Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urban Health ; 91(1): 107-21, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23917943

RESUMO

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) now recommends screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) as part of routine preventive services for women. However, there is a lack of clarity as to the most effective methods of screening and referral. We conducted a 3-year community-based mixed-method participatory research project involving four community health centers that serve as safety net medical providers for a predominately indigent urban population. The project involved preparatory work, a multifaceted systems-level demonstration project, and a sustainability period with provider/staff debriefing. The goal was to determine if a low-tech system-level intervention would result in an increase in IPV detection and response in an urban community health center. Results highlight the challenges, but also the opportunities, for implementing the new USPSTF guidelines to screen all women of childbearing years for intimate partner violence in resource-limited primary care settings.


Assuntos
Centros Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Parceiros Sexuais , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Philadelphia , Fatores de Risco , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Mens Health ; 5(1): 47-56, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20413382

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the perspectives of fathering staff regarding domestic violence (DV) perpetration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 85 fathering staff members was conducted to identify behaviors and barriers regarding inquiry about DV perpetration. RESULTS: Almost half (47.1%) of the surveyed staff reported never having identified DV perpetration. Routine inquiry was less likely if staff perceived low prevalence rates among their clients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.11, p = .001), did not have standard ways of asking (OR = 0.11, p < .001), or if they had never identified family violence before (OR = 0.07, p < .001). Increased years as a provider (OR = 6.62, p = .001) and DV training (OR = 7.29, p = .003) increased rates of DV perpetration inquiry. CONCLUSIONS: Staff of fathering agencies do not routinely screen for DV perpetration likely due to the interplay between individual and agency-level barriers. Appropriate training interventions can address identified barriers.


Assuntos
Redes Comunitárias , Violência Doméstica/prevenção & controle , Pai , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Poder Familiar , Philadelphia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA