Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on Tinnitus.

HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to investigate the prevalence of spin in abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering the treatment of tinnitus. We hypothesized that spin would be present in these articles and a significant relationship would exist between spin usage and extracted study characteristics. BACKGROUND: Spin, the misrepresentation of study findings, can alter a clinician's interpretation of a study's results, potentially affecting patient care. Previous work demonstrates that spin is present in abstracts of randomized clinical trials. METHODS: Using a cross-sectional analysis, we conducted a systematic search using MEDLINE and Embase databases on June 2, 2020, for systematic reviews focused on tinnitus treatment. Investigators performed screening and data extraction in a masked, duplicate fashion. RESULTS: Forty systematic reviews met inclusion criteria, and spin was identified in four of them. Spin in abstracts most frequently occurred when conclusions claimed the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite high risk of bias in primary studies (n = 3). The other form of spin found was the conclusion claims safety based on nonstatistically significant results with a wide confidence interval (n = 1). There was no significant association between spin and any of our extracted study characteristics. CONCLUSION: Spin was observed in 10% of abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering the treatment of tinnitus. Although this percentage may be small, we recommend that medical journals provide a more detailed framework for abstract structure and require the inclusion of risk of bias assessment results in abstracts to prevent the incorporation of spin.

Pediatric cochlear implantation: role of language, income, and ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: To compare post-cochlear implantation (CI) early speech perception (ESP) outcomes between a non-English speaking, ethnic minority study group and an English speaking, ethnic majority control group. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study at an academic tertiary care children's hospital. Records were reviewed of 49 children who underwent CI from February 2005 to September 2011. Children with abnormal cognitive function (n=12), post-surgical complications (n=1), or incomplete SP testing (n=24) were excluded. The remaining 12 cases (mean implant age 4.3 y) were reviewed for language, income, ethnicity, and ESP scores. Their scores were compared to a subset of patients (n=18; mean implant age 2.2 y) serving as control from the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study at 1 year follow up where standard ESP testing was performed. Briefly, CDaCI includes a demographically balanced and multicenter-based pediatric cohort from which publications are beginning to define normative post-CI SP outcomes. RESULTS: Of our 12 children, 7 were Hispanic, 2 Caucasian, 2 multi-ethnicity and 1 Russian. 4 were non-English speaking, 5 spoke English as a second language, and 7 were bilingual. Three received bilateral CI. Mean early speech perception (ESP) scores (reported on a scale of 1-4) collected at 6 and 12 months in the study group were 1.71 and 1.75, respectively; in the control group, 3.83 and 3.92. At both follow up intervals the study group performed significantly worse than the control group (6 mo P=0.048, 12 mo P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that among pediatric CI recipients, those from predominantly non-English speaking, socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds develop SP at slower than normal rates. Future interventions should be directed at overcoming these obstacles.