Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 307(6): 1873-1882, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36897397

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, after TCRA, 31 patients received a special IUB, and 38 patients received an IUD. The Fisher exact test, logistic regression method, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for statistical analysis. A two-sided value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The readhesion rate significantly differed between the IUB group and IUD group, at 15.39% and 54.06%, respectively (P = 0.002). For recurrent moderate IUA, patients in the IUB group had lower scores than patients in the IUD group (P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in the intrauterine pregnancy rate of IUA patients in the IUB group and IUD group after treatment, with rates of 55.56% and 14.29%, respectively (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients in the special IUB group had better outcomes than those in the IUD group, which has a certain guiding significance for clinical work.


Assuntos
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Aderências Teciduais , Tamponamento com Balão Uterino , Doenças Uterinas , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Histeroscopia/métodos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA