Long-Term Outcomes in Breast Augmentation in Trans-Women: A 20-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation in trans-women requires special consideration and thorough preoperative planning. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present our long-term outcome and experience gained over the past 21 years. METHODS: Trans-women who have undergone breast augmentation since 1995 were reviewed for primary surgery, type of incision, implant site, implant size and shape, and revisions. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients with a follow-up of 4.6 years (range, 2.0-13.3) were included. In 112 patients (82.4%), the inframammary incision was chosen. Subpectoral implantation was performed in 70 patients (51.5%). Round breast implants (91 patients, 66.9%, P = 0.010) with low projection (103 patients, 75.7%, P < 0.001) were favored. The implant size used during 2011-2016 of 363.3 ± 97.3 cc was significantly increased as compared to the implant size reported during 1995-1999 (mean difference, +142.1 cc, P < 0.001) and 2000-2004 (mean difference, +113.5 cc, P < 0.001). Simultaneously, revision rates dropped significantly over time (52.9% during 1995-1999 as compared to 6.9% during 2011-2016, P < 0.001). Overall, request for larger implants was the most common indication for revision (13 patients, 9.4%) after 6 months (range, 4.0-18.7). At revision, implant volume was 355.4 ± 132.8 cc, showing significant increase of 107.0 ± 48.1 cc as compared to primary implants (+30.0%, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Request for larger breast implants was the most common reason for revision. Depending on the various degrees of breast tissue growth due to hormonal therapy, whenever applicable, we recommend round, low projection implants with a mean size of 360 cc in the prepectoral pocket.

Quality of Life Following Male-To-Female Sex Reassignment Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of persons who are born with primary and secondary male sexual characteristics but feel that they are female (trans women) is ca. 5.48 per 100 000 males in Germany. In this article, we provide a detailed overview of the currently available data on quality of life after male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. METHODS: This review is based on publications retrieved by a systematic literature search that was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases in March 2017. RESULTS: The 13 articles (11 quantitative and 2 mixed quantitative/qualitative studies) that were found to be suitable for inclusion in this review contained information on 1101 study participants. The number of trans women in each study ranged from 3 to 247. Their mean age was 39.9 years (range: 18-76). Seven different questionnaires were used to assess postoperative quality of life. The findings of the studies permit the conclusion that sex reassignment surgery beneficially affects emotional well- being, sexuality, and quality of life in general. In other categories (e.g., "freedom from pain", "fitness", and "energy"), some of the studies revealed worsening after the operation. All of the studies were judged to be at moderate to high risk of bias. The drop-out rates, insofar as they were given, ranged from 12% to 77% (median: 56%). CONCLUSION: Current studies indicate that quality of life improves after sex reassign- ment surgery. The available studies are heterogeneous in design. In the future, prospective studies with standardized methods of assessing quality of life and with longer follow-up times would be desirable.