Inter- and intravein differences in cardiac output with cardiac resynchronization pacing using a multipolar LV pacing lead.

BACKGROUND: Quadripolar left ventricular pacing leads permit a variety of pacing configurations from different sites within a coronary vein. There may be advantages to selecting a specific pacing vector. This study examines whether the range of cardiac outputs obtained at cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation is greater between different poles within a vein, or greater between two different veins. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cardiac index (CI, L/min/m(2) ) was measured during CRT implantation using a noninvasive cardiac output monitor (NICOM™, Cheetah Medical Inc., Newton Center, MA, USA) and a quadripolar left ventricle (LV) lead, in 22 patients with sinus rhythm. CI was recorded during right atrial-biventricular pacing at 70/min with fixed atrioventricular and ventriculo-ventricular delay, from each LV electrode in one vein, and then from an alternate vein. Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) occurred in nine of 15 posterior and three of 21 anterior veins (P = 0.005). At least one electrode in each vein had no PNS. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) difference between best and worst CI within any one vein was 13.1% (±9%). The mean (SD) difference between the best CI in one vein compared to the other was 9.8% (±8%; P = 0.043). In 16 of 22 patients, the range of CI was greater between poles within one vein, rather than between two veins (best of one vein compared to best from the other). In four of 22 patients, the range was greater between veins (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: A greater range of CI is found within a single vein than between two different veins. This finding has implications both for the approach to implant technique and postimplant programming and optimization.

A pacemaker magnet check alone is sufficient for the majority of patients postpacemaker implant.

BACKGROUND: Patients postpacemaker implant can undergo a full assessment by pacing system programmer (PSP) or a magnet check. The former takes longer, but provides more detailed information; a magnet-mode assessment is faster, but provides only capture data in an asynchronous pacing mode. A magnet-mode assessment alone may be sufficient in most cases, and current clinical practice varies considerably. METHODS: A retrospective single-center assessment of all pacemaker implants receiving PSP and magnet checks between September 2009 and April 2010. Patient records were reviewed. The results of PSP and magnet checks and any subsequent device-related management were noted. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients underwent pacemaker implantation, magnet-mode assessment, and then PSP interrogation during this period. Magnet-mode assessment revealed a problem in only one patient-failure of atrial capture, leading to subsequent atrial lead repositioning. None of the remaining 167 patients have a serious problem at PSP interrogation; six had minor issues at PSP check, none of which required repeat surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The magnet-mode test only provides information on lead capture in an asynchronous pacing mode, which is the most essential data postoperatively. Our study has suggested that a magnet-mode assessment without PSP interrogation may be sufficient in the immediate postimplant assessment of these patients. Routine postimplant PSP interrogation is time consuming, labor intensive, and adds only minimal additional benefit to the safe management of these patients above and beyond a magnet check, coupled with informed assessment of the associated electrocardiogram/rhythm strip, clinical examination, and chest x-ray.

The benefits of using a bismuth-containing, radiation-absorbing drape in cardiac resynchronization implant procedures.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure is a major concern in cardiac device implantation, especially cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures. The RadPad™ (Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc., Kansas City, MO, USA), a radiation-attenuating adhesive drape, has been shown to be beneficial in several clinical settings involving fluoroscopy, but less is known about the actual benefits in CRT procedures. METHODS: Consecutive CRT implants performed with and without a RadPad™ drape over a 10-month period were analyzed. Two thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were attached to each implanting physician at several locations (adjacent to eyes, center abdomen [outside lead apron], left and right index fingers, and dorsum of the right foot). Results were corrected for background using control TLDs, and normalized to dose-area product (DAP). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (31 male), 16 with and 20 without the RadPad™, were included in the study. No technical problems were caused by the presence of the radiation-absorbing drape. Time required to position the drape never exceeded 30 seconds, no acute skin reactions were noted, and no radiation-absorbing drape became displaced. Despite a trend toward longer fluoroscopy times and higher DAPs in the radiation-absorbing drape group, radiation exposure was significantly reduced: 65% in the case of the hands and body (P < 0.001), and 40% the eyes (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of a radiation-absorbing drape results in a significant reduction in radiation dose to the implanting physician during CRT procedures. Not only is the dose to the hands reduced, but also the eye and body doses are significantly reduced. The routine use of radiation-absorbing drapes should be considered for all CRT implant procedures in the light of these findings.

Feasibility of mitral isthmus and left atrial roof linear lesions using an 8 mm tip cryoablation catheter.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial linear lesions are part of the ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency (RF) energy is the standard energy modality. Pulmonary vein (PV) balloon cryoablation has similar success rates to RF energy but is unsuitable for linear lesions. This study assessed the feasibility and safety of left atrial linear lesions using an 8 mm tip cryoablation catheter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were studied. An 8 mm tip focal cryoablation catheter was used to create mitral isthmus and left atrial roof linear lesions and compared to a matched cohort undergoing RF ablation. A total of 21 patients (54 ± 11 years, 14 male), 15 undergoing de novo procedures using a dual console technique (simultaneous focal catheter and cryoballoon PV ablation) and 6 redo procedures (single console and focal catheter) were studied. Mitral isthmus ablation was successful in 19/21 (91%) with a mean total ablation time of 32.5 ± 2.9 minutes. Roof line ablation was successful in 18/19 with a mean ablation time of 15.6 ± 6.0 minutes. Success rates were similar but ablation times were longer than those in the matched RF group. Epicardial ablation in the coronary sinus was required less often with cryoablation (11/21 vs 17/21, P < 0.05). There were no complications. CONCLUSION: Left atrial linear lesions with an 8 mm tip cryoablation catheter are feasible and safe with a high acute success rate. The need for coronary sinus ablation is reduced. A dual console technique is possible. Long-term durability of linear lesions remains to be determined.

Absolute risk reduction in total mortality with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: analysis of primary and secondary prevention trial data to aid risk/benefit analysis.

AIMS: Absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat (NNT) are considered by many to be the most appropriate figures to use for the informed consent process, yet the results of published implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) trials are frequently presented as relative risk reduction or odds ratio. The period over which risk reduction is calculated also varies between trials, making comparison difficult. METHODS AND RESULTS: Published ICD trials used to formulate national and international guidelines were examined for 1, 2, and 3 year total mortality in ICD and medically treated patients. The number of patients enrolled and at risk at these time points were also sought. Where the raw data were not included in the original text, estimates were taken from published Kaplan-Meier graphs. Eight primary prevention (PP) trials, three secondary prevention (SP) trials, and one SP meta-analyses were included. For PP, ARR at 3-year follow-up ranged from 0 (no benefit) to 24.6% (NNT = 4). For SP, ARR at 3-year follow up ranged from 3.7% (NNT = 27) to 11.3% (NNT = 9). Absolute risk reduction increased with follow-up in PP trials, whereas there was considerable variation in SP trials. Overall, very few trial patients received 3-year follow-up, giving wide confidence intervals (CIs). CONCLUSION: Absolute risk reduction from ICD trials varies significantly depending upon trial entry criteria, subgroup characteristics, and duration of follow-up. The relatively small number of patients followed for 2 or more years leads to wide CIs. Despite these limitations, the standardized ARR and NNT data presented may give a more individualized estimate of risk/benefit that could potentially aid an informed consent process.

Mitral isthmus ablation is feasible, efficacious, and safe using a remote robotic catheter system.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of a remote robotic catheter system (RCS) for mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, matched control study included 45 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation using a remote RCS compared to 45 patients who underwent conventional ablation. All patients had circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), roof, and MI ablation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics. There were no significant differences in MI block (RCS: 44/45 [98%] vs CONTROL: 43/45 [96%], P = 1.0), roof block (RCS: 45/45 [100%] vs CONTROL: 44/45 [98%], P = 1.0), and PVI (RCS: 45/45 [100%] vs CONTROL: 45/45 [100%], P = 1.0). Ablation and procedural times were similar in both arms. Using RCS, mean total MI ablation and procedure times were 13 ± 6 minutes and 23 ± 15 minutes, respectively. Coronary sinus (CS) ablation was significantly less in the RCS arm (48% vs 72%, P = 0.03). It was possible to "drive" the ablation catheter into the distal CS using the RCS in 19/22 (86%) patients. There was a significant trend of reduction in mean MI ablation (P = 0.008) and procedural times (P = 0.004) over the course of the study period. There was a significant reduction in fluoroscopy time in the RNS arm (33 ± 17 minutes vs 49 ± 20 minutes, P = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: It is feasible and safe to use a remote RCS for MI ablation, including "driving into the CS." MI block was achieved in 98% with a significant reduction in the need for CS ablation (48%). There is a short learning curve.

Mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Mitral isthmus ablation is challenging. The use of steerable sheath and high ablation power may improve success rate. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled 200 patients who underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), including mitral isthmus ablation. Mitral isthmus ablation was performed using an irrigated ablation catheter via a steerable sheath (endocardium: maximum power: 40/50 W limited to annular end, maximum temperature: 48 °C; coronary sinus [CS]: maximum power: 25/30 W, maximum temperature: 48 °C). Endpoint was bidirectional mitral isthmus block. RESULTS: Mitral isthmus block was acutely achieved in 182/200 patients (91%). Sixty-nine percent of patients required CS ablation. Mean total ablation time was 13 ± 6 minutes. There was 1 case of acute circumflex artery occlusion. Mean left atrium (LA) diameter was significantly bigger in patients with unsuccessful mitral isthmus ablation (49 ± 4 mm vs. 43 ± 6 mm; P = 0.0007). In redo procedures, the incidence of reconduction at the mitral isthmus, roof and cavotricuspid isthmus was 44%, 37%, and 29%, respectively. Overall incidence of perimitral flutter was 9%. Prior complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation was a predictor for microreentrant atrial tachycardia (AT) whereas gaps in linear lesions predicted macroreentrant flutters. After a mean follow-up of 20 ± 9 months, 73% of patients remained free from AF or AT. CONCLUSION: We reported on a series of mitral isthmus ablation using steerable sheath and high ablation power (50 W). Larger LA diameter was a predictor of failure to achieve mitral isthmus block. The mitral isthmus had a moderately high incidence of re-conduction but was only associated with a relatively low incidence of perimitral flutter.

Microscopic magnetic resonance imaging reveals high prevalence of third coronary artery in human and rabbit heart.

AIM: The human coronary tree is commonly assumed to have two roots: the left and right coronary arteries (LCA and RCA, respectively). However, a third coronary artery (TCA) has been observed in humans and animals, usually arising from the right anterior aortic sinus near the RCA. Using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, we identified TCA prevalence and characteristics in rabbit and human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Third coronary artery presence was analysed in hearts from 11 New Zealand white rabbits and 7 human cadavers, using excised tissue that was fixed, gadolinium-treated, and agar-embedded for imaging-based reconstruction. A TCA was identified in all rabbit hearts and six of seven human hearts, originating either from an independent ostium (7 of 11 rabbits, 2 of 7 humans) or an ostium shared with the RCA (4 of 11 rabbits, 4 of 7 humans). Proximal TCA cross-sectional area in rabbits was 15.3 ± 6.0% of RCA area (mean ± SD, based on n = 9 rabbit hearts in which reliable measurements could be taken for both vessels), and 26.7 ± 10.1% in humans (n = 4). In all-but-one case where a TCA was observed, it originated ventral to the RCA, progressing towards the right ventricular outflow tract. In one rabbit, the TCA originated dorsal to the RCA and progressed towards the Crista terminalis in the right atrium. A fourth vessel, forming a separate aortic Vas vasorum was occasionally seen, originating from the right anterior aortic sinus either from an ostium common with (1 of 11 rabbits, 0 of 7 humans) or independent of (1 of 11 rabbits, 1 of 7 humans) the TCA. Pilot optical mapping experiments showed that TCA occlusion had variable acute effects on rabbit cardiac electrophysiology. CONCLUSION: Third coronary artery presence is common in rabbit and human hearts. Functional effects of disrupted TCA blood supply are ill-investigated, and the rabbit may be a suitable species for such research.

Questionnaire survey of cardiologists' knowledge, attitudes, and guideline application of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

INTRODUCTION: There are little data on cardiologists' knowledge and application of current implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) guidelines, attitudes to risk, and how these may influence ICD prescription. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was sent to UK cardiologists to test their knowledge and application of ICD guidelines and their estimate of the clinical benefits gained in different clinical scenarios. They were questioned on the minimum absolute risk reduction (ARR) required to justify an ICD implant and factors that influenced their decision making. RESULTS: Sixty responses from 23 implanters and 37 nonimplanters were obtained. Eighty-three percent implanters and 43% nonimplanters were fully aware of UK ICD National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines. Only 7% responders had a screening program to identify primary prevention (PP) candidates. Although the mean estimate of ARR in PP scenarios was similar to trial data, the range of estimates was very wide. The benefit in secondary prevention (SP) scenarios was overestimated by both implanters and nonimplanters. Three-year ARR believed to justify PP and SP ICDs were heavily influenced by patients' age but in patients <80 years, age was compatible with trial results. Implanters and nonimplanters correctly applied guidelines in SP scenarios with younger patients but often withheld an ICD in elderly patients. Correct application did not correlate with full awareness of guidelines. CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge of guidelines (particularly in nonimplanters), failure of nonimplanters to offer ICDs to appropriate PP patients, age bias, and a lack of screening programs appear to be the greatest barriers to uptake of ICDs in the United Kingdom, rather than financial concerns.

High incidence of acute sub-clinical circumflex artery 'injury' following mitral isthmus ablation.

AIMS: Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation is technically challenging, requiring long endocardial ablation times and frequently coronary sinus (CS) ablation. The circumflex artery lies in the epicardium in close proximity to the CS and the mitral annulus and may potentially be injured during radiofrequency ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent catheter ablation procedures that included MI ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Irrigated ablation catheters were used with the following settings: endocardial surface (max power: 40/50 W at the annular end; max temperature: 48°C); CS (max power: 25/30 W; max temperature: 48°C). Coronary angiography was performed pre- and post-ablation and analysed by two cardiologists with quantitative coronary angiography. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 89% of patients (60% required CS ablation). Fifteen patients (28%) had angiographic changes following ablation: eight had mid-circumflex narrowing only, one had circumflex and obtuse marginal (OM) artery narrowing, one had OM narrowing only, and five had distal circumflex occlusion/narrowing. Five patients had significant narrowing (50-84%), which resolved with intracoronary glycerine trinitrate. Fourteen (93%) of the patients with circumflex 'injury' had CS ablation and a longer mean CS ablation time (5.0 ± 3.0 vs. 2.6 ± 3.3 min, P = 0.03). Patients with distal circumflex occlusion had significantly smaller vessel diameter (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 2.1 ± 0.2 mm, P = 0.03). A shorter distance between the circumflex and the CS was also associated with circumflex 'injury' (3.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.6 ± 3.2 mm, P = 0.04). There were no electrocardiographic or echocardiographic abnormalities and no angina symptoms during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Acute sub-clinical circumflex 'injury' following MI ablation is not uncommon. Ablation within the CS, proximity of the circumflex and the CS, and a small distal circumflex were risk factors for 'injury'.

Larger coronary sinus diameter predicts the need for epicardial delivery during mitral isthmus ablation.

AIMS: Mitral isthmus ablation is technically challenging, often requiring both endocardial and epicardial coronary sinus (CS) ablation. Blood flow in the CS and circumflex artery may act as a 'heat sink' and reduce the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation. This study investigates how the CS and circumflex artery diameters affect mitral isthmus ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five patients underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation. Irrigated-tip catheters were used during mitral isthmus ablation with the following settings: endocardial surface (maximum power: 40-50 W at the annular end of line; maximum temperature: 48°C); CS (maximum power: 25-30 W; maximum temperature: 48°C). The absence of block after 10 min of endocardial ablation led to CS ablation for up to 5 min. If there was still no block, further ablation was at the discretion of the physician. Coronary angiography and CS venography were performed and analysed with quantitative coronary angiography. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 31 patients (89%). Twenty-three patients (74%) required CS ablation to achieve block. These patients were found to have significantly larger CS diameters (6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.4 ± 0.5 mm, P< 0.02). Coronary sinus diameter >59 mm predicted the need for CS ablation (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 78%). Coronary sinus diameter correlated significantly with total mitral isthmus ablation time (r = 0.52, P < 0.003) and CS ablation time (r = 0.59, P < 0.0005), whereas circumflex diameter did not. CONCLUSION: Larger-diameter CS is associated with a need for CS ablation during mitral isthmus ablation. Coronary sinus but not circumflex diameter was significantly correlated with total and CS ablation time, supporting the hypothesis that the CS but not the circumflex artery acts as a heat sink.

Local activation times at the high posterior wall of the left atrium during left atrial appendage pacing predict roof line block with high specificity and sensitivity.

AIMS: Ensuring complete block after left atrial (LA) linear lesions is important as partial block may be pro-arrhythmic. Techniques to confirm roof line block may be time consuming and challenging and have not been well described. This study investigates whether local activation times (LAT) during left atrial appendage (LAA) pacing help in the assessment of roof line block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) including circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, roof, and mitral isthmus lines. Local activation times were measured at pre-defined points on the posterior wall and high anterior wall during LAA pacing at the following stages: (i) baseline; (ii) incomplete roof line; (iii) roof block; and (iv) roof and mitral isthmus block. Time from pacing at high posterior wall to LAA was also recorded at each stage. Receiver operator curve analyses were performed on different parameters to assess if they could confirm roof line block. There was a stepwise increase in mean high posterior wall LAT: 83 ± 16 ms (baseline); 105 ± 20 ms (incomplete roof block); 133 ± 26 ms (roof block), and 152 ± 35 ms (roof and MI block; one way analysis of variance, P< 0.0001). Increased LA diameter, amiodarone use, and adjunctive complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation were associated with longer LATs. For patients with persistent AF, LAA to high posterior wall times of >133 ms, high posterior wall to LAA times of >125 ms and double potential >77 ms predict roof line block with high specificity and sensitivity especially if there was also mitral isthmus block. CONCLUSION: Parameters derived from the measurement of LAT of the high posterior and anterior LA wall help guide the assessment of roof line block.

Acute occlusion of left circumflex artery following radiofrequency catheter ablation at the mitral isthmus.

Damage to the coronary artery is a rare but important complication following radiofrequency catheter ablation. This case report describes the management of circumflex artery occlusion following mitral isthmus ablation in a 62-year-old male. It also provides a brief literature review and discusses the clinical implications of this complication.

No Benefit of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Linear Ablation: Benefit of Complex Ablation Study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre randomized study compared circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation (control arm) versus circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation+complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation (CFAE arm) in patients with persistent AF. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation was performed followed by roof and mitral isthmus ablation, before CFAE ablation in the CFAE arm. Ablation strategy was maintained at the first redo procedure. Sixty-five patients were recruited in each arm. The mean age was 61±10 years, 75% were men, median AF duration was 2 years, 42% had long-lasting persistent AF, 68% had associated cardiovascular disease, mean left atrial dimension was 46±6 mm, and median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2. Ablation and procedure times were significantly longer in the CFAE arm (70±20 versus 55±17; 201±35 versus 152±45 minutes; P<0.005). After a mean follow-up of 35±5 months, single-procedural success off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months (CFAE: 30/65 [46%] versus control: 37/65 [57%]; P=0.29) and multiprocedural success (CFAE: 51/65 [78%] versus control: 52/65 [80%]; P=1.0) were not significantly different. At the first redo procedure, patients in the CFAE arm had a higher incidence of organized atrial tachycardia/flutter (24/33 [73%] versus 11/31 [35%]; P=0.005) and gap-related macro-re-entrant flutter (8/33[24%] versus 1/31[3%]; P=0.03). Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was an independent predictor of late recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: CFAE ablation did not confer incremental benefit when performed in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein ablation and linear ablation. It was associated with a higher incidence of gap-related flutter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01711047.

The benefit of tissue contact monitoring with an electrical coupling index during ablation of typical atrial flutter--a prospective randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to investigate the use of tissue contact monitoring by means of the electrical coupling index (ECI) in a prospective randomised control trial of patients undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for atrial flutter. METHODS: Patients with ECG-documented typical flutter undergoing their first CTI ablation were randomised to ECI™-guided or non-ECI™-guided ablation. An irrigated-tip ablation catheter was used in all cases. Consecutive 50-W, 60-s radiofrequency lesions were applied to the CTI, from the tricuspid valve to inferior vena cava, with no catheter movement permitted during radiofrequency (RF) delivery. The ablation endpoint was durable CTI block at 20 min post-ablation. Patients underwent routine clinic follow-up post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients (79 male), mean age 66 (+/-11), 50 ECI-guided and 51 control cases were enrolled in the study. CTI block was achieved in all. There were no acute complications. All patients were alive at follow-up. CTI block was achieved in a single pass in 36 ECI-guided and 30 control cases (p = 0.16), and at 20 min post-ablation, re-conduction was seen in 5 and 12 cases, respectively (p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in total procedure time (62.7 ± 33 vs. 62.3 ± 33 min, p = 0.92), RF requirement (580 ± 312 vs. 574 ± 287 s, p = 0.11) or fluoroscopy time (718 ± 577 vs. 721 ± 583 s, p = 0.78). After 6 ± 4 months, recurrence of flutter had occurred in 1 (2 %) ECI vs. 8 (16 %) control cases (OR 0.13, 95 % CI 0.01-1.08, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: ECI-guided CTI ablation demonstrated a non-statistically significant reduction in late recurrence of atrial flutter, at no cost to procedural time, radiation exposure or RF requirement.

The determinants of successful RF ablation - is measurement of tissue contact the next step?

The assessment of tissue contact is an area undergoing much research as a means of improving the outcomes of cardiac radiofrequency ablation. This review provides an overview of RF ablation with specific reference to the relevance of good tissue contact to adequate RF lesion formation. An up-to-date review of the clinical evidence is provided, and recent patents of novel contact-sensing technologies in the field of cardiac RF ablation are presented.

Steerable sheath technology in the ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Steerable sheaths have been shown to reduce procedure time in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), where catheter positioning and stability is typically challenging. This review critically addresses and highlights the recent developments in design of sheaths used to manipulate the ablation catheter and how these developments may impact on the ablation procedure itself, in particular the likelihood of first-time success. Patents relating to steerable sheaths are reviewed and discussed to gauge potential future developments in this area.