Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy using carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for elderly patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC): TORG 0604.

BACKGROUND: The role of irinotecan for elderly patients with LD-SCLC has been unclear, and the timing of TRT combined with chemotherapy has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients aged > 70 years with untreated, measurable, LD-SCLC, performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of induction with carboplatin on day 1 and irinotecan on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 4 cycles, and sequential TRT (54Gy in 27 fractions). Carboplatin doses were based on AUC of 4 and 5 (levels 1 and 2, respectively), with a fixed irinotecan dose (50 mg/m2). Primary objective of the phase II study was overall responce rate. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled and forty-one were finally analyzed (median age: 75 years [range 70-86 years); males 31; PS 0/1/2, n = 22/18/1]. Two patients were excluded because of protocol violation (ascertained to be extensive disease). Twelve patients were accrued at phase I and the number of patients with carboplatin dose-limiting toxicities at levels-1 (n = 6) and -2 (n = 6) were 1(grade 3 hypertension) and 2 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia), respectively. The phase II trial was expanded to 29 additional patients receiving the level 1 carboplatin dose, total of 35 patients. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range 1-4), and the median radiation dose was 54Gy (range 36-60). Toxicities were generally mild. There were 4 complete and 27 partial responses (response rate 88.6%). With a median follow-up of 52 months, the median progression-free and overall survival times of phase II were 11.2 and 27.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy of carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential TRT was well tolerated and effective for elderly patients with LD-SCLC. Additional confirmatory studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: UMIN000007352 Name of registry: UMIN. Date of registration: 1/Dec/2006. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 6/Feb/2007. Clinical trial registration date: 1/Feb/2006 (prospective).

Feasibility study of first-line chemotherapy using Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab for advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: TORG1015.

BACKGROUND: The addition of bevacizumab to cytotoxic agents prolongs survival in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, there is no evidence to suggest that treatment with a cytotoxic agent plus bevacizumab is more effective than a cytotoxic agent alone for nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. We conducted a feasibility study of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC in elderly patients. METHODS: Major eligibility and exclusion criteria included: chemotherapy-naive status; non-fitness for bolus combination chemotherapy; stage III/IV or relapsed nonsquamous NSCLC; age ≥70; performance status 0-1; absence of brain metastasis; and no history of hemoptysis and thoracic irradiation. Pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) were administered intravenously on day 1, and repeated every 3 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the percentage of patients who completed ≥3 cycles. RESULTS: From October 2010 to April 2012, a total of 12 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity or treatment-related deaths were observed. Three patients achieved PR, and the ORR was 25 %. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 months (95 % CI 1.1-8.8 months) and 13.6 months (95 % CI 5.3-15.6 months), respectively. Seven of 12 patients (58 %) received ≥3 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in the treatment of elderly patients with nonsquamous NSCLC was well tolerated and shows promise as first-line treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004263 . Registered on 25 September, 2010.

Quality of life and survival survey of cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients-Japan nutrition and QOL survey in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer study.

PURPOSE: Although cancer cachexia is mainly characterized by persistent loss of body weight (BW), usually in response to a malignancy, the pathophysiology of cachexia remains unresolved. To elucidate the relationship between the loss of BW and other related clinical factors, we conducted a nationwide, multi-institutional, prospective, observational study in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0-2 were eligible. BW, handgrip strength (HGS), quality of life (QOL), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), biochemical parameters, and survival were evaluated at baseline and every 4 weeks for 1 year. The relationship between BW loss and other factors was examined by linear regression analysis. Estimated survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and applied by the log-rank test. Clinical factors associated with cancer cachexia were identified through principal component analysis. The generalized estimating equation approach was used to analyze the deterioration of QOL resulting from the progression of cachexia. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were analyzed. BW loss was significantly associated with worsening of QOL, HGS, KPS, and biochemical parameters. The incidence of BW loss was observed throughout the study period. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients as BW loss progressed. BW loss, decrease in HGS, anorexia, and fatigue were identified as core factors of cachexia that contributed to the deterioration of QOL. CONCLUSION: BW loss most likely deteriorated QOL and shortened survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and should be closely monitored.

Feasibility study of docetaxel plus bevacizumab as first line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 1014.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel monotherapy is one of the standard treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients. The addition of bevacizumab to docetaxel seems promising; however, the feasibility of this combination has not been investigated in such patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer aged 70 years or older who had not previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients in the Level 0 cohort received docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, whereas those in the Level-1 cohort received docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. Chemotherapy was repeated 3 weekly for six cycles. The primary endpoint was toxicity and the secondary endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and proportion of patients who underwent three or more cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled from December 2010 to September 2012 at six institutes. Of the nine patients enrolled in Level 0, two experienced dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia and prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia in one patient, and Grade 3 infection in another patient) during the first cycle. Enrollment to the Level 0 cohort was terminated because two patients developed Grade 4 sepsis during later cycles. The remaining 12 patients were enrolled in the Level-1 cohort, in which two dose-limiting toxicities (prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia and Grade 3 increased aminotransferase level) were observed. No patient in the Level-1 cohort experienced Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 89 % of Level 0 patients and 50 % of Level-1 patients. The proportion of patients who experienced Grade 3/4 infection, febrile neutropenia or sepsis was 44 % in the Level 0 cohort, and 8 % in the Level-1 cohort. The overall response rate to chemotherapy and progression-free survival were 29 % (95 % CI, 11-52 %) and 5.9 months (95 % CI, 3.6-9.1 months), respectively. Efficacy outcomes did not differ significantly between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicities were tolerable in level-1 cohort. The recommended dose of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and bevacizumab for elderly patients was determined as 50 mg/m(2) of docetaxel and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab and toxicities were tolerable. Further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry; UMIN000004240 .

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A single-agent topotecan has an indication for the treatment of small cell lung cancer in Japan. Previous studies demonstrated that topotecan combined with a platinum agent could provide additional antitumor efficacy. This study was to find the recommended dose of topotecan in combination with cisplatin and preferred administration sequence in untreated patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer for Phase II study. METHODS: Patients received topotecan as a 30 min infusion for 5 days in escalating doses (starting at 0.5 mg/m(2)/day), and cisplatin at a fixed dose of 60 mg/m(2), 3 weeks cycle. This study employed the following stages: cisplatin was given before topotecan on day 1 to previously treated patients (Stage 1). After the maximum-tolerated dose level was achieved, the same schedule was applied for untreated patients (Stage 2). Subsequently, cisplatin was given after topotecan on day 5 to untreated patients (Stage 3). The recommended doses of cisplatin on day 1 and 5 schedules were estimated by considering results obtained from Stages 2 and 3, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. The maximum-tolerated doses in Stages 1-3 were estimated at 0.65, 0.65, and 1.4 mg/m(2), respectively. The recommended doses of cisplatin on day 1 and 5 schedules in untreated patients were determined at 0.65 and 1.0 mg/m(2), respectively. The major toxicity in this combination was hematological events. CONCLUSIONS: For treatment-naive patients, the combined use of 0.65/60 mg/m(2) topotecan/cisplatin with cisplatin on day 1 schedule or 1.0/60 mg/m(2) topotecan/cisplatin with cisplatin on day 5 schedule is recommended for Phase II study.

The PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5' nuclease-based method), a sensitive method for detecting EGFR gene mutations in lung cancer specimens; comparison with direct sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Several sensitive assays, including the PCR-invader method (structure-specific 5' nuclease-based method), have been used to detect EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, validation has not been reported. We assessed the detection rate of EGFR mutation by the PCR-invader method and direct sequencing using same clinical specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: EGFR mutations were analyzed with the PCR-invader method and compared with direct sequencing using paraffin tissues and pleural and pericardial effusions from NSCLC patients. The relationships between the treatment responses and mutations were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty-four samples from 42 NSCLC patients were studied. EGFR mutations were identified in 52% of the patients and 52% of the samples with the PCR-invader method, but only in 43% of the patients and in 35% of the samples by direct sequencing. In the samples obtained from the same patients at different sites and different times, EGFR mutations were coincident in nine out of ten patients by the PCR-invader method but in six out of ten patients by direct sequencing. Seventeen patients with EGFR mutations were treated with gefitinib; the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 41 and 94%, and median treatment duration was more than 6 months. Seven EGFR mutation-negative patients were treated with gefitinib; the RR and DCR were 0 and 14%, and median treatment duration was 1 month. CONCLUSION: The PCR-invader method was useful for detecting EGFR mutations in clinical lung cancer specimens and is more sensitive than direct sequencing.

Randomized phase II trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: TORG 0503.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care for patients with completely resected stage IB, II and IIIA NSCLC. However, optimum chemotherapy regimen has not been determined. TORG0503 was undertaken to select a preferred platinum-based 3rd generation regimen in this clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with completely resected stage IB, IIA, IIB or stage IIIA NSCLC were stratified by stage (IB/IIA vs. IIB/IIIA) and institutions, and randomized to receive 3 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2) (arm A) or paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC 6) (arm B) on day 1, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was 2-year relapse free survival, and the key secondary endpoints included overall survival, feasibility and toxicity. RESULTS: 111 patients were randomized, 58 patients to arm A and 53 to arm B. Patient demographics were balanced between the two arms. 93 % (54/58) of patients on the arm A and 92 % (49/53) patients on the arm B completed the planned 3 cycles of chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related death in both arms. The 2 and 5 year relapse free survival was 74.5 % (95 %CI: 68.6-80.4) and 61.6 % in the arm A, and 72.0 % (95 %CI: 65.7-78.3) and 46.0 % in the arm B. The overall 2, 5-year survival was 89.7 %, 73.9 % in the arm A and 86.9 %, 67.5 % in the arm B. CONCLUSION: Both docetaxel plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus carboplatin are safe and feasible regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy. We choose docetaxel plus cisplatin as the control regimen for the next clinical trial.

Dose-escalating and pharmacokinetic study of a weekly combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9910-DI.

OBJECTIVE: Combined paclitaxel and carboplatin is a standard regimen for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although an every-3-week schedule is common, weekly paclitaxel is clinically effective for various cancers. A Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) for weekly combined paclitaxel and carboplatin, and to evaluate anti-tumor response, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with inoperable NSCLC. METHODS: Twenty patients with inoperable NSCLC received weekly carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) = 2 mg/ml min and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was escalated if MTD was not reached. Three patients each were entered at levels 1 and 2 (level 1, paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 2 mg/ml min; level 2, 60/2), six at level 3 (70/2), five at level 4 (80/2) and three at level 5 (90/2). RESULTS: One patient had grade 4 (G4) neutropenia at level 2, one had G3 hepatic toxicity at level 3 and one had G3 cardiac toxicity at level 4. MTD was not reached for all dose levels. Response rate (RR) was 35% (7/20) and median survival was 11.1 months. Severe neutropenia (G3 and G4) was seen in seven patients associated with greater AUC, peak concentration (C(max)) and the duration of plasma concentration >50 ng/ml of paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly combined paclitaxel (up to 90 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2 mg/ml min) was well tolerated. A higher dose intensity of paclitaxel can be given, and RR and survival are not less than the every-3-week protocol. The weekly regimen is an alternative for untreated inoperable NSCLC patients.

A phase II study of cisplatin and irinotecan as induction chemotherapy followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy with daily low-dose carboplatin in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9510.

OBJECTIVE: It is important to find optimal regimens of cisplatin (CDDP)-based third-generation chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This Phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of two courses of chemotherapy (CDDP 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy/40 fractions in 4 weeks) combined with daily carboplatin (CBDCA) administration. CBDCA was administered at a target area under the plasma level-time curve of 0.4 x (24 h creatinine clearance + 25), according to Calvert's formula. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The patients' median age was 63 years (range 40-74 years) and included 22 males and 4 females. Seven patients were Stage IIIA and 19 were Stage IIIB. Twenty had a performance status (PS) of 1 versus six with a PS of 0. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis and pneumonia associated with Grade 4 neutropenia and diarrhea during chemotherapy. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhea were observed in 14 and 5 patients, respectively. Toxicity of the radiotherapy was mild. There were 0 complete response and 13 partial responses, giving a response rate of 50.0%. Median survival time and 2-year survival were 16.4 months and 21.5%, respectively. This study was designed with Simon's two-stage design, and the response rate did not meet the criteria to proceed to the second stage and the study was terminated early. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen might be inactive for patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

[Case of bilateral chylothorax with systemic lupus erythematosus complicated by steroid-/immunosuppressant-resistant pleural effusion].

A 20-year-old woman, with systemic lupus erythmatosus complicated by steroid-and immunosuppressant-resistant bilateral pleural effusion, was admitted to the emergency room because of dyspnea and fever. Chest Xray film revealed bilateral massive pleural effusion. Bilateral thoracocentesis yielded fluid with chyle. Conservative treatment including intravenous hyper-alimentation and continuous drainage were performed but with no remarkable improvement. She underwent thoracoscopy-aided ligation of the thoracic duct. After the operation, bilateral pleurodesis was performed by intrathoracic injection of OK-432, because of uncontrolled pleural effusion. There have been no signs of recurrence at 10 months in this case of SLE with steroid-and immunosuppressant-resistant pleural effusion.

Overall Survival Results of the Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Followed by Long-term Single-agent Administration of S-1 in Patients With Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0809.

OBJECTIVES: The TORG0809 study was a multicenter feasibility study of long-term single-agent therapy with S-1 after docetaxel plus cisplatin therapy in patients with completely resected stage II or stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. We report the results of the final overall survival (OS) analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 129 eligible patients received 3 cycles of docetaxel (60 mg/m, day 1) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m, day 1), followed by S-1 at 40 mg/m twice daily for 14 consecutive days, for >6 months (maximum, 1 y). RESULTS: At the cutoff date of April 13, 2016, the median follow-up time was 6.0 years. Of the 129 patients, 43 had died, and 74 patients developed disease recurrence or died. The median OS had not been reached. The 5-year OS rate was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62-78]. The 5-year OS rates in the patients with stage II and stage IIIA were 76% and 68%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) duration was 3.4 years (95% CI, 2.3-5.7). The 5-year RFS rate was 44% (95% CI, 36-53). The 5-year RFS rates in patients with stage II and stage IIIA disease were 57% and 38%, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 68 patients, and 62 of these patients received second-line chemotherapy. The most common sites of recurrence were the brain (n=22) and mediastinal lymph nodes (n=22). CONCLUSION: The survival data obtained from this study are promising and comparable to those reported from a previous study conducted in Japan.

Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is effective against small-cell lung cancer. In a phase 2 study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer, there was a high response rate and a promising median survival time. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study in which we compared irinotecan plus cisplatin with etoposide plus cisplatin in patients with extensive (metastatic) small-cell lung cancer. RESULTS: The planned size of the study population was 230 patients, but enrollment was terminated early because an interim analysis found a statistically significant difference in survival between the patients assigned to receive irinotecan and cisplatin and those assigned to receive etoposide and cisplatin; as a result, only 154 patients were enrolled. The median survival was 12.8 months in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group and 9.4 months in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group (P=0.002 by the unadjusted log-rank test). At two years, the proportion of patients surviving was 19.5 percent in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group and 5.2 percent in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group. Severe or life-threatening myelosuppression was more frequent in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group than in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group, and severe or life-threatening diarrhea was more frequent in the irinotecan-plus-cisplatin group than in the etoposide-plus-cisplatin group. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan plus cisplatin is an effective treatment for metastatic small-cell lung cancer.

[Medical treatment for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)].

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases with varying prognoses. In addition,the definitions of "resectable" or "unresectable" differ among countries and investigators. Therefore,no clear-cut consensus regarding the management of this disease has been established worldwide as of yet. Single-modality treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery alone show disappointing results, and therefore combined-modality treatments have been investigated for this disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for good-risk patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC. However, when including new agents for chemoradiotherapy, no optimal treatment has been established. A full dose of chemotherapy including new agents plus concurrent radiotherapy is considered impossible due to excessive toxicity. Consequently, split or reduced doses of chemotherapy are preferred in this setting. On the other hand, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, especially platinum-based combination chemotherapy,prolongs survival in patients with completely resected stage III NSCLC. However,the role of the addition of surgery to chemoradiotherapy and the role of molecular-target drugs are still controversial in the management of stage III NSCLC. In the future, many more well-designed clinical trials are warranted to improve the treatment outcome for stage III NSCLC.

[A case of legionella pneumonia associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute renal failure treated with methylprednisolone and sivelestat].

A 48-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and alcholic chronic pancreatitis was admitted to our hospital with fever and dyspnea. Chest x-ray film showed infiltration of the right upper lung field and blood exam demonstrated marked increase in CPK and renal dysfunction. Intravenous ceftriaxone sodium was started, but the next day, we started intravenous ciprofloxacin because the urine sample was positive for the Legionella antigen. Hemodialysis was started for acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis, and mechanical ventilation was introduced due to worsening of acute respiratory failure. Despite these treatments, bilateral infiltration on chest x-ray worsened, resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). After administration of intravenous pulse methylpredonisolone and sivelestat (neutrophil elastase inhibitor), the patient was successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. He was also removed from hemodialysis, and discharged from hospital with a good performance status 28 days later. The outcome in this case suggested that treatment with pulse steroid and sivelestat sodium in addition to antibiotics may be effective for Legionella pneumonia complicated by ARDS and acute renal failure.

[Perforation of the small intestine caused by metastasis from primary lung cancer: report of two cases and the discussion of 48 cases published in the Japanese literature].

Case 1 was a 62-year-old man who had performance status (PS) of 1 and stage IIIB adenocarcinoma of the lung. Because he showed progressive disease after induction chemoradiotherapy, he started to receive best supportive care alone. Three months after initial diagnosis, he complained of abdominal pain. As a result of computed tomography of the abdomen. He was diagnosed with abdominal pain probably caused by ileal perforation. An operation was undertaken and the surgical findings showed perforation by small intestine metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma. After the operation, he survived more than ten months. Case 2 was a 54-year-old man who had a PS of 3 and stage IV large cell carcinoma. After chemotherapy and sequential cranial radiotherapy, he developed anemia of unknown cause. He also complained of an abdominal pain during hospitalization and digestive tract perforation was diagnosed by a CT scan of the abdomen. He underwent surgery and the surgical findings showed a metastasis of large cell carcinoma in the small intestine. He died in a hospice two months after the operation. In the Japanese literature from 1983 to 2006. 48 operated cases with perforation caused by small intestine metastasis of lung cancer have been reported in full-length papers. Although the postoperative median survival time was 48 days, only one surgery-related death occurred. Patients who had a history of prior cancer treatment before surgery tended to achieve more prolonged survival compared to those who had not cancer treatment, probably due to poor PS. The preoperative PS may be one important prognostic factor in these patients.

A combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and irinotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that carboplatin plus etoposide is an effective and relatively non-toxic regimen in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Recently, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group reported that irinotecan plus cisplatin was more effective than etoposide plus cisplatin in the treatment of non-elderly patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC. Therefore, we conducted a prospective feasibility study designed specifically to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin (day 1) and irinotecan (days 1, 8, 15) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in elderly SCLC patients. METHODS: Three carboplatin AUC and irinotecan dose levels were used: 4 mg/ml x min and 50 mg/m2, respectively (level 1); 5 mg/ml x min and 50 mg/m2, respectively (level 2), and 5 mg/ml x min and 60 mg/m2, respectively (level 3). Although a phase I trial using this drug combination against non-SCLC performed at our institution found that the recommended dose was level 3, as the current trial included only elderly patients, the starting dose used was level 2. However, if a patient had history of prior chemotherapy, performance status (PS) of 2, or was aged 75 years or more, the dose administered was reduced by 1 level. If a patient had a PS of 0, the dose was increased by 1 level. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks, and patients aged 70 years or more with a PS of 0-2 were eligible. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, of which nine were given the level 1 dose, seven the level 2 dose, and two the level 3 dose. The patient group had a median age of 75 years, 8 patients had limited disease (LD) versus 10 with ED, 9 had received previous treatment for SCLC versus 9 previously untreated, and 13 had a PS of 0-1 versus 5 with a PS of 2. Seventeen (94%) patients received two or more cycles of chemotherapy, and the median actual delivery of irinotecan was 84% of the projected dose. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and diarrhea occurred in 50%, 33% and 6% of patients, respectively. Other toxicities were mild and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The response rate was 89%, with two complete responses and 14 partial responses. The median survival time was 13.3 months and the 1-year survival rate was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin and irinotecan with G-CSF support was an effective and non-toxic regimen in elderly SCLC patients and should be further evaluated in phase III trials.

