Serum CXCL10 levels are associated with better responses to abatacept treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify therapeutic predictors of abatacept (ABT) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in vitro and in patients. METHODS: T cell cytokine, monokine, and chemokine levels in culture supernatants or serum were determined using flow cytometry bead-based immunoassays. CXCL10 mRNA and protein expressions were also assessed using qPCR and ELISA analyses, respectively. In the patient study, 25 ABT-treated patients were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into low disease activity (LDA) or non-low disease activity (non-LDA) groups at 24 weeks of ABT treatment. Seven T cell cytokines and CXCL10 levels were compared in these two groups. RESULTS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy donors were stimulated by immobilised anti-CD3 with or without ABT for three days, and the levels of 13 T cell cytokines in culture supernatants were determined. ABT significantly inhibited anti-CD3-induced production of IFN-γ. To examine the effect of these T cell cytokines in rheumatoid synovial cells (RSC), RSCs were stimulated with 10% of culture supernatants from anti-CD3-stimulated PBMCs with or without ABT, and the levels of 23 cytokines were determined. Only CXCL10 was significantly reduced by ABT-treated supernatants. In the patient study, CXCL10 levels at baseline were not different between the LDA and non-LDA groups, whereas CXCL10 levels at 24 weeks were significantly decreased in the LDA group only. CONCLUSIONS: ABT treatment significantly affected IFN-γ and CXCL10 cytokine levels in vitro. In addition, serum CXCL10 levels were associated with better responses in ABT treatment.

Risk Factors for Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Prophylactic Indication of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Immunosuppressant medications (ISPs) increase the occurrence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) for PCP is effective but has serious adverse effects and so should be selectively used for patients at high risk. The aims of this study were to clarify the risk factors for PCP in RA patients and to establish the indications for administering TMP/SMX. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2640 patients (2010-2014) diagnosed as having RA who had not received a prophylactic administration of TMP/SMX. The risk factors for PCP were evaluated by comparing the clinical parameters between patients with PCP (PCP group, n = 19) and those without (non-PCP group, n = 2621). RESULTS: The PCP group was older (70 vs. 64 years), received higher doses of prednisolone (6.2 vs. 2.4 mg/d) and methotrexate (7.7 vs. 5.2 mg/wk), and had a greater number of ISPs (1.3 vs. 0.8) (p < 0.05). We stratified the PCP risk using a scoring system based on odds ratios (ORs) calculated for these parameters (methotrexate ≥6 mg/wk OR = 4.5, 1 point; age ≥65 years, OR = 3.7, 1 point; ≥2 ISPs, OR = 3.7, 1 point; prednisolone ≥5 mg/d, OR = 12.4, 3 points). The incidence of PCP among patients scoring 0 to 2 points was 0.04%; 3 to 4 points, 2.3%; and 5 points or more, 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic administration of TMP/SMX for PCP is recommended for RA patients who score at least 5 points with our system.

Tolerability and efficacy of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase I study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of single and multiple doses of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary objectives included evaluating its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy. METHODS: This dose-escalation, single- and multiple-dose, multicenter, open-label study was conducted at nine sites in Japan. Seven patients were enrolled at each of three dose levels (2, 8 and 16 mg/kg) and received a single intravenous dose of abatacept on day 1 of the single-dose phase. The multiple-dose phase, at the same dose, started once the patients had completed the single-dose phase and when it was confirmed that there were no safety issues. RESULTS: Twenty patients started the single-dose phase. Single and multiple doses of abatacept were well tolerated, and adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no discontinuations or deaths due to adverse events. The pharmacokinetics of abatacept were linear, with no notable accumulation. There were no immunogenic effects on the safety, efficacy, or pharmacokinetics of abatacept. Multiple doses of abatacept improved individual items of the American College of Rheumatology core set. CONCLUSION: Single and multiple doses of abatacept showed favorable tolerability and efficacy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Pretreatment Prediction of Individual Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' Response to Anti-Cytokine Therapy Using Serum Cytokine/Chemokine/Soluble Receptor Biomarkers.

UNLABELLED: The inability to match rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with the anti-cytokine agent most efficacious for them is a major hindrance to patients' speedy recovery and to the clinical use of anti-cytokine therapy. Identifying predictive biomarkers that can assist in matching RA patients with more suitable anti-cytokine treatment was our aim in this report. The sample consisted of 138 RA patients (naïve and non-naïve) who were administered tocilizumab or etanercept for a minimum of 16 weeks as a prescribed RA treatment. Pretreatment serum samples were obtained from patients and clinical measures of their disease activity were evaluated at baseline and 16 weeks after treatment commenced. Using patients' pretreatment serum, we measured 31 cytokines/chemokines/soluble receptors and used multiple linear regression analysis to identify biomarkers that correlated with patients' symptom levels (DAS28-CRP score) at week 16 and multiple logistic analyses for biomarkers that correlated with patients' final outcome. The results revealed that sgp130, logIL-6, logIL-8, logEotaxin, logIP-10, logVEGF, logsTNFR-I and logsTNFR-II pretreatment serum levels were predictive of the week 16 DAS28-CRP score in naïve tocilizumab patients while sgp130, logGM-CSF and logIP-10 were predictive in non-naïve patients. Additionally, we found logIL-9, logVEGF and logTNF-α to be less reliable at predicting the week 16 DAS28-CRP score in naïve etanercept patients. Multiple linear regression and multiple logistic regression analyses identified biomarkers that were predictive of remission/non-remission in tocilizumab and etanercept therapy. Although less reliable than those for tocilizumab, we identified a few possible biomarkers for etanercept therapy. The biomarkers for these two therapies differ suggesting that their efficacy will vary for individual patients. We discovered biomarkers in RA pretreatment serum that predicted their week 16 DAS28-CRP score and clinical outcome to tocilizumab therapy. Most of these biomarkers, especially sgp130, are involved in RA pathogenesis and IL-6 signal transduction, which further suggests that they are highly reliable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial UMIN000016298.

Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody therapy favors adrenal androgen secretion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) were demonstrated to inhibit adrenal steroidogenesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and this was particularly evident in the increase in adrenal androgen levels during anti-TNF therapy. This study investigated the influence on steroidogenesis of an interleukin-6 (IL-6)-neutralizing strategy using IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies (referred to as MRA). METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study over 12 weeks in 29 patients with RA being treated with prednisolone, 13 of whom received placebo and 16 of whom received 8 mg MRA/kg body weight, the effects of MRA on serum levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), DHEA sulfate (DHEAS), androstenedione (ASD), estrone, and 17beta-estradiol, as well as their respective molar ratios, were determined. RESULTS: MRA therapy markedly improved clinical signs of inflammation (the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, swollen joint score, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints). Serum levels of ACTH and cortisol and the molar ratio of cortisol to ACTH did not change. Although serum levels of DHEA and DHEAS remained stable during therapy, the DHEAS:DHEA molar ratio significantly decreased in treated patients (P = 0.048). Serum levels of ASD as well as the ASD:cortisol and ASD:17OHP molar ratios increased in MRA-treated patients (minimum P < 0.004). Serum levels of estrone and 17beta-estradiol did not change. but the estrone:ASD molar ratio (an indicator of aromatization) decreased during 12 weeks of MRA treatment (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Neutralization of IL-6 increases secretion of biologically active adrenal androgens in relation to that of precursor hormones and estrogens. This is another important indication that proinflammatory cytokines interfere with adrenal androgen steroidogenesis in patients with RA.