Effects and safety of iron-based phosphate binders in dialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To assess the effects and safety of iron-based phosphate binders in adult patients receiving dialysis. METHODS: We electronically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CBM for randomized controlled trials about iron-based phosphate binders in adult dialysis patients. Study quality was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of intervention. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Eight studies with 2018 participants were eligible for our meta-analysis. Iron-based phosphate binders were superior to placebo (MD = -2.43 mg/dL, 95% CI: -3.18 to -1.68, p < 0.00001) and as efficient as sevelamer (MD = 0.04 mg/dL, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.36, p = 0.83) in reducing serum phosphorus in dialysis patients. No significant differences were found in all adverse events (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.77 to 2.20, p = 0.32) between iron-based phosphate binders and placebo. Iron-based phosphate binders were associated with significant higher serum iron (MD = 9.39 ng/mL, 95% CI 1.48 to 17.30, p = 0.02), higher serum transferring saturation (MD = 6.29%, 95% CI 2.72 to 9.87, p = 0.0006) and lower serum total iron binding capacity (MD = -23.13 µg/dL, 95% CI -35.69 to -10.58, p = 0.0003) in comparison to placebo. CONCLUSION: Iron-based phosphate binders are as effective as sevelamer and well tolerated for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. Iron-based phosphate binders appear to have a beneficial effect on renal anemia in patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, iron-based phosphate binders may represent a new treatment option for dialysis patients.

Effect of lanthanum carbonate versus calcium-based phosphate binders in dialysis patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of lanthanum carbonate (LC) vs. calciumbased phosphate binders in dialysis patients have been a matter of debate. METHODS: We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and CBM for all randomized controlled trials comparing LC with calcium-based phosphate binders in adult dialysis patients. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Metaanalysis was conducted by RevMan 5.2. RESULTS: Nine studies were eligible for our meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.25 - 2.83) and cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.55 - 1.29) between LC and calcium-based phosphate binders. LC was associated with similar proportions of phosphate-controlled patients (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.27 - 1.44) and lower incidence of hypercalcemia (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.35) in comparison to calcium-based phosphate binders. Compared with calcium salts, LC was associated with significantly lower serum calcium, similar serum Ca x P product and higher serum iPTH. CONCLUSION: Despite the trends observed, we found no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events between LC and calcium-based phosphate binders in dialysis patients. The conclusion was limited by lack of large sample and long-term trials. LC could reduce the incidence of hypercalcemia while comparable with calcium-based phosphate binders in reducing serum phosphorus level.

Clinical utility of intravascular ultrasonography-guided therapy in a small-vessel coronary lesion associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown whether the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be routinely used in small-vessel coronary lesions in patients affected by Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to assess the clinical significance of the IVUS-guided PCI treatment for small-vessel coronary lesions in T2DM. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional trial. A total of 228 patients affected by T2DM with stable angina and a positive stress test in the presence of coronary arteriography (CAG) involving small vessels [online measurement reference vessel diameter ≤3.0 mm by means of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)] were recruited and divided into two groups: an IVUS-guided group (n=120) and a CAG-guided group (n=108). Follow-up PCIs were performed via CAG or IVUS criteria, respectively. Between-group comparisons were made for the number of stents implanted, length, diameter, and high-pressure balloons used post-dilatation. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were the primary endpoint. The value of late lumen loss and proportion of in-stent restenosis (ISR) were the secondary endpoint, all of which were also evaluated during the follow-up period. RESULTS: There was an increased lesion length observed using the IVUS measurement when compared with QCA measurements in the IVUS-guided group (p≤0.001). The number of implanted stents, diameter, length, percentage of high-pressure balloons used during post-dilatation, value of late lumen loss, and proportion of ISR decreased in the IVUS-guided group when compared with the CAG-guided group (p=0.002, p=0.001, p=0.003, p=0.004, p=0.007, p=0.001, respectively). After a 2-year follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the incidence of MACEs was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group (log-rank p=0.029), mainly because of the TLR reduction (log-rank p=0.037). CONCLUSION: The IVUS-guided PCI treatment improved the event-free survival in small-vessel coronary lesions in patients affected by T2DM.

Umeclidinium Plus Vilanterol Versus Placebo, Umeclidinium, or Vilanterol Monotherapies for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The role of umeclidinium plus vilanterol as a combination therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not yet been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium plus vilanterol, in contrast to either monotherapy or placebo. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Randomized clinical trials pertaining to the treatment of COPD with the combination of umeclidinium and vilanterol, versus umeclidinium, vilanterol or placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to mean differences (MDs), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Six studies were included in our meta-analysis. The application of umeclidinium plus vilanterol compared with umeclidinium alone showed increases in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] (MD 0.05 L, 95 % CI 0.04-0.07; p < 0.00001) and forced vital capacity [FVC] (MD 0.07 L, 95 % CI 0.04-0.10; p < 0.00001). Similarly, versus vilanterol alone, the application of umeclidinium plus vilanterol showed increases in trough FEV1 (MD 0.10, 95 % CI 0.08-0.12; p < 0.00001) and FVC (MD 0.16 L, 95 % CI 0.13-0.20; p < 0.00001). Compared with placebo, umeclidinium plus vilanterol also showed increases in trough FEV1 (MD 0.21 L, 95 % CI 0.19-0.22; p < 0.00001) and FVC (MD 0.31 L, 95 % CI 0.26-0.35; p < 0.00001). In addition, umeclidinium plus vilanterol has beneficial effects on dyspnea, albuterol use, and health-related quality of life compared with the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the other three groups, i.e. placebo, umeclidinium and vilanterol, umeclidinium plus vilanterol improves lung function and quality of life in patients with COPD, reduces the use of albuterol, and does not increase the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events.

Long-term outcome of intravascular ultrasound application in patients with moderate coronary lesions and grey-zone fractional flow reserve.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term outcome of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) application in patients with a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of 0.75-0.80. BACKGROUND: Scientifically evaluating anatomical structures is vital because structure influences both physiological function and decision-making in moderate coronary lesions, especially for those with an FFR of 0.75-0.80. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n=128) were divided into three groups based on treatment: the drug control group (n=40), the IVUS-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (n=40) and the IVUS-drug group (n=48). A PCI was performed when a patient had a minimum lumen area less than 4 mm(2) and a plaque burden of 70% or greater. Major adverse clinical events were defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, including PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting, and unstable angina, all of which were also evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the incidence of major adverse clinical events did not differ between the IVUS-PCI and IVUS-drug groups (5 vs. 6.3%, P=0.810), but the levels in both of these groups significantly decreased compared with the drug control group (5 vs. 22.5%, P=0.024, and 6.5 vs. 22.5%, P=0.026, respectively). CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of the application of IVUS in patients with a grey-zone FFR of 0.75-0.80 was superior to that of patients who were treated only with drugs without IVUS measurement. Patients with a grey-zone FFR should receive an individualized treatment strategy according to their IVUS parameters. Patients with the same FFR values may require different treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of lanthanum carbonate versus calcium-based phosphate binders in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted this review to assess the relative efficacy and safety of lanthanum carbonate versus calcium-based phosphate binders in chronic kidney disease. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese Biological Medical Database for randomized controlled trials comparing lanthanum carbonate with calcium-based phosphate binders in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. Study quality was assessed using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of intervention. Meta-analysis was conducted by reviewer manager software, version 5.3. RESULTS: Eleven trials with 1,501 participants were included. Lanthanum carbonate appeared to be associated with a significant reduction in progression of vascular calcification and a beneficial effect on bone outcomes without aluminum-like toxicity. Lanthanum carbonate achieved similar proportions of phosphate-controlled patients (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.27-1.44) with lower incidence of hypercalcemia (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.35) in comparison with calcium-based phosphate binders. Lanthanum carbonate was associated with significantly lower serum calcium, similar serum Ca × P product and higher serum iPTH compared with calcium salts in patients with chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Lanthanum carbonate could delay the progression of vascular calcification and benefit chronic kidney disease patients on bone outcomes. Lanthanum carbonate could achieve similar proportion of phosphate-controlled patients as calcium-based phosphate binders with lower incidence of hypercalcemia.