RESUMO
Retrospective prescribing data were obtained from 46 general practice surgeries in NHS Scotland. Patients with asthma who were naïve to previous long-acting ß agonist therapy and initiated combination inhaler therapy in 2008-2009 were classified according to the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose in their combination inhaler compared with the highest dose of ICS they received before initiation. Among the 685 patients (541 (79.0%) who had been prescribed an ICS previously), those originally on low-, medium- or high-dose ICS were changed to high-dose combination therapy in 122/250 (48.8%), 94/151 (62.3%) or 85/113 (75.2%) cases in each ICS dose category, respectively. These results suggest that evaluation of appropriate high-dose ICS prescribing in general practice is needed.
Assuntos
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Adulto , Asma/fisiopatologia , Preparações de Ação Retardada/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The British guideline on the management of asthma produced by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) describes five steps for the management of chronic asthma. Combination therapy of a long acting ß2-agonist (LABA) and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended as first-line therapy at step 3, although the dose of ICS at which to add a LABA is subject to debate. AIMS: To classify the inhaled therapy prescribed to patients with asthma in NHS Forth Valley according to two interpretations of the BTS/SIGN guideline and to evaluate the use of combination therapy in this population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis including patients from 46 general practitioner surgeries was conducted. Patients with physician diagnosed asthma were classified according to the BTS/SIGN guideline based on treatment prescribed during 2008. Patient characteristics were evaluated for the overall step classification, and specifically for therapy in step 3. RESULTS: 12,319 patients were included. Guideline interpretation resulted in a shift of 9.2% of patients (receiving medium-dose ICS alone) between steps 2 and 3. The largest proportion of patients (32.3%) was classified at step 4. Age, sex, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease co-morbidity, and utilisation of short-acting ß2-agonists and oral corticosteroids all correlated with step; however, no differences in these characteristics were evident between low-dose combination therapy and medium-dose ICS alone at step 3. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to evaluate prescribing decisions in asthma. Guideline recommendations regarding the use of ICS dose escalation versus combination therapy need to be clarified relative to the published evidence.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração por Inalação , Administração Oral , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Asma/complicações , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar , Reino UnidoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether differing airway interleukin (IL)-18 levels may be implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma and sarcoidosis. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IL-18 levels were measured in BAL fluid and in the supernatant of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated alveolar macrophages obtained by BAL from 15 patients with sarcoidosis, 11 patients with asthma, and 13 healthy subjects. We also examined the relationship between IL-18 levels and macrophage and lymphocyte concentrations in BAL fluid. IL-18 was measured using an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: IL-18 levels were significantly lower in BAL fluid from patients with asthma (median, 0.0 pg/mL; interquartile range, 0.0 to 0.0 pg/mL) compared to patients with sarcoidosis (median, 222.0 pg/10(6); interquartile range, 110 to 340 pg/mL; p = 0.009, Mann Whitney rank-sum test) and healthy control subjects (median, 162 pg/mL; interquartile range, 38 to 203 pg/mL; p = 0.025, Mann Whitney rank-sum test). Individual analyses comparing IL-18 levels with BAL macrophage counts, and IL-18 with lymphocyte counts in the three groups showed no correlation between these indexes. The mean levels of IL-18 in unstimulated macrophage supernatants were 410 pg/10(6) cells for patients with asthma, 723.4 pg/10(6) cells for patients with sarcoidosis, and 734.8 pg/10(6) cells for healthy control subjects (p > 0.05). Stimulated macrophages from patients with sarcoidosis responded with increasing amounts of IL-18 at lower doses of LPS than macrophages from healthy control subjects or patients with asthma. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that inherently low levels of IL-18 may be associated with the pathogenesis of asthmatic airway inflammation.