Outpatient clinical pharmacy practice in the face of COVID-19 at a cancer center in New York City.

PURPOSE: With the rapid spread of COVID-19 in New York City since early March 2020, innovative measures were needed for clinical pharmacy specialists to provide direct clinical care safely to cancer patients. Allocating the workforce was necessary to meet the surging needs of the inpatient services due to the COVID-19 outbreak, which had the potential to compromise outpatient services. We present here our approach of restructuring clinical pharmacy services and providing direct patient care in outpatient clinics during the pandemic. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic clinical documentation involving clinical pharmacy specialist patient encounters in 9 outpatient clinics from March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020. The analysis of the clinical pharmacy specialist interventions and the impact of the interventions was descriptive. DATA SUMMARY: As hospital services were modified to handle the surge due to COVID-19, select clinical pharmacy specialists were redeployed from the outpatient clinics or research blocks to COVID-19 inpatient teams. During these 3 months, clinical pharmacy specialists were involved in 2535 patient visits from 9 outpatient clinics and contributed a total of 4022 interventions, the majority of which utilized telemedicine. The interventions provided critical clinical pharmacy care during the pandemic and omitted 199 in-person visits for medical care. CONCLUSION: The swift transition to telemedicine allowed the provision of direct clinical pharmacy services to patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Evaluation of toxicity of carmustine with or without bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or progressive high grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: An increased incidence in hematologic toxicity has been reported with the addition of bevacizumab to lomustine for patients with recurrent or progressive high grade gliomas (HGG). Data regarding incidence of toxicity with combination bevacizumab and carmustine is limited. The purpose of this study is to compare toxicity of single agent carmustine and carmustine plus bevacizumab for patients with HGGs. METHODS: This single center retrospective study at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center included pathologically confirmed HGG with age ≥ 18 years who received carmustine between January 2003 and May 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with HGGs collectively received 110 doses of BCNU during the specified time period. Sixteen patients received single agent BCNU (30 doses); 49 patients received combination bevacizumab with BCNU (80 doses). There was no significant difference in incidence or grade of toxicity between single agent and combination therapy with respect to hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Rates of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (20% vs 13.8%, p = 0.55) and thrombocytopenia (23.3% vs 23.8%, p = 1) did not differ between single agent BCNU versus combination therapy. When stratified based on dose ( < 150 mg/m2, 150 mg/m2, > 150 mg/m2), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to grade 3 and 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report the toxicity of carmustine with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent and refractory HGG. The addition of bevacizumab to carmustine did not increase incidence or grade of hematologic toxicity when compared to single agent carmustine.

Incidence of skeletal related events in patients with bone metastasis receiving denosumab every four weeks compared to intervals greater than every four weeks.

OBJECTIVE: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used for prevention of skeletal related events in patients with bone metastasis from solid tumors and is administered every four weeks. In our practice, denosumab is often given at different frequencies more similar to patient's chemotherapy regimens to decrease frequency of clinic visits. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of skeletal related events, incidence of hypocalcemia, and cost with denosumab given at every four weeks and denosumab given at other frequencies. METHODS: This retrospective study at Duke University Health System included solid tumor patients with an age ≥18 years who received denosumab for prevention of skeletal related events. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included, with 29 in the every four-week group and 65 in the greater than every four-week group. Patients who received denosumab every four weeks had a 41.4% incidence of skeletal related events compared to 26.2% incidence of skeletal related events in patients who received denosumab at intervals greater than every four weeks (OR: 0.50; p = 0.14). There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of hypocalcemia. Based on average wholesale price, when the frequency of denosumab is extended to greater than every four weeks, annual cost savings per patient ranged from $4700 (every 5 weeks) to $18,800 (every 12 weeks). CONCLUSION: While this study raises the possibility of decreasing the frequency of denosumab administration, further data are necessary to confirm that less frequent administration is non-inferior to every four-week administration.

Incidence of hypocalcemia in patients receiving denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastasis.

