Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines.

BACKGROUND: British Sarcoma Group guidelines for the management of GIST were initially informed by those published by the European Society of Clinical Oncology. This update was written by a group of experts to includes a discussion of the highlight improvements in our knowledge of the disease and recent treatment developments. The guidelines include sections on Incidence, Aetiology, Diagnosis, including risk assessment, Treatment and Follow-up. METHODS: A careful review of the literature was performed to ensure that wherever possible recommendations are supported by the results of clinical trials or substantive retrospective reports. Areas of uncertainty are indicated appropriately. CONCLUSION: Guidelines represent a consensus view of current best clinical practice. Where appropriate, key recommendations are given and the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation gradings are those used by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO).

Simple biliary cysts of the liver can be lined by mucinous epithelium.

AIMS & METHODS: Simple biliary cysts of the liver are described to be lined by biliary epithelium and may be managed nonsurgically or by deroofing only. By contrast, its important differential diagnosis-mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN)-is at least focally lined by mucinous epithelium, has malignant potential, and therefore should be resected. Following anecdotal observations in routine diagnostic practice, the following case series was assembled to confirm whether simple biliary cysts of the liver can be lined by mucinous epithelium. Detailed clinicoradiological review, including postoperative follow-up, was also completed to assess whether the presence of mucinous epithelium had any associations, including a risk of hepatobiliary neoplasia. RESULTS: Histological review of 21 simple biliary cysts received as surgical specimens over a 3- year period confirmed an absence of ovarian-like stroma in all cases. The lining epithelium of seven cysts showed focal supranuclear/apical mucin, as confirmed histochemically. Cysts with mucinous epithelium were generally larger and more often showed histological evidence of previous haemorrhage than cysts without this epithelium. There were no other statistically-significant differences in clinicoradiological features between cysts with and without mucinous epithelium, including at postoperative radiological follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Focal mucinous epithelium can be present in at least one-third of surgically-managed, simple biliary cysts of the liver. Such epithelium may be metaplastic and should not be misinterpreted to indicate a diagnosis of MCN but, apart from this, appears to have no clinical significance. Ovarian-like stroma may therefore be the only histological feature that reliably distinguishes MCN from simple biliary cyst.

The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Expert Board: an analysis of activity during 2017-2020.

AIMS: The inception of the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England in 2006 highlighted the fact that the differential diagnosis between the presence of epithelial misplacement and adenocarcinoma occurring in colorectal adenomas is problematic. The pathology Expert Board (EB) was created to facilitate the review of difficult cases by a panel of three experienced gastrointestinal pathologists. This article describes a review of the work of the EB over a 4-year period (2017-2020). METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty polyps were referred to the EB from 193 pathologists and 76 hospitals during this time. The EB diagnosis was benign for 67%, malignant for 28%, and equivocal for 2% (with no consensus in the remainder). The most common diagnosis change made by the EB was from malignant to benign-made in 50% of polyps referred with an initially malignant diagnosis. The level of agreement between the individual EB members was 'good' (kappa score of 0.619) but that between the EB and the referring diagnosis was 'poor' (kappa score of 0.149). Data from one EB member indicated that the presence of lamina propria, features of torsion and cytological similarity between the superficial and deep glands were predictors of a benign diagnosis, whereas the presence of irregular neoplastic glands, a desmoplastic reaction and lymphovascular invasion were commonly observed features in polyps with a malignant diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic agreement between EB members is better than that between the EB and referring pathologists. There was a consistent trend for the EB to change diagnoses from malignant to benign.

The diagnostic and clinical significance of granulomas in gastrointestinal biopsies from haematopoietic transplant patients.

AIMS: The diagnostic and clinical significance of granulomas in gastrointestinal (GI) biopsies from haematopoietic transplant patients remains disputed, especially following the proposal of cord colitis syndrome (CCS) as a new entity. The aim of the following study was to explore this controversy by identifying such biopsies with granulomas and detailing their clinicopathological associations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve patients with granuloma-containing biopsies were identified from across three scenarios: prospectively during a GI pathologist's routine practice over a period of 5 years; retrospectively from a cohort of transplant patients with clinically validated GI graft versus host disease (GVHD); and retrospectively from a cohort of patients who had received umbilical cord blood (UCB). Their clinicopathological assessments (which included unique long-term patient follow-up) showed that granulomas are only rarely seen across all GI biopsies from haematopoietic transplant patients, and may uncommonly constitute a histological feature of GI GVHD. Granulomas-and especially well-defined, non-cryptolytic ones-are more commonly present in GI biopsies from UCB recipients, but do not show any accompanying histological features that are different from those seen in granuloma-containing biopsies from other patient groups. Furthermore, the three UCB recipients with granuloma-containing biopsies were clinically diagnosed with GVHD rather than CCS. Finally, polymorphic post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) can present histologically as GI granulomatous inflammation that mimics Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Granulomas in GI biopsies of haematopoietic transplant patients may often indicate a treatable aetiology such as GVHD or PTLD. Granulomas are more commonly seen in GI biopsies from UCB recipients, but do not necessarily indicate a diagnosis of CCS.

Calponin and MUC6 complement inhibin as diagnostic immunomarkers of serous cystadenoma in endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration/biopsy specimens.

AIMS: Because serous cystadenoma (SCA) does not usually require excision, it is critical to distinguish it from differential diagnoses which do, especially neuroendocrine tumour (NET). The gold standard for diagnosing SCA is assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNAB) material. Inhibin immunohistochemistry aids this assessment, but such positivity is not absolutely sensitive or specific to SCA. The following is the largest known study of SCA EUS-FNAB specimens and the first to compare four potential SCA immunomarkers between themselves and inhibin, compared against NET. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry for calponin, mucin 6 (MUC6), glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) was performed on 30 EUS-FNAB and three resection specimens of SCA and 32 EUS-FNAB specimens of NET. GLUT1 and VEGFA were suboptimal as diagnostic immunomarkers of SCA, being expressed by 10 and 44% of NETs, respectively. Further, their expression by cellular constituents of blood which often contaminate EUS-FNAB specimens hampered identification of neoplastic cells, especially in hypocellular samples. While 19% of NETs showed nuclear MUC6 positivity, cytoplasmic expression of the protein showed 100% specificity and sensitivity as an SCA marker. However, assessing MUC6 in EUS-FNAB specimens must also consider the protein's focal expression in physiological pancreatic, gastric or duodenal tissues, which can contaminate these specimens. Calponin was less sensitive (71% versus 100%) but more specific (100% versus 91%) than inhibin, although easier to assess in EUS-FNAB specimens than MUC6. CONCLUSIONS: Of the four potential immunomarkers of SCA suggested by the existing literature, calponin and MUC6 are useful complementary studies to inhibin for application to EUS-FNAB specimens.

Current dilemmas in the pathological staging of colorectal cancer: the results of a national survey.

AIMS: Accurate and consistent pathological staging of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) in resection specimens is especially crucial to guide adjuvant therapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether certain staging scenarios yield discordant opinions in the setting of current international and UK national guidelines. METHODS AND RESULTS: Members of the UK Gastrointestinal Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme were invited to complete an anonymous, on-line survey that presented 15 scenarios related to pT or pR staging of CRC, and three questions about the respondent. The survey invitation was e-mailed to 405 pathologists, and 184 (45%) responses were received. The respondents had discordant opinions on whether and how CRC pT or pR staging is affected by: acellular mucin lakes and duration after short-course radiotherapy; the nature of the carcinoma at a resection margin or peritoneal surface; and microscopic evidence of perforation. This discordance was rarely related to the respondent's occupation type, and was not related to duration of work as a consultant or the staging guidelines used. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms that there remain several clinically critical but unresolved pT and pR staging issues for CRC. These issues therefore deserve attention in future versions of international and national staging guidelines.

Histopathological diagnosis of tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: a Delphi consensus study.

AIMS: Tumour deposits (TDs) are an important prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. However, the classification, and inclusion in staging, of TDs has changed significantly in each tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) edition since their initial description in TNM-5, and terminology remains controversial. Expert consensus is needed to guide the future direction of precision staging. METHODS AND RESULTS: A modified Delphi consensus process was used. Statements were formulated and sent to participants as an online survey. Participants were asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale and also to suggest additional statements for discussion. These responses were circulated together with anonymised comments, and statements were modified prior to carrying out a second online round. Consensus was set at 70%. Overall, 32 statements reached consensus. There were concerns that TDs were currently incorrectly placed in the TNM system and that their prognostic importance was being underestimated. There were concerns regarding interobserver variation and it was felt that a clearer, more reproducible definition of TDs was needed. CONCLUSIONS: Our main recommendations are that the number of TDs should be recorded even if lymph node metastases (LNMs) are also present and that nodules with evidence of origin [extramural venous invasion (EMVI), perineural invasion (PNI), lymphatic invasion (LI)] should still be categorised as TDs and not excluded, as TNM-8 specifies. Whether TDs should continue to be included in the N category at all is controversial, and did not achieve consensus; however, participants agreed that TDs are prognostically worse than LNMs and the N1c category is suboptimal, as it does not reflect this.

