Association Between Use of a Flying Intervention Team vs Patient Interhospital Transfer and Time to Endovascular Thrombectomy Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in Nonurban Germany.

Importance: The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke is highly time-dependent, and it is challenging to expedite treatment for patients in remote areas. Objective: To determine whether deployment of a flying intervention team, compared with patient interhospital transfer, is associated with a shorter time to endovascular thrombectomy and improved clinical outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a nonrandomized controlled intervention study comparing 2 systems of care in alternating weeks. The study was conducted in a nonurban region in Germany including 13 primary telemedicine-assisted stroke centers within a telestroke network. A total of 157 patients with acute ischemic stroke for whom decision to pursue thrombectomy had been made and deployment of flying intervention team or patient interhospital transfer was initiated were enrolled between February 1, 2018, and October 24, 2019. The date of final follow-up was January 31, 2020. Exposures: Deployment of a flying intervention team for EVT in a primary stroke center vs patient interhospital transfer for EVT to a referral center. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time delay from decision to pursue thrombectomy to start of the procedure in minutes. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome after 3 months, determined by the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale score (a disability score ranging from 0 [no deficit] to 6 [death]). Results: Among the 157 patients included (median [IQR] age, 75 [66-80] y; 80 [51%] women), 72 received flying team care and 85 were transferred. EVT was performed in 60 patients (83%) in the flying team group vs 57 (67%) in the transfer group. Median (IQR) time from decision to pursue EVT to start of the procedure was 58 (51-71) minutes in the flying team group and 148 (124-177) minutes in the transfer group (difference, 90 minutes [95% CI, 75-103]; P < .001). There was no significant difference in modified Rankin Scale score after 3 months between patients in the flying team (n = 59) and transfer (n = 57) groups who received EVT (median [IQR] score, 3 [2-6] vs 3 [2-5]; adjusted common odds ratio for less disability, 1.91 [95% CI, 0.96-3.88]; P = .07). Conclusions and Relevance: In a nonurban stroke network in Germany, deployment of a flying intervention team to local stroke centers, compared with patient interhospital transfer to referral centers, was significantly associated with shorter time to EVT for patients with acute ischemic stroke. The findings may support consideration of a flying intervention team for some stroke systems of care, although further research is needed to confirm long-term clinical outcomes and to understand applicability to other geographic settings.

The "Flying Intervention Team": A Novel Stroke Care Concept for Rural Areas.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients is difficult to establish in remote areas, and time dependency of treatment effect increases the urge to develop health care concepts for this population. SUMMARY: Current strategies include direct transportation of patients to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) ("mothership model") or transportation to the nearest primary stroke center (PSC) and secondary transfer to the CSC ("drip-and-ship model"). Both have disadvantages. We propose the model "flying intervention team." Patients will be transported to the nearest PSC; if telemedically identified as eligible for thrombectomy, an intervention team will be acutely transported via helicopter to the PSC and endovascular treatment will be performed on site. Patients stay at the PSC for further stroke unit care. This model was implemented at a telestroke network in Germany. Fifteen remote hospitals participated in the project, covering 14,000 km2 and a population of 2 million. All have well established telemedically supported stroke units, an angiography suite, and a helicopter pad. Processes were defined individually for each hospital and training sessions were implemented for all stroke teams. An exclusive project helicopter was installed to be available from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. during 26 weeks per year. Key Messages: The model of the flying intervention team is likely to reduce time delays since processes will be performed in parallel, rather than consecutively, and since it is quicker to move a medical team rather than a patient. This project is currently under evaluation (clinicaltrials NCT04270513).

Acute Glaucoma Following Internal Carotid Artery Stenting: A Rare But Serious Complication of Ocular Ischemic Syndrome.

Acute glaucoma following carotid artery recanalization is a rare but severe complication of underlying ocular ischemic syndrome. We present a case of a 71-year-old woman with ocular ischemic syndrome and severe stenosis of the right internal and external carotid artery undergoing carotid artery stenting. Immediate postprocedural angiography showed pronounced reperfusion of the ophthalmic artery. Subsequently, the patient developed vision-threatening acute glaucoma despite treatment with acetazolamide. Monitoring of intraocular pressure is important in patients who are at risk of developing ocular ischemic syndrome because of internal carotid artery stenosis. Interventionalists should also assess the degree of vascular collateralization from the external carotid artery.

Investigations on the effect of cigarette smoking in the comet assay.

The comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis, SCG) is widely accepted as an in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity test. Because of its demonstrated ability to detect various kinds of DNA damage and its ease of application, the technique is being increasingly used in human biomonitoring. However, the assessment of small genotoxic effects as typically obtained in biomonitoring may be limited by the different sources of assay variability and the lack of an optimal protocol with high sensitivity. To better characterize the suitability of the comet assay for biomonitoring, we are performing a comprehensive investigation on blood samples from smokers and non-smokers. Because tobacco smoke is a well-documented source of a variety of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic compounds, smokers should be a suitable study group with relevant mutagen exposure. Here, we report our results for the first sample of 20 healthy male smokers and 20 healthy male non-smokers. Baseline and benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide (BPDE)-induced effects were analysed by two investigators using two image analysis systems. The study was repeated within 4 months. Furthermore, the influence of a repair inhibitor (aphidicolin, APC) on baseline and BPDE-induced DNA damage was comparatively analysed. In all experiments, a reference standard (untreated V79 cells) was included to correct for assay variability. None of these approaches revealed significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. Although more data is needed for a final conclusion, this study indicates some limitations of the comet assay with regard to the detection of DNA damage induced by environmental mutagens in peripheral blood cells.