Anaesthesia praCtice for Caesarean dElivery Snapshot Study (ACCESS): Protocol and baseline characteristics of registered centres.

BACKGROUND: Specific guidelines to manage caesarean delivery anaesthesia are lacking. A European multicentre study, ACCESS investigates caesarean delivery anaesthesia management in European centres. In order to identify ACCESS participating centres, a registration survey was created. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current report is to describe the characteristics of ACCESS study participating centres, the rationale for the ACCESS study and the study methodology. DESIGN AND SETTING: The ACCESS study is a European multicentre cross-sectional study to describe anaesthesia management for caesarean delivery (CD) using a snapshot (2-week) design. The ACCESS registration survey gathered: contact details for National Coordinators (NC); Lead Investigators (LI) per centre; centre annual CD volume; expected no. of CD during 2-week snapshot window; centre practice information; data collection language. The ACCESS registration survey was launched July 2022 (Google Forms, Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and distributed through personal connections, national and international societies, social media networks, during Euroanaesthesia 2023, through the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care newsletter. RESULTS: The ACCESS registration survey identified Lead Investigators for 418 centres, in 32 countries, representing an anticipated number of 15,073 CD cases over the planned 12-month study period. A median (range) of 20 (2 to 400) CD cases are anticipated per centre during the 2-week snapshot window. Most 366/418 (87.6%) centres are small, ≤2000 annual CD cases, 42 are medium 2000-5000 cases and 10 are large, ≥5000 annual CD cases. Registered centres reported in 134 (32.0%) centres that anaesthesia for caesarean delivery is performed mostly by a specialist obstetric anaesthesiologist. CONCLUSION: The ACCESS registration survey revealed variability in volume and CD practice as well as training-levels and staffing among European countries. The ACCESS study (https://www.access-study.org/) aims to generate practice data to guide CD anaesthetic management strategies.

Israeli survey of anesthesia practice related to placenta previa and accreta.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia practices for placenta previa (PP) and accreta (PA) impact hemorrhage management and other supportive strategies. We conducted a survey to assess reported management of PP and PA in all Israeli labor and delivery units. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board waiver, we surveyed all 26 Israeli hospitals with a labor and delivery unit by directly contacting the representatives of obstetric anesthesiology services in every department (unit director or department chair). Each director surveyed provided information about the anesthetic and transfusion management in their labor and delivery units for three types of abnormal placentation based on antenatal placental imaging: PP, low suspicion for PA, and high suspicion for PA. The primary outcome was use of neuraxial or general anesthesia for PP and PA Cesarean delivery. Univariate statistics were used for survey responses using counts and percentages. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic mode for PP cases, used in 17/26 (65.4%) of labor and delivery units. By comparison, most representatives reported that they perform general anesthesia for patients with PA: 18/26 (69.2%) for all low suspicion cases of PA and 25/26 (96.2%) for all high suspicion cases of PA. Although a massive transfusion protocol was available in the majority of hospitals (84.6%), the availability of thromboelastography and cell salvage was much lower (53.8% and 19.2% hospitals respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our survey, representatives of anesthesia labor and delivery services in Israel are almost exclusively using general anesthesia for women with high suspicion for PA; however, almost two-thirds use spinal anesthesia for PP without suspicion of PA. Among representatives, we found wide variations in anesthesia practice patterns with regard to anesthesia mode, multidisciplinary management, and hemorrhage anticipation strategies.

Mode of anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery: secondary analysis from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Caesarean Registry.

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery is often performed by Caesarean section. We investigated modes of anaesthesia and risk factors for general anaesthesia among women undergoing preterm Caesarean delivery. METHODS: Women undergoing Caesarean delivery between 24(+0) and 36(+6) weeks' gestation were identified from a multicentre US registry. The mode of anaesthesia was classified as neuraxial anaesthesia (spinal, epidural, or combined spinal and epidural) or general anaesthesia. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristic, obstetric, and peripartum risk factors associated with general anaesthesia. RESULTS: Within the study cohort, 11 539 women had preterm Caesarean delivery; 9510 (82.4%) underwent neuraxial anaesthesia and 2029 (17.6%) general anaesthesia. In our multivariate model, African-American race [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.7-2.2], Hispanic ethnicity (aOR=1.5; 95% CI=1.2-1.8), other race (aOR=1.4; 95% CI=1.1-1.9), and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome or eclampsia (aOR=2.8; 95% CI=2.2-3.5) were independently associated with receiving general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery. Women with an emergency Caesarean delivery indication had the highest odds for general anaesthesia (aOR=3.5; 95% CI=3.1-3.9). For every 1 week decrease in gestational age at delivery, the adjusted odds of general anaesthesia increased by 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, nearly one in five women received general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery. Although potential confounding by unmeasured factors cannot be excluded, our findings suggest that early gestational age at delivery, emergent Caesarean delivery indications, hypertensive disease, and non-Caucasian race or ethnicity are associated with general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery.

Prospective longitudinal cohort questionnaire assessment of labouring women's preference both pre- and post-delivery for either reduced pain intensity for a longer duration or greater pain intensity for a shorter duration.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of labour pain focus on pain intensity, not on duration. We aimed to assess the importance labouring women apply to pain intensity and duration before labour and post-delivery. METHODS: Forty healthy women scheduled for labour induction were enrolled in this institutional review board-approved, prospective cohort study. Participants completed a pain preference questionnaire before active labour and within 24-h of delivery. The questionnaire consisted of seven stem questions that evaluated preference for pain intensity or duration. The pain preference ratio was determined by dividing the percentage of women who preferred reduced pain intensity for longer duration by that of those who preferred greater pain intensity for shorter duration (estimate of the odds). The overall hypothetical pain burden was determined by multiplying intensity by time. All questions presented the same overall hypothetical pain burden. RESULTS: Pain preference questionnaire scores demonstrated preference for low intensity pain for a longer duration rather than higher intensity for a shorter duration, both pre-labour (P<0.001) and post-delivery (P<0.001): the null median imputed as 3 of 6 (i.e. no preference for pain intensity over pain duration). This preference for pain duration over intensity was greater post-delivery compared with before labour (P=0.03). There was a significant correlation (r=0.83; P=0.04) between the pain preference ratio vs overall hypothetical pain burden before labour but not after delivery (r=0.28; P=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary labour assessment, women preferred lower pain intensity at the cost of longer pain duration. This suggests that pain intensity is the primary driver of hypothetical pain burden-a preference reinforced post-delivery.

Extended release formulations for local anaesthetic agents.

Systemic toxicity through overdose of local anaesthetic agents is a real concern. By encapsulating local anaesthetics in biodegradable carriers to produce a system for prolonged release, their duration of action can be extended. This encapsulation should also improve the safety profile of the local anaesthetic as it is released at a slower rate. Work with naturally occurring local anaestheticss has also shown promise in the area of reducing systemic and neurotoxicity. Extended duration local anaesthetic formulations in current development or clinical use include liposomes, hydrophobic based polymer particles such as Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres, pasty injectable and solid polymers like Poly(sebacic-co-ricinoleic acid) P(SA:RA) and their combination with synthetic and natural local anaesthetic. Their duration of action, rationale and limitations are reviewed. Direct comparison of the different agents is limited by their chemical properties, the drug doses encapsulated and the details of in vivo models described.

A multicenter interdisciplinary survey of practices and opinions regarding oral intake during labor.

INTRODUCTION: Different society guidelines diverge regarding oral intake in labor. Our goal was to assess practices and opinions in Israeli labor and delivery units, comparing different disciplines. METHODS: An anonymous Google Forms survey was sent to anesthesiologists, obstetricians and midwives in all Israeli labor and delivery units. RESULTS: Responses were collected from all 27 labor and delivery units contacted, with a total of 501 respondents comprising 161 anesthesiologists, 102 obstetricians and 238 midwives. Forty-eight per cent stated there were no institutional guidelines for oral intake. The most common oral intake permitted was light food (60%). Midwives were significantly more likely than anesthesiologists and obstetricians to consider that women who are both low risk for cesarean delivery (P <0.00001) and high risk for cesarean delivery (P=0.001) should eat. Epidural analgesia did not impact recommendations regarding oral intake. The most common reasons for restricting oral intake were obstetric. Sixty-two per cent identified aspiration as the main risk associated with eating during labor, but 19% of midwives compared with 4% of anesthesiologists and obstetricians stated there were no risks (P <0.00001). The annual delivery volume of the unit did not impact staff practices. CONCLUSIONS: There was a discrepancy between opinions and practices across all disciplines. Permissive practices identified in this survey should be addressed to find the safe middle ground between restrictive and permissive policies for low- and high-risk women.

The time is now: addressing the need for training in maternal critical care medicine.

Amongst many high-income countries, indirect medical conditions (e.g. cardiovascular disease, sepsis) now account for the majority of maternal deaths. In response to this concerning rise in indirect causes of maternal deaths, professional societies have developed guidelines that regionalize high-risk obstetric care and prioritize critical care expertise as a requirement for designated 'top' maternity hospitals. Critical care proficiency is mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for graduating obstetric anesthesiology fellows. Despite these requirements, no formal obstetric critical care educational curricula or fellowship pathways, combining critical care medicine and obstetric anesthesiology, currently exist. Dual subspecialty training in both obstetric anesthesiology and critical care medicine represents one strategy to improve the care of critically-ill obstetric patients and reduce maternal mortality and morbidity, which is one of the pressing healthcare issues of our time.

Outcomes of pregnancy and delivery in women with cardiac disease compared to matched healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: We compared pregnancy and delivery outcomes between women with cardiac disease versus matched healthy controls. The primary outcome was the frequency of unplanned cesarean delivery. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective case-control study, women with cardiac disease were identified and matched (1:2 ratio, according to maternal age, parity, number of prior cesareans, gestational age, delivery onset and fetal presentation) to healthy controls who delivered within the same year. Outcomes were frequency of unplanned cesarean delivery, complications during pregnancy and postpartum course, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve women with cardiac disease (exposed group, 225 deliveries) were identified and matched with 450 healthy women (controls, 2003-2014). The cohort comprised of 103 women (204 deliveries) with acquired heart disease (valve disease [n = 69], arrhythmia [n = 31], 3 with cardiomyopathy and peri/myocarditis, and 9 women (21 deliveries) with congenital heart disease. The frequency of unplanned cesarean was 14 (7.9%) for the exposed group as compared with 12 (3.4%) in controls with an odds ratio of 2.33 (95% CI = 1.0.2-5.32, p = .045). This difference was accentuated in a sub-group of women with severe cardiac disease (15% vs. 4.2% in matched control group, p = .028). Seventy-one (31.6%) exposed women exhibited obstetric and cardiovascular complications during pregnancy as compared with 65 (14.4%) controls, p < .001. Twenty-five (13.9%) exposed women experienced postpartum complications versus 26 (7.5%) in the control group (p = .019). Maternal ICU admission occurred in 13 (7.3%) of the exposed group as compared with only 2 (0.6%) in controls (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with a background cardiac condition, particularly those with severe disease, are at a higher risk for an unplanned cesarean delivery and other peripartum complications as compared with matched healthy controls.

A national Israeli survey of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery: pre-operative block assessment and intra-operative pain management.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial protocols for cesarean delivery differ among institutions, with various means of assessing the block prior to incision and managing breakthrough intra-operative pain. The different approaches used to deal with these issues in Israel have not been assessed. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to all anesthesiologists working in obstetric units in Israeli hospitals. The survey included several non-identifying respondent details intended to allow a description of the study population as a whole and multiple-choice questions addressing neuraxial techniques, method of pre-operative block assessment and medications used to treat intra-operative pain. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-one doctors completed the survey in 24 medical centers, an 81.1% response rate. Thirteen different protocols for spinal anesthesia and 20 different protocols for epidural anesthesia were described. Nine different protocols for assessment of the block prior to incision were identified, with significant inter-institutional differences (P <0.001). For treatment of intra-operative pain prior to delivery, 35.7% of spinals given and 40% of epidurals given were converted to general anesthesia whereas, after delivery, conversion of spinal to general anesthesia was 18% and epidural to general anesthesia was 18.6%. CONCLUSIONS: There were a variety of spinal and epidural regimens used as well as different methods for assessing the block and managing intra-operative pain. Further studies should be performed to identify optimal techniques for neuraxial anesthesia for pre-operative block assessment and for management of intra-operative pain.

A randomized trial to investigate needle redirections/re-insertions using a handheld ultrasound device versus traditional palpation for spinal anesthesia in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound may be useful to identify the spinal anesthesia insertion point, particularly when landmarks are not palpable. We tested the hypothesis that the number of needle redirections/re-insertions is lower when using a handheld ultrasound device compared with palpation in obese women undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: Study recruits were obese (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2) women with impalpable bony landmarks who were undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Women were randomized to ultrasound or palpation. The primary study outcome was a composite between-group comparison of total number of needle redirections (any withdrawal and re-advancement of the needle and/or introducer within the intervertebral space) or re-insertions (any new skin puncture in the same or different intervertebral space) per patient. Secondary outcomes included insertion site identification time and patient verbal numerical pain score (0-10) for comfort during surgical skin incision. RESULTS: Forty women completed the study. The mean BMI (standard deviation) for the ultrasound group was 39.8 (5.5) kg/m2 and for the palpation group 37.3 (5.2) kg/m2. There was no difference in the composite primary outcome (median (interquartile range) [range]) between the ultrasound group (4 (2-13) [2-22]) and the palpation group (6 (4-10) [1-17]) (P=0.22), with the 95% confidence interval of the difference 2 (-1.7 to 5.7). There were no differences in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld ultrasound did not demonstrate any advantages over traditional palpation techniques for spinal anesthesia in an obese population undergoing cesarean delivery, although the study was underpowered to show a difference.

Placenta accreta spectrum disorder: updates on anesthetic and surgical management strategies.

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a leading contributor to major obstetric hemorrhage and severe maternal morbidity in the developed world. In the United States, PAS has become the most common cause of peripartum hysterectomy. Over the last 40 years, clinicians have also witnessed a dramatic increase in the incidence of PAS. In the 1950s, the incidence of PAS was reported to be 0.03 per 1000 pregnancies. Recent epidemiological studies estimate that the PAS incidence is between 0.79 and 3.11 in 1000 pregnancies. As a consequence, obstetric anesthesiologists are increasingly likely to be called upon to manage women with suspected PAS for delivery. Given the increasing incidence and the morbidity burden associated with PAS, anesthesiologists play a vital role in optimizing maternal outcomes for women with PAS. This review will provide up-to-date information on nomenclature, pathophysiology, risk factors, antenatal detection, systemic preparations (includes timing of delivery, location of surgery, pre-operative evaluation and patient positioning), surgical and anesthetic approach, intra-operative management, invasive radiology and postoperative plans.

Randomized controlled trial of external cephalic version in term multiparae with or without spinal analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial analgesia significantly increases the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) among nulliparae. The study objective was to compare ECV success among multiparae with and without spinal analgesia. METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled trial performed over a pre-defined 6 yr period in a tertiary referral delivery suite. Healthy multiparae at term requesting ECV for breech presentation, without fetal or uterine anomaly, were enrolled after written informed consent. Women were randomized to receive either spinal analgesia (bupivacaine 7.5 mg) or no analgesia before the ECV. The primary outcome was successful conversion from breech to vertex presentation, confirmed by ultrasound. Visual analogue pain score and adverse outcomes (complications of anaesthesia or ECV) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed according to intention to treat using two-sided tests. RESULTS: Among 265 multiparae who underwent ECV, 65 consented to enrol, one subsequently refused ECV; therefore, data from 64 women were analysed. ECV was successful in 27 of 31 patients (87.1%) receiving spinal analgesia vs 19 of 33 (57.5%) with no analgesia (P=0.009; 95% CI of difference: 0.075-0.48). ECV with spinal analgesia reduced visual analogue pain score, mean (sd) 1.7 (2.4) vs 5.5 (2.9) without (P<0.0001). Maternal hypotension was seen after spinal analgesia in 10 of 31 (32%) (P=0.0003) and easily treated without adverse outcome. No complications were noted after the ECV. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of spinal analgesia significantly increased the rate of successful ECV among multiparae at term with increased patient comfort. The trial was registered at the National Institute of Health Trials Registry, NCT00119184, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

What's new in obstetric anesthesia in 2018?

The Gerard W. Ostheimer Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) is a one-year summary of the literature published in domains of interest to anesthesiologists who manage and care for obstetric patients. One individual is asked to review the literature and present the lecture. This manuscript summarizes aspects of the Gerard W. Ostheimer Lecture presented at the 2019 SOAP meeting; the relevant literature from 2018 was summarized. The topics included in this review are maternal morbidity, antibiotic prophylaxis, anaphylaxis, the Lancet series on increasing cesarean delivery rates, the Robson Ten-Group Classification System, pelvic floor disorders, timing of delivery in nulliparous women, placenta accreta disorders, anesthesia for cesarean delivery, labor analgesia (including parturients with thrombocytopenia and tattoos, and epidural maintenance with the programmed intermittent epidural bolus technique), ultrasound use in obstetric anesthesia, and drugs in pregnancy.

Post-traumatic stress disorder and postpartum depression and their reported association with recent labor and delivery: a questionnaire survey cohort.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the index traumatic event associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and evaluate the timing of the onset of symptoms in relation to the recent delivery. METHODS: Questionnaire study regarding prior exposure to traumatic events, PTSD, postpartum depression (PPD) and fear of childbirth among women two to 12 months postpartum, recruited via targeted internet sites. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 143 women, with PPD reported by 22 (15.4%), probable PTSD by 11 (7.7%), and fear of childbirth by 14 (9.8%). Overall, 97 (67.8%) women reported a prior traumatic event: 16 (16.5%) reported the recent delivery to be the worst traumatic event and that symptoms began subsequent to this delivery; 17 (17.5%) reported the worst traumatic event was not the recent delivery but symptoms had started postpartum. Significantly higher symptom levels suggestive of PTSD and PPD were found in women whose trauma event was not delivery, yet symptoms started postpartum. Women whose traumatic event pre-dated the delivery also showed significantly higher symptom levels of PTSD. More than half of those describing PTSD related to the recent delivery presented with clinically relevant levels of fear of childbirth, compared with less than a third of women whose PTSD was related to a different event. CONCLUSION: PTSD identified postpartum may not be linked to the recent delivery and often pre-dates it. Future studies should identify the trigger traumatic event responsible for PTSD symptoms, to enable a more accurate picture of the reasons for PTSD and fear of childbirth.

Antepartum continuous epidural ropivacaine therapy reduces uterine artery vascular resistance in pre-eclampsia: a randomized, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: No therapy is currently available to improve the reduced uteroplacental blood flow (UPBF) that characterizes pre-eclampsia. We hypothesized that sympathectomy induced by epidural local anaesthesia reduces uterine vascular resistance (which is inversely correlated with UPBF) in pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Ten pregnant women between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation with pre-eclampsia and uterine artery flow abnormalities were randomized to antepartum continuous epidural therapy (ACET) or control. ACET was initiated by a 5 day dose-ranging trial (ACET-1) of 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1% ropivacaine and saline placebo, each at 10 ml h(-1) for 24 h. Doses were randomized and double-blind. Doppler ultrasound indices of vascular resistance were assessed at baseline and after each 24 h dosing period in both uterine arteries. Subsequently, these ACET patients were administered 0.1% ropivacaine until delivery (ACET-2), with one additional randomized double-blind placebo day. RESULTS: Five patients were randomized to ACET. In each patient, one uterine artery exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in vascular resistance (P=0.035), a response that returned to baseline following placebo (P<0.001). The contralateral uterine artery exhibited either increased vascular resistance or no change. In all cases, the uterine artery that responded to ACET had higher baseline resistance than its pair (P=0.043). Baseline right-left difference in resistance between paired uterine arteries was greatly diminished following ACET. Although ACET patients had a mean (sd) duration to delivery of 19 (9) days compared with control 2 (1) days (P=0.008), this should be interpreted with caution because of demographic differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: ACET reduces uterine artery resistance in pre-eclampsia <32 weeks. Uteroplacental re-distribution is a novel observation and warrants further investigation.

Pulse oximeter perfusion index as an early indicator of sympathectomy after epidural anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The pulse oximeter perfusion index (PI) has been used to indicate sympathectomy-induced vasodilatation. We hypothesized that pulse oximeter PI provides an earlier and clearer indication of sympathectomy following epidural anesthesia than skin temperature and arterial pressure. METHODS: Forty patients received lumbar epidural catheters. Patients were randomized to receive either 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine or 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. PI in the toe, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and toe temperature were all assessed at baseline and at 5, 10 and 20 min following epidural anesthesia. The effect of epidural anesthesia over time was assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Additionally, we defined clinically evident sympathectomy criteria (a 100% increase in the PI, a 15% decrease in MAP and a 1 degrees C increase in toe temperature). The numbers of patients demonstrating these changes for each test were compared using the McNemar test for each time point. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects had photoplethysmography signals that met a priori signal quality criteria for analysis. By 20 min, PI increased by 326%, compared with a 10% decrease and a 3% increase in MAP and toe temperature, respectively. For PI 15/29, 26/29 and 29/29 of the subjects met the sympathectomy criteria at 5, 10 and 20 min, respectively, compared with 4/29, 6/29 and 18/29 for MAP changes and 3/29, 8/29 and 14/29 for toe temperature changes. CONCLUSIONS: PI was an earlier, clearer and more sensitive indicator of the development of epidural-induced sympathectomy than either skin temperature or MAP.

Walking reduces the post-void residual volume in parturients with epidural analgesia for labor: a randomized-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The post-void residual volume is higher among parturients who received epidural analgesia than those who received no or alternative analgesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded study was performed in a tertiary referral center labor suite. The post-void residual volume was measured by a transabdominal ultrasound following a voiding attempt. Healthy parturients with low-dose epidural analgesia in active labor were randomized either to walk to the toilet or to use a bedpan for voiding. The primary outcome measure (post-void residual volume in labor) was compared between the study groups. RESULTS: The toilet group (n=34) and the bedpan group (n=28) demonstrated similar post-void residual volumes (212 +/- 100 vs. 168 +/- 93 ml, P=0.289). Twenty patients (59%) randomized to the toilet group were unable to walk and actually voided in a bedpan. A secondary analysis was performed analyzing the groups as treated. The post-void residual volume was significantly lower in the actual toilet group (n=14, 63 +/- 24 ml) vs. the bedpan group (n=48, 229 +/- 200 ml), P=0.0052. Thirteen (93%) women who walked to the toilet managed to void before the ultrasound measurement vs. 20/48 (42%) using the bedpan, P=0.001. Fewer women who managed to walk to the toilet required urinary bladder catheterization during the labor than women who used the bedpan (6/14, 43% vs. 36/48, 75%) P=0.028. CONCLUSION: Women who were randomized to walk to the bathroom with epidural analgesia and were able to do so during labor had a significantly reduced post-void residual volume and a reduced requirement for urinary catheterization.

The comparative accuracy of a handheld and console ultrasound device for neuraxial depth and landmark assessment.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare the accuracy of epidural depth estimation of a handheld ultrasound device, with an integrated algorithm that estimates epidural depth (AU; Accuro, Rivanna Medical), to that of a console ultrasound machine (GU; GE LOGICTM S8). METHODS: Women requesting labor epidural analgesia consented to this prospective cohort study. The L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 interspaces and the respective depths to the epidural space were identified, marked and measured using an AU and GU. An anesthesia provider who was blinded to ultrasound depth measurements performed epidural analgesia at one of the ultrasound identified insertion points and recorded the Tuohy needle depth at loss-of-resistance. Bland Altman analysis was used to measure the agreement between the epidural depths measured by the AU and GU. RESULTS: A total of 47 women were analyzed. The mean ±â€¯standard deviation body mass index of the study cohort was 29 ±â€¯5 kg/m2 [range 23-45]. The mean difference between the epidural depths measured by the AU and GU was -0.29 cm [95% limit of agreement 0.50 to -0.91]. The mean difference between the depth to the epidural space measured by the GU versus the needle depth was -0.33 cm [95% CI -0.49 to -0.16]. The previously reported AU versus needle depth was -0.61 cm [95% CI -0.79 to -0.44]. CONCLUSION: The AU and GU provided comparable epidural depth estimates. The AU device may be a reasonable alternative to more sophisticated ultrasound devices in determining the epidural space and depth in a non-obese obstetric population.

A 10-year update: national survey questionnaire of obstetric anesthesia units in Israel.

BACKGROUND: This nationwide survey was conducted to provide data about the obstetric anesthesia services in Israeli labor and delivery units in 2016. METHODS: Prospective survey questionnaire was emailed to obstetric anesthesia unit directors/chairperson of all 25 labor and delivery services units within the jurisdiction of the Israeli Ministry of Health. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Nineteen (76%) units have dedicated anesthesiologist cover. Fifteen (60%) units offered nitrous oxide, four units (16%) offered patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl and six units (24%) offered patient-controlled intravenous remifentanil for alternative labor analgesia. The median (range) epidural rate was 60% (22-85%). The median (range) cesarean delivery rate was 20% (10-26%). Overall, general anesthesia was performed for median (range) 10% (1-25%) of cesarean deliveries. Neuraxial anesthesia was performed for 95% (40-99%) of elective and 60% (0-90%) of urgent cesarean deliveries. Intrathecal morphine was administered routinely for spinal anesthesia for post-cesarean delivery analgesia in 11 (44%) units. Nineteen (72%) units had a written aspiration prophylaxis protocol; 20 (80%) had a written labor analgesia protocol; 19 (76%) had a postdural puncture headache management protocol; 20 (80%) had a local anesthetic toxicity protocol; 24 units had Intralipid available in the unit. CONCLUSION: No new labor units have opened since 2005, despite huge increases in delivery volume in many units. These units manage increased numbers of epidurals and cesarean deliveries. Use of intrathecal morphine for spinal anesthesia has become more widespread. Future efforts should focus on availability of emergency equipment, separate obstetric anesthesia staffing, and establishing emergency protocols.