Pilot study of concurrent etoposide and cisplatin plus accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy followed by irinotecan and cisplatin for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9903.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) significantly improved survival compared with etoposide and cisplatin (EP), in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a previous Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) randomized trial. JCOG9903 was conducted to evaluate the safety of sequentially given IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TRT) for the treatment of limited-stage SCLC (LSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Between October 1999 and July 2000, 31 patients were accrued from 10 institutions. Thirty patients were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. Treatment consisted of etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, and concurrent twice-daily TRT of 45 Gy beginning on day 2. The IP regimen started on day 29 and consisted of irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, with three 28-day cycles. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. The response rate was 97% (complete response, 37%; partial response, 60%). Median overall survival was 20.2 months; 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 76%, 41%, and 38%, respectively. Of the 24 patients who started the IP regimen, 22 received two or more cycles. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (67%), anemia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (4%). Nonhematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included diarrhea (8%), vomiting (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). Of the 20 patients with recurrence, none had local recurrence alone and only two had both local and distant metastasis as the initial sites of disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: IP following concurrent EP plus twice-daily TRT is safe with acceptable toxicities. A randomized phase III trial comparing EP with IP following EP plus concurrent TRT for LSCLC is ongoing (JCOG0202).

[Autopsy case of sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesothelioma].

A 61-year-old man with a sensation of chest compression was admitted to our hospital. He had hemothorax. After drainage with a chest tube, chest CT scan revealed multiple bilateral pulmonary nodules with slight pleural thickening. Open pleural biopsy was performed and the biopsy specimens showed tumor cells with sarcomatoid proliferation, but no definite epithelial pattern. Initial immunohistochemical staining was negative for keratin and carletinin, but positive for desmin, suggesting rhabdomyosarcoma. After supportive care, he died due to progression of the disease. Autopsy revealed extensive invasion suggesting mesothelioma, so the immunohistochemical staining was repeated. Because it revealed patchy staining for keratin and carletinin, this case was diagnosed as sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Differential diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma or rhabdomyosarcoma is made by immunohistochemical staining, but it is sometimes difficult. For the selection of the best treatment strategy for mesothelioma especially in the early stage, we should be aware of this difficulty.

Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with cisplatin and etoposide for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9104.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimal timing for thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a phase III study in which patients were randomized to sequential TRT or concurrent TRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 231 patients with LS-SCLC. TRT consisted of 45 Gy over 3 weeks (1.5 Gy twice daily), and the patients were randomly assigned to receive either sequential or concurrent TRT. All patients received four cycles of cisplatin plus etoposide every 3 weeks (sequential arm) or 4 weeks (concurrent arm). TRT was begun on day 2 of the first cycle of chemotherapy in the concurrent arm and after the fourth cycle in the sequential arm. RESULTS: Concurrent radiotherapy yielded better survival than sequential radiotherapy (P =.097 by log-rank test). The median survival time was 19.7 months in the sequential arm versus 27.2 months in the concurrent arm. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for patients who received sequential radiotherapy were 35.1%, 20.2%, and 18.3%, respectively, as opposed to 54.4%, 29.8% and 23.7%, respectively, for the patients who received concurrent radiotherapy. Hematologic toxicity was more severe in the concurrent arm. However, severe esophagitis was infrequent in both arms, occurring in 9% of the patients in the concurrent arm and 4% in the sequential arm. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that cisplatin plus etoposide and concurrent radiotherapy is more effective for the treatment of LS-SCLC than cisplatin plus etoposide and sequential radiotherapy.

Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: the Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: Few randomized trials have demonstrated survival benefit of combination chemotherapy involving new agents plus cisplatin compared with classic combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim of this study was to test whether docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) improves survival compared with vindesine plus cisplatin (VdsC) in patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, stage IV, chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 311) were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 3- or 4-week cycle, or vindesine 3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. Cross-over administration of docetaxel and vindesine was prohibited for both treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, 302 patients were eligible for evaluation. The DC arm demonstrated significant improvements compared with the VdsC arm in overall response rates (37% v 21%, respectively; P <.01) and median survival times (11.3 v 9.6 months, respectively; P =.014). Two-year survival rates were 24% for the DC arm compared with 12% for the VdsC arm. The physical domain of the Quality of Life for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs measure was significantly better in the DC arm than in the VdsC arm (P =.020). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more severe in the VdsC arm. CONCLUSION: As first-line treatment for stage IV NSCLC, DC resulted in greater clinical benefit in terms of response rate (with marked improvements in overall and 2-year survival rates) and quality of life than did treatment with VdsC.