Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare single and tandem ureteral stenting in the management of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO). METHODS: Our hospital's institutional review board approved this prospective study. Between November 2014 and June 2017, single ureteral stenting was performed in 56 patients (94 renal units) and tandem ureteral stenting in 48 patients (63 renal units) for MUO. A comparative analysis of the technical success rate, patient survival, stent patency, and complications was performed. RESULTS: Similar demographic data were observed in patients receiving either single or tandem ureteral stenting. The technical success rate was 93.6% (88/94) for single ureteral stenting and 95.2% (60/63) for tandem ureteral stenting. There was no difference in overall survival between patients receiving single or tandem ureteral stenting (p = 0.41), but the duration of stent patency in tandem ureteral stenting was significantly longer (p = 0.022). The mean patency time was 176.7 ± 21.3 days for single ureteral stenting, and 214.7 ± 21.0 days for tandem ureteral stenting. The complications of ureteral stenting were urinary tract infection (n = 18), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 5), haematuria (n = 3), and stent migration (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Tandem ureteral stenting is a safe and feasible treatment for MUO, and had better efficacy compared to single ureteral stenting. KEY POINTS: • Ureteral stenting is an established treatment for the management of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) • Prospective single-centre study showed that tandem ureteral stenting is a safe and feasible treatment for MUO • Tandem ureteral stenting provides longer stent patency compared to single ureteral stenting in patient with MUO.

Prevalence, clinical features and treatment pattern of patients with concurrent diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic disease: results of a 14-year retrospective study in a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: Multiple comorbidities, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have been reported to be associated with psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and the clinical features of RA among patients with psoriasis in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2013, all patients coded with psoriatic disease (ICD-9 CM 696.0 OR ICD-9 CM696.1) and RA (ICD-9 CM 714.0) in a tertiary medical center were enrolled. RESULTS: There were 10,844 patients and 9073 patients with psoriatic disease and RA identified by diagnostic codes, respectively. Among patients with psoriasis, 111 patients had claim-based diagnosis of RA (1.02%). By reviewing medical records and telephone interview or clinic visits, 25 of the 111 patients (0.23%) was identified unequivocally as having concurrent RA. Among them, 17 (68%) were female and 16 (64%) patients developed arthritis prior to the onset of psoriasis with a mean lag of 6.3 years (1-19 years); 8 (32%) had psoriasis skin lesions prior to the onset of arthritis with a mean lag of 6.9 years (3-20 years); 1 (4%) had skin lesions and arthritis in the same time; 17 (68%) patients also fulfilled the CASPAR classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis. The mean age of onset for arthritis was 49.6 years old. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RA in psoriasis might be overestimated in some previous studies using claimed database. Patients with concurrent RA and psoriasis showed a comparable age of onset and male to female ratio, but had more axial involvements compared to patients without psoriasis.