Open label trial of alefacept in palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPP) is difficult to treat. We assessed the effectiveness of alefacept in PPP and the safety of a 30 mg/week dose. METHODS: Fifteen individuals with PPP were started on 15 mg/week intramuscularly (IM) alefacept. Efficacy was measured by the PPP severity instrument (PSI). Treatment was continued for 16 weeks, and the alefacept dose was increased to 30 mg/week IM at week 9 if the PSI did not decrease by at least 25%. Other outcomes included physician's global assessment (PGA), reported adverse events and CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. Clinical response was observed for 12 weeks after the last injection. RESULTS: The severity of PPP improved in both the PSI and the PGA (p<0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Much of the improvement occurred after 10 weeks of therapy. Nail severity scores improved (p = 0.0003). CD4+ counts decreased, but all remained >250 cells/mm3. There were no severe adverse effects or discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Alefacept in doses up to 30 mg/week was well tolerated in patients with PPP and appeared to have some efficacy. The use of concomitant therapy, the lack of a comparator, and the small sample size are limitations of the study.

Lack of efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% for treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study.

Pruritus is a common and disabling symptom for patients undergoing hemodialysis. Many topical and systemic treatments have been used for uremic pruritus, mostly in anecdotal reports. A recent case series demonstrated that topical tacrolimus ointment 0.03% had a significant antipruritic effect for patients with uremia. In an attempt to confirm these findings, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study to assess the efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% for the treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus. The results of this study do not demonstrate that tacrolimus ointment 0.1% is more effective than vehicle in relieving uremic pruritus.

Pilot study of the effect of ultraviolet light on pain and mood in fibromyalgia syndrome.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of effective systemic or adequate symptomatic treatment for pain associated with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Anecdotes suggest ultraviolet (UV) light may be of some benefit. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to determine if UV is effective in ameliorating chronic pain in persons with FMS. METHODS: Nineteen subjects with FMS were enrolled in a controlled trial of UV and non-UV (control) tanning beds for 2 weeks, followed by randomization to receive UV or non-UV (control) exposure for 6 additional weeks. A follow-up interview was conducted 4 weeks after the last treatment. Pain was assessed with an 11-point numerical pain rating (Likert scale), a visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Mood variables were also assessed. RESULTS: During the initial 2 weeks when subjects received both UV and non-UV (control) exposures, the 11-point Likert scale pain score decreased 0.44 points after exposure to UV from pre-exposure levels (S.E. = .095). Additionally, UV exposure resulted in greater positive affect, well-being, relaxation, and reduced pain levels when compared to non-UV (control) exposure (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.80, p = 0.0059). Following the randomized treatment period, there was slight improvement in pain as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire in the UV group compared to the non-UV (control) group (12.2 versus 14.1; p = 0.049); the other pain scales yielded nonsignificant results. Assessment 4 weeks after the last treatment showed no significant differences in scores in the adjusted means for outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this pilot study suggest that tanning beds may have some potential in reducing pain in persons with FMS.