COVID-19 Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) pathway: real-world outcomes on vaccination rates and antibody protection.

BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosed vaccine-related "allergies" lead to unnecessary vaccine deferrals and incomplete vaccinations, leaving patients unprotected against COVID-19. To overcome limitations and queues for Allergist assessment, the "VAS-Track" pathway was developed to evaluate patients via a multi-disciplinary triage model including nurses, non-specialists, and Allergists. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of VAS-Track and evaluate its real-world impact in terms of vaccination rates and COVID-19 protection. METHODS: Patients referred to VAS-Track between September 2021 and March 2022 were recruited. Subgroup analysis was performed with prospective pre- and post-clinic antibody levels. RESULTS: Nurse-assisted screening identified 10,412 (76%) referrals as inappropriate. 369 patients were assessed by VAS-Track. Overall, 100% of patients were recommended to complete vaccination and 332 (90%) completed their primary series. No patients reported any significant allergic reactions following subsequent vaccination. Vaccination completion rates between patients seen by non-specialists and additional Allergist review were similar (90% vs. 89%, p = 0.617). Vaccination rates were higher among patients with prior history of immediate-type reactions (odds ratio: 2.43, p = 0.025). Subgroup analysis revealed that only 20% (56/284) of patients had seropositive COVID-19 neutralizing antibody levels (≥ 15 AU/mL) prior to VAS-Track, which increased to 92% after vaccine completion (pre-clinic antibody level 6.0 ± 13.5 AU/mL vs. post-clinic antibody level 778.8 ± 337.4 AU/mL, p > 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A multi-disciplinary allergy team was able to streamline our COVID-19 VAS services, enabling almost all patients to complete their primary series, significantly boosting antibody levels and real-world COVID-19 protection. We propose similar multidisciplinary models to be further utilized, especially in the settings with limited allergy services.

The Role of the Allergist in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Allergy Safety: A Pilot Study on a "Hub-and-Spoke" Model for Population-Wide Allergy Service.

BACKGROUND: Hong Kong started its coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination program in February 2021. A territory-wide Vaccine Allergy Safety (VAS) clinic was set up to assess individuals deemed at "higher risk" of COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A novel "hub-and-spoke" model was piloted to tackle the overwhelming demand of services by allowing nonallergists to conduct assessment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of the VAS hub-and-spoke model for allergy assessment. METHODS: Records of patients attending the VAS hub-and-spoke Clinics between March and August 2021 were reviewed (n = 2725). We studied the overall results between the Hub (allergist led) and Spoke (nonallergist led) Clinics. The Hub and the Hong Kong West Cluster Spoke Clinic were selected for subgroup analysis as they saw the largest number of patients (n = 1411). RESULTS: A total of 2725 patients were assessed under the VAS hub-and-spoke model. Overall, 2324 patients (85.3%) were recommended to proceed with vaccination. Allergists recommended significantly more patients for vaccination than nonallergists (odds ratio = 21.58; P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that 881 of 1055 (83.5%) patients received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination safely after assessment. Among those recommended vaccination, more patients assessed by allergists received their first dose of vaccination (odds ratio = 4.18; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The hub-and-spoke model has proven to be successful for the vaccination campaign. This study has illustrated the crucial role of allergists in countering vaccine hesitancy. Results from the study revealed considerable differences in outcomes between allergist-led and nonallergist-led clinics. Precise reasons for these differences warrant further evaluation. We are hopeful that the hub-and-spoke model can be similarly adapted for other allergist-integrative services in the future.

Patient Preferences for Anxiety and Depression Screening in Cancer Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

OBJECTIVES: Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer care is recommended, as identification is the first step in managing anxiety and depression. Nevertheless, patient preferences for anxiety and depression screening in cancer care are unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate and identify the aspects of an anxiety and depression screening program cancer patients value most, to inform decision-makers about ways to improve patient uptake and ultimately, the provision of patient-centered care. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was designed and implemented within an Australian cancer population sample. Participants were presented with a series of hypothetical screening programs labeled as "screening program 1" and "screening program 2" and were asked to choose their preferred one. The discrete choice experiment was administered using an online survey platform. A mixed logit and a latent class analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Participants (n = 294) preferred screening to be conducted by a cancer nurse, face-to-face, and at regular intervals (monthly or every 3 months). Participants also preferred follow-up care to be delivered by mental health professionals embedded within the cancer care team. Factors that influenced preferences were the low cost and short waiting times for access to care. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients prefer cancer services with integrated mental healthcare services. To maximize patient uptake, anxiety and depression screening programs should be routinely offered, delivered by oncology healthcare staff in a face-to-face format, and, postscreening, to be care for by mental health professionals embedded within the cancer service.

Disparities in chronic spontaneous urticaria: Eligibility for drug reimbursement associated with clinical outcomes.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an immunologic condition with an estimated prevalence of 0.1%. For CSU that is poorly controlled despite the use of antihistamines, omalizumab is the only treatment approved and recommended by international guidelines. Objective: Our aim was to outline the impact of treatment accessibility on CSU outcomes in the real world. Methods: Serial data on adult patients with CSU receiving care for at least 6 months at a dedicated, immunologist-led urticaria clinic at Grantham Hospital in Hong Kong between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Patients' clinicodemographic data, drug eligibility status (eligible for reimbursement or not), treatment step, and disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score [UAS7]) were collected and compared according to drug eligibility status. Results: This study included 238 patients, 80 (33.6%) of whom were eligible for reimbursement and 158 of whom were not. No significant clinicodemographic differences, including disease activity, were found at baseline. At latest follow-up, significantly more patients in the eligible group were receiving omalizumab (28.7% vs 5.7% [P < .001]), which is equivalent to a multivariate odds ratio of 9.35 (95% CI = 3.689-23.703 [P < .001]). The discrepancy persisted even in patients with moderate-to-severe CSU whose UAS7 was 16 or higher (40.6% [13 of 32] vs 10.2% [6 of 59]; P < .001). In addition, there was significantly less dose reduction (<300 mg every 4 weeks) in the eligible omalizumab users (4.3% vs 44.4% [P = .015]). Clinically, significantly greater improvements in UAS7 were reported by the eligible group (median change -8.0 vs -5.0 [P = .021]). Conclusion: Patterns of management varied largely among patients with different drug eligibility statuses and led to disparities in health outcomes. More efforts to secure equitable access to guideline-based CSU care are warranted.

Enhancing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Drug Hypersensitivity: A Validated 6-Item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Patients With Drug Hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) can significantly impair patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, tools for HRQoL assessment for patients with DHR are time-consuming and remain underutilized. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an optimized version of the Drug Hypersensitivity Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) designed for everyday clinical use. METHODS: Item response theory (IRT), a statistical framework for psychometric measurement, was used to evaluate the 15 questions from the original DrHy-Q for their respective item difficulty, discrimination, and information using prospective data from 243 patients with histories of suspected/confirmed DHR before allergy workup. Accordingly, the best-performing items were identified to develop a 6-item optimized version (DrHy-Q6), which was subsequently validated with another prospective cohort of 156 patients. RESULTS: All 15 items of the original DrHy-Q demonstrated satisfactory parameters in IRT analysis, including very high discrimination (>1.7), appropriate difficulty (in between -1.5 and 1.5), and good information (a high and broad peak in the information curve). Six items with top-ranked IRT parameters were identified to construct an optimized version, which we named the DrHy-Q6. The DrHy-Q6 demonstrated a 1-factor structure with an improved fit compared with the original DrHy-Q (comparative fit index = 0.985, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.974), excellent convergent validity (unadjusted Pearson correlation with the full version = 0.955; adjusted = 0.894, P < .001), reliability (Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω = 0.93), divergent validity (Pearson correlation with all Short Form 12-item Health Survey Version 2 subscales <0.60, P < .001), and discriminant validity (significantly higher scores with multiple DHR labels [42.45 ± 27.26 vs 32.93 ± 26.66], P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: From an IRT perspective, the DrHy-Q and all its constituent items are psychometrically valid for HRQoL assessment. We propose an optimized 6-item version (DrHy-Q6) as an abbreviated alternative for assessing HRQoL in patients with DHR, especially for routine use in clinical practice. Patients and physicians may benefit from its streamlined length and simpler scoring algorithm.

Clinical utility of and correlation between Sniffin' Sticks and TIB smell identification test (TIBSIT) among Hong Kong Chinese with or without chronic rhinosinusitis.

Introduction: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Validated and culturally specific tests, such as the "Sniffin' Sticks" test (SST) and the TIB Smell Identification Test (TIBSIT), are crucial for the diagnosis and monitoring of OD. However, they have not been utilised in Hong Kong Chinese and their correlations are unknown. Methods: Twelve CRS patients and twenty healthy volunteers were prospectively recruited from a joint allergy-otorhinolaryngology clinic in Hong Kong and performed both SST and TIBSIT. Demographics, baseline characteristics and all test results were compared and analysed. Results: Patients with CRS demonstrated significantly lower test scores than healthy controls (all p < 0.001). Significant and strong correlations were observed between all composite and subtest scores, particularly between the composite SST and TIBSIT scores (ρ = 0.789, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of CRS and increasing age were significantly associated with OD. Conclusion: Both SST and TIBSIT are useful olfactory tests and are strongly correlated among Hong Kong Chinese. We advocate that either test can be used for measuring OD among CRS patients.

Safety and efficacy of single insertion accelerated MR-image guided brachytherapy following chemo-radiation in locally advanced cervix cancer: modifying our EMBRACE during the COVID pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Utero-vaginal brachytherapy (BT) is an irreplaceable care component for the curative treatment of locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-image guided adaptive BT (IGABT) using the GYN-GEC-ESTRO EMBRACE guidelines is the international care standard. Usually following chemo-radiation therapy (CRT), IGABT has high proven utility in LACC but requires significant health system resources. Timely access was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic which challenged us to re-design our established IGABT care pathway. METHODS: From April 2020 consecutive patients with LACC were enrolled after CRT in a single arm exploratory non-inferiority study of a modified IGABT (mIGABT) protocol. This delivered an iso-effective IGABT dose (39.3 Gy: EQD2: α/ß10Gy concept) over a 24-h period during a single overnight hospitalisation. RESULTS: Fourteen LACC patients received mIGABT from April 2020 to March 2022. Median age was 62.5 years (37-82 years). LACC histology was primary squamous (9/14) or adeno-carcinoma (5/14). International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stages ranged from IB1/2 (N = 3), IIA1/IIB (5), IIIB (2), IIIC1/2 (4) with mean ± standard deviation (SD) gross tumour volume-at-diagnosis (GTV_D) of 37.7 cc ± 71.6 cc. All patients achieved complete metabolic, clinical, and cytologic cancer response with CRT and IGABT. High-risk HPV was cleared by 6-months. Complete MRI-defined cancer response before mIGABT (GTV_Fx1) was seen in 77% of cases (10/13). Only two women developed metastatic disease and one died at 12-months; 13 patients were alive without cancer at mean 20.3 ± 7.2 months follow-up. Actuarial 2-year overall survival was 93%. Compared with our pre-COVID IGABT program, overall mIGABT cost-saving in this cohort was USD 22,866. Prescribed dose covered at least 90% (D90) of the entire cervix and any residual cancer at time of BT (HRCTV_D90: high-risk clinical target volume) with 3-fractions of 8.5 Gy delivered over 24-h (22.8 ± 1.7 h). Total treatment time including CRT was 38 days. The mIGABT schedule was well tolerated and the entire cohort met EMBRACE recommended (EQD2: α/ß10Gy) combined HRCTV_D90 coverage of 87.5 ± 3.7 Gy. Similarly, organ-at-risk (OAR) median: interquartile range D2cc constraints (EQD2: α/ß3Gy) were EMBRACE compliant: bladder (65.9 Gy: 58.4-72.5 Gy), rectum (59.1 Gy: 55.7-61.8 Gy), and sigmoid colon (54.6 Gy: 50.3-58.9 Gy). ICRU recto-vaginal point dose was significantly higher (75.7 Gy) in our only case of severe (G4) pelvic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the utility of mIGABT and VMAT CRT in a small cohort with LACC. Loco-regional control was achieved in all cases with minimal emergent toxicity. Single insertion mIGABT was logistically efficient, cost-saving, and patient-centric during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Validation of the Chinese drug hypersensitivity quality of life questionnaire: Role of delabeling.

The Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q) is not currently available in Chinese. Besides, penicillin allergy (PA) is a worldwide public health challenge, and delabeling inauthentic PA can improve clinical and economic outcomes. However, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains poorly known. Objective: The study objective is to translate and validate a Chinese version of DrHy-Q and investigate the effect of PA delabeling on HRQoL using DrHy-Q. Methods: A Chinese DrHy-Q was translated then completed by patients with drug allergy labels for psychometric validation. Afterwards, another cohort of patients finished the Chinese DrHy-Q before and after their PA workup for pre-post comparison. Results: A total of 130 patients were studied. Sixty-three patients (79.4% female; median age = 59 ± 15 years) completed the Chinese DrHy-Q for validation (mean score = 38.9 ± 23.5). It demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.956; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.939-0.971) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.993 [95% CI, 0.969-0.998]). Construct validity was confirmed by its one-dimensional structure in factor analysis. Divergent validity was established because only 2 (out of 9) SF-36 scales showed weak negative correlations to DrHy-Q. Patients with multiple implicated drugs presented significantly higher DrHy-Q scores than those with only a single drug (42.0 ± 22.5 vs 28.7 ± 24.4; P = 0.038), showing discriminant validity. Subsequently, another 67 patients (73.1% female; median age = 56 ± 15 years) underwent PA investigations and completed their pre-post DrHy-Q. A significant drop in DrHy-Q score was shown (40.8 ± 21.7 vs 26.6 ± 22.5; Cohen's d = 0.964; P < 0.001), reflecting improvement in HRQoL. Conclusion: The Chinese DrHy-Q is reliable and valid for HRQoL assessment. PA delabeling significantly benefits patients' HRQoL. Future larger-scale studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Men's perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review.

Purpose: To assess the literature on men's preferences and perceptions regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy. Methods: A scoping review was undertaken as per JBI guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct with search terms including "prostate cancer," "radiotherapy," "radiation therapy," "radiation oncology," "patient preferences," "patient perceptions" and "patient experience." The resultant studies were mapped and grouped according to the emergent themes and pathway stages. Results: A total of 779 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Fifty-two full-text studies were reviewed, with 27 eligible for inclusion. There were 4 pre-treatment, 13 during treatment and 10 post-treatment studies covering broad themes of information needs (n = 3), preferences and decisions (n = 6), general experiences (n = 8), side effects (n = 6), and support (n = 4). There were a mix of methodologies, including 11 qualitative, 14 quantitative (including four preference studies), one mixed methods and one narrative review. Conclusion: There were only four preference studies, with the remaining 23 reporting on perceptions. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding patient preferences and perceptions of prostate cancer radiation therapy, particularly when considering how many clinical and technical studies are published in the area. This highlights opportunities for future research.

The MANGO study: a prospective investigation of oxygen enhanced and blood-oxygen level dependent MRI as imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in glioblastoma.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of brain cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of ~5% and most tumours recurring locally within months of first-line treatment. Hypoxia is associated with worse clinical outcomes in GBM, as it leads to localized resistance to radiotherapy and subsequent tumour recurrence. Current standard of care treatment does not account for tumour hypoxia, due to the challenges of mapping tumour hypoxia in routine clinical practice. In this clinical study, we aim to investigate the role of oxygen enhanced (OE) and blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI as non-invasive imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in GBM, and to evaluate their potential role in dose-painting radiotherapy planning and treatment response assessment. Methods: The primary endpoint is to evaluate the quantitative and spatial correlation between OE and BOLD MRI measurements and [18F]MISO values of uptake in the tumour. The secondary endpoints are to evaluate the repeatability of MRI biomarkers of hypoxia in a test-retest study, to estimate the potential clinical benefits of using MRI biomarkers of hypoxia to guide dose-painting radiotherapy, and to evaluate the ability of MRI biomarkers of hypoxia to assess treatment response. Twenty newly diagnosed GBM patients will be enrolled in this study. Patients will undergo standard of care treatment while receiving additional OE/BOLD MRI and [18F]MISO PET scans at several timepoints during treatment. The ability of OE/BOLD MRI to map hypoxic tumour regions will be evaluated by assessing spatial and quantitative correlations with areas of hypoxic tumour identified via [18F]MISO PET imaging. Discussion: MANGO (Magnetic resonance imaging of hypoxia for radiation treatment guidance in glioblastoma multiforme) is a diagnostic/prognostic study investigating the role of imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in GBM management. The study will generate a large amount of longitudinal multimodal MRI and PET imaging data that could be used to unveil dynamic changes in tumour physiology that currently limit treatment efficacy, thereby providing a means to develop more effective and personalised treatments.

Health preference research: An overview for medical radiation sciences.

Understanding preferences of key stakeholders including patients, clinicians and policymakers can inform clinical practice, workforce and policy. It also allows health services to evaluate existing clinical practices, policies and procedures. This commentary aims to introduce medical radiation professionals to health preference research by describing commonly used preference methodologies, with a particular focus on discrete choice experiments. Relevant examples of health preference research will be highlighted to demonstrate the application of health preference research in medical radiation sciences.

Investigating the Association Between Self-Reported Comorbid Anxiety and Depression and Health Service Use in Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression have a higher prevalence in cancer survivors than in the general population and are associated with lower quality of life, poorer survival and an increased risk of suicide. Anxiety and depression are also highly comorbid among cancer survivors and associated with increased health service use. As such, it is important to consider both anxiety and depression and health service use in cancer survivors. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to explore the association between anxiety and depression and health service utilisation, both cancer-specific and general doctor visits, in cancer survivors. METHODS: Data from a Dutch cancer registry were analysed to determine the association between anxiety and depression (measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and health service use. Negative binomial regression models, controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities and cancer-related variables were estimated. RESULTS: Cancer survivors (n = 2538), with a mean age of 61.1 years and between 0.7 and 10.9 years since diagnosis, were included in the analysis. Increasing levels of anxiety and depression were associated with increased health service use. Having severe levels of anxiety was associated with more frequent visits to the general practitioner (p < 0.001). Severe depression in cancer survivors was associated with more frequent visits to the specialist (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anxiety and depression in cancer survivors, particularly severe anxiety and depression, were associated with increased health service use. Treatment of anxiety and depression in cancer survivors has the potential to reduce overall health service use and associated costs and improve health outcomes for cancer survivors.

Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.

BACKGROUND: Before integrating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) into routine care, it is important to assess if the benefits justify the differences in resource use. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of PSMA-PET/CT when compared with conventional imaging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was developed using data from the proPSMA study. proPSMA included patients with high-risk prostate cancer assigned to conventional imaging or 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with planned health economics data collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from an Australian societal perspective. INTERVENTION: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared with conventional imaging (CT and bone scan). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome from proPSMA was diagnostic accuracy (nodal and distant metastases). This informed a decision tree analysis of the cost per accurate diagnosis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The estimated cost per scan for PSMA PET/CT was AUD$1203, which was less than the conventional imaging cost at AUD$1412. PSMA PET/CT was thus dominant, having both better accuracy and a lower cost. This resulted in a cost of AUD$959 saved per additional accurate detection of nodal disease, and AUD$1412 saved for additional accurate detection of distant metastases. The results were most sensitive to variations in the number of men scanned for each 68Ga-PSMA-11 production run. Subsequent research is required to assess the long-term costs and benefits of PSMA PET/CT-directed care. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/CT has lower direct comparative costs and greater accuracy compared to conventional imaging for initial staging of men with high-risk prostate cancer. This provides a compelling case for adopting PSMA PET/CT into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: The proPSMA study demonstrated that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) better detects disease that has spread beyond the prostate compared with conventional imaging. Our analysis shows that PSMA PET/CT is also less costly than conventional imaging for the detection of disease spread. This research was presented at the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Scientific Meeting in October 2020.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation: a comparative dosimetric study and introduction of a novel qualitative index for plan evaluation, the normal tissue index.

INTRODUCTION: We report on a retrospective dosimetric study, comparing 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy (hIMRT). We evaluated plans based on their planning target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, dose to organs at risk (OARs) and exposure of normal tissue to radiation. The Homogeneity Index (HI) was used to assess the dose homogeneity in the target region, and we describe a new index, the normal tissue index (NTI), to assess the dose in the normal tissue inside the tangent treatment portal. METHODS: Plans were generated for 25 early-stage breast cancer patients, using a hIMRT technique. These were compared with the 3DCRT plans of the treatment previously received by the patients. Plan quality was evaluated using the HI, NTI and dose to OARs. RESULTS: The hIMRT technique was significantly more homogenous than the 3DCRT technique, while maintaining target coverage. The hIMRT technique was also superior at minimising the amount of tissue receiving D 105% and above (P < 0.0001). The ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast maximum were significantly lower in the hIMRT plans (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005), but the 3DCRT technique achieved a lower mean heart dose in left-sided breast cancer patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy plans achieved improved dose homogeneity compared to the 3DCRT plans and superior outcome with regard to dose to normal tissues. We propose that the addition of both HI and NTI in evaluating the quality of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) breast plans provides clinically relevant comparators which more accurately reflect the new paradigm of treatment goals and outcomes in the era of breast IMRT.