Primary BAP1-absent atypical meningioma arising from median nerve within infraclavicular brachial plexus: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The authors present the only known case of a World Health Organization grade II ectopic meningioma occurring in the infraclavicular brachial plexus, causing pain within the axilla not associated with a primary malignant meningioma of the central nervous system. Peripheral nerve sheath tumors are rare entities, the majority of which are schwannomas or neurofibromas. Ectopic meningiomas only represent 1%-2% of all meningiomas. To date, there is one other published case specifically of a primary ectopic meningioma located in the brachial plexus. OBSERVATIONS: Following the dissection of the left axilla, a dominant rubbery tumor involving the median nerve was encountered. The tumor capsule contained areas of hemorrhage and a soft core with nerve fascicles coursing through, which were not compromised during internal tumor debulking. The tumor lacked a clear pseudocapsule that is characteristically seen in schwannomas. Histopathological studies confirmed an atypical epithelioid neoplasm with elevated numbers of mitotic figures and BAP1 gene deletion. LESSONS: Primary meningiomas arising outside the central nervous system are exceedingly rare. For this unusual higher-grade primary ectopic meningioma located in the distal brachial plexus, surgery with the goal of gross-total resection, adjuvant radiation, additional imaging, and genetics screening were recommended. Close follow-up is warranted. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24226.

Neurosurgical Outcomes Among Non-English Speakers: A Systematic Review and a Framework for Future Research.

OBJECTIVE: In 2019, 22% of adults in the United States reported speaking a language other than English at home, representing 52% growth since 2000. This diversity in languages - and resulting possible communication barriers - represents a potential challenge to effective care. In this manuscript, we summarize clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization patterns of adult and pediatric neurosurgical patients who are non-English primary language speakers (NEPLS). METHODS: We systematically queried 5 databases from inception through October 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to identify studies for inclusion. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies. Additionally, a retrospective chart review was conducted to assess differences in postoperative communication patterns in a cohort of English and Spanish speaking patients with craniosynostosis at our institution. RESULTS: Our search yielded 442 abstracts; ten were included in the final cohort. Outcomes for 973 unique NEPLS with a neurosurgical condition were included; Spanish was the most represented language. Delivery and timing of surgical treatment was the most frequently reported metric; 75% of studies demonstrated a statistically significant delay in time to surgery or decreased likelihood for NEPLS to receive surgical treatment. Length of stay was reported in 3 studies; all demonstrated that NEPLS had longer length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature reporting outcomes among NEPLS. It is critical to examine NEPLS patients' outcomes and experiences, as language barriers are potentially modifiable demographic factors. We present a framework that demonstrates opportunities for further research to improve quality of care.

Cross-cultural serious neurological illness communication: qualitative analysis of multidisciplinary perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Cultural competence is important in approaching serious illness communication with diverse patients about goals of care. Culture colors patients' perspectives on many healthcare issues, including end-of-life care, and impacts how clinicians make decisions with patients. Communication about serious neurological illnesses can be additionally challenging due to disease impact on patients' cognition and decision-making abilities. We aim to understand provider experiences regarding cross-cultural serious neurological illness communication with diverse patients and families. METHODS: Using non-stratified purposive and snowball sampling, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 multidisciplinary participants, including neurosurgeons, neurologists, and social workers, who provide care for patients diagnosed with serious neurological disorders, at three hospital settings between 2021 and 2022. We used standard qualitative content analysis methods with dual review. RESULTS: Five themes reflected provider perspectives about serious neurological illness communication with diverse patients and families. Theme 1: providers recognize that patients' personal biases and lived experiences impact attitudes about healthcare and communication. Theme 2: challenges in communication can arise when providers miss chances to identify important cultural values. Theme 3: understanding how to engage with family members is important for effective communication about serious neurological illness. Theme 4: providers want to accommodate patients. Theme 5: cultivating trust builds a strong patientprovider partnership, even when racial or cultural discordance is present. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights elements of cross-cultural communication and opportunities for providers to approach diverse patients and families within a racial or culturally discordant context. Effective communication, fostered through respecting individual experiences and variation, eliciting cultural perspectives, engaging family, and cultivating trust reflects processes and learned skills required of highquality teams caring for patients with serious neurological conditions.

Frequency and Distribution of Ophthalmic Surgical Procedures among Patients with Inherited Retinal Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to characterize the frequency and distribution of ocular surgeries in patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and evaluate associated patient and disease factors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged ≥ 18 years who were followed at the Johns Hopkins Genetic Eye Disease Center. METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with an IRD diagnosis to analyze the occurrence of laser and incisional surgeries. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups: central dysfunction (macular/cone/cone-rod dystrophy, "MCCRD group") and panretinal or peripheral dysfunction (retinitis pigmentosa-like, "RP group"). Genetic testing status was recorded. The association of patient and disease factors on the frequency, distribution, and timing of surgeries was analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, prevalence odds ratio (POR), hazard ratio (HR) of ophthalmic procedures by phenotype. RESULTS: A total of 1472 eyes of 736 subjects were evaluated. Among them, 31.3% (n = 230) had undergone ocular surgery, and 78.3% of those (n = 180/230) had a history of more than 1 surgery. A total of 602 surgical procedures were analyzed. Cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation (CEIOL) was the most common (51.2%), followed by yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy, refractive surgery, retinal surgery, and others. Cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation occurred more frequently in RP than in MCCRD subjects (POR, 2.59; P = 0.002). Retinitis pigmentosa subjects underwent CEIOL at a younger age than patients with MCCRD (HR, 2.11; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of patients with IRD had a history of laser or incisional surgery. Cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation was the most common surgery; its frequency and timing may be associated with the IRD phenotype. This data may inform the design of prospective research. Such efforts may illuminate routine clinical decision-making and contribute to surgical strategy development for cell and gene therapy delivery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans.

Importance: Preoperative goals of care discussion and documentation are important for patients undergoing surgery, a major health care stressor that incurs risk. Objective: To assess the association of race, ethnicity, and other factors, including history of mental health disability, with disparities in preoperative goals of care documentation among veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) of 229 737 veterans who underwent surgical procedures between January 1, 2017, and October 18, 2022. Exposures: Patient-level (ie, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, history of mental health comorbidity) and system-level (ie, facility complexity level) factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preoperative life-sustaining treatment (LST) note documentation or no LST note documentation within 30 days prior to or on day of surgery. The standardized mean differences were calculated to assess the magnitude of differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated with logistic regression. Results: In this study, 13 408 patients (5.8%) completed preoperative LST from 229 737 VHA patients (209 123 [91.0%] male; 20 614 [9.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.9] years) who received surgery. Compared with patients who did complete preoperative LST, patients tended to complete preoperative documentation less often if they were female (19 914 [9.2%] vs 700 [5.2%]), Black individuals (42 571 [19.7%] vs 2416 [18.0%]), Hispanic individuals (11 793 [5.5%] vs 631 [4.7%]), or from rural areas (75 637 [35.0%] vs 4273 [31.9%]); had a history of mental health disability (65 974 [30.5%] vs 4053 [30.2%]); or were seen at lowest-complexity (ie, level 3) facilities (7849 [3.6%] vs 78 [0.6%]). Over time, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures completed preoperative LST increasingly more often. Covariate-adjusted estimates of preoperative LST completion demonstrated that patients of racial or ethnic minority background (Black patients: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80; P <.001; patients selecting other race: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P <.001; Hispanic patients: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P <.001) and patients from rural regions (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P <.001) had lower likelihoods of completing LST compared with patients who were White or non-Hispanic and patients from urban areas. Patients with any mental health disability history also had lower likelihood of completing preoperative LST than those without a history (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, disparities in documentation rates within a VHA cohort persisted based on race, ethnicity, rurality of patient residence, history of mental health disability, and access to high-volume, high-complexity facilities.