The important role of the histopathologist in clinical trials: challenges and approaches to tackle them.

High-quality histopathology is essential for the success of clinical trials. Histopathologists have a detailed understanding of tumour biology and mechanisms of disease, as well as practical knowledge of optimal tissue handling and logistical service requirements for study delivery, such as biomarker evaluation, tissue acquisition and turnaround times. As such, histopathologist input is essential throughout every stage of research and clinical trials, from concept development and study design to trial delivery, analysis and dissemination of results. Patient recruitment to trials takes place among all healthcare settings, meaning that histopathologists make an invaluable contribution to clinical trials as part of their routine day-to-day work that often goes unrecognised. More complex evaluation of surgical specimens in the neoadjuvant setting and ever-expanding minimum data sets add to the workload of every histopathologist, not just academic pathologists in tertiary centres. This is occurring against a backdrop of increasing workload pressures and a worldwide shortage of histopathologists and biomedical scientists. Providing essential histopathology support for trials at grassroots level requires funding for adequate resources including histopathologist time, education and training, biomedical scientist and administrative support and greater recognition of the contribution made by histopathology. This paper will discuss the many ways in which histopathologists are involved in clinical trials and the challenges faced in meeting the additional demands posed by trial participation and potential ways to address this, with a special emphasis on the UK model and the Cellular-Molecular Pathology Initiative (CM-Path).

Primary peri-anal adenocarcinoma of intestinal type - a new proposed entity.

AIMS: The currently recognised subtypes of anal canal/peri-anal adenocarcinoma are those arising from low rectal mucosa or columnar cuff, fistula-related tumours and anal gland carcinoma. This report presents two examples of a hitherto undescribed subtype of peri-anal adenocarcinoma with an intestinal phenotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 74-year-old man had a peri-anal tumour locally excised, whereas a 73-year-old female underwent an abdominoperineal resection for peri-anal Paget's disease with an underlying carcinoma. Neither patient had a history of perineal fistulae, Crohn's disease or previous gastrointestinal neoplasia, and neither showed clinical, radiological or endoscopic evidence of another abdominal or pelvic tumour. Both resection specimens contained adenocarcinoma, which were similar in demonstrating an intestinal morphology and CDX2 immunopositivity. The man has shown a disease-free outcome thus far, but the woman has suffered with nodal and pelvic recurrence within a few months of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The name 'primary peri-anal adenocarcinoma of intestinal type' is proposed for this previously unrecognised subtype of perineal neoplasia. Awareness of its distinct existence - by recognising its intestinal morphology and immunophenotype while excluding metastasis from the intestinal tract - should help to collate data to determine its specific prognosis and to formulate its best management.

A33 shows similar sensitivity to but is more specific than CDX2 as an immunomarker of colorectal carcinoma.

AIMS: CDX2 is widely used as a sensitive and specific immunomarker for colorectal carcinoma (CRC), but neither its sensitivity nor its specificity is absolute. The aim of this study was to compare CDX1 and A33 with CDX2 as immunomarkers for CRC. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a pilot study, whole sections of 51 cases of liver metastatic carcinoma with different origins-colorectum (n = 32), breast (n = 3), oesophagogastric tract (n = 4), lung (n = 3), pancreas (n = 8), and prostate (n = 1)-were immunostained with CDX1, CDX2, and A33. A33 showed higher sensitivity as a CRC immunomarker, greater interobserver reproducibility for assessment of expression and less background cross-reactivity than CDX1. Therefore, only A33 was compared with CDX2 for a tissue microarray (TMA)-based study of primary adenocarcinomas with different origins: CRC (n = 55), liver deposits of metastatic CRC (n = 60), breast (n = 101), lung (n = 40), oesophagogastric tract (n = 134), ovary (n = 67), pancreas (n = 77), and prostate (n = 56). When the whole section and TMA cases of CRC were combined, A33 had a sensitivity of 95.9% and CDX2 had a sensitivity of 97.2%. When the whole section and TMA cases of non-colorectal carcinomas were combined, A33 had a specificity of 85.4% as a marker of CRC and CDX2 had a specificity of 64.3%. The higher specificity of A33 than of CDX2 as a CRC immunomarker was particularly seen among pancreatic and ovarian carcinomas. Furthermore, unlike what was seen with CDX2, none of the prostatic and lung carcinomas studied showed A33 positivity. CONCLUSIONS: A33 shows similar sensitivity to but is more specific than CDX2 as an immunomarker of CRC.

Gastrointestinal pathology in transplant patients.

The assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) specimens from transplant patients is complicated by the wide range of potentially rare pathologies that may be found in this clinical setting. Acute GI graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is characterized by epithelial cell apoptosis, although there is increasing recognition that acute and/or chronic inflammation may also be present. By contrast, thus far there are no histological features known to be specific to chronic GI GvHD. Mycophenolate mofetil colitis may mimic both GvHD and inflammatory bowel disease, whereas both cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus infections can cause gland apoptosis. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder should be considered if a Crohn's-like histological picture is seen, and granulomas in biopsies from umbilical cord blood recipients should raise a suspicion of cord colitis syndrome. Finally, the GI tract may be involved directly or indirectly by the disease that originally required haematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation.

An immunohistochemical study of potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers of wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to investigate whether succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry could screen for wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), and to determine what proportion of wild-type GISTs expressed these proteins and might therefore represent candidates for targeted therapies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-seven wild-type GISTs and 91 KIT-mutated or PDGFRA-mutated GISTs were immunostained for SDHB, IGF1R, HER2, and EGFR. A preliminary study of the BRAF VE1 antibody showed non-specific staining, and indicated it was neither a specific nor a sensitive marker of wild-type GISTs. SDHB loss showed 100% specificity but only 37% sensitivity as such a marker. EGFR and IGF1R were expressed by 63% and 33% of the wild-type GISTs but also by 56% and 32% of the KIT/PDGFRA mutant GISTs, respectively. Therefore, adding EGFR and/or IGF1R to SDHB as a panel only decreased the specificity of SDHB loss as a marker for wild-type status. CONCLUSIONS: All five antibodies failed, individually or collectively, to represent highly sensitive and highly specific markers for wild-type GIST. However, whereas HER2 has been excluded as a therapeutic biomarker, both EGFR and IGF1R are expressed by some wild-type GISTs and are therefore potential therapeutic targets.

Abdominal monophasic synovial sarcoma is a morphological and immunohistochemical mimic of gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

AIMS: Synovial sarcomas may arise within retroperitoneal or pelvic tissues or, more rarely, within the luminal gastrointestinal tract. This case series aims to demonstrate how such primary abdominal synovial sarcomas may particularly mimic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) on both morphological and immunohistochemical grounds. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four cases of primary abdominal synovial sarcoma were reviewed morphologically and with immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization with an SS18 break-apart probe, and KIT/PDGFRA mutation analysis. The four patients comprised two males and two females, with a median age of 42 years (range: 17-59 years). Two synovial sarcomas arose within the stomach, one within the small-intestine mesentery, and the fourth within the retroperitoneum. All four tumours showed only a monophasic spindle cell component in the tissues available for review. All four tumours showed DOG1 immunopositivity, and three coexpressed CD117. Three tested cases did not show activating KIT or PDGFRA mutations, whereas all four cases showed chromosomal rearrangement of SS18. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of synovial sarcoma should be considered particularly if an abdominal spindle cell neoplasm shows a haemangiopericytomatous pattern and diffuse CD99 and CD56 immunopositivity. A confident distinction between abdominal synovial sarcoma and GIST requires KIT/PDGFRA mutation analyses and specific molecular testing for synovial sarcoma.

My approach to assessing for colorectal polyp cancer.

Assessing a locally excised colorectal adenoma for malignancy is a common but often challenging scenario. This article outlines a simple, stepwise approach to this diagnostic assessment. The first steps are to assess for high-grade dysplasia and, if present, to determine whether any neoplastic glands lie within the submucosa. If so, a distinction must then be made between epithelial misplacement and adenocarcinoma; this process is aided by certain clinical and endoscopic data together with assessment of six key histological features. If adenocarcinoma is diagnosed, a final step is to report the presence/absence of high-risk features of polyp cancers because this will then determine if further surgical resection is required for that malignancy. Caveats, uncertainties and newly introduced concepts exist at several steps of the assessment pathway presented and are therefore discussed in detail throughout the article.

My approach to bowel ischaemia.

Resections of ischaemic bowel are one of the most common pathology specimens yet are often viewed as unappealing and diagnostically unrewarding. This article serves to dispel both misconceptions. It also provides guidance on how clinical information, macroscopic handling and microscopic assessment-and especially the interlinking of all three-can maximise the diagnostic yield of these specimens. This diagnostic process requires recognition of the wide range of causes of intestinal ischaemia, including several more recently described entities. Pathologists should also be aware of when and why such causes cannot be discerned from a resected specimen and of how certain artefacts or differential diagnoses can mimic ischaemia.