (n=155). The comparison group received treatment as usual at the same psychiatric hospital. Group re-admission rates were compared using logistic and Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Group membership was a significant predictor of rehospitalization (P<0.0001) at both 6 and 12 months. Expressed as 1/odds ratio (OR), the EOTP group was less likely to readmit once and more than once at 6 months postdischarge (1/OR=3.82 and 4.74, respectively) compared with the non-EOTP group. The EOTP group was also less likely to readmit once and more than once at 12 months postdischarge (1/OR=2.96 and 3.51, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that participation in the EOTP service in this high-acuity setting was significantly related to reduced likelihood of rehospitalization at 6 and 12 months. Several variables may account for this observation, including length of stay, longer medication adherence, environmental stability, and more individualized and extensive psychotherapy treatment.

Customizing Early Intervention Treatment for Psychosis in the UTHealth - Harris County Psychiatric Center.

High-need, high-cost patients include those with diagnosed serious mental illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia; SMI). They often delay or fail to seek treatment. If they receive treatment, care is often sought from generalist settings (e.g., primary care or emergency medicine) or is suboptimal due to the provision of limited, non-evidence-based intervention and lack of communication, integration, and coordination among providers. This results in high aggregate costs and poor outcomes. Value-based health care requires care coordination to address the medical and social needs of this population. We describe a unique early intervention program for SMI that emanates from an inpatient setting: The Early Onset Treatment Program (EOTP) at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Harris County Psychiatric Center. The EOTP offers free, phase-specific, multidisciplinary treatment to young adults without health insurance with the aim of improving their long-term outcomes and reducing the rate of rehospitalization. An evaluation of the EOTP indicates program participants were significantly less likely to be rehospitalized at six months (4.73 times less likely) and at 12 months (3.5 times less likely) than a comparison group (p <.001), and participants' scores of symptomatology and disability significantly decreased following treatment.

Inpatient early intervention for serious mental illnesses and post-discharge criminal involvement in a high-volume psychiatric hospital setting.

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are at increased risk for arrest and incarceration relative to the same-community population without SMI. Publicly-funded inpatient psychiatric hospitals usually feature short lengths of stay and limited opportunities for extended services that might impact criminal justice involvement after discharge. This study examined the influence of an early intervention program for SMI at a high-volume public psychiatric hospital on involvement in the criminal justice system post-discharge. The Early Onset Treatment Program (EOTP) is an extended service intervention program for uninsured patients who are within 5 years of SMI onset. Criminal justice records (number of arrests with conviction, days of incarceration) were obtained for EOTP participants (n = 164) and comparison patients (n = 164) matched on demographics, diagnosis, and discharge date via propensity score matching. Data were zero-inflated and analyzed using hurdle models, controlling for prior arrests. The EOTP group was less likely to be convicted of at least one crime post-discharge (0 arrests vs. > 0, p < .001), and spent fewer days incarcerated (if incarcerated ≥1 day, p < .03). Participation in the EOTP service was linked to reduced likelihood of post-discharge arrest and days incarcerated. Several alternative variables may contribute to this preliminary observation, including length of stay, medication adherence, longer environmental stability, and individual patient characteristics.