The efficacy and safety of apatinib plus capecitabine in platinum-refractory metastatic and/or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that monotherapy with apatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has promising efficacy for treating recurrent or metastatic (RM) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with capecitabine as a second-line therapy or beyond for treating RM-NPC patients who failed the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-arm, phase II study, we enrolled RM-NPC patients who had at least one measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). The sample size was determined using Simon's two-stage design. All patients were administered with apatinib 500 mg once daily and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice per day on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints comprised disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: We enrolled 64 patients from September 2018 to August 2020. The ORR and DCR were 39.1% (95% CI, 27.1-52.1) and 85.9% (95% CI, 75.0-93.4), respectively. The median DoR was 14.4 months (95% CI, 7.8-21.0). As of April 20, 2021, the median follow-up duration was 12.0 months. The median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.0) and the median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI, 11.3-20.1). The most common toxicities of any grade were anemia (75.0%), hand-foot syndrome (65.6%), and proteinuria (64.0%). Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 36 (56.3%) patients, with hypertension (14.1%), mucositis (12.4%), and fatigue (10.9%) most commonly observed. CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib plus capecitabine shows promising efficacy as a second-line treatment option in pretreated platinum-refractory RM-NPC patients. Dose selection of this combination needs further investigation considering the toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chi-CTR1800017229.

The prognostic value of weight loss during radiotherapy among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large-scale cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We aim to investigate the prognostic value of weight loss during radiotherapy (RT) among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 1149 NPC patients who received radical RT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' weight were measured at initiation of RT (WPre-RT) and every week during RT (WRT1,2,3,4,5,6,7). Percentage of weight loss (PWL) at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th week of RT (RT-PWL1,2,3,4,5,6,7) were calculated using the following equation: (WPre-RT -WRT1,2,3,4,5,6,7)/WPre-RT × 100%. The optimal threshold of RT-PWL7 was determined by recursive partitioning analyses (RPAs). Our endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS). RESULTS: The median RT-PWLs were 0, 0, 1.5, 2.9, 4.1, 5.5, 6.6% at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th week of RT, respectively. RT-PWL7 optimal threshold with respect to DFS was 5.3% based on RPAs. Therefore, a consistent threshold of 5% (<5% vs > ≥5%) was selected to classify NPC patients into low RT-PWL7 and high RT-PWL7 groups for survival analysis. Compared to high RT-PWL7 (≥5%), patients with low RT-PWL7 (< 5%) had significantly better ten-year DFS (61.2% vs 78.8%; P < 0.001), OS (70.1% vs 86.6%; P < 0.001), and DMFS (80.2% vs 88.5%; P = 0.007). However, no difference was observed between LRRFS groups (91.7% vs 94.3%; P = 0.173). In multivariate analysis, high RT-PWL7 was an independent risk factor for DFS (HR, 1.56; 95%CI, 1.19-2.03; P = 0.001), OS (HR, 1.54; 95%CI, 1.11-2.15; P = 0.011), and DMFS (HR, 1.47; 95%CI, 1.03-2.10; P = 0.033) in patients with NPC. In addition, treatment strategy, plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA, and N stage were associated with weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: High RT-PWL7 was significantly associated with decreased DFS, OS, and DMFS for NPC patients. Clinicians should continuously inform patients on the health impact of minimizing RT-PWL7 under 5% during radiotherapy.

Impact of cumulative cisplatin dose in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to comprehensively investigate the optimal cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC) with different tumor responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Patients with CA-LANPC who underwent NAC followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Evaluation of tumor response in patients was conducted by Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 after two to four cycles NAC. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for prognosis. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to classify participates and predict disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients with favorable response after NAC were included. The median CC-CCD was 163 mg/m2 (IQR, 145-194 mg/m2), and 160 mg/m2 was selected as the cutoff point to group patients into low and high CC-CCD groups (< 160 vs. ≥ 160 mg/m2). There was significant improvement in 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 72.6%; P = 0.003) for patients receiving high CC-CCD compared to those receiving low CC-CCD. Multivariate analysis revealed that CC-CCD, T stage, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were independent prognostic factors for DFS (P < 0.05 for all). Patients were further categorized into two prognostic groups by RPA: the low-risk group (T1-3 disease with regardless of EBV DNA, and T4 disease with EBV DNA < 4000 copy/mL), and the high-risk group (T4 disease with EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copy/mL). Significant 5-year DFS improvement was observed for the high-risk group (P = 0.004) with high CC-CCD. However, DFS improvement was relatively insignificant in the low-risk group (P = 0.073). CONCLUSIONS: CC-CCD was a positive prognostic factor for responders after NAC in CA-LANPC. Furthermore, CC-CCD ≥ 160 mg/m2 could significantly improve DFS in the high-risk group with CA-LANPC, but the benefit of high CC-CCD in the low-risk group needs further study.

