[Effects of Dexmedetomidine on the Recovery Quality of Donors Undergoing Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy]. / å³ç¾Žæ‰˜å’ªå®šå¯¹è ¹è ”é•œä¾›è‚èŽ·å–æœ¯ä¾›è€ è‹é†’æœŸæ¢å¤è´¨é‡çš„å½±å“.

Objective: To investigate the effects of intraoperative intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the recovery quality of donors undergoing pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. Methods: A total of 56 liver donors who were going to undergo scheduled pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups, a DEX group ( n=28) and a control group ( n=28). Donors in the DEX group received DEX infusion at a dose of 1 µg/kg over 15 minutes through a continuous pump, which was followed by DEX at 0.4 µg/(kg·h) until the disconnection of the portal branch. Donors in the control group were given an equal volume of 0.9% normal saline at the same infusion rate and over the same period of time as those of the dex infusion in the DEX group. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation (EA). The Aono's Four-point Scale (AFPS) score was used to assess EA. The secondary observation indicators included intraoperative anesthesia and surgery conditions, spontaneous respiration recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, scores for the Ramsay Sedation Scale, the incidence of chills, numeric rating scale (NRS) score for pain, and blood pressure and heart rate after extubation. Results: The incidence of EA was 10.7% and 39.3% in the DEX group and the control group, respectively, and the incidence of EA was significantly lower in the DEX group than that in the control group ( P=0.014). The APFS scores after extubation in the DEX group were lower than those in the control group (1 [1, 1] vs. 2 [1, 3], P=0.005). Compared to the control group, the dosages of intraoperative propofol and remifentanil were significantly reduced in the DEX group ( P<0.05). During the recovery period, the number of donors requiring additional boluses of analgesia, the blood pressure, and the heart rate were all lower in the DEX group than those in the control group ( P<0.05). No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the spontaneous respiration recovery time, recovery time, extubation time, the incidence of chills, NRS score, scores for the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and the length-of-stay in postanesthesia care unit (PACU) ( P>0.05). Conclusion: DEX can reduce the incidence of EA after pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy and improve the quality of recovery without prolonging postoperative recovery time or extubation time.

Lidocaine pretreatment attenuates inflammatory response and protects against sepsis-induced acute lung injury via inhibiting potassium efflux-dependent NLRP3 activation.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis may often result in acute lung injury (ALI), with a high mortality and morbidity. Available evidence indicates that activation of NLRP3 inflammasome to induce macrophage inflammation plays a crucial role in the inflammation progression of ALI and lidocaine can attenuate inflammatory responses. We hypothesized that lidocaine may attenuate inflammatory response and sepsis-induced ALI by inhibiting potassium efflux-dependent NLRP3 activation. METHODS: C57BL/6N mice were randomized and divided into six groups (n = 6) receiving different treatments. Lung vascular permeability and histological changes in the lungs were evaluated by Evans blue dye, bronchoalveolar lavage analysis and hematoxylin and eosin staining. J774A.1 macrophages were divided into 12 groups receiving different treatments. The expression of both NLRP3 inflammasome activation-related protein and P2X7 in the macrophages was measured by immunofluorescence staining and Western blots. The whole cell currents were determined by a voltage-patch clamp technique. RESULTS: Challenge with LPS led to ALI in mice with an increased lung injury score (0.54 ± 0.09), which was significantly attenuated by lidocaine pretreatment (0.20 ± 0.08, P < 0.0001). Lidocaine pretreatment significantly decreased the NLRP3 activation and IL-1ß release in the macrophages. Furthermore, lidocaine pretreatment down-regulated the expression of P2X7 receptors, inhibited LPS- and ATP-induced sodium (Na+) inward flow, and maintained the intracellular K+ level in the macrophages. In addition, activation of Na+ influx did not eliminate anti-inflammatory effect of lidocaine. The activation of NLRP3 could be suppressed by extracellular K+ level in a dose-dependent model. However, lidocaine pretreatment eliminated NLRP3 activation and IL-1ß release induced by K+ efflux, and decreased outward K+ current and extracellular K+ level in the macrophages challenged by LPS/ATP. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine pretreatment can attenuate the sepsis-induced ALI by an anti-inflammatory mechanism of inhibiting K+ efflux-dependent NLRP3 activation.

