Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 35(1): 83-7, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26563894

RESUMO

DNA-based techniques are frequently used to confirm the relatedness of putative outbreak isolates. These techniques often lack the discriminatory power when analyzing closely related microbes such as E. coli. Here the value of Raman spectroscopy as a typing tool for E. coli in a clinical setting was retrospectively evaluated.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Escherichia coli/classificação , Análise Espectral Raman/métodos , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Escherichia coli/química , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Arch Dis Child ; 94(9): 705-7, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19395401

RESUMO

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial pathogen causing sexually transmitted infections in Dutch adults. As prenatal screening for C trachomatis and treatment of pregnant women is not routine practice in The Netherlands, perinatal transmission of C trachomatis may therefore occur. The presence of C trachomatis in infants less than 6 months of age who presented with respiratory complaints to the Erasmus MC-Sophia hospital was evaluated. Respiratory specimens, primarily nasopharyngeal swabs, were tested for C trachomatis, respiratory viruses and Mycoplasma pneumoniae using PCR, viral isolation in cell cultures and direct immunofluorescence. C trachomatis respiratory tract infection was confirmed to be relatively common with detection in 10 of 148 (7%) infants tested. C trachomatis had not been tested for by the attending physicians, but was the second most frequently detected respiratory pathogen after human Respiratory Syncitial Virus, which was found in 41 (28%) infants.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/transmissão , Feminino , Técnica Direta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Masculino , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Países Baixos , Pneumonia por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 43(9): 4684-90, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145127

RESUMO

The success of large-scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis depends on the availability of noninvasive samples, low costs, and high-quality testing. To evaluate C. trachomatis testing with pregnant women, first-void urine specimens from 750 consecutive asymptomatic pregnant women from the Rotterdam area (The Netherlands) were collected. Initially, we investigated the performance of three different DNA isolation methods with 350 of these urines and 70 pools of 5 of the same subset of urine samples. The routinely used COBAS AMPLICOR test was compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR test with prior DNA isolation by use of the MagNA Pure large-volume kit and the MagNA Pure bacterial DNA isolation kit. The latter combination provided the best DNA test for pooled urines, with a sensitivity twice that of the other methods. Next, using all 750 urines, the COBAS AMPLICOR performance for individual testing was compared to pooled testing with the standard COBAS AMPLICOR procedure and subsequently to pooled testing with COBAS AMPLICOR in combination with the MagNA Pure bacterial DNA isolation kit. The sensitivity of COBAS AMPLICOR was 65% on individual and 42% on pooled urines but improved to 92% on pooled urines with the MagNA Pure bacterial DNA isolation kit, making this combination the best screening method. The C. trachomatis prevalence in this population appeared to be 6.4%. Additionally, the cost of the combined MagNA Pure bacterial DNA isolation kit and COBAS AMPLICOR method on pooled urines was only 56% of the cost of the standard COBAS AMPLICOR test applied to individual urines. Costs per positive case detected in the combined method were 39% of standard costs.


Assuntos
Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Urina/microbiologia , Automação , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Chlamydia trachomatis/genética , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Países Baixos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/economia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA