Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
1.
Andrologia ; 50(2)2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28762521

RESUMO

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is relevant to sperm quality, sperm capacitation and male fertility. However, it is still unknown whether CFTR can be a potential parameter for fecundity prediction in healthy couples. In this study, 135 healthy couples were divided into groups according to their fertility. We demonstrated that the sperm CFTR expression level of healthy males who never impregnated their partners (49 cases, 38.68 ± 2.71%) was significantly lower than that of fertile men (86 cases, 46.35 ± 2.32%). Sperm CFTR expression level accurately corresponded with fertility through the logistic regression model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the cut-off value of sperm CFTR expression level for fecundity prediction was 43.75%. Furthermore, cumulative pregnancy rates (CPRs) of CFTR > 43.75% group and CFTR ≤ 43.75% group during the follow-up periods were 80.6% and 49.3% respectively. Meanwhile, the mean time to pregnancy (TTP) of CFTR ≤ 43.75% group (26.79 ± 2.35) was significantly longer than that of CFTR > 43.75% group (16.46 ± 2.42). Therefore, sperm CFTR expression level is relevant to fecundity of healthy couples and shows potential predictive capacity of fecundity.


Assuntos
Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/fisiologia , Fertilidade/fisiologia , Taxa de Gravidez , Espermatozoides/metabolismo , Adulto , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/análise , Feminino , Seguimentos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Capacitação Espermática , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Oncol ; 20(5): 897-905, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19179553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that N-ratio has significant superiority in minimizing 'stage migration' for patients with >15 lymph nodes retrieved. Whether the result is applicable to patients with < or =15 lymph nodes retrieved is still in question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival rates of 2159 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical resection were compared between patients with different number and level of lymph nodes retrieved according to pN [International Union Against Cancer (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer)/AJCC N stage], n (JGCA N stage) and rN (N-ratio) staging system. RESULTS: Patient number was significantly different between insufficient and sufficient number or level retrieved group in pN and n system, respectively, but not in rN system, while overall survival rates were not significantly different between those groups. The 5-year survival rates of patients with insufficient nodes retrieved were significantly lower than those with sufficient nodes retrieved in pN and n system, but not in rN system. The hazard risk for patients with insufficient nodes retrieved was significantly higher than that for patients with sufficient nodes retrieved in pN and n system, but not in rN system. CONCLUSION: The rN stage has more potential advantages in minimizing stage migration phenomenon for patients with insufficient number or level of lymph nodes retrieved.


Assuntos
Gastrectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , China , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Andrologia ; 41(4): 235-40, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19601935

RESUMO

To examine the semen quality of patients with uraemia and renal transplant recipients, 40 patients with uraemia and 40 renal transplant recipients were included. According to their interval of post-transplantation, renal transplant recipients were subdivided into group A (22) < or =2 years and group B (18) >2 years. A total of 40 healthy men with normal fertility were included as the controls. Semen samples from all subjects were collected and analysed. The fertility index (FI) value was calculated. The FI value of the normal fertility men was 13.02 (14.26), that of the renal transplant recipient groups A and B were 5.53 (8.30) and 9.27 (22.49) respectively, while the FI of the patients with uraemia was 0.23 (0.76). Compared with the uraemia group, the FI values of renal transplant recipient group either group A or group B were significantly better (P < 0.01). However, compared with the normal control group, the FI values of renal transplant recipient group A were lower (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between group B and the control group (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the FI of renal transplant recipients was recovered close to the level of healthy men with normal fertility 2 years after transplantation.


Assuntos
Fertilidade , Transplante de Rim/fisiologia , Análise do Sêmen , Uremia/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Sobrevivência Celular , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/sangue , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolactina/sangue , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides , Espermatozoides/citologia , Espermatozoides/fisiologia , Testosterona/sangue , Uremia/complicações
4.
Phys Rev Lett ; 67(20): 2769-2772, 1991 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10044550
5.
Phys Rev Lett ; 65(7): 843-846, 1990 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10043037
11.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 47(2): 891-894, 1993 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9968511
12.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 46(2): R389-R392, 1992 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9968187
13.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 46(6): R2144-R2148, 1992 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9968404
14.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 50(3): 1659-1674, 1994 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9969827
15.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 49(4): R1778-R1782, 1994 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9969475
17.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 48(4): 2085-2088, 1993 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9969054
18.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 54(6): 3266-3269, 1996 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9971701
19.
Phys Rev C Nucl Phys ; 52(3): R1161-R1165, 1995 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9970680
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA