Hemodynamic and Stress Response After Sound Intervention with Different Headphone Systems: A Double-Blind Randomized Study in Healthy Volunteers Working in the Health Care Sector.

Objectives: Two headphone systems using different sound systems were compared to investigate the effects of a sound intervention on cardiovascular parameters, indicators of stress, and subjective feelings. Methods: One hundred volunteers who work in the health care sector reporting elevated workplace-related stress were enrolled and randomized to a 12-min sound intervention (classical music) with either conventional headphones ("MEZE 99 Classic") or with the same-but internally modified-headphone (called "Lautsaenger"). Cardiovascular parameters were measured with the VascAssist2.0, both before and after sound interventions. In addition, participants were asked to complete questionnaires on burnout risk and emotions/stress. Results: The study population consisted mainly of female participants (n = 83), with the majority being students (42%). Median age was 32.5 years (range 21-71). In terms of cardiovascular parameters, a significant reduction in aortic pulse wave velocity, as measure of arterial stiffness, and heart rate was observed within both treatment arms. Both systolic blood pressure and arterial flow resistance were reduced by sound intervention, while these effects were only documented with Lautsaenger. Treatment groups were comparable in terms of subjective feedback by participants: a significant increase in emotional wellbeing was achieved with both headphone systems. Conclusions: A single short-term sound intervention seems to be able to achieve objective cardiovascular improvements in healthy volunteers reporting subjective symptoms of workplace-related stress, using two different headphone systems. Moreover, significant emotional improvement was reported within both arms. Trial Registration: ISRCTN registry 70947363, date of registration August 13, 2021.

Assessment and Evaluation of Psychosocial Distress in Outpatients with Cancer at a University Hospital in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients (pts) suffer from a significant amount of psychosocial distress related to tumor disease itself or straining treatments. Despite recommendations on how to screen for and to deal with psychosocial distress in cancer pts, data about implementation of psycho-oncological interventions (poi) in outpatient settings of cancer pts are scarce. The aim of this study was to identify outpatients with cancer in need of poi and to evaluate different assessment instruments. METHODS: N = 200 outpatients with hemat-/oncological malignancies were interviewed between October 2015 and December 2017 at the University Hospital Mannheim using the Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado) and the Hornheider Screening Instrument (HSI) - both clinician-administered assessment tools - followed by descriptive, univariate, and agreement analysis. RESULTS: N = 61 cancer pts (31%) were identified to be in need for poi considering the results of both questionnaires. The number of identified pts in need of poi was lower when analyzing the results of the PO-Bado (n = 42, 21%) and the HSI (n = 39, 20%) separately. The degree of agreement between the results of PO-Bado and HSI was low (kappa = 0.3655). Several factors like gender, age and diagnosis were identified to have significant impact on the need for poi (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study underlines that different screening instruments for psychosocial distress may identify disparate populations of cancer pts. The study data also revealed significant characteristics that might be associated with elevated levels of psychosocial distress and a clear indication for poi. However, further analyses on larger populations of cancer pts are needed to provide information how to transfer positive screening to poi in clinical routine.

Clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition and their molecular characterization in six patients with mismatch repair-deficient metastatic cancer of the digestive system.

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, depth and duration of clinical response is not uniform. We assessed tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a response marker in patients with GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Detailed clinical and response data were collected from six patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Efficacy was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Tumors and matched normal tissue were profiled by targeted next generation sequencing (127 gene panel, size 0.8 Mb). Impact of included mutation types, germline filtering methodology and different variant allele frequency thresholds on TMB estimation was assessed. RESULTS: Objective radiographic responses were observed in all six patients, and complete response was achieved in two of the six patients. Responses were durable (minimum 25 months). TMB estimates were clearly above the two recently reported cut-offs for metastatic colorectal cancer of 12 or 37 mutations per megabase for five of six patients, respectively, while one patient had borderline TMB elevation. TMB did not show an association with extent and duration of response but was influenced by included mutation types, germline filtering method and variant allele frequency threshold. CONCLUSION: Our case series confirms the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR GI cancers and illustrates the vulnerability of TMB as predictive marker in a subset of patients.