Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) ; 2: 1-20, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24719969

RESUMO

Caring for the 9 million low-income elderly or disabled adults who are eligible for full benefits under both Medicare and Medicaid can be extremely costly. As part of the federal Financial Alignment Initiative, states have the opportunity to test care models for dual-eligibles that integrate acute care, behavioral health and mental health services, and long-term services and supports, with the goals of enhancing access to services, improving care quality, containing costs, and reducing administrative barriers. One of the challenges in designing these demonstrations is choosing and applying measures that accurately track changes in quality over time­essential for the rapid identification of effective innovations. This brief reviews the quality measures chosen by eight demonstration states as of December 2013. The authors find that while some quality domains are well represented, others are not. Quality-of-life measures are notably lacking, as are informative, standardized measures of long-term services and supports.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Elegibilidade Dupla ao MEDICAID e MEDICARE , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Capitação/organização & administração , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/organização & administração , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Qualidade de Vida , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
2.
J Comp Eff Res ; 9(10): 721-736, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32672474

RESUMO

Aim: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Pipeline to Proposal (P2P) Awards Initiative funded 177 awardees to engage patients and stakeholder partners in preresearch. Based on P2P, we described engagement strategies; outcomes; facilitators; and challenges to inform research funders and stakeholders participating in preresearch. Materials & methods: We used a qualitative approach based on content analysis of program data and interviews with P2P awardees and partners. Results: Awardees developed partnership infrastructure by recruiting patients and stakeholders, establishing clear roles, and providing training. Building trust was key to engaging patients and stakeholders in preresearch. Awardees reported partners were more likely to engage in PCOR in the future. Conclusion: P2P awardees increased capacity of patient and stakeholder partnerships to conduct PCOR.


Assuntos
Distinções e Prêmios , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Participação do Paciente , Participação dos Interessados , Academias e Institutos , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA