RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: With more than two billion downloads since its launch, TikTok is the fastest-growing video-sharing platform in the world. Many people turn to TikTok for dermatologic medical information. However, there is limited data about psoriasis and psoriasis treatment content on this social media platform. OBJECTIVE: To compare the viewer engagement, content quality, and viewer experience of psoriasis treatment TikTok videos between physicians and non-physicians. METHODS: We searched the terms "psoriasis" and "psoriasis treatment" on TikTok. Video characteristics were collected. Content quality was evaluated using DISCERN. Viewer experience was assessed using the AVA. RESULTS: Viewer engagement did not significantly differ between physicians and non-physician content creators (0.033 plus/minus 0.005 vs 0.047 plus/minus 0.001, P=0.066). Compared to non-physicians, physicians created videos of higher quality (DISCERN: 1.76 plus/minus 0.058 vs 1.44 plus/minus 0.032, P<0.001) and of greater viewer experience (AVA: 2.55 plus/minus 0.183 vs 1.96 plus/minus 0.081, P=0.001). However, there is room for improvement in terms of creating videos of higher quality by both physicians and non-physicians. CONCLUSION: TikTok can be a powerful tool to promote health literacy and dispel misinformation. Dermatologists may consider focusing their efforts on creating comprehensive educational content and incorporating trending features to reach a wider audience. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2): doi:10.36849/JDD.7050e.
Assuntos
Médicos , Psoríase , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Promoção da Saúde , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limited analyses of social media content among psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients exist. These patients may turn to social media to gain insight into treatments such as biologics. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the content, sentiment, and engagement of social media posts regarding biologics for PsO and PsA. METHODS: Posts and comments discussing biologics were extracted from publicly accessible PsO and PsA Reddit groups. Posts were assigned higher (HOT) and lower order (LOT) themes, sentiments, and engagement scores. RESULTS: Of 1141 posts extracted, 705 posts were classified under the HOT general/efficacy. Twelve lower order themes (LOTs) were identified: general advice/experience (10.2%), symptoms improved (36.6%), switching biologics (10.5%), and time to results (13.4%). 61.3% of content was of positive sentiment, 24.0% was neutral, and 14.7% was of negative sentiment. The mean sentiment score, defined as the average of all posts' sentiment scores (where negative=-1, neutral=0, and positive=1), was overall positive at 0.47, 95% CI [.41-.52]. Mean sentiment scores between LOTs were significantly different (P<0.001). Information regarding biologics on Reddit is mostly positive; however, there remains a significant number of users expressing dissatisfaction with their efficacy or with biologics in general. Many users sought anecdotal advice. CONCLUSION: These findings can help guide educational efforts to anticipate concerns and appease hesitancy regarding biologics and their efficacy. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(3):306-309. doi:10.36849/JDD.7124.
Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Humanos , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Atitude , PercepçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the role of race in access to biologics for patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare biologic use among adult and pediatric United States psoriasis patients of different racial backgrounds. METHODS: Population-based study of US psoriasis patients using the 2003 to 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). RESULTS: Among 31,525,500 adults and children with psoriasis (weighted), 3,026,578 (9.6%) were on biologics. Among psoriasis patients, 27,464,864 (87.1%) self-identified as white, 2,033,802 (6.5%) self-identified as Black, 1,173,435 (3.7%) self-identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 853,399 (2.7%) self-identified as other races. Among those on biologics, 2,778,239 (91.8%) self-identified as white, 84,971 (2.8%) identified as Black, 89,452 (3.0%) self-identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 73,917 (2.4%) self-identified as other races. Multivariate logistic regression revealed no significant differences in biologic access between whites and non-whites after adjusting for sociodemographic factors including insurance status (OR for Blacks: 0.347 [0.118, 1.021], P=0.055; OR for Asians: 0.616 [0.240, 1.579], P=0.311; OR for other races: 0.850 [0.216, 3.336], P=0.814. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that race alone is not independently associated with access to biologics among adult US psoriasis patients. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate factors independently associated with biologics access among adults and children with psoriasis in the US. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):835-837. doi:10.36849/JDD.7134 Reddy R, Khan S, Yee D, et al. No racial differences found in access to biologics: a population-based study of psoriasis patients in the United States. .
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Psoríase , Grupos Raciais , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Produtos Biológicos/provisão & distribuição , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
How Hispanic patients access dermatologic care for skin diseases is unknown. This study aims to determine if differences exist in accessing the emergency department (ED), primary care, and outpatient dermatologic offices for skin diseases between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients. This cross-sectional study used nationally representative data from the Medical Panel Expenditure Survey (MEPS) from 2016-2019. A total of 109,337,668 (weighted) patients with any skin disease diagnosed at an ED, primary care, or dermatology visit were identified. Hispanics comprised 13.0% and non-Hispanic Whites comprised 68.8% of this subpopulation. Overall, 94.1% of Hispanic patients attended a primary care visit for their skin complaint, 5.8% saw a dermatologist, and 0.1% attended an ED visit. Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics were more likely to attend a primary care visit (aOR 1.865; 95%CI, 1.640-2.122) and less likely to attend an outpatient dermatology visit (aOR 0.536; 95%CI, 0.471-0.610), after adjusting for insurance status, education, income, sex, age, and comorbidities. Our study suggests that, compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanic patients access primary care more frequently and outpatient dermatologic offices less frequently for their skin conditions. Language barriers, less familiarity with the healthcare system, and lack of adequate health insurance may play roles in this observation.
Assuntos
Dermatologia , Dermatopatias , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , População Branca , Hispânico ou LatinoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Psoriasis patients may seek information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and their diagnosis from social media platforms. Analyses of social media interactions may help guide dermatologists’ educational efforts during this pandemic. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the content and sentiment of online social media posts about the medication interaction between SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and anti-psoriatic therapies among psoriasis patients. DESIGN: Publicly accessible Facebook and Reddit groups regarding psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were identified. Posts uploaded between March 1, 2021, and July 31, 2021, with information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, were extracted. Themes, sentiment scores, and engagement scores were assigned to each post. RESULTS: 477 posts contained content pertaining to the vaccine and psoriatic medications. 19 (4%) of the posts contain negative sentiment, 232 (48.6%) contain neutral sentiment, and 226 (47.4%) contain positive sentiment. Several themes emerged from this study. A majority of posts (32.5%) contained concerns about holding or stopping medications prior to obtaining the vaccine. Other common concerns included fear of negative reaction (21.8%) and uncertainty about the ability to generate an efficient immune response to the vaccine while on anti-psoriatic medications (19.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Concerns identified by our content analysis should be incorporated into education efforts to address the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among patients with psoriatic diseases. These patient concerns can also help guide our strategy for implementing evidence-based recommendations on COVID-19 vaccination. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):901-905. doi:10.36849/JDD.6853.
Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , COVID-19 , Vacinas , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Opinião Pública , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) is a non-profit organization founded in 2013. It is composed of researchers and stakeholders who work to develop evidenced-based outcome measures to enhance research and treatment recommendations of dermatologic diseases. SUMMARY: The 2021 IDEOM Virtual Annual Meeting occurred from November 19-20, 2021. Contributions were made by leaders and stakeholders from the psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa, acne, vitiligo, actinic keratosis, alopecia areata, itch, and cutaneous lymphoma workgroups. The psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and actinic keratosis workgroups provided an overview of their respective instruments for treatment satisfaction and symptom measurement. The inaugural meetings of the itch, alopecia areata, and cutaneous lymphoma workgroups identified unmet needs of their respective diseases and future goals. The acne, vitiligo, and pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa workgroups discussed concerns of quality of life, instruments for symptom measurement, and screening tools. Additionally, a representative from the US Food and Drug Administration was in attendance and presented an update on topical drugs and generics. This report provides a summary of workgroup updates from the past year and future directions established during the meeting. KEY MESSAGES: This report summarizes progress made by each IDEOM workgroup at the 2021 IDEOM Virtual Annual Meeting. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):867-874. doi:10.36849/JDD.6974.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Alopecia em Áreas , Artrite Psoriásica , Dermatologia , Hidradenite Supurativa , Ceratose Actínica , Psoríase , Vitiligo , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Criança , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
We conducted a cross-sectional study to compare viewer engagement, content quality and viewer experience of eczema related medical content on TikTok between health care professionals and non-health care professionals. Compared to non-health care professionals, health care professionals created videos of higher quality and superior viewing experience. Viewer engagement did not differ significantly between videos made by health care professionals and non-health care professionals. Overall, content creators should focus on producing comprehensive, evidence-based videos.
Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos , Eczema , Mídias Sociais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Leite Humano , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológicoAssuntos
Poluição do Ar , Psoríase , Humanos , Psoríase/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) affects 18.6%-59% of persons with Parkinson disease (PD), and recent studies provide evidence that oral cannabidiol (CBD) therapy could reduce sebum production in addition to improving motor and psychiatric symptoms in PD. Therefore, oral CBD could be useful for improving symptoms of both commonly co-occurring conditions. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether oral CBD therapy is associated with a decrease in SD severity in PD. METHODS: Facial photographs were collected as a component of a randomized (1:1 CBD vs placebo), parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a short-term 2.5 mg per kg per day oral sesame solution CBD-rich cannabis extract (formulated to 100 mg/mL CBD and 3.3 mg/mL THC) for reducing motor symptoms in PD. Participants took 1.25 mg per kg per day each morning for 4 ±1 days and then twice daily for 10 ±4 days. Reviewers analyzed the photographs independently and provided a severity ranking based on the Seborrheic Dermatitis Area and Severity Index (SEDASI) scale. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics, as well as posttreatment SEDASI averages and the presence of SD, were analyzed with 2-tailed t tests and Pearson χ2 tests. SEDASI was analyzed with longitudinal regression, and SD was analyzed with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 27 participants received a placebo and 26 received CBD for 16 days. SD severity was low in both groups at baseline, and there was no treatment effect. The risk ratio for patients receiving CBD, post versus pre, was 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-1.18; P=.15), compared to 1.20 (95% CI 0.88-1.65; P=.26) for the patients receiving the placebo. The within-group pre-post change was not statistically significant for either group, but they differed from each other (P=.07) because there was an estimated improvement for the CBD group and an estimated worsening for the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide solid evidence that oral CBD therapy reduces the presence of SD among patients with PD. While this study was sufficiently powered to detect the primary outcome (efficacy of CBD on PD motor symptoms), it was underpowered for the secondary outcomes of detecting changes in the presence and severity of SD. Multiple mechanisms exist through which CBD can exert beneficial effects on SD pathogenesis. Larger studies, including participants with increased disease severity and longer treatment periods, may better elucidate treatment effects and are needed to determine CBD's true efficacy for affecting SD severity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03582137; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03582137.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency cricothyrotomy training for non-surgeons is important as rare "cannot intubate or oxygenate events" may occur multiple times in a provider's career when surgical expertise is not immediately available. However, such training is highly variable and often infrequent, therefore, enhancing these experiences is important. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is bronchoscopy-enhanced cricothyrotomy training in cadavers feasible, and what are the potential benefits provided by this innovation for trainees? METHODS: This study was performed during implementation of a new program to train non-surgeon providers on cadaveric donors on our campus. Standard training with an instructional video and live coaching was enhanced by bronchoscopic visualization of the trachea allowing participants to review their technique after performing scalpel and Seldinger-technique procedures, and to review their colleagues' technique on live video. Feasibility was measured through assessing helpfulness for trainees, cost, setup time, quality of images, and operator needs. Footage from the bronchoscopy recordings was analyzed to assess puncture-to-tube time, safety errors, and evidence for a training effect within groups. Participants submitted pre- and post-session surveys assessing their levels of experience and gauging their confidence and anxiety with cricothyrotomies. RESULTS: The training program met feasibility criteria for low costs (<200 USD/donor), setup time (<30 minutes/donor), and operator needs (1/donor). Furthermore, all participants rated the cadaveric session as helpful. Participants demonstrated efficient technique, with a median puncture-to-tube time of 48.5 seconds. Bronchoscopy recordings from 24 analyzed videos revealed eight instances of sharp instruments puncturing the posterior tracheal wall (33% rate), and two instances of improper tube placement (8% rate). Sharp instruments reached potentially dangerous insertion depths beyond the midpoint of the anterior-posterior diameter of the trachea in 58.3% of videos. Bronchoscopic enhancement was rated as quite or extremely helpful for visualizing the trachea (83.3%) and to assess depth of instrumentation (91.7%). There was a significant average increase in confidence (64.4%, P<0.001) and average decrease in performance anxiety (-11.6%, P = 0.0328) after the session. A training effect was seem wherein the last trainee in each group had no posterior tracheal wall injuries. INTERPRETATION: Supplementing cadaveric emergent cricothyrotomy training programs with tracheal bronchoscopy is feasible, helpful to trainees, and meets prior documented times for efficient technique. Furthermore, it was successful in detecting technical errors that would have been missed in a standard training program. Bronchoscopic enhancement is a valuable addition to cricothyrotomy cadaveric training programs and may help avoid real-life complications.
Assuntos
Broncoscopia , Cartilagem Cricoide , Humanos , Cartilagem Cricoide/cirurgia , Currículo , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , CadáverRESUMO
As 2023 approaches, the COVID-19 pandemic has killed millions. While vaccines have been a crucial intervention, only a few effective medications exist for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in breakthrough cases or in unvaccinated or immunocompromised patients. SARS-CoV-2 displays early and unusual features of micro-thrombosis and immune dysregulation that target endothelial beds of the lungs, skin, and other organs. Notably, anticoagulation improves outcomes in some COVID-19 patients. The protein transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß1) has constitutive roles in maintaining a healthy microvasculature through its roles in regulating inflammation, clotting, and wound healing. However, after infection (including viral infection) TGF-ß1 activation may augment coagulation, cause immune dysregulation, and direct a path toward tissue fibrosis. Dysregulation of TGF-ß signaling in immune cells and its localization in areas of microvascular injury are now well-described in COVID-19, and such events may contribute to the acute respiratory distress syndrome and skin micro-thrombosis outcomes frequently seen in severe COVID-19. The high concentration of TGF-ß in platelets and in other cells within microvascular thrombi, its ability to activate the clotting cascade and dysregulate immune pathways, and its pro-fibrotic properties all contribute to a unique milieu in the COVID-19 microvasculature. This unique environment allows for propagation of microvascular clotting and immune dysregulation. In this review we summarize the physiological functions of TGF-ß and detail the evidence for its effects on the microvasculature in COVID-19. In addition, we explore the potential role of existing TGF-ß inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 associated microvascular thrombosis and immune dysregulation.
RESUMO
The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) initiative presented an update on their progress related to instruments for psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patient-centered outcome measures at the 2021 annual meeting of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). The Treatment Satisfaction working group presented the development of a 7-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire specific for dermatological conditions. The group is beginning by assessing the validity and reliability of the instrument in PsO patient populations, with the ultimate goal of validating it for use in multiple dermatological diseases. The Musculoskeletal Symptoms working group discussed how implementation of a screening measurement tool in patients with PsO can help identify unknown diagnoses of PsA or prevent worsening of symptoms.
Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Dermatologia , Psoríase , Reumatologia , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Psoriásica/terapia , Humanos , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , PeleRESUMO
Background: Psoriasis patients may seek information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and their disease from social media platforms. Analyses of social media interactions may help guide dermatologists' educational efforts during this pandemic. Objectives: This study analyzes social media interactions among patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis regarding the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to determine the misinformation circulating and the apprehension to receiving the vaccine. Methods: Publicly accessible Facebook and Reddit groups regarding psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were identified. Posts uploaded between March 1, 2021 and July 31, 2021 which contained information about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were extracted. First-order themes, sub-themes, sentiment scores and engagement scores were assigned to each post. Results: 345 posts within the first-order theme of vaccination decision and 1379 posts within the first-order theme of vaccine reaction were analyzed. Within vaccination decision, common sub-themes for refusing the vaccine include fear of psoriasis flare up, vaccine is experimental, vaccine is unnecessary, vaccine is dangerous, and concern for reaction/vaccine efficacy while on psoriasis medications. 41.4% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 38.3% contained negative sentiment. Within vaccine reaction, common sub-themes identified were no change to psoriasis, skin/joint flare up, skin flare up attributed specifically to stopping psoriasis medications, skin/joint improvement, and skin flare up but vaccine was worth it. 77.8% of posts contained positive sentiment; whereas, 6.2% contained negative sentiment. Conclusions: Our study identified common SARS-CoV-2 vaccine concerns within the psoriasis community which should be used to guide educational efforts.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites and may be a go-to source of health and dermatology education for the general population. Prior research indicates poor skin of color (SOC) photo representation in printed dermatology textbooks and online medical websites, but there has been no such assessment performed to determine whether this discrepancy also exists for Wikipedia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the number and quality of SOC photos included in Wikipedia's skin disease pages and to explore the possible ramifications of these findings. METHODS: Photos of skin diseases from Wikipedia's "List of Skin Conditions" were assigned by three independent raters as SOC or non-SOC according to the Fitzpatrick system, and were given a quality rating (1-3) based on sharpness, size/resolution, and lighting/exposure. RESULTS: We identified 421 skin disease Wikipedia pages and 949 images that met our inclusion criteria. Within these pages, 20.7% of images of skin diseases (196 of 949 images) were SOC and 79.3% (753 of 949 images) were non-SOC (P<.001). There was no difference in the average quality for SOC (2.05) and non-SOC (2.03) images (P=.81). However, the photo quality criteria utilized (sharpness, size/resolution, and lighting/exposure) did not capture all aspects of photo quality. Another limitation of this analysis is that the Fitzpatrick skin typing system is prone to subjectivity and was not originally intended to be utilized as a non-self SOC metric. CONCLUSIONS: There is SOC underrepresentation in the gross number of SOC images for dermatologic conditions on Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages should be updated to include more SOC photos to mend this divide to ameliorate access to accurate dermatology information for the general public and improve health equity within dermatology.