Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Minerva Ginecol ; 64(4): 337-44, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22728578

RESUMO

Estrogen deficit in postmenopausal women causes urogenital atrophy, which is responsible for a wide range of urinary disorders (urinary incontinence, urge incontinence, recurrent urinary infections) and genital disorders (prolapse, dispareunya, vaginal dryness). The efficacy of estrogen therapy on urinary incontinence is not yet demonstrated, but it is widely recognized that the topical use of estrogens lowers the risk of recurrent urinary infections and improves urogenital atrophy.


Assuntos
Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Pós-Menopausa , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva , Incontinência Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Minerva Ginecol ; 66(5): 447-53, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25245994

RESUMO

AIM: Osteoporosis is a worldwide health problem and bone fractures from osteoporosis are among the major causes of disability, with a great impact on the national health budgets. The aim of our study was to analyze the efficacy of FRAX algorithm and phalanger ultrasound to predict the risk of osteoporotic fractures, in order to identify a high risk population to examine with a second level diagnostic analysis. METHODS: The study population was composed of 1208 premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal women, between 40 and 81 years. For each woman phalangeal QUS was performed and FRAX index was calculated. The FRAX index was evaluated according to standard plots available on web (http://www.shed.ac.uk/FRAX/index.htm). RESULTS: Analysing the correlation between women age and phalanger bone ultrasound values we know that all parameter decrease with increasing of age. We found a significant difference between FRAX index and the ultrasound parameters (P<0.05) to predict a major osteoporotic fracture, we did not find differences between age and ultrasound parameters. Furthermore, we show that after correction per age of the women the ultrasound parameters lose their significant correlation with major osteoporotic fractures. Finally, FRAX index showed a good AUC and in our population and a 10-year probability over 9.4% of major osteoporotic fractures had a good specificity (88%) and sensitivity (83%) to predict osteoporotic fractures. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that FRAX index alone could be used to address high risk women to more invasive tests but we need more data about ultrasound parameters.


Assuntos
Falanges dos Dedos da Mão/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/complicações , Osteoporose/complicações , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Perimenopausa , Pós-Menopausa , Pré-Menopausa , Probabilidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA