Pattern of alloimmune response in second same donor allografts after induction of tolerance using CTLA4Ig.

BACKGROUND: The pattern of allograft acceptance in the presence of costimulatory blockade is manifested by the sequential appearance of Th1 cells, followed by Th2 cells. The aim of this study was to examine whether this phenomenon repeats itself after second same donor allotransplantation, hoping to determine whether acceptance in this setting provokes a predominance of the Th2 response. METHODS: Tolerance was achieved by transplantation of CTLA4Ig-transduced ACI liver allografts in Lewis recipients. Recipient long-term survivors received a second transplant, consisting of a cervical heterotopic heart from the same ACI donor strain. Animals were sacrificed at predetermined intervals following the second transplant and the heart and liver were processed for histology and cytokine mRNA expression. RESULTS: Recipients of CTLA4Ig-transduced livers survived indefinitely. Rechallenge with same donor strain second allograft was manifested by an anergic immune response in the second cardiac allograft, and a very mild transient infiltrate within the first accepted liver graft. Cardiac function was maintained with resolution of all infiltrates. The cytokine cascade was activated within the allografts; however, the pattern of acceptance was not associated with predominance of a specific Th subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of acceptance of an allograft following CTLA4Ig-mediated costimulatory blockade is not related to long-term predominance of Th2 cells, a phenomenon that may be unique to the setting of a tolerant liver. It may be likely that the infiltrating lymphocytes that are dominant in the second graft are suppressed by other memory mechanisms.

The fate of liver grafts declined for subjective reasons and transplanted out of a local organ procurement organization.

BACKGROUND: Decisions made by transplant surgeons to decline liver grafts for local use are based on both objective and ill-defined subjective parameters. These livers may be offered and subsequently transplanted at non-local centers. We analyzed the fate of these exported livers, focusing on the outcome of grafts declined for subjective reasons. The aim is to determine whether local surgeons' concerns about inferior graft function are justified. METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 13.3% of 555 livers in our organ procurement organization (OPO) were exported and transplanted out of the local area. Donor data and reason for decline were obtained from an extensive OPO database. Objective reasons for decline were based on no appropriate matched recipient due to donor size, serologies, or malignancy with potential for spread. Subjective parameters were related to the procuring surgeon's assessment and included variables such as medical and social history, abnormal liver enzymes, older age, organ visualization, and biopsy. Recipient data were obtained from questionnaires sent to outside transplant centers. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher rate of nonfunction in the subjective group (17.1%), compared to the objective group (0%). One-year graft and patient survival were 79 and 83% for the objective group and 59 and 68% for the subjective group (P=NS). When donors declined for medical/social history were excluded from the subjective group, leaving only grafts declined based solely on the surgeon's assessment of graft quality, there is a significant difference in graft survival (79% for objective and 46% for this subjective subgroup, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Livers declined for local use based on subjective assessment by the procuring surgeon have a high nonfunction rate, associated with a high morbidity. Therefore, the use of these grafts should be restricted to recipients at the most urgent status.

Liver transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

The liver transplant program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia experienced healthy growth in its clinical activity in the past 5 years. Patterns of referral and patient evaluation were established, care of patients while waiting on the list or being followed after transplantation was streamlined. We are now achieving excellent outcomes while transplanting relatively sicker patients. Innovative surgical procedures are implemented resulting in more efficient utilization of cadaveric and living-donor liver grafts. The protocols that are used for patient care are more standard, yet flexible and accommodate recent advancement in transplantation immunobiology. This progress of the clinical program was enhanced by careful preservation of the academic mission of the institution, which encourages the liver transplant faculty to be involved in NIH-supported clinical and basic science research.