Knowledge and awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) influence HPV vaccination uptake among the catch-up generation in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its importance for young women, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage remains low in Japan. Previous studies have examined behaviors related to HPV catch-up vaccination. Uniquely, this study aimed to investigate perceptions and factors influencing vaccination coverage among female university students in the catch-up program, focusing on both medical and non-medical undergraduates. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted at Kochi University from January 16 to February 13, 2023, targeting female students born between April 2, 1997, and April 1, 2006. The survey collected demographic data and assessed knowledge of HPV infection, cervical cancer, and preventive measures. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses were used to identify differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups as well as factors related to HPV vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 310 participants, 39.0 % were vaccinated against HPV, 35.2 % were freshmen, and 75.2 % were in medical science programs. HPV vaccination was significantly associated with being in upper years of university (OR = 3.78-42.83), studying medical sciences (OR = 1.93), undergoing cervical cancer screening (OR = 4.04), and receiving free vaccination vouchers (OR = 2.03). CONCLUSION: Knowledge and awareness of HPV and cervical cancer significantly contribute to higher vaccination uptake in the generation receiving catch-up vaccinations. Tailoring information and distributing free vaccination vouchers could enhance HPV vaccination rates and awareness in this group.

Unilateral lymphadenitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST834 strain.

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is a global concern, primarily as a cause of skin and soft tissue infections, particularly in young people. Here, we describe a case of unilateral multiple lymphadenitis caused by the CA-MRSA sequence type (ST) 834 strain. A previously healthy 15-year-old girl was referred to our hospital with fever and swollen lymph nodes in the right axillary, cubital, and groin regions. Imaging examinations revealed enlargement of the lymph nodes in these areas but no swelling in any other lymph nodes. The patient had self-destructive lymph nodes in her groin. MRSA was detected in all swollen lymph node samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests showed that MRSA was susceptible to clindamycin and levofloxacin, leading to the suspicion of CA-MRSA. Genetic analysis revealed that all strains were ST834 and carried the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec IV and the toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 gene but not the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene. The patient was treated with linezolid followed by oral clindamycin. This was a rare case of unilateral multiple lymphadenitis caused by ST834 CA-MRSA. Although ST834 strains are rarely reported, lymphadenitis has been frequently reported and is considered more likely to cause lymphadenitis than other CA-MRSA strains.

Rapid screening of positive blood cultures for extended-spectrum ß-lactamases and metallo-ß-lactamases using a drug susceptibility testing microfluidic method.

OBJECTIVES: An increasing number of drug-resistant bacteria have been identified recently. In particular, drug-resistant bacteria have been linked to unfavorable prognoses in patients with bacteremia, highlighting the need for rapid testing. Our previous studies have focused on the utility of a drug susceptibility testing microfluidic (DSTM) method using microfluidic channels. A system with this DSTM method for screening for ß-lactamases can rapidly detect extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs). In this study, we have evaluated the clinical utility of pre-treatment for screening positive blood cultures using the DSTM method. METHODS: A total of 178 positive blood cultures and five simulated samples of MBL-producing bacteria were prepared at Kochi University Hospital, Japan. The pretreatment consisted of a two-step centrifugation. The obtained sediments were screened with the DSTM method for the production of ß-lactamase based on morphological changes in the bacteria after 3 h of incubation. RESULTS: The pretreatment functioned properly for all samples. Of the 25 ESBL samples, 21 were positive for ESBLs. Four false-negative samples, all obtained from the same patient, contained CTX-M-2 enzyme-producing Proteus mirabilis and showed insusceptibility to an ESBL inhibitor. The simulated samples prepared for MBL screening were positive for MBLs. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with a method for rapidly identifying bacterial species, DSTM may enable patients with bloodstream infections to start receiving appropriate treatment within 4 h after positive blood cultures are screened.

Clinical evaluation of a modified SARS-CoV-2 rapid molecular assay, ID NOW ™ COVID-19 2.0.

