European survey on follow-up strategies for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Introduction: The increasing detection rates of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) pose a challenge for both neurovascular centers, tasked with managing a growing pool of patients requiring regular monitoring with imaging, and the healthcare system that must bear the costs of such surveillance. While there is consensus on the need for follow-up of UIA, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal cessation of surveillance, especially when considering diverse patient risk factors and, notably, in cases of treated aneurysms with stable rest perfusion. Detailed guidelines on UIA follow-up are currently lacking, exacerbating these challenges. Research question: We sought to investigate European strategies for follow-up of untreated, microsurgically and endovascularly treated UIA. Material and methods: An online survey consisting of 15 questions about follow-up management of UIA was sent out to the cerebrovascular section of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS). Results: The survey response rate was 27.3% (68/249). There was consenus upon the necessity for long-term follow-up of UIA (100% [n = 68]). The recommendation to perform follow-up was inversely correlated with patient age and more prevalent among endovascularly compared to microsurgically treated patients (92.6% [n = 63] vs. 70.6% [n = 48]). A majority recommended continued follow-up of treated aneurysms with stable rest perfusion, with lifelong surveillance in patients under 60 years and continuation for 5-10 years in patients aged 61-80, irrespective of whether they underwent microsurgical (38.3% [n = 23]; 33.3% [n = 20]) or endovascular (41.9% [n = 26]; 30.6% [n = 19]) treatment. Discussion and conclusion: This survey confirmed a European consensus on the necessity of long-term follow-up for untreated UIA. However, significant variations in follow-up strategies, especially for treated UIA and post-treatment rest perfusion, were noted. Despite limited evidence suggesting low risk from aneurysm remnants, respondents favored long-term follow-up, highlighting uncertainty in management. This underscores the need for collaborative research on aneurysm remnants and standardized follow-up protocols for UIA in Europe.

Muscle ischaemia in patients with orthostatic hypotension assessed by velocity recovery cycles.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with orthostatic hypotension may experience neck pain radiating to the occipital region of the skull and the shoulders while standing (so-called coat-hanger ache). This study assessed muscle membrane potential in the trapezius muscle of patients with orthostatic hypotension and healthy subjects during head-up tilt (HUT), by measuring velocity recovery cycles (VRCs) of muscle action potentials as an indicator of muscle membrane potential. METHODS: Eight patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), orthostatic hypotension and a positive history for coat-hanger pain and eight normal controls (NCs) were included in this study. Repeated VRCs were recorded from the trapezius muscle by direct muscle stimulation in the supine position and during HUT for 10 min. RESULTS: Muscle VRC recordings did not differ between MSA patients and NCs in the supine position. During HUT, early supernormality decreased progressively and relative refractory period increased in MSA patients whereas VRC measures remained unchanged in NCs. Ten minutes after the start of HUT, early supernormality was reduced by 44% and relative refractory period was increased by 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Muscle membranes in patients with orthostatic hypotension become progressively depolarised during standing. Membrane depolarisation is most likely the result of muscle ischaemia, related to the drop in perfusion pressure caused by orthostatic hypotension. Coat-hanger ache is most likely a consequence of this muscle ischaemia.

Insights into the natural history of spontaneous intracranial hypotension from infusion testing.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pathophysiologic changes in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) based on measures of CSF dynamics, and on the duration of symptoms, in a retrospective case-controlled study. METHODS: We included consecutive patients investigated for SIH at our department from January 2012 to February 2018. CSF leak was considered confirmed if extrathecal contrast spillage was seen on imaging (CT or MRI) after intrathecal contrast application, or dural breach was detected by direct intraoperative visualization. We divided patients with a confirmed CSF leak into 3 groups depending on the symptom duration, as follows: ≤10, 11-52, and >52 weeks. Clinical characteristics and measures of CSF fluid dynamics obtained by computerized lumbar infusion testing were analyzed over time and compared with a reference population. RESULTS: Among the 137 patients included, 69 had a confirmed CSF leak. Whereas 93.1% with <10 weeks of symptoms displayed typical orthostatic headache, only 62.5% with >10 weeks of symptoms did (p = 0.004). Analysis of infusion tests revealed differences between groups with different symptom duration for CSF outflow resistance (p < 0.001), lumbar baseline pressure (p = 0.013), lumbar plateau pressure (p < 0.001), baseline pressure amplitude (p = 0.021), plateau pressure amplitude (p = 0.001), pressure-volume index (p = 0.001), elastance (p < 0.001), and CSF production rate (p = 0.001). Compared to the reference population, only patients with acute symptoms showed a significantly altered CSF dynamics profile. CONCLUSION: A CSF leak dramatically alters CSF dynamics acutely, but the pattern changes over time. There is an association between the clinical presentation and changes in CSF dynamics.

Subdural versus subgaleal drainage for chronic subdural hematomas: a post hoc analysis of the TOSCAN trial.

OBJECTIVE: The use of subdural drains after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) decreases the risk of recurrence and has become the standard of care. Halfway through the controlled, randomized TOSCAN (Randomized Trial of Follow-up CT after Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma) trial, the authors' institutional guidelines changed to recommend subgaleal instead of subdural drainage. The authors report a post hoc analysis on the influence of drain location in patients participating in the TOSCAN trial. METHODS: The study involved 361 patients enrolled in the TOSCAN trial. The patients were stratified according to whether they received surgery before (cohort A) or after (cohort B) the change in institutional protocol. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed with surgery for recurrence as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were outcome-based on modified Rankin Scale scores, seizures, infections, parenchymal brain injuries, and hematoma diameter. RESULTS: Of the 361 patients included in the analysis, 214 were stratified into cohort A (subdural drainage recommended), while 147 were stratified into cohort B (subgaleal drainage recommended). There was a 31.78% rate of crossover from the subdural to the subgaleal drainage insertion site due to technical or anatomical difficulties. No differences in the rates of reoperation (21.5% [cohort A] vs 25.17% [cohort B], OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.50-1.34, p = 0.415), infections (0.47% [cohort A] vs 2.04% [cohort B], OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.02-2.19, p = 0.199), seizures (3.27% [cohort A] vs 2.72% [cohort B], OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.35-4.21, p = 0.765), or favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3) at 1 and 6 months (91.26% [cohort A] vs 96.43% [cohort B], OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.14-1.07, p = 0.067; 89.90% [cohort A] vs 91.55% [cohort B], OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.73, p = 0.605) were noted between the two cohorts. Postoperatively, patients in cohort A had more frequent parenchymal brain tissue injuries (2.8% vs 0%, p = 0.041). Postoperative absolute and relative hematoma reduction was similar irrespective of the location of the drain. CONCLUSIONS: Subgaleal rather than subdural placement of the drain did not increase the risk for reoperation for recurrence of CSHs, nor did it have a negative impact on clinical or radiological outcome. The intention to place a subdural drain was associated with a higher rate of parenchymal injuries.