RESUMO
To study the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with rehabilitation nursing in patients with rectal cancer surgery. 106 cases of rectal cancer patients in our hospital were selected. 53 cases in each group were treated with surgical treatment combined with rehabilitation nursing treatment and preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with surgical treatment and rehabilitation nursing treatment in the study group. The T stage (ypT) and N stage (ypN) downgrading rates of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 were compared between the two groups after treatment. The 5-year cumulative survival rate, recurrence rate and the positive rate of Bax and antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (Ki-67) expression were detected. T stage downgrading rate and N stage downgrading rate were 77.36% (41/53) 35.85% (19/53) in control group and 94.34% (50/53) 64.15% (34/53) in research group, respectively. The CEA and CA19-9 levels measured at the end of surgery and one month after nursing in both groups were lower than those before treatment. After treatment, scores of quality of life indicators in both groups increased. The positive rates of Bax and Ki-67Ki-67 were significantly different between the two groups after treatment (P < 0.05). Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with rehabilitation nursing has obvious effect on patients with rectal cancer surgery, and has obvious advantages in inhibiting tumor growth, destroying tumor survival immune environment and reducing surgical complications, which can improve the prognosis and is worthy of clinical application. It could provide a potential treatment for patients with rectal cancer.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to explore the effects of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) on pain scores and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin (IL)-2 in patients with simple anal fistulas. METHODS: Ninety patients with simple anal fistulas were evenly randomized into a study group (treated with LIFT) and a control group (treated with traditional anal fistulectomy) according to a random number table. The surgical outcomes, basic operation conditions (operation time, hospital stay, and anal continence), and postoperative wound healing rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The study group had significantly better operation conditions (better anal continence and shorter length of hospital stay), a higher postoperative wound healing rate, lower pain scores, higher VEGF and IL-2 levels, and higher overall efficacy rate than the control group. However, the incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent LIFT had better surgical outcomes, higher wound healing rates, better anal continence, a shorter length of hospital stay, and less severe postoperative pain than those who underwent simple anal fistulectomy. Increased levels of VEGF and IL-2 after surgery may promote wound healing.