Elevated effluent potassium concentrations predict the development of postreperfusion hyperkalemia in deceased liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Postreperfusion hyperkalemia (PRHK) has garnered increasing attention in regard to deceased liver transplantation (LT), especially for LT using the expanded criteria donor grafts. However, the impact of the effluent potassium (eK+) concentration on PRHK has been largely overlooked. We evaluated whether elevated eK+ concentrations are associated with PRHK in deceased LT. METHODS: In this single-institution, retrospective cohort study, we included all adults who underwent deceased LT with intraoperative eK+ concentration monitoring between November 2016 and December 2018. The eK+ concentrations were obtained from the effluent samples collected following a standard portal vein flush. PRHK was defined as any serum potassium (sK+) level of > 5.5 mmol/L following reperfusion. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for PRHK, and linear regression was used to examine predictors of the maximum percentage increase in the sK+ level following reperfusion. RESULTS: Of the 86 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 54 (62.8%) developed PRHK. Independent predictors for PRHK included greater graft weight (OR 1.283 [95% CI 1.029-1.599] per 100 g, P = 0.027), an elevated eK+ concentration (OR 1.291 [95% CI 1.068-1.561] per mol/L, P = 0.008), and a higher sK+ level before reperfusion (OR 4.459 [95% CI 1.543-12.884] per mol/L, P = 0.006). An eK+ concentration of more than 6.9 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 59.26% and a specificity of 78.12% for predicting PRHK (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.694). Multiple linear regression analyses indicated that the eK+ and sK+ levels before reperfusion were significant predictors of the maximum percentage increase in the sK+ level following reperfusion. In addition, PRHK was associated with an increased risk of postreperfusion significant arrhythmias, severe postreperfusion syndrome, and postoperative early allograft dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the eK+ concentration could predict the risk of PRHK in deceased LT. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify these associations.

Long-term high-risk drinking does not change effective doses of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope in Chinese male patients.

BACKGROUND: Available literature indicates that long-term drinkers demand a higher dose of propofol for induction of anesthesia than non-drinkers. However, there is no study having assessed the influence of long-term high-risk drinking (LTHRD) on the effective doses of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope with sedation. This study was designed to compare the effective doses of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope between LTHRD and non-drinking (ND) Chinese male patients. METHODS: Thirty-one LTHRD patients and 29 ND male patients undergoing elective gastroscopy with propofol sedation were enrolled. The modified Dixon's up-and-down method was applied to determine the calculated median effective dose (ED50) of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope. Furthermore, the isotonic regression analysis was used to establish the dose-response curve of propofol and assess the effective doses of propofol where 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of gastroscope insertions were successful. RESULTS: The calculated ED50 of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope was 1.55 ± 0.10 mg/kg and 1.44 ± 0.11 mg/kg in the LTHRD and ND patients. The isotonic regression analysis further showed that ED50 and ED95 of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope was 1.50 mg/kg (95%CI, 1.40-1.63) and 1.80 mg/kg (95%CI, 1.74-1.90) in the LTHRD patients, respectively; 1.40 mg/kg (95% CI, 1.27-1.57) and 1.60 mg/kg (95%CI, 1.56-1.65) in the ND patients. The ED50 of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope was not significantly different between LTHRD and ND patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the difference in the estimated ED50 of propofol for successful insertion of gastroscope between LTHRD and ND Chinese male patients was not statistically significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on November 28, 2020 ( ChiCTR2000040382 ) in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Does really selection of nostril affect performance of nasotracheal intubation with nasotracheal Airtraq®?

No abstract.