Comparison of Mismatch Repair Status Between Primary and Matched Metastatic Sites in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Differences between the features of primary cancer and matched metastatic cancer have recently drawn attention in research. This study investigated the concordance in microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair (MMR) status between primary and corresponding metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Consecutive patients with metastatic CRC who had both primary and metastatic tumors diagnosed at our institution in January 2008 through December 2016 were identified. Immunohistochemistry was used to test the MMR status of both primary and matched metastatic tumors, and PCR analysis was performed to test MSI in patients with deficient MMR (dMMR) status. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included. Of the 46 patients with MSI-high primary tumors, 37 (80.4%) also had MSI-high metastatic tumors, whereas 9 (19.6%) had microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic tumors. A high concordance was found in patients with liver, lung, or distant lymph node metastases. Interestingly, the discrepancy was more likely to be limited to peritoneal (5/20) or ovarian (4/4) metastasis (chi-square test, P<.001). These organ-specific features were also found in the pooled analysis. Along with the change of MSI-high in primary cancer to MSS in metastatic cancer, lymphocyte infiltration decreased significantly (P=.008). However, the change did not influence survival; the median overall survival of MSI-high and MSS metastatic tumors was 21.3 and 21.6 months, respectively (P=.774). The discrepancy rate was 1.6% for patients with proficient MMR primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with dMMR primary tumors, the concordance of MSI and MMR status in primary CRC and corresponding metastatic cancer is potentially organ-specific. High concordance is found in liver, lung, and distant lymph node metastases, whereas discrepancy is more likely to occur in peritoneal or ovarian metastasis. Rebiopsy to evaluate MSI-high/dMMR status might be needed during the course of anti-PD-1 therapy in cases of peritoneal or ovarian metastasis.

The systemic immune-inflammation index is an independent predictor of survival for metastatic colorectal cancer and its association with the lymphocytic response to the tumor.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction has been proved to be significantly associated with cancer progression and metastasis in many cancer types, including colorectal cancer. We examined the prognostic significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and the relationship between the lymphocytic response to the tumor and this index. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 240 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed stage IV mCRC who underwent surgical resection. The SII values were calculated based on preoperative laboratory data regarding platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were evaluated using the surgical specimens. The overall survival and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by regression analyses and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 26.7 (1.1-92.4) months, 146 patients (60.8%) died. In the univariate analysis, a high SII was significantly associated with poor overall survival (P = 0.009). The multivariable analysis also confirmed that a high SII was independently associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.462, 95% confidence interval 1.049-2.038, P = 0.025). The SII value was significantly correlated with the TILs value at the tumor's center (P = 0.04), but not at the invasive margin (P = 0.39). When we evaluated overall survival for groupings of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and SII values, we identified three distinct prognostic groups. The group with low tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte values and high SII values had the worst prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: A high SII value independently predicts poor clinical outcomes among patients with mCRC. In addition, combining the lymphocytic response to the tumor and SII could further enhance prognostication for mCRC.

Comparison of immunological characteristics between paired mismatch repair-proficient and -deficient colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently, mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) status is a promising candidate for targeted immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, however, the potential immunological mechanism has not yet been well clarified and some other predictors need to be excavated as well. METHODS: We collected 330 CRC patients by the match of mismatch repair-proficient (167) and dMMR (163), explored the relationship between MMR status and some important immune molecules including MHC class I, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1, and investigated the risk factors for dMMR status as well as low MHC class I expression. The Pearson Chi square test was used for analyzing the associations between clinicopathological and immune characteristics and MMR status, and two categories logistic regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to predict the odds ratio of risk factors for dMMR status and low MHC class I expression. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low MHC class I and CD4 expression and high CD8 expression were significant risk factors for dMMR status [odds ratio (OR) = 24.66, 2.94 and 2.97, respectively; all p < 0.05] and dMMR status was the only risk factor for low MHC class I expression (OR = 15.34; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High CD8 and low MHC class I expression suggests the contradiction and complexity of immune microenvironment in dMMR CRC patients. Some other immunocytes such as CD56+ cells might also participate in the process of immune checkpoint inhibition, whereas needs further investigations.

Clinical baseline and prognostic difference of platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in right-sided and let-sided colon cancers.

BACKGROUND: Right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) differ with respect to their biology and genomic patterns, but inflammatory index variation did not fully investigate. This study aimed to examine the difference of inflammatory indexes and its value between RCC and LCC. METHODS: The differences of common clinicopathologic factors, inflammatory indexes including PLR (Platelet lymphocyte ratio) between LCC and RCC were analyzed in the training cohort with logistic regression model, subsequently, confirmed in validation cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied for the analysis of the survival difference distinguished by the PLR and the Nonparametric Test was adopted to demonstrate the difference of PLR variation with the standard TNM classification between RCC and LCC. RESULTS: A total of 1846 CRC patients entered the study, 744 (40.3%) patients were RCC, 1102 (59.7%) were LCC. The patients' number in both cohorts was 923. It was found that LCC patients in the training cohort significantly to be with higher CEA, adenocarcinoma, early UICC/AJCC stage, p-MMR (mismatch-repair proficient), and lower PLR, and the later four features were confirm in validation cohort. Higher PLR, the unique inflammatory index, was significantly associated with poorer OS in LCC cohort (P = 0.002) and was elevated with the TNM stage in the LCC patients (P < 0.001), however, the two relationships did not sustain in RCC patients. CONCLUSION: Expect the classical characteristics, PLR, an inexpensive and easily assessable inflammatory index was found first time to be significant differ between LCC and RCC. Further, elevated PLR associated with poor OS (overall survival) in the LCC and more common in advanced TNM stage.

A prognostic classifier consisting of 17 circulating cytokines is a novel predictor of overall survival for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

We aimed to determine the prognostic values of 39 circulating cytokines in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and to develop a novel cytokine-based prognostic classifier (CBPC) for prognostic prediction. A total of 176 patients were divided into two cohorts based on the date of first-line chemotherapy. The first 99 cases were assigned to the training cohort, and the remaining 77 cases were assigned to the validation cohort. Thirty-nine cytokines were simultaneously analyzed in the patient serum samples using multiplex bead-based Luminex technology. We used support vector machine-based methods and Cox proportional hazards models to develop a CBPC from the training cohort, which we then validated using the second patient cohort. Univariate analysis showed that FGF-2, TGFα, Flt-3L, GM-CSF, INFα2, GRO, IL-10, MCP-3, MDC, sIL-2Rα, IL-2, IL-7, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1ß, TNFα and VEGF were significant risk factors affecting the overall survival (OS) of both the training cohort and the validation cohort. We developed a CBPC to predict the OS of metastatic CRC patients using these 17 cytokines (sensitivity, 0.835; specificity, 0.800). In the validation cohort, the CBPC was found to have significant power in predicting the OS of metastatic CRC patients. Our study showed that there were significant associations between cytokine expression and prognosis of the patients with metastatic CRC. The CBPC that we developed includes multiple circulating cytokines and may serve as a novel screening tool for identifying metastatic CRC patients with a high risk of short OS. These high-risk individuals may also be suitable for cytokine-targeted therapies.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in elderly patients with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study based on medical comorbidities.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly (≥65 years) patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC, stage III-IVa). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using an NPC-specific database, 245 elderly patients with stage III-IVa NPC, receiving CCRT +/- NAC, and an Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) score <2 were included. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) based on TNM stage and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were applied for risk stratification. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Two risk groups were generated by the RPA model. In the high-risk group (EBV DNA < 4000 copy/ml with stage IVa & EBV DNA ≥4000 copy/ml with stage III-IVa), patients treated with NAC plus CCRT achieved improved 5-year DFS rates compared to those who received CCRT alone (56.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.003). But we failed to observe the survival benefit of additional NAC in the low-risk group (EBV DNA <4000 copy/ml with stage III). The most common severe acute toxic effects were leucopenia (46.8% vs. 24.4%) and neutropenia (43.7% vs. 20.2%) in the NAC plus CCRT group versus CCRT group with statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of NAC to CCRT was associated with better DFS for the high-risk group of elderly LANPC patients with ACE-27 score <2. However, the survival benefit of additional NAC was not observed in low-risk patients.

Regorafenib with or without a programmed cell death protein 1 antibody as third-line treatment for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of regorafenib plus nivolumab demonstrates promising outcomes in patients with refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this effect has not been substantiated in other studies. Moreover, a comparison between the outcomes of regorafenib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody combination therapy and regorafenib monotherapy remains unexplored. In this study, we aimed to assess whether regorafenib and PD-1 antibody combination therapy is superior to regorafenib monotherapy as a third-line treatment for MSS mCRC. METHODS: Patients with MSS mCRC who received regorafenib and PD-1 antibody or regorafenib monotherapy as third-line treatment were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: In total, 179 patients were enrolled, of which 84 were administered regorafenib combined with a PD-1 antibody and 95 were administered regorafenib monotherapy. Patients administered regorafenib combined with a PD-1 antibody had similar progression-free survival (PFS) as those on regorafenib monotherapy (median PFS was 2.4 months and 1.9 months, respectively, p = 0.086). The administration of regorafenib combined with a PD-1 antibody resulted in significantly longer PFS than that seen with regorafenib monotherapy in both male (5.2 months vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.001) and female (3.9 months vs. 1.8 months, p = 0.037) patients without liver metastasis. Female patients with liver metastasis who were administered regorafenib combined with a PD-1 antibody had shorter PFS than those administered regorafenib monotherapy (1.8 months vs. 2.0 months, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Liver metastasis and sex are predictors of survival benefit following the addition of a PD-1 antibody to regorafenib in patients with MSS mCRC.

The feasibility of reduced-dose radiotherapy in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma with favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility of adjusting radiation dose (RD) in childhood NPC with favorable tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an NPC-specific database, children and adolescents (≤18 years) with locoregionally advanced NPC (CA-LANPC) were retrospectively analyzed. Enrolled patients were those who received favorable tumor response after 2-4 cycles of NAC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities were compared for the standard RD on primary tumors (PT-RDstandard, 66-72 Gy) and the reduced RD on primary tumors (PT-RDreduced, 60-65.9 Gy). RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 75.2 months (IQR, 53.2-98.7 months) for the entire cohort. The PT-RDreduced group had a significantly decreased incidence of severe mucositis (51.3 % vs 32.1 %; P = 0.034) when compared to the PT-RDstandard group. The total incidence of severe sequela in the PT-RDstandard group were significantly higher than those in the PT-RDreduced group (31.8 % vs 13.7 %; P = 0.029). In the propensity-matched analysis, the PT-RDreduced group resulted in parallel 5-year survival with the PT-RDstandard group from the matched cohort (disease-free survival, 82.7 % vs 80.3 %, P = 0.841; overall survival, 91.7 % vs 91.3 %, P = 0.582; distant metastasis-free survival, 87.5 % vs 82.8 %, P = 0.573; and locoregional relapse-free survival, 95.6 % vs 97.3 %, P = 0.836). In multivariate analysis, the impact of PT-RDreduced on all survival end points remained insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy with RD at levels of 60-65.9 Gy may be a reasonable strategy for CA-LANPC with favorable tumor response after NAC.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric patients with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a real-world propensity score-matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to CCRT alone in children and adolescents (age ≤ 18 years) with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC, stage III-IVA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 195 CA-LANPC patients who were treated through CCRT with or without NAC between 2008 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. A matched cohort composed of CCRT patients and NAC-CCRT patients was generated by propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:2 ratio. Survival outcomes and toxicities were compared between the CCRT group and NAC-CCRT group. RESULTS: Of the 195 patients, 158 (81%) received NAC plus CCRT, and 37 (19%) received CCRT alone. The NAC-CCRT group had higher EBV DNA levels (≥ 4000 copy/mL), more advanced TNM stage (stage IV disease), and lower incidence of a high radiation dose (> 6600 cGy) than the CCRT group. To avoid bias in treatment selection within retrospectively analysis, 34 patients from the CCRT group were matched with 68 patients from the NAC-CCRT group. In the matched cohort, the 5-year DMFS rate was 94.0% in the NAC-CCRT group versus 82.4% in the CCRT group, with marginal statistical significance (HR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.09-1.10; P = 0.055). During treatment, the accumulate incidence of severe acute toxicities (65.8% vs 45.9%; P = 0.037) in the NAC-CCRT group was higher than the CCRT group. However, the CCRT group had significantly higher accumulate incidence of severe late toxicities (30.3% vs 16.8%; P = 0.041) than the NAC-CCRT group. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of NAC to CCRT tended to improve long-term DMFS in CA-LANPC patients with acceptable toxicity. However, relative randomized clinical trial is still needed in the future.

Response to programmed cell death protein 1 antibody in patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

AIM: Epstein-Barr virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EBVaICC) has a distinct genomic profile and increased CD3+ and CD8+ T cells infiltration. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy in EBVaICC remains largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody therapy in EBVaICC. METHODS: Patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) diagnosed at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2016 to December 2021 were identified. In situ hybridisation was performed to detect EBV. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured. RESULTS: A total of 698 patients with metastatic BTC were identified, of whom 39 (5.6%) had EBVaICC. Among the 136 patients who were not administered PD-1 antibody, the OS was similar between patients with EBVaICC and EBV-negative ICC (median OS 12.5 versus 9.5 months, respectively; P = 0.692). For the 205 patients who were administered PD-1 antibody, patients with EBVaICC had significantly longer OS than patients with EBV-negative ICC (median OS 24.9 versus 11.9 months, respectively; P = 0.004). Seventeen patients with EBVaICC were administered PD-1 antibody. Eight patients (47%) achieved a partial response, and 17 patients achieved disease control. The median PFS was 17.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a clinically actionable subset of patients with EBVaICC with a promising response to the PD-1 antibody.

Does three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy provide benefits for all childhood patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the main strategy in treatment of children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC). Yet, an optimal number of NAC cycles remains unknown. We aimed to optimize the NAC cycle and potentially contribute to clinical decision making for the individual treatment of CA-LANPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Utilizing an NPC-specific database through an acknowledged big-data information system at our center, we identified 143 CA-LANPC treated with NAC followed by CCRT between September 2007 through April 2018. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to categorize the patients and predict disease-free survival (DFS). The clinical benefits of NAC cycles (two cycles vs three cycles) were assessed in each risk group. RESULTS: Independent factors derived from multivariable analysis to predict DFS were T stage (T1-3 vs T4) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (< 4000 vs ≥ 4000 copies/mL) for risk stratification. Consequently, 87 (61%) participants were classified as low-risk group (T1-3 with low or high EBV DNA, and T4 with low EBV DNA) and the other 56 patients (39%) were classified as a high-risk group (T4 with high EBV DNA) through RPA, and corresponding 5-year DFS rates of 91.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the high-risk group, patients receiving three cycles of NAC had statistically significant improvement in 5-year DFS over those who received two cycles of NAC (86.7% vs 59.1%; p = 0.020), while the survival benefit of three cycles NAC for low-risk groups were not observed (94.7% vs 89.7%; p = 0.652). CONCLUSIONS: We found three cycles of NAC with CCRT was a positive prognostic indicator for improved DFS for the high-risk group among CA-LANPC. However, whether low-risk patients could benefit from three cycles NAC needs further study.

Development of a web-based prognostic model to quantify the survival benefit of cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To quantify and predict the survival benefits of cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) in children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with CA-LANPC who received first-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between September 2007 and April 2018 were evaluated. Recursive partitioning analyses (RPAs) helped identify the ideal thresholds of CC-CCD on disease-free survival (DFS). We then developed a web-based predictive model to quantify the survival benefit of CC-CCD for CA-LANPC. RESULTS: In total, 139 patients were eligible for the analysis. The median CC-CCD was 162 mg/m2 (IQR, 138-192 mg/m2). The optimum cut-off point of CC-CCD was 160 mg/m2 for DFS. Hence, we selected 160 mg/m2 as the cut-off to classify CA-LANPC into either high or low CC-CCD groups for survival analysis. The 5-year DFS rates were 91.6% in the high (≥160 mg/m2) CC-CCD group and 77.8% in the low (<160 mg/m2) CC-CCD group (P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis indicated CC-CCD (HR, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.13-0.87; P = 0.024), T stage (HR, 3.72; 95%CI, 1.35-10.22; P = 0.011), and EBV DNA (HR, 3.00; 95%CI, 1.00-8.97; P = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors and were incorporated into the prognostic model. N stage was also included due to its clinical importance. The predictive model was demonstrably accurate (C-index, 0.741) when predicting 5-year DFS rates. CONCLUSIONS: We built a predictive model to quantify the survival benefit of CC-CCD for CA-LANPC treated with NAC plus CCRT. This tool may improve individual treatment consultations and facilitate evidence-based decision-making.

The prognostic value of adding systemic inflammation response index to Epstein-Barr virus DNA in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) combined with plasma load of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CALANPC). METHODS: A total of 205 consecutive patients with CALANPC were enrolled. We used recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to classify patients into various risk groups, with a primary endpoint of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Elevated SIRI (≥1.53) and EBV DNA (≥4000 copy/ml) were significantly associated with inferior OS in CALANPC. RPA categorized patients into low- and high-risk groups based on prognostic factors. Survival curves showed excellent discrimination in OS (95.3% vs 77.6%; p < 0.001) between the low- and high-risk groups. A significant improvement was confirmed using the prognostic methods for conventional TNM staging systems (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SIRI with EBV DNA provided a more detailed understanding of patient risks, and enhanced risk discrimination in CALANPC.

Association between somatic RET mutations and clinical and genetic characteristics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Rearranged during transfection (RET) is a targetable oncogene. RET fusions have been reported in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, RET mutations in mCRC are less studied. Here, we aimed to characterize the clinical, pathological, and molecular landscape of RET-mutated mCRC. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty-two patients were included in this study. Next-generation sequencing was performed to detect RET mutations and calculate tumor mutation burden (TMB). We compared the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of mCRC cases with tumors that harbored somatic RET mutations (N = 16, 2.7%) or had wild-type RET (N = 566, 97.3%). RESULTS: Males comprised the absolute majority of cases with RET mutations (15/16 [93.8%]) compared to their fraction among cases with wild-type RET (339/566 [59.9%]). Furthermore, all patients with RET mutations were younger than 60 years (16/16 [100%]), whereas such patients were less predominant in the group with wild-type RET (379/566 [67.0%]). Individuals with tumors positive for RET mutations more frequently exhibited mucinous histology (5/16 [31.2%] vs. 55/566 [9.7%]), exhibited a lower incidence of liver metastasis (4/16 [25.0%] vs. 335/566 [59.2%]), and higher incidence of peritoneal metastasis (9/16 [56.2%] vs.161/566 [28.4%]), expressed wild-type TP53 (8/16 [50.0%] vs.120/566 [21.2%]), and showed an increased frequency of MSI-high (6/16 [37.5%] vs. 18/566 [3.2%]). In those with microsatellite-stable mCRC, patients with RET mutations had a higher median TMB than patients with wild-type RET (9.4 vs. 6.7 mutations/Mb, respectively, p = 0.001). The median progression-free survival was similar in individuals with mutated and wild-type RET on the oxaliplatin-based regimen (7.1 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.516). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that cases with RET mutations represent a separate mCRC subtype. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of RET inhibitors in mCRC patients with RET mutations.

The effect of adding concurrent chemotherapy to radiotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma with undetectable pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA: Retrospective analysis with a large institutional-based cohort.

Little is known about the value of adding concurrent chemotherapy (CC) to radiotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with undetectable (0 copies/mL) pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. To address this question, the present study retrospectively reviewed 514 patients with newly diagnosed stage II NPC and undetectable pretreatment EBV DNA from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between March 2008 and October 2016. Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes between concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and IMRT alone groups were compared. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to control for confounding factors. Although CCRT group had significantly higher proportions of stage N1 disease than IMRT alone group before matching (85% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), no statistically significant differences were noted for OS (97.8% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.700), DFS (93.4% vs. 94.5%, p = 0.846), DMFS (96.0% vs. 96.9%, p = 0.762), and LRFS (97.3% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.701). After 1:1 propensity-score matching, 177 pairs were identified. Patients in each group were found to be well balanced in baseline characteristics and risk factors (all P > 0.05). The five-year OS (96.9% vs. 98.2%, p = 0.302), DFS (92.0% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.777), DMFS (95.2% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.896), and LRFS (97.3% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.328) rates remain comparable for both CCRT and RT alone groups. Additionally, subgroup analysis still failed to observe any significant survival benefit for the addition of CC to IMRT for N1 disease (P>0.05 for all). Our results indicated that IMRT alone appeared to achieve comparable survival to CCRT for stage II NPC with undetectable pretreatment EBV DNA.

Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy among children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world data study.

PURPOSE: To identify an optimal cumulative cisplatin dose along with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) for children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CALANPC) using real-world data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an NPC-specific database at our center, 157 patients younger than 19 years old with non-disseminated CALANPC and receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) were enrolled. Confounding factors were controlled by conducting propensity score matching analysis. Primary endpoints include disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: The optimal threshold for CC-CCD with respect to DFS was 160 mg/m2 based on recursive partitioning analyses (RPA). Therefore, a uniform threshold of 160 mg/m2 (≥160 vs. <160 mg/m2) was selected to classify patients between high and low CC-CCD groups for survival analysis. Patients receiving low CC-CCD showed a significant decrease in 5-year DFS (76.6% vs 91.3%; P = 0.006) and DMFS (81.3% vs 93.5%; P = 0.009) compared to those receiving high CC-CCD. Multivariate analyses indicated that high CC-CCD as an favorable prognostic influence for DFS (P = 0.007) and DMFS (P = 0.008). Further matched analysis identified 65 pairs in both high and low CC-CCD groups. In the matched cohort, high CC-CCD was still identified as a favorable factor for prognosis in DFS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.70; P = 0.010) and DMFS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.82; P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: CC-CCD exerts significant treatment effects and 160 mg/m2 CC-CCD may be adequate to provide antitumor effects for CALANPC receiving NAC plus CCRT.

[Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras status].

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) and unclear K-ras status. METHODS: Clinical data of 102 ACRC patients, treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center from March 2005 to December 2008, were collected. The cumulative survival rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) of the cases were calculated. The difference in ORR, DCR, PFS and oval survival (OS) between the regimens used as first-line and non-first-line treatment, and between the regimens including oxaliplatin and irinotecan were compared. RESULTS: The overall ORR of cetuximab plus chemotherapy was 43.1%, DCR 73.5%, median PFS 4.0 months, OS 28.5 months, and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rate was 89.2%, 50.9% and 27.5%, respectively. The differences in ORR (50.0% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.344), DCR (78.1% vs. 72.9%, P = 0.571) and OS (51.0 months vs. 35.0 months, P = 0.396) between the regimens as first line and as non-first line treatment were not statistically significant. However, the PFS of the regimen as first-line was longer than that as non-first-line treatment (PFS 5.5 months vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.001). The differences in ORR (54.2% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.223), DCR (79.2% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.654), PFS (5.0 months vs. 3.0 months, P = 0.726) and OS (36.0 months vs. 40.0 months, P = 0.759) between cetuximab plus oxliplatin and irinotecan were not statistically significant. The most common side effects of cetuximab plus chemotherapy were acneiform eruption (80.4%, grade 3-4 in 9.8%), neutropenia (66.7%, grade 3-4 in 18.6%), and diarrhea (19.6%, grade 3-4 in 5.9%). No treatment-related death was recorded. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy have good ORR and OS, and the regimen is safe with less adverse events for them. There is no significant difference between the efficacies of regimens as first line and as non-first line treatment, and between cetuximab plus oxliplatin and cetuximab plus irinotecan regimens.