The Relationship Between TIMI Flow and MAPH Score in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI.

The MAPH (mean platelet volume, age, total protein and hematocrit) score is a newly developed simple scoring system for patients with STEMI that has been associated with satisfactory predictive values to determine thrombus burden in STEMI patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine the relationship between the MAPH risk score and TIMI flow in patients with STEMI.The study included 260 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between December 2019 to July 2022, and had TIMI 0 flow in the responsible coronary artery due to STEMI. According to the TIMI flow score after stent implantation, the patients were classified into either the no-reflow group (n = 59) or the normal flow group (n = 201). In order to calculate the MAPH score, ROC analysis was performed to find the cutoff point for each component of the MAPH score. MAPH scores were calculated (MPV + Age + Protein + Hematocrit) for both groups. Our study was a retrospective, observational study.In the multivariable regression analysis, the MAPH score (OR: 0.567; 95%CI: 0.330-0.973, P = 0.04) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR: 0.249; 95%CI: 0.129-0.483, P < 0.001) were parameters found to be independent predictors of TIMI flow. An MAPH score value > 2.5 predicted the presence of low TIMI coronary flow in patients with STEMI, with 78% specificity and 45% sensitivity (ROC area under curve: 0.691, 95% CI: 0.617-0.766, P < 0.001).The MAPH risk score is simple, inexpensive, and quick to calculate. A high MAPH score may be an indicator of coronary no-reflow in patients with STEMI.

Predictors of coronary tortuosity in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Aim    Coronary artery tortuosity is a common coronary angiographic finding. This tortuosity can cause myocardial ischemia even in the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis. Our aim was to compare the demographic, clinical and echocardiographic features of patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and with and without coronary artery tortuosity.Material and methods    361 patients who underwent elective coronary angiography (CAG) due to CCS were included in the study. These patients divided into two groups, those with coronary tortuosity (Group 1) and those without (Group 2). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors associated with coronary artery tortuosity.Results    The mean age of the 361 CCS patients (44 % female; 56 % male) was 56.7±11.5 years. In the univariable regression analysis, age, female sex, hypertension (HT), PR interval, QTc interval, ST / T segment changes, left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), left ventricle hypertrophia (LVH) were identified as predictors of coronary tortuosity. In the multivariable regression analysis, age (OR: 1.059; 95 %CI: 1.032-1.087, p<0.001) and hypertension (OR: 0.484; 95 %CI: 0.278-0.843, p=0.01) were identified as independent predictors of coronary tortuosity.Conclusion    Coronary artery tortuosity is an angiographic finding that develops as a result of adaptive mechanisms in the heart and can cause myocardial ischemia. Predictors of coronary artery tortuosity in patients with CCS were long PR and QTc intervals, ST / T segment changes, LVH, LVDD, advanced age, and female gender. Evaluation of these demographic, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data may help clinicans to anticipate coronary artery tortuosity in patients with CCS and to be precautious for PCI.

The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA. SAMPLE SIZE: 148 patients. RESULTS: In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, P=.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, P=.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), P<.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS. LIMITATIONS: Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.