Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes at Term in Women With Gestational Diabetes and the Risk of Neonatal Hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVES: The management for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) arriving at the delivery ward with pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM) has not been elucidated. We tested the hypothesis that prolonged PROM in women with GDM would result in higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled women with diet or insulin-controlled GDM who presented with spontaneous clear PROM. Each woman was allocated into one of two groups based on the PROM-delivery time: <18 hours (group 1) and ≥18 hours (group 2). The primary outcome was the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia, defined as glucose <40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L) within 24 hours of birth. RESULTS: We ultimately analyzed 631 cases of GDM (6.7%), 371 with PROM-delivery <18 hours, and 260 with PROM-delivery ≥18 hours. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia did not differ between the two groups, reaching 7.3%. Women in group 2 were at increased risk of both cesarean delivery (20% vs. 12.4%, P < 0.01) and maternal chorioamnionitis morbidity (6.5% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a sub-group of women with GDM, a PROM-delivery time ≥18 hours is not associated with higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia, but higher rates of chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery were noted. Therefore, we suggest consideration for early delivery when managing women with GDM and PROM.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Intertwin Delivery Interval and Associated Maternal and Second Twin Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to identify possible risk factors and the morbidity associated with prolonged intertwin delivery interval (IDI). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center. Women with twin gestations who reached the second stage of labor between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between short IDI (≤15 minutes) and prolonged IDI (>15 minutes). The primary outcome was the rate of 5-minute Apgar score ≤ 7. RESULTS: A total of 461 women were included; 312 of whom were in the short IDI group and 149 were in the prolonged IDI group. Rates of 5-minute Apgar score ≤ 7 and neonatal acidemia were significantly higher in the prolonged IDI group (3.5 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.008; 4.3 vs. 15.7%, p = 0.01, respectively). Vaginal delivery was less likely to occur in the prolonged IDI group (75.8 vs. 93.3%). Placental abruption and hemoglobin drop ≥ 3 g/dL were more prevalent in the prolonged IDI group (4 vs. 1%, p = 0.03; 39.1 vs. 24.7%, p = 0.01, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.76, p = 0.01), nulliparity (aOR: 1.66, p = 0.03), and birth weight ratio ≥ 1.2 (aOR: 1.92, p < 0.05) were associated with prolonged IDI. CONCLUSION: Prolonged IDI is associated with an increased risk for neonatal acidemia and low 5-minute Apgar score, and with an increased rate of cesarean delivery, placental abruption, and hemoglobin drop ≥ 3 g/dL. Advanced maternal age, nulliparity, and twin birth weight ratio ≥ 1.2 are associated with prolonged IDI. KEY POINTS: · Prolonged was found to be associated with higher neonatal acidemia and lower 5-minute Apgar score.. · Prolonged IDI is also associated with increased rate of cesarean delivery, placental abruption, and blood loss.. · Advanced maternal age, birth weight discordancy, and nulliparity were associated with prolonged IDI..

Higher risk of hemorrhage and maternal morbidity in vaginal birth after second stage of labor C-section.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the association between timing and indication for previous cesarean section (C-section) and its association with postpartum risks for adverse maternal outcomes, primarily postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). METHODS: This retrospective case-control study examined women following term vaginal delivery in a university-affiliated medical center between 2008 and 2018. Postpartum complications were compared between women who had their first VBAC and a control group comprised of women who had vaginal delivery without prior C-section. Additional analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the timing of previous C-section and the severity of postpartum adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of the women meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 2879), 1,455 had VBAC and 1,424 were in the control group. Overall, significant postpartum complications, primarily PPH, were observed in the VBAC group compared to controls. Women who underwent C-section during second-stage of labor experienced higher PPH rates and increased drop in hemoglobin levels compared to women who underwent C-section during the first stage of labor or an elective C-Sect. (4.3 ± 0.9 g/dL vs. 2.8 ± 1.1 g/dL vs. 2.4 ± 0.8, p = 0.033). Concomitant increased need for blood transfusion (8.1% vs. 3.5% vs. 2.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and uterine atony (12.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 4.4%, respectively, p = 0.009) were also observed. No significant differences were demonstrated in other postpartum adverse effects evaluated. CONCLUSION: VBAC is associated with higher rates of postpartum complications, primarily PPH. The risk is significantly increased in VBAC following a second stage cesarean section. This data should be taken into consideration in the management of laboring women after C-section.

Antenatal betamethasone and the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia: it's all about timing.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate whether there is a relationship between the "time during the day" of maternal betamethasone administration between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation and the risk for neonatal hypoglycemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study included cases between 2008 and 2018. Eligible cases were pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who received a single course of betamethasone between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation. Each woman was allocated into one of four pre-defined groups based on the time when intramuscular betamethasone was administered. Group 1 (23:00-04:59) represents the lowest daily natural corticosteroids' activity, group 2 (05:00-10:59) represents the peak daily natural corticosteroids' activity, whereas group 3 (11:00-16:59) and group 4 (17:00-22:59) present an intermediate natural state of steady corticosteroids' secretion and activity. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (glucose level of less than 40 mg/dL). RESULTS: We have identified 868 women who received a single complete course of betamethasone, of which 353 women (40.7%) had a steroid treatment latency to delivery up to 14 days. The incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly higher in group 2 (39.5%, 30/76, p = 0.0063), compared to group 1, who had the lowest incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (16.9%, 12/71), and to group 3 and group 4. CONCLUSIONS: The "time during the day" when betamethasone administered is important when considering the risk for neonatal hypoglycemia. The risk was significantly higher when betamethasone was administered during the peak time and significantly lower when administered at