Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Obstet Invest ; 83(6): 564-568, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28957806

RESUMO

AIMS: Creation of a bladder flap has traditionally been an integral surgical step of Cesarean birth, and the practicality of such a procedure to create a bladder flap is still highly debated. METHODS: A total of 208 patients undergoing a primary cesarean birth were randomized. Group 1 (bladder flap) had 101 patients and group 2 (omission of a bladder flap) had 100 patients. The primary outcome was the total operating time and secondary outcomes were postoperative urinary symptoms, bladder injury, postoperative urinary retention, and postoperative residual urine volume. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among groups in terms of mean total operating time and mean skin incision-to-delivery time. No bladder injury occurred in either group. Postoperative urine retention observed in the bladder flap group was 2%. The postoperative residual urine volume was significantly more in the bladder flap group compared to the non-bladder flap group (24.5 ± 2.8 vs. 16.2 ± 1.4 mL). The number of patients with dysuria was significantly higher in the bladder flap group (42 vs. 13%). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a bladder flap during cesarean birth does not have an effect on intraoperative results and operation time, but it is associated with short-term urinary complaints, such as postoperative urinary retention and dysuria.


Assuntos
Cesárea/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Duração da Cirurgia , Paridade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Gravidez , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/epidemiologia
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 227: 67-70, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29894926

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of subcutaneous saline irrigation in preventing wound complications after cesarean sections. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing primary cesarean sections were randomly assigned to either the subcutaneous saline irrigation group or the control group. The participants were asked to come to the hospital for routine inspection of the skin incision on day 7 and day 30 postoperatively. The wounds were inspected for hematoma, seroma, separation and signs of superficial infection. The prime outcome was the comparison of the superficial surgical site infection (SSI) rates among the groups. Additionally, factors associated with wound complications were also analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 204 women undergoing primary cesarean sections were randomized, and 185 were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in terms of SSI rates among the groups (14.3% in the saline group vs 12.8% in the control group, p = 0.76). However, the existences of hematoma and seroma were significantly lower in the saline irrigation group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Irrigation of subcutaneous tissue decreases the occurrences of both postoperative hematoma and seroma in women undergoing primary cesarean sections.


Assuntos
Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA