Performance and Safety of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Through Long-Term Follow-Up: Final Results From the Pivotal Study.

BACKGROUND: Substernal lead placement of the extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) permits both defibrillation at thresholds similar to those seen with transvenous ICDs and effective antitachycardia pacing (ATP), while avoiding the vasculature and associated complications. The global Pivotal study has shown the EV ICD system to be safe and effective through 6 months, but long-term experience has yet to be published. We aim to report the performance and safety of the EV ICD system throughout the study. METHODS: The EV ICD Pivotal study was a prospective, global, single-arm, pre-market clinical study. Individuals with a class I or IIa indication for a single-chamber ICD per guidelines were enrolled. Freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications, as well as appropriate and inappropriate therapy rates, were assessed through 3 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Anti-tachycardia pacing success was calculated using simple proportions. RESULTS: An implant was attempted in 316 patients [25.3% female, 53.8±13.1 years old, 81.6% primary prevention, LVEF 38.9%±15.4%]. Of 299 patients with a successful implant, 24 experienced 82 spontaneous arrhythmic episodes that were appropriately treated with either ATP only (38, 46.3%), shock only (34, 41.5%), or both (10, 12.2%) for a Kaplan-Meier-estimated rate of first any appropriate therapy of 9.2% at 3 years. Antitachycardia pacing was successful in 77.1% (37/48) of episodes, and ATP usage significantly increased from discharge to last follow-up visit (P<0.0001). Shock therapy was successful in 100% (27/27) of discrete, spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. The inappropriate shock rates at 1 and 3 years were 9.8% and 17.5%, respectively, with P-wave oversensing the predominant cause. No major intraprocedural complications were reported and the estimated freedom from system- or procedure-related major complications was 91.9% at 1 year and 89.0% at 3 years. The most common major complications were lead dislodgement (10 events; n=9 patients, 2.8%), postoperative wound or device pocket infection (n=8, 2.5%), and device inappropriate shock delivery (n=4, 1.3%). Twenty-four system revisions were performed as a result of major complications related to the EV ICD system or procedure. CONCLUSIONS: From implant to study completion, the EV ICD Pivotal study demonstrated that a single integrated system with an extravascular lead placed in the substernal space maintains high ATP success, effective defibrillation, and a consistent safety profile.

Efficacy and Safety of an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has a single lead implanted substernally to enable pause-prevention pacing, antitachycardia pacing, and defibrillation energy similar to that of transvenous ICDs. The safety and efficacy of extravascular ICDs are not yet known. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-group, nonrandomized, premarket global clinical study involving patients with a class I or IIa indication for an ICD, all of whom received an extravascular ICD system. The primary efficacy end point was successful defibrillation at implantation. The efficacy objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was greater than 88%. The primary safety end point was freedom from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months. The safety objective would be met if the lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the percentage of patients free from such complications was greater than 79%. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were enrolled, 316 of whom had an implantation attempt. Among the 302 patients in whom ventricular arrhythmia could be induced and who completed the defibrillation testing protocol, the percentage of patients with successful defibrillation was 98.7% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 96.6%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 88%); 299 of 316 patients (94.6%) were discharged with a working ICD system. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients free from major system- or procedure-related complications at 6 months was 92.6% (lower boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 89.0%; P<0.001 for the comparison with the performance goal of 79%). No major intraprocedural complications were reported. At 6 months, 25 major complications were observed, in 23 of 316 patients (7.3%). The success rate of antitachycardia pacing, as assessed with generalized estimating equations, was 50.8% (95% CI, 23.3 to 77.8). A total of 29 patients received 118 inappropriate shocks for 81 arrhythmic episodes. Eight systems were explanted without extravascular ICD replacement over the 10.6-month mean follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective global study, we found that extravascular ICDs were implanted safely and were able to detect and terminate induced ventricular arrhythmias at the time of implantation. (Funded by Medtronic; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04060680.).

Patient-reported quality of life and acceptance of the extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Results from pivotal study.

INTRODUCTION: The pivotal study of the extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) recently demonstrated primary efficacy and safety endpoints comparable to previous ICD systems. Patient experience with this novel device has not been reported. The current study examined the standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) metrics of quality of life (QOL) and patient acceptance of the device. METHODS: The EV ICD Pivotal Study was a prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized, global, premarket approval trial. Patients completed the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) QOL surveys at baseline and at 6 months following implant. Additionally, patients completed the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) QOL survey at 6 months. RESULTS: From baseline to 6 months, patients within the EV ICD Pivotal Study (n = 247) reported statistically significant SF-12 improvements in physical QOL (45.4 ± 9.4 vs. 46.8 ± 9.1 respectively, p = .020) and no changes in mental QOL (49.3 ± 10.4 vs. 50.5 ± 9.7, p = .061). No differences were noted by sex, atrial fibrillation, or the experience of ICD shock. EV ICD patients reported better total FPAS patient acceptance of their ICD than TV-ICD or S-ICD patients using historical norms comparisons (80.4 ± 15.7 vs. 70.2 ± 17.8, p < .0001 for S-ICD and 73.0 ± 17.4, p = .004 for TV-ICD). CONCLUSION: The initial PROs for EV ICD patients indicated that patients had improvements in physical QOL from baseline to 6-month follow-up and markedly better overall acceptance of their ICD compared to a previous study with S-ICD and TV-ICD data. These initial results suggest that the EV ICD is evaluated positively by patients.

Comprehensive analysis of substernal lead removal: experience from EV ICD Pilot, Pivotal, and Continued Access Studies.

AIMS: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, but little is known about EV ICD lead removal in humans. This analysis aimed to characterize the EV ICD lead removal experience thus far. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective analysis of lead removals from the EV ICD Pilot, Pivotal, and Continued Access Studies. Patients with a successful EV ICD implant who underwent lead removal were included. The main objective was lead removal success. Ancillary objectives included characterizing technique used, procedure complications, and reimplantation status. An EV ICD system was successfully implanted in 347 patients across the 3 studies (25.9% female; 53.4 ± 13.3 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 39.7 ± 15.9). Of these patients, 29 (8.4%) underwent lead removal with a mean lead dwell time of 12.6 ± 14.3 months (0.2-58.4). The main reason for lead removal was lead dislodgement (n = 9, 31.0%). Lead removal was successful in 27/29 (93.1%) cases [100% (19/19) success rate <1 year and 80% (8/10) success rate >1 year post-implant]. Simple traction was used in 22/26 (84.6%) and extraction tools in 4/26 (15.4%) successful cases where technique was known. No complications were reported for any of the removal procedures. All 11 EV ICD reimplant attempts were successful. CONCLUSION: Complete removal of the EV ICD lead was successful in 93.1% of cases, and simple traction was sufficient in most instances. Based on these results, lead removal from the substernal space was safe and achievable up to 3 years post-implant.

The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: The pivotal study plan.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (TV ICD) provide life-saving therapy for millions of patients worldwide. However, they are susceptible to several potential short- and long- term complications including cardiac perforation and pneumothorax, lead dislodgement, venous obstruction, and infection. The extravascular ICD system's novel design and substernal implant approach avoids the risks associated with TV ICDs while still providing pacing features and similar generator size to TV ICDs. STUDY DESIGN: The EV ICD pivotal study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, nonrandomized, premarket clinical study designed to examine the safety and acute efficacy of the system. This study will enroll up to 400 patients with a Class I or IIa indication for implantation of an ICD. Implanted subjects will be followed up to approximately 3.5 years, depending on when the patient is enrolled. OBJECTIVE: The clinical trial is designed to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the EV ICD system in human use. The safety endpoint is freedom from major complications, while the efficacy endpoint is defibrillation success. Both endpoints will be assessed against prespecified criteria. Additionally, this study will evaluate antitachycardia pacing performance, electrical performance, extracardiac pacing sensation, asystole pacing, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, as well as a summary of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The EV ICD pivotal study is designed to provide clear evidence addressing the safety and efficacy performance of the EV ICD System.

