RESUMO
Background. Silica nanoparticles found in sugarcane ash have been postulated to be a toxicant contributing to chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu). However, while the administration of manufactured silica nanoparticles is known to cause chronic tubulointerstitial disease in rats, the effect of administering sugarcane ash on kidney pathology remains unknown. Here we investigate whether sugarcane ash can induce CKD in rats. Methods. Sugarcane ash was administered for 13 weeks into the nares of rats (5 mg/day for 5d/week), and blood, urine and kidney tissues were collected at 13 weeks (at the end of ash administration) and in a separate group of rats at 24 weeks (11 weeks after stopping ash administration). Kidney histology was evaluated, and inflammation and fibrosis (collagen deposition) measured. Results. Sugarcane ash exposure led to the accumulation of silica in the kidneys, lungs, liver and spleen of rats. Mild proteinuria developed although renal function was largely maintained. However, biopsies showed focal glomeruli with segmental glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis that tended to worsen even after the ash administration had been stopped. Staining for the lysosomal marker, LAMP-1, showed decreased staining in ash administered rats consistent with lysosomal activation. Conclusion. Sugarcane ash containing silica nanoparticles can cause CKD in rats.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND & HYPOTHESIS: KDIGO recommends proteinuria <1 g/d as a treatment target in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) because of high-risk of progression to kidney failure. However, long-term kidney outcomes in patients with low-grade proteinuria remain insufficiently studied. METHODS: We enrolled patients with biopsy-proven primary IgAN from the Swedish Renal Registry and analyzed associations between urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR, in categories < 0.3, ≥0.3-0.5, ≥0.5-1.0, ≥1.0-1.5, ≥1.5-2.0 and ≥ 2.0 g/g) and the occurrence of major adverse kidney events (MAKE, a composite of kidney replacement therapy [KRT] and > 30% decline in eGFR). We also explored the risk of kidney events associated with change in uACR within a year. RESULTS: We included 1269 IgAN patients (74% men, median 53 years, mean eGFR 33 mL/min/1.73m², median uACR 0.7 g/g). Over median follow-up of 5.5 [2.8;9.2] years, 667 MAKE and 517 KRT events occurred, and 528 patients experienced > 30% eGFR decline. Compared with uACR < 0.3 g/g, any higher uACR category was strongly and incrementally associated with the risk of MAKE (adjusted HR ranging from 1.56 [95%CI 1.14-2.14] if uACR 0.3-0.5 g/g to 4.53 [3.36-6.11] if uACR ≥ 2.0 g/g), KRT (HR ranging from 1.39 to 4.65), and eGFR decline > 30% (HR ranging from 1.76 to 3.47). In 785 patients who had repeated uACR measurements within a year, and compared with stable uACR, the risk of kidney events was lower if uACR decreased by 2-fold (HR ranging from 0.47 to 0.49), and higher if uACR increased by 2-fold (HR from 1.18 to 2.56), irrespective of baseline uACR. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial risk of adverse kidney outcomes among patients with IgAN and uACR between 0.3 and 1.0 g/g, a population currently considered at low-risk of CKD progression. Reduction in uACR is associated with better kidney outcomes, irrespective of baseline uACR.
RESUMO
Background: Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, few have investigated the impact of CKD stage and dialysis modality. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association between CKD stage, dialysis modality and risk of severe COVID-19. Secondly, we aimed to study the impact of comorbidities and drugs on the risk of severe COVID-19 in the CKD population. Methods: This nationwide observational study was based on data from the Swedish Renal Registry and three other national registries. Patients with non-dialysis CKD stage 3b-5 or dialysis on 1 January 2020 were included and followed until 31 December 2021. The primary outcome was COVID-19 hospitalization; the secondary outcome was COVID-19 mortality. Associations were investigated using logistic regression models, adjusting for confounders. Results: The study population comprised 7856 non-dialysis CKD patients and 4018 dialysis patients. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality were highest in the dialysis group [aOR 2.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79-2.81; aOR 3.10, Cl 95% 2.03-4.74], followed by CKD 4 (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.68; aOR 1.66, Cl 95% 1.07-2.57), as compared with CKD 3b. No difference in COVID-19 outcomes was observed between patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Overall comorbidity burden was one of the strongest risk factors for severe COVID-19 and the risk was also increased in patients prescribed insulin, proton pump inhibitors, diuretics, antiplatelets or immunosuppressants. Conclusions: Worsening CKD stage and comorbidity are independent risk factors for severe COVID-19 in the Swedish CKD population.