Background Denosumab therapy is commonly used for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastasis. However, a common side effect of denosumab is hypocalcemia. Objective The aim of the study is to determine the incidence of hypocalcemia in patients receiving denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastasis and evaluate risk factors for developing hypocalcemia. Methods This was a retrospective medication use evaluation reviewing the incidence of hypocalcemia in patients receiving outpatient denosumab for prevention of skeletal-related events at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Additionally, various risk factors were reviewed to determine their risk of developing hypocalcemia. Results As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03, of the 106 patients included in the study population, 37 (35%) patients had an incidence of hypocalcemia within 30 days of denosumab administration. Fourteen patients (13.2%) had an incidence of grade 1, 13 patients (12.3%) had an incidence of grade 2 hypocalcemia, and 7 patients (6.6%) had an incidence of grade 3 hypocalcemia. Grade 4 hypocalcemia occurred in three (2.8%) patients. Calcium supplementation did not decrease the risk of developing hypocalcemia. Patients who had one or more episodes of acute kidney insufficiency were at a higher risk of developing hypocalcemia (odds ratio = 7.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-36.3), p = 0.001). Conclusion This study found that the overall incidence of hypocalcemia and severe hypocalcemia was higher than reported in clinical trials. Additionally, calcium supplementation did not have an effect on incidence of hypocalcemia, while patients who experienced acute kidney insufficiency while on denosumab had a higher likelihood of developing hypocalcemia.

Use of naloxone for reversal of life-threatening opioid toxicity in cancer-related pain.

OBJECTIVE: To review the emergency-based approach to opioid toxicity reversal in cancer-related pain patients. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE and PubMed search was conducted (1966 to May 2014) using the terms opioids, cancer, naloxone, respiratory depression, morphine, morphine derivatives, emergency, and anaphylaxis. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: English articles in human subjects identified from the MEDLINE and PubMed search were evaluated. Citations were excluded if they addressed acute overdoses, non-cancer pain, and/or acute, non-chronic pain. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Pain is a common occurrence in the oncology population. Although toxicity from opioids is common, life-threatening toxicities are not. The use of naloxone in this particular patient population occurs frequently for any perceived opioid-related effect and can be detrimental to the oncology patient's care and quality of life. Difficulties exist when attempting to separate opioid toxicity from disease progression or metastases and, therefore, a thorough history is needed prior to complete opioid reversal in this population. Severity of the opioid intoxication should dictate reversal strategy. Dosing strategies that take into account both the treatment of the opioid-related effects as well as the negative effects reversal will have on the patient are offered. We also review the pre-hospital setting and identified the need for protocols that not only take the patient's symptoms into account, but also the patient's cancer history. CONCLUSION: Opioid reversal protocols should be developed by a multi-disciplinary team. Each protocol should differentiate those toxicities which are life-threatening and require complete opioid reversal with toxicities that require small aliquots of naloxone to mitigate the presenting symptoms.

A systematic approach towards missing lab data in electronic health records: A case study in non-small cell lung cancer and multiple myeloma.

Real-world data derived from electronic health records often exhibit high levels of missingness in variables, such as laboratory results, presenting a challenge for statistical analyses. We developed a systematic workflow for gathering evidence of different missingness mechanisms and performing subsequent statistical analyses. We quantify evidence for missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR), mechanisms using Hotelling's multivariate t-test, and random forest classifiers, respectively. We further illustrate how to apply sensitivity analyses using the not at random fully conditional specification procedure to examine changes in parameter estimates under missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms. In simulation studies, we validated these diagnostics and compared analytic bias under different mechanisms. To demonstrate the application of this workflow, we applied it to two exemplary case studies with an advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a multiple myeloma cohort derived from a real-world oncology database. Here, we found strong evidence against MCAR, and some evidence of MAR, implying that imputation approaches that attempt to predict missing values by fitting a model to observed data may be suitable for use. Sensitivity analyses did not suggest meaningful departures of our analytic results under potential MNAR mechanisms; these results were also in line with results reported in clinical trials.

Is more better? Increased doses of high dose methotrexate and addition of rituximab is associated with improved outcomes in a large primary CNS lymphoma cohort.

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive primary brain tumor. While high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) regimens remain standard of care, it remains unclear if optimization of HDMTX doses and the addition of rituximab provide clinical benefit. Over the last 30 years, standard care given at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) has evolved, allowing the comparison of patients receiving different numbers of HDMTX doses and those treated with and without rituximab. The purpose of this study was to describe outcomes based on treatment pattern changes. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, IRB-approved study at MSKCC included patients with immunocompetent PCNSL, age ≥18 years and diagnosed between 1/1983-12/2017. Overall survival (OS) was modeled from date of last HDMTX for analyses associating HDMTX and OS. Multivariable Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: There were 546 patients identified with newly diagnosed PCNSL. Median overall survival (mOS) of the entire population was 4.7 years (95% CI: 3.8-5.7 years); 3.3 years (95% CI: 2.7-3.9 years) in patients diagnosed prior to 2006 and 8.1 years (95% CI: 6.6-11.1 years) in patients diagnosed 2006 onwards. Patients receiving ≥6 doses of HDMTX had improved survival compared to those receiving <6 doses of HDMTX (mOS: 7.8 vs. 4.3 years; P=0.001). Patients receiving induction rituximab had improved OS compared to those who did not receive rituximab (mOS: 10.5 vs. 3.2 years; P<0.0001). Patients receiving ≥6 doses of HDMTX and rituximab had greatest mOS at 13 years, with a 70% reduction in death (HR =0.30; 95% CI: 0.19-0.47) adjusting for treatment era, sex, and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes comprising age and karnofsky performance score (KPS). Conclusions: OS for PCNSL has improved significantly over the last few decades. Patients seem to benefit with ≥6 doses of HDMTX and the addition of rituximab, an effect independent of treatment era, age, and KPS.

Rituximab, Methotrexate, Carmustine, Etoposide, and Prednisone (RMBVP) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective single-center study.

Relapsed/refractory Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (R/R PCNSL) has a poor prognosis with no established preferred treatment. We report the efficacy and toxicity of a combination chemotherapy regimen: methotrexate, carmustine, etoposide, and prednisone with or without rituximab (RMBVP). This retrospective study included thirty patients who received a median of two 28-day cycles (0.5-5). The median age was 66 years (23-81); median KPS was 70 (30-90); 14 (46.7%) were women. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy and all received prior methotrexate. Of 29 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 73.3% (n = 22). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.6 months. Patients who recurred or progressed <12 months since last chemotherapy had a shorter median PFS (7.6 vs 37.6 months). Toxicity was moderate with 20% rates of severe myelosuppression. RMBVP is a tolerable treatment option for R/R PCNSL, with favorable response rates in those with recurrent disease.

Immunotherapy in Gliomas.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the immunotherapy approaches currently under investigation for the treatment of gliomas. To discuss the management of immune-related adverse effects. DATA SOURCES: Published literature, clinical trials, and oncology association guidance documents. CONCLUSION: There are numerous modalities of immune treatment currently being evaluated in patients with glioma, including peptide vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, oncolytic viruses, CAR-T cells, and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Immunotherapy utilizes new mechanisms of treatment that may lead us to the eradication of gliomas. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Immunotherapy is a rapidly growing field in the treatment of gliomas. Oncology nurses are often involved in the safe administration of these therapies, as well as the identification and management of immune-related toxicities.

Retrospective review of safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in refractory high grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression has been reported in up to 61% of high grade gliomas (HGG). The purpose of this study was to describe safety and efficacy of PD-1 inhibition in patients with refractory HGGs. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board approved single center retrospective study included adult patients with pathologically confirmed HGG who received a PD-1 inhibitor from 9/2014-10/2016 outside of a clinical trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. RESULTS: Twenty five HGG patients received pembrolizumab as part of a compassionate use program. Median age was 50 years (range 30-72); 44% were men; 13 had glioblastoma (52%), 7 anaplastic astrocytoma (28%), 2 anaplastic oligodendroglioma (8%), 2 unspecified HGG (8%), and 1 gliosarcoma (4%). Median prior lines of treatments were 4 (range 1-9). Nineteen (76%) previously failed bevacizumab. Median KPS was 80 (range 50-100). Concurrent treatment included bevacizumab in 17 (68%) or bevacizumab and temozolomide in 2 (8%) patients. Median number of doses administered was 3 (range 1-14). Outcomes were assessed in 24 patients. PD-1 inhibitor related adverse events included LFT elevations, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, myalgias/arthralgias, and rash. Best radiographic response was partial response (n = 2), stable disease (n = 5), and progressive disease (n = 17). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 1.4 months (range 0.2-9.4) and median overall survival (OS) was 4 months (range 0.5-13.8). Three-month PFS was 12% and 6-month OS was 28%. CONCLUSION: While response rates are low, a few patients had a prolonged PFS. Pembrolizumab was tolerated with few serious toxicities, even in patients receiving concomitant therapy.