Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of transfusion-associated circulatory overload in a mixed intensive care unit population: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) in a cohort of mixed intensive care unit patients and to compare risk factors with those for cardiac overload in the absence of transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, patients who developed TACO were compared using multivariate analysis of two control groups: patients without pulmonary deterioration who received transfusion and patients who developed circulatory overload in the absence of transfusion. RESULTS: TACO was diagnosed in 66 of 1140 patients who received transfusions (5.8%). A total of 585 control transfusion recipients and 76 control patients who developed circulatory overload also were identified. Risk factors were the referring specialties cardiology (odds ratio [OR], 13.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-35.7; p ≤ 0.001) and cardiothoracic surgery (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 3.7-20.7; p ≤ 0.001), history of cardiac failure (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6; p = 0.01), continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.9; p = 0.03), and degree of positive fluid balance (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; p ≤ 0.001), which was associated less with the onset of TACO compared with circulatory overload (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97; p = 0.005). Patients in the TACO group had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit compared with the transfusion and circulatory overload controls groups (median, 7.2 vs. 4.3 vs. 4.4 days; p = 0.001 vs. p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TACO is high in a mixed intensive care unit population. The risk factors identified for TACO are cardiac failure, renal failure, and degree of positive fluid balance. A positive fluid balance may be less essential in the onset of TACO than in the onset of circulatory overload in the absence of transfusion.

Preparation and medical outcomes of Nepalese staff and porters compared with foreign nationals on the Annapurna trekking circuit.

This cross-sectional study investigates preparedness and medical problems in Nepalese staff and porters compared with foreign nationals trekking at altitude in the Nepal Himalaya. 331 Nepalese and 338 foreign nationals in 61 trekking groups were surveyed over 4 weeks on the Annapurna trekking circuit. Foreign nationals reported that 92% of trekking groups received altitude illness information and carried a medical kit. However, fewer than 30% knew the evacuation insurance status of the Nepalese staff and porters on their trek, 39% would not pay for an ill Nepalese national's helicopter evacuation, and 41% reported insufficient resources to carry an individual. Medical problems occurred in 44% of groups. A significantly higher proportion of Nepalese staff and porters were evacuated compared with foreign nationals. No significant differences in Nepalese and foreign national preparation were found between groups with and without medical problems. Medical problems were commonly encountered, yet many groups lacked resources to evacuate someone dangerously ill. Foreign and Nepalese nationals have a duty of care towards each other; recognizing that preparedness relies not only on a first aid kit, but also on knowledge of acclimatization and individuals' insurance is an important part of health and safety for individuals trekking at altitude.