In the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several types of instruments and reagents for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing have been introduced to meet clinical needs. We evaluated the clinical performances of ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 (ID NOW™ 2.0), which is capable of detecting SARS-CoV-2 within 12 min as part of point-of-care testing (POCT). Patients who displayed COVID-19 related symptoms, and who were tested for screening purposes, were recruited to this study. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested using the ID NOW™ 2.0 test. Reference testing was performed using the cobas 8800 or 6800 (reagents: cobas SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B). A total of 38 samples and 46 samples were tested positive and negative, respectively, by the reference test. The ID NOW™ 2.0 showed a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI: 82.3-99.4) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 92.3-100). Samples that were positive by reference testing had cycle threshold (Ct) values ranging from 11.90 to 35.41. Among these reference positive samples, two samples were negative by ID NOW™ 2.0 with Ct values of 35.25 and 35.41. For samples with Ct values < 35, the sensitivity of ID NOW™ 2.0 was 100%. In Japan, the restrictions related to COVID-19 have been relaxed, however the COVID-19 epidemic still continues. ID NOW™ 2.0 is expected to be used as a rapid and reliable alternative to laboratory-based RT-PCR methods.

Outcome evaluation of pharmacist-physician collaborative protocol-based antimicrobial treatment for hospitalized stroke patients with aspiration pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and patient outcomes of pharmacist-physician collaborative protocol-based antimicrobial treatment regimens for antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS: Patients treated for aspiration pneumonia due to stroke within 48 h after admission to Kochi Medical School Hospital (January 2019 to December 2022) were included. Primary outcomes were the cumulative number of days of antimicrobial treatment and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients under-dosed with first-choice antimicrobial agents and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: Group A (66 patients) did not receive the antimicrobial treatment protocol, whereas group B (46 patients) did. There were no differences in the patient backgrounds. Group B had a significantly lower percentage of patients who were undertreated with the first-choice antimicrobial agent (9.1 % vs. 42.9 %). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between group A and group B (6.1 % vs. 4.3 %). The cumulative number of days of antimicrobial administration and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in group B: 7.0 days (95 % CI, 6.0-8.0) vs. 9.0 days (95 % CI, 8.0-11.0) for antimicrobial administration, and 28.5 days (95 % CI, 22.0-35.0) vs. 43.0 days (95 % CI, 28.0-55.0) for hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-based antimicrobial treatment for aspiration pneumonia supports appropriate antimicrobial usage and improves patient quality of life. These findings will assist in the effective treatment of aspiration pneumonia in an aging society.

Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 in Japan and Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug administered to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Fundamental research suggests that ivermectin is effective against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment option. METHODS: This multi-regional (Japan and Thailand), multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild COVID-19 (IVERMILCO Study). The participants took a specified number of the investigational product (ivermectin or placebo) tablets of, adjusted to a dose of 0.3-0.4 mg/kg, orally on an empty stomach once daily for three days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time at which clinical symptoms first showed an improving trend by 168 h after investigational product administration. RESULTS: A total of 1030 eligible participants were assigned to receive the investigational product; 502 participants received ivermectin and 527 participants received a placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was approximately 96 h (approximately four days) for both ivermectin and placebo groups, which did not show statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank test, p = 0.61). The incidence of adverse events and adverse drug reactions did not show statistically significant differences between the ivermectin and placebo groups (chi-square test, p = 0.97, p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that ivermectin (0.3-0.4 mg/kg), as a treatment for patients with mild COVID-19, is ineffective; however, its safety has been confirmed for participants, including minor participants of 12 years or older (IVERMILCO Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05056883.).

Antibody Avidity Maturation Following Recovery From Infection or the Booster Vaccination Grants Breadth of SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Capacity.

BACKGROUND: Cross-neutralizing capacity of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants is important in mitigating (re-)exposures. Role of antibody maturation, the process whereby selection of higher affinity antibodies augments host immunity, to determine SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing capacity was investigated. METHODS: Sera from SARS-CoV-2 convalescents at 2, 6, or 10 months postrecovery, and BNT162b2 vaccine recipients at 3 or 25 weeks postvaccination, were analyzed. Anti-spike IgG avidity was measured in urea-treated ELISAs. Neutralizing capacity was assessed by surrogate neutralization assays. Fold change between variant and wild-type neutralization inferred the breadth of neutralizing capacity. RESULTS: Compared with early-convalescent, avidity indices of late-convalescent sera were significantly higher (median, 37.7 [interquartile range 28.4-45.1] vs 64.9 [57.5-71.5], P < .0001). Urea-resistant, high-avidity IgG best predicted neutralizing capacity (Spearman r = 0.49 vs 0.67 [wild-type]; 0.18-0.52 vs 0.48-0.83 [variants]). Higher-avidity convalescent sera better cross-neutralized SARS-CoV-2 variants (P < .001 [Alpha]; P < .01 [Delta and Omicron]). Vaccinees only experienced meaningful avidity maturation following the booster dose, exhibiting rather limited cross-neutralizing capacity at week 25. CONCLUSIONS: Avidity maturation was progressive beyond acute recovery from infection, or became apparent after the booster vaccine dose, granting broader anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing capacity. Understanding the maturation kinetics of the 2 building blocks of anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity is crucial.

Optimal therapeutic recommendation for Clostridioides difficile infection in pediatric and adolescent populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy profiles of metronidazole (MNZ) and vancomycin (VCM) in pediatric and adolescent patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov) through July 6, 2022. We analyzed the clinical cure and recurrence rates to determine the efficacy of MNZ and VCM. The clinical cure rates in all included studies were not significantly different between MNZ and VCM (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.36-1.10; I2 = 0%; P = 0.10). Subgroup analyses were performed separately for each region to account for regional differences in the CDI. MNZ treatment achieved significantly lower clinical cure rates than did VCM in the United States of America (USA) and Europe (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.19-0.93, I2 = 0%, P = 0.03). Recurrence rates were not significantly different between MNZ and VCM (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.62-3.53, I2 = 28%, P = 0.38).    Conclusion: MNZ exhibited significantly lower clinical cure rates than did VCM in the US and Europe; therefore, it is not recommended for the management of CDI in pediatric and adolescent populations. What is Known: • The unavailability of robust data on recommendations of therapeutic agents for the management of Clostridioides difficile infections in children precludes effective antibiotic choice. What is New: • Metronidazole exhibited significantly lower clinical cure rates than did vancomycin in the United States of America and Europe and recurrence rate was not significantly different between metronidazole and vancomycin; therefore, it is not recommended for the management of Clostridioides difficile infection in children.

Epidemiological analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Gram-negative bacilli that cause bacteremia in Japan.

We investigated the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of seven major Gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp.) that caused bacteremia in Japan. We collected clinical information and isolates from patients aged 20 years or older who developed bacteremia during a year at three Japanese university hospitals and performed microbiological examination. In total, 628 cases were included, half of which were caused by E. coli (315 isolates). P. aeruginosa (56 isolates) was isolated most frequently among non-fermenting bacteria and 33 Bacteroides spp. were isolated. Mortality rates were the highest for P. aeruginosa (7-day, 16.1%; 30-day, 26.8%). The 7- and 30-day mortality rates ranged 3.8-9.0% and 8.3-17.6%, respectively, for Enterobacterales, and they were 15.2% each for Bacteroides spp. Regarding antimicrobial resistance, Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter spp. showed susceptibility to carbapenems and amikacin (98.0-100.0%). The susceptibility rates to ceftolozane/tazobactam ranged 82.4-99.0% for Enterobacterales and 92.9% for P. aeruginosa. More than 30.0% of E. coli isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolone. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producers were found in 21.0% of E. coli and approximately 80% of those were resistant to fluoroquinolones. The susceptibility of the 33 Bacteroides spp. to carbapenems, ampicillin/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam was 100.0%. Among the ESBL producers, blaCTX-M group 9 was the major subgroup in E. coli (77.3%), and blaCTX-M group 1 was detected in 18.2% of E. coli and 50.0% of Klebsiella spp. Continuous surveillance is needed to understand the epidemiology and consider appropriate therapeutic strategies.

First case of bacteremia caused by Cetobacterium somerae following necrotizing cholecystitis.

Cetobacterium somerae, a gram-negative anaerobic rod, first identified in the feces of children with autism, also colonize freshwater fish intestinal tract. However there have been no reports of human C. somerae infection. Here, we describe the first case of C. somerae bacteremia in a patient with necrotizing cholecystitis. A 72-year-old male presented to the emergency department with chills, vomiting, and fever and was diagnosed with acute necrotizing cholecystitis. An emergency cholecystectomy was performed and the following day, two sets of blood culture were positive for gram-negative bacilli. Identification of C. somerae from the biochemical profile was difficult but possible by mass spectrometry and 16s rRNA sequence.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole is a novel triazole antifungal agent. However, the previous outcomes were highlighted by statistical heterogeneity. This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) compared with other antifungal agents (amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazole). METHODS: Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and Ichushi databases were searched for relevant articles that met the inclusion criteria through February 2023. Mortality, IFI rate, discontinuation rate of antifungal therapy and incidence of abnormal hepatic function were evaluated. The discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of therapy discontinuations due to adverse events. The control group included patients who received other antifungal agents. RESULTS: Of the 1784 citations identified for screening, 10 studies with an overall total of 3037 patients enrolled. Isavuconazole was comparable with the control group in mortality and IFI rate in the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, respectively (mortality, odds rate (OR) 1.11, 95% confidential interval (CI) 0.82-1.51; IFI rate, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.49-2.12). Isavuconazole significantly reduced the discontinuation rate in the treatment (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.07) and incidence of hepatic function abnormalities in the treatment and prophylaxis, compared with the control group (treatment, OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.41-3.78; prophylaxis, OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.31-10.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed that isavuconazole was not inferior to other antifungal agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of IFIs, with substantially fewer drug-associated adverse events and discontinuations. Our findings support the use of isavuconazole as the primary treatment and prophylaxis for IFIs.

Systematic review and meta-analysis for impacts of oral antibiotic treatment on pregnancy outcomes in chronic endometritis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic endometritis is a persistent inflammatory condition of the endometrium that negatively affects pregnancy outcomes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend oral antibiotic treatment for chronic endometritis. However, a recent randomized controlled trial concluded that it was unclear whether antibiotic treatment improved pregnancy outcomes. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the impact of oral antibiotic treatments on pregnancy outcomes among patients with chronic endometritis. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Ichushi, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases until May 2021. We compared the pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis with and without antibiotic treatment. We then focused on the implantation rate, intrauterine pregnancy rate, and live birth rate to evaluate pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three hundred seventy-two patients were treated with antibiotics, while 1024 patients were not treated with antibiotics. Various antibiotic regimens were administered during the study period [14-21 days]. Antibiotic treatments for chronic endometritis did not increase the implantation rate (odds ratios [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.33), intrauterine pregnancy rate (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.72-1.63), or live birth rate (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65-1.97). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis proved that oral antibiotic treatment did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with chronic endometritis. Accordingly, further studies are needed to elucidate the treatment to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Novel approach for rapid detection of extended spectrum ß-lactamase and metalloid-ß-lactamase using drug susceptibility testing microfluidic device (DSTM).

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Rapid detection of ß-lactamases is important in a recent situation where resistant bacteria are increasing. By using the drug susceptibility testing microfluidic device (DSTM), rapid screening of extended spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) and metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) has become possible. METHODS: ß-lactams and ß-lactamase inhibitors were pre-fixed in the DSTM for use. A bacterial suspension in Mueller-Hinton broth (McF 0.25) was introduced into the device, and the effects of ß-lactamase inhibitor on morphological changes caused by ß-lactam were evaluated after 3 h incubation. RESULTS: Clinical isolates genetically confirmed to produce ß-lactamase were used. Of the 84 ESBL-producing strains, 80 strains (95%) turned to be ESBL positive, and five strains (6%) of them MBL were positive as well as ESBL. Four strains (5%) were negative for both ESBL and MBL. Of the 24 MBL-producing strains, 23 strains (96%) were positive for MBL. All the 43 AmpC-producing strains were negative for both ESBL and MBL. Of the 156 ESBL- and MBL-nonproducing strains, 155 strains (99%) were negative for both ESBL and MBL, and one strain was positive for ESBL. With this method, the detection sensitivity was 95% and the specificity was 100% for ESBL, whereas the detection sensitivity was 96% and the specificity was 98% for MBL. These results were not significantly different from the results of the disc diffusion method. CONCLUSION: The DSTM method allows rapid detection of ß-lactamases in 3 h and may be a useful replacement for the disc diffusion method.

Empyema and bacteremia caused by Aeromonas hydrophila: Case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the advance in antibiotics and widespread chest tube drainage, acute empyema still shows a high mortality rate, accounting for 10-25%. We experienced a case of acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila, which is extremely uncommon, and reviewed all previously published articles. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year older man with a medical history of liver cirrhosis (LC) due to chronic hepatitis C and hepatic cell carcinoma was admitted to our institute. Elevated inflammatory reaction and effusions on chest CT were seen, and he was suspected of having acute empyema. Although an empiric antibiotic therapy of meropenem with chest tube drainage was performed as an initial treatment, he died within 8 hours of admission. Postmortem, both blood and left pleural fluid cultures yielded Aeromonas hydrophila. The final diagnosis was acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila. We reviewed previously reported empyema caused by Aeromonas species cases (4 A. hydrophila, and 1 A. veronii) in 4 previous reports written in English, including ours. Of 5, all were male, and the mean age was 52 years (range 27-76 years). All patients had LC due to alcohol or viral infections. As for antibiotics initially prescribed, third-generation cephalosporins were most frequently used in 3/5 (60%). Thoracentesis was performed in all patients (100%). As for prognosis, 2 (40%) survived, and 3 (60%) died. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the possibility of acute empyema caused by A. hydrophila among patients with chronic hepatic disease.

Could quick SOFA and SOFA score be a predictive tool for 30-day and in-hospital mortality in acute empyema?

While acute empyema is a critical infectious disease showing a high mortality rate, there are no prognostic tools to evaluate the disease severity and prognosis for patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort to determine whether quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and SOFA score can predict the disease severity and prognosis of acute empyema. A total of 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 69 years and 41 patients (77%) were male. Twenty-two patients (42%) had multiple underlying diseases with the Charlson comorbidity index ≥3. The-30 days, and in-hospital deaths were 7 (13%) and 10 (19%), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of SOFA score and CCI for 30-day and in-hospital deaths were 0.814 (p = 0.073) and 0.752 (p = 0.082), 0.848 (p = 0.07) and 0.762 (p = 0.011), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that qSOFA ≥2 and SOFA score ≥2, isolation of potentially drug-resistant (PDR) pathogen, high CCI (≥3), performance status of 2-4, surgical intervention, and anaerobic bacteria involvement were prognostic factors. Of these, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that qSOFA ≥2 and SOFA score ≥2 (p = 0.011), isolation of PDR pathogen (p = 0.005), and high CCI (≥3) (p = 0.015) were independently poor prognostic factors. We concluded that qSOFA and SOFA scores could predict the disease severity and prognosis in acute empyema. Additionally, isolation of PDR pathogens and high CCI could be poor prognostic factors for patients.

Efficacy and validity of guideline-concordant treatment according to the JRS guidelines for the managements of pneumonia in adults updated in 2017 for nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia. A propensity-matching score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) commonly receive empiric antibiotic therapy according to the guideline's recommendation corresponding to the patient's deteriorated conditions. However, it is unclear whether guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) could be effective or not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate the efficacy and validity of GCT according to the current guideline for pneumonia, we conducted this retrospective study. NHCAP patients who were admitted to our institute between 2014 and 2017 were enrolled. Based on the initial antibiotic treatment, these patients were divided into two groups, the GCT group (n = 83) and the non-GCT group (n = 146). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics and potential confounders between the two groups. After PSM, patients' characteristics, microbial profiles, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups were well-balanced after PSM, and 78 patients were selected from each group. There were no differences in patients' characteristics or microbial profiles between the two groups. As for outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day, in-hospital mortality rate, duration of antibiotic treatment, or admission. The severity of pneumonia was more severe in patients with the GCT group than those with the non-GCT group. Anti-pseudomonal agents as initial treatment were more frequently seen in patients with the GCT group than those in the non-GCT group. CONCLUSION: Unlike previous studies, GCT's recommendation for management of pneumonia by the JRS in 2017 would appear to be valid and does not increase the mortality rate.

Oral fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Fidaxomicin (FDX) has received considerable attention as a novel therapeutic alternative agent to vancomycin (VCM) for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). However, the superiority and efficacy profile of FDX are not sufficiently determined by high-quality evidence. This study aimed to clarify the superiority of FDX for CDI treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated the efficacy and safety of FDX and VCM in patients with CDI. Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched for studies published until October 15, 2021. The primary endpoint was global cure. The secondary endpoints were clinical cure, recurrence, and adverse event. Risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Assessment Criteria. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to VCM, FDX was associated with significantly higher global cure rates (RR = 1.18, P < 0.00001; RD = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.07-0.16). In addition, clinical cure rates were comparable between FDX and VCM (P = 0.31). FDX was associated with significantly lower recurrence rates compared to VCM (RR = 0.59, P < 0.0001). In addition, adverse event rates were not significantly different between the drugs (P = 0.41). CONCLUSION: FDX achieves significantly higher global cure rates and lower recurrence rates and is comparable to VCM in clinical cure rates and adverse event rates in patients with CDI. Collectively, FDX is superior to VCM as a therapeutic agent for CDI.

Comparative study of SmartAmp assay and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction by saliva specimen for the diagnosing COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic of a novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been problematic worldwide. A new SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test (SmartAmp) was licensed in Japan in July 2021. This method, which enables us to diagnose COVID-19 as well as a gene mutation on the virus, is promising to reduce medical costs and staff labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SmartAmp assay for diagnosing COVID-19, we performed this retrospective study at our institute during April and May 2021. We compared the results of the SmartAmp assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) using a saliva sample from individuals suspected as having COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 70 samples tested, the SmartAmp assay had 50 (71%) positive and 20 (29%) negative results. Using rRT-PCR as a reference, the diagnostic accuracy displayed a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 97.7%, and a negative predictive value of 70.4%. On the other hand, false-negative cases were found in 7 (10%), and there was no significant difference of Ct-value between true positive and false negative cases (Mean Ct-value 25.2 vs. 27.5 cycles, p = 0.226 by Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: The SmartAmp assay is a valuable method to diagnose COVID-19 rapidly. However, the negative predictive value is not high enough to diagnose the disease, so that negative results should be considered for rRT-PCR testing if patients are suspected of having COVID-19.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of decontamination methods to prevent hospital environmental contamination and transmission of Clostridioidesdifficile.

The current guidelines suggest that hospital rooms previously occupied with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) patients should be decontaminated with recommended decontamination methods because C. difficile can persist on surfaces despite adherence to the recommended procedures. Recently, ultraviolet (UV) light and hydrogen peroxide have increasingly been used as innovative decontamination methods. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate which decontamination methods are effective in reducing environmental C. difficile contamination. We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Ichushi until March 11, 2021. We evaluated the efficacy of decontamination methods in terms of the frequency of C. difficile contamination on high-touch surfaces in hospital rooms and the incidence of hospital-acquired C. difficile infection. Among the 15 studies retrieved in our meta-analysis, eight evaluated decontamination methods with the frequency of C. difficile detection among samples after disinfection procedures, and eight reported the number of hospital-acquired CDI cases. Pooled analysis indicated that hydrogen peroxide significantly reduced the frequency of environmental C. difficile contamination, compared with hypochlorite (odds ratios [OR]: 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.23). Additionally, hydrogen peroxide reduced the incidence of hospital-acquired CDI compared to other methods (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28-0.96). Decontamination with UV significantly reduced the incidence of hospital-acquired CDI compared to hypochlorite (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). The use of hydrogen peroxide and UV can help prevent environmental C. difficile contamination and transmission in healthcare facilities.

Risk factors of first recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVES: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) often recurs. Approximately 25% of patients have recurrences after the initial treatment, and patients who have relapsed once are more likely to relapse. We aimed to identify the risk factors for initial CDI recurrence. METHODS: We performed a retrospective survey of patient backgrounds and treatment-related factors. Risk factors were analyzed using single and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were included in the study. Prophylactic probiotic use and nasogastric tube feeding were independent risk factors for the initial recurrence of CDI. Patients using prophylactic probiotics had significantly higher recurrence rates than those not using prophylactic probiotics. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic probiotic use and nasogastric tube placement may be risk factors for the initial recurrence of CDI. It is noteworthy that CDI that occurs during the use of prophylactic probiotics may be prone to recurrence.