Treatment of Plagiocephaly With Orthotic Helmets: Prevalence, Costs, and Inequities in Massachusetts.

Positional plagiocephaly is a craniofacial condition resulting from infant positioning that applies pressure consistently to a part of the skull. This study analyzed the prevalence of, and costs associated with orthotic helmet treatment for positional plagiocephaly and assessed inequities in treatment between medically underserved areas (MUAs) and non-MUAs using health insurance claims data from the Center for Health Information and Analysis (CHIA) in Massachusetts for the years 2016-2021. The mean percentage of patients receiving orthotic helmet therapy was 4.3% (SD=0.49, 95% CI=3.88-4.91, P=0.44). MUAs contained 37.2% of patients with positional plagiocephaly and 2.9% of MUA patients were treated with helmets compared with 5.2% of non-MUA patients (P<0.01). There was a significant decline in the percentage of patients prescribed helmeting therapy over the course of the study (P<0.01). The average copay amount for public insurance was $0.00, and for private insurance, it was $559.8 (SD=160.7, 95% CI=529.1-590.5, P<0.01). Of 3295 claims for orthotic helmet treatment, 92 were fully denied (2.8%). Private insurers issued more fully denied claims (3.8%) than public insurance (1.1%) (P<0.01). We found that public insurance is favorable for patients seeking treatment due to a lower likelihood of full denial and lower copayments. In addition, we found that there is a significant disparity in the prevalence of helmet treatment in MUAs, and the percentage of patients treated with helmeting therapy has declined over time.

Back Pain According to Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Scale After Abdominoplasty With Plication: A Prospective Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic back pain is a physically debilitating condition that affects more than 80% of adults in the United States. A recent case series highlighted how abdominoplasty with plication can offer an alternative surgical approach for treating chronic back pain. These results have been corroborated by a large prospective series. However, this study excluded male and nulliparous subjects, who may also benefit from this surgery. Our group aims to investigate the effect of abdominoplasty on back pain in a more diverse patient population. METHODS: Subjects older than 18 years undergoing abdominoplasty with plication were recruited. An initial survey called the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) was administered at the preoperative visit. This questionnaire inquiries about and grades the patient's history of back pain and surgery. Demographic, medical, and social history was also obtained. A follow-up survey and RMQ was then given 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Thirty subjects were enrolled. Subjects had a mean age of 43.4 ± 14.3 years. Twenty-eight subjects were female and 26 were postpartum. Twenty-one subjects reported initial back pain on the RMQ scale. Of these, 19 reported a decrease in RMQ score after surgery, including male and nulliparous subjects. A significant decrease in mean RMQ score was demonstrated 6 months after surgery (2.94-0.44, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis of female subjects demonstrated significantly decreased final RMQ score in parous women, vaginal or cesarean section delivery, and absence of twin gestation. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominoplasty with plication significantly decreases self-reported back pain 6 months after surgery. These results support that abdominoplasty is not purely a cosmetic procedure but can also be applied therapeutically to improve functional symptoms of back pain.

Impending Backlog of Cleft Palate Patients Due to COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems worldwide, but while high-income countries (HICs) have been able to adapt, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been much slower to do so due to a lack of funding, skilled healthcare providers, equipment, and facilities. The redistribution of resources to combat the pandemic in LMICs has resulted in decreased surgical volumes at local surgical centers as well as a dramatic reduction in the number of humanitarian aid missions. Despite recent global investment in improving the surgical capacities of LMICs, even in the pre-COVID-19 era there was a vast unmet surgical need. This deficit in surgical capacity has grown during the pandemic and it will be a significant struggle to overcome the resulting backlog of patients. A topic of particular concern to the authors is the effect that the pandemic will have on the delivery of time-sensitive surgical care to patients with cleft palate deformities as delay in providing care can have enormous physical and psychosocial consequences. This paper draws increased attention to the lasting impact that the COVID-19 pandemic may have on cleft palate patients in LMICs. SSRN Pre-print server link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3898055.