Performance of Multiple-Batch Approaches to Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Testing for Orally Inhaled Drug Products with Batch-to-Batch Variability.

Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of orally inhaled drug products has been documented and can render single-batch PK bioequivalence (BE) studies unreliable; results from one batch may not be consistent with a repeated study using a different batch, yet the goal of PK BE is to deliver a product comparison that is interpretable beyond the specific batches used in the study. We characterized four multiple-batch PK BE approaches to improve outcome reliability without increasing the number of clinical study participants. Three approaches include multiple batches directly in the PK BE study with batch identity either excluded from the statistical model ("Superbatch") or included as a fixed or random effect ("Fixed Batch Effect," "Random Batch Effect"). A fourth approach uses a bio-predictive in vitro test to screen candidate batches, bringing the median batch of each product into the PK BE study ("Targeted Batch"). Three of these approaches (Fixed Batch Effect, Superbatch, Targeted Batch) continue the single-batch PK BE convention in which uncertainty in the Test/Reference ratio estimate due to batch sampling is omitted from the Test/Reference confidence interval. All three of these approaches provided higher power to correctly identify true bioequivalence than the standard single-batch approach with no increase in clinical burden. False equivalence (type I) error was inflated above the expected 5% level, but multiple batches controlled type I error better than a single batch. The Random Batch Effect approach restored 5% type I error, but had low power for small (e.g., <8) batch sample sizes using standard [0.8000, 1.2500] bioequivalence limits.

Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Robustness of Modified Chi-Square Ratio Statistic for Cascade Impactor Equivalence Testing Through Monte Carlo Simulations.

The objective of this work was to study the performance of the modified chi-square ratio statistic (mCSRS test) proposed for cascade impactor (CI) profile equivalence testing. The test (T) and reference (R) CI profile datasets were generated from different typical CI profile patterns either with or without inter-site correlation (ISC) through Monte Carlo simulations. The mCSRS test pass rate outcome employing previously published critical values was compared with that of critical values derived from different types of datasets. The influence of number of bootstrap iterations (B) on the consistency of the outcome was assessed within the range of 10-10,000 iterations. Power curves were constructed to study the effect of differences in T and R mean stage deposition, T/R variance ratios, differences between T and R profiles in high/low deposition sites, and sample size on the performance of the mCSRS test. The derived critical values exhibited trends based on R product variability: M1 rank-ordered without ISC (at low variability) and the previously published M8 critical values (at high variability) resulted in lowest pass rate outcomes. The precision of the outcome did not increase considerably beyond B = 2000 (default). The probability of showing equivalence between T and R CI profiles increased with (1) a decrease in mean deposition differences, (2) a decrease in T product variability, and (3) an increase in sample size. The mCSRS outcome is less sensitive to low deposition sites that are prone to analytical variability. In conclusion, the mCSRS test is a sensitive and robust method under most conditions.

Performance of the Population Bioequivalence (PBE) Statistical Test with Impactor Sized Mass Data.

This article extends previous work studying performance characteristics of the population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical test recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orally inhaled and nasal drug products. Based on analysis of a metered dose inhaler database for impactor sized mass, a simulation study was designed to compare performance of the recommended PBE approach with several modified or alternative approaches. These included an extended PBE that separately modeled within-batch (can) and between-batch (batch) variability and average bioequivalence (ABE) tests that modeled with or without between-batch variability and with or without log-transformation. This work showed that separately modeling within- and between-batch variability while increasing the number of sampled batches addressed previously identified issues of the PBE approach when between-batch variability was present, namely, (a) increased risk for falsely concluding equivalence and (b) low probability of correctly concluding equivalence. The same modifications were also required of the ABE to achieve expected performance. However, these modifications did not successfully address the issue of equivalence conclusions that depended on the direction of product mean differences (asymmetric performance). This work highlights the importance of understanding decision-making error rates in developing regulatory recommendations to standardize bioequivalence outcomes across products.

Cascade Impactor Equivalence Testing: Comparison of the Performance of the Modified Chi-Square Ratio Statistic (mCSRS) with the Original CSRS and EMA's Average Bioequivalence Approach.

The performances of three statistical approaches for assessing in vitro equivalence was evaluated with a set of 55 scenarios of realistic test (T) and reference (R) cascade impactor (CI) profiles (originally employed by the Product Quality Research Institute to evaluate the chi-square ratio statistic: CSRS) by comparing the outcomes against experts' opinion (surrogate for the truth). The three methods were (A) a stepwise aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) equivalence test integrating population bioequivalence (PBE) testing of impactor-sized mass (ISM) with the CSRS (PBE-CSRS approach), previously suggested by the USFDA; (B) the combination of PBE testing of single actuation content and ISM with the newly suggested modified CSRS (PBE-mCSRS approach), a method employing reference variance scaling; and (C) EMA's average bioequivalence (ABE approach). Based on Monte-Carlo simulations, both PBE-CSRS and ABE approaches resulted in high misclassification rates, the former with highest false-pass rate and the latter with highest false-fail rate at both ≥ 50% and ≥ 80% classification threshold values (the % of simulations or experts necessary to judge a given scenario as equivalent). Based on DeLong's tests, the PBE-mCSRS approach showed significantly better overall agreement with experts' opinion compared to the other approaches. Comparison of CSRS with mCSRS (both without PBE) suggested that the more discriminatory characteristics of the mCSRS method is based on the integration of variance scaling into the mCSRS method. Contrary to the ABE approach, the application of PBE-mCSRS approach for assessing APSD profiles of three dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations supported the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence assessment of these formulations.

Performance of the Population Bioequivalence (PBE) Statistical Test Using an IPAC-RS Database of Delivered Dose from Metered Dose Inhalers.

This article reports performance characteristics of the population bioequivalence (PBE) statistical test recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orally inhaled products. A PBE Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) assembled and considered a database comprising delivered dose measurements from 856 individual batches across 20 metered dose inhaler products submitted by industry. A review of the industry dataset identified variability between batches and a systematic lifestage effect that was not included in the FDA-prescribed model for PBE. A simulation study was designed to understand PBE performance when factors identified in the industry database were present. Neglecting between-batch variability in the PBE model inflated errors in the equivalence conclusion: (i) The probability of incorrectly concluding equivalence (type I error) often exceeded 15% for non-zero between-batch variability, and (ii) the probability of incorrectly rejecting equivalence (type II error) for identical products approached 20% when product and between-batch variabilities were high. Neglecting a systematic through-life increase in the PBE model did not substantially impact PBE performance for the magnitude of lifestage effect considered. Extreme values were present in 80% of the industry products considered, with low-dose extremes having a larger impact on equivalence conclusions. The dataset did not support the need for log-transformation prior to analysis, as requested by FDA. Log-transformation resulted in equivalence conclusions that depended on the direction of product mean differences. These results highlight a need for further refinement of in vitro equivalence methodology.

Comparison of systemic pharmacodynamic effects of two combination pressurized metered dose inhalers that deliver salmeterol and fluticasone propionate.

AIM: The aim of this study was to test the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the salmeterol component of two pressurized metered dose inhalers that delivered a combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (SM/FP). METHODS: This was a six-way crossover study in 43 adult subjects, using a single blind design (subject blinded to product and clinical assessor blinded for all measurements). Each subject received single doses of two, six, and twelve inhalations from test and reference products that delivered SM/FP as 25/125 mcg per inhalation. Heart rate, QTcB, and plasma potassium and glucose were monitored over 6 h. RESULTS: Safety equivalence was shown by relative potency analysis for primary endpoints of maximum heart rate and maximum QTcB, since the 90% confidence intervals for both endpoints were within the acceptance limit of (0.67, 1.50). There were six secondary analyses for relative potency and equivalence was met for five of these endpoints. There were also 18 pairwise comparisons performed at each dose level. No statistical differences (95% confidence intervals included zero) among these pairwise comparisons were seen at the two-inhalation dose (therapeutic dose) or the six-inhalation dose. At the supratherapeutic dose of twelve inhalations, the test product was either comparable to or statistically less than that of the reference product for all comparisons. Overall, the results demonstrated comparable systemic safety. No differences were seen between the products in reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The safety equivalence of the systemic pharmacodynamic effects of the SM component of the test and reference SM/FP products was demonstrated.

Relationship of reverse anatomical remodeling and ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) affects reverse anatomical remodeling in patients with heart failure. CRT has also been associated with fewer ventricular arrhythmias and reduced sudden death in some clinical trials, but the predictors and mechanism of the antiarrhythmic actions of CRT have not been well defined. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship of reverse anatomical remodeling to ventricular arrhythmias in CRT patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective analysis was performed of the InSync III Marquis study, a prospective, randomized, multicenter CRT trial. Echocardiographic data from 198 patients were obtained at baseline and after 6 months of CRT, and anatomical responders were defined as a reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) of >or=15%. Anatomical responders (n = 71, 36%) demonstrated 29% fewer single premature ventricular contractions beats (PVCs) (P = 0.0001), 48% fewer PVC runs (p = 0.0096), and fewer treated episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) (P = 0.050) than nonresponders. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that responder status significantly predicted single PVCs and PVC runs. Gender was the most important predictor of treated VT/VF with females having no episodes over 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic responders to CRT demonstrate significantly fewer single PVCs and runs of PVCs. The implication of these observations is that anatomic remodeling is linked to electrical remodeling.

Atrial fibrillation therapy in patients with a CRT defibrillator with wireless telemetry.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with congestive heart failure. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this international, prospective multicenter study were to evaluate the efficacy of atrial shock therapy in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and to evaluate the safety of the new CRT-D. The effectiveness of a new wireless telemetry system was also evaluated. METHODS: A total of 282 patients, without permanent AF, who had indications for a CRT-D were included. Atrial shock therapy was tested on both spontaneous and induced AF episodes. The effectiveness of the Medtronic wireless telemetry system (Conexus; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was also tested. Secondary endpoints included the heart failure Clinical Composite Response, system performance evaluation, and adverse event summary. RESULTS: Atrial shock therapy was successful in 168 of 171 episodes (98.2%). Of these, 138 episodes were induced and 33 were spontaneous. Successful cardioversion occurred in 137 of the 138 induced-AF episodes (86.1% with 12 joule (J), 13.1% with 24 J, and 0.7% with 35 J). During the first 3 months of implant, there were 43 system-related complications in 37 subjects out of 278 subjects. There were 1,999 Conexus telemetry uses recorded during this study. This includes 282 uses during the implant procedure. There were no cases of complete loss of telemetry or any adverse events reported using this system. CONCLUSION: We achieved an atrial shock efficacy of 98.2% in patients who met standard CRT-D indications. The wireless telemetry performed well with no reported unanticipated adverse device effects.

Percent ventricular pacing with managed ventricular pacing mode in standard pacemaker population.

AIMS: Unnecessary right ventricular pacing has deleterious effects and becomes more significant when cumulative percent ventricular pacing (Cum%VP) exceeds 40% of time. The Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) mode has been shown to significantly reduce the percent ventricular pacing compared to the DDD/R mode. This study assessed the percent of ventricular pacing in a standard pacemaker population programmed to MVP and for which patients it is possible to achieve a Cum%VP < or = 40%. METHODS AND RESULTS: Unselected, consecutive patients were implanted with a dual chamber pacemaker with a mean follow-up period of 76 days. The Cum%VP was calculated from device diagnostics between pre-hospital discharge (PHD) and the 1-month post implant visit. The median Cum%VP of 107 patients (age 67.2 +/- 14 years; 53% male) who were programmed to MVP was 3.9%. The median Cum%VP was 1.4% in patients with sinus node disease (SND) and 28.8% in patients with AV block (AVB). Cum%VP < or = 40% was observed in 72% of all patients, in 50% of AVB patients, and in 86% of SND patients. CONCLUSION: The MVP mode is capable of achieving a low percent of ventricular pacing in a standard pacemaker population with SND and AVB. In addition, 72% of patients in MVP mode demonstrated Cum%VP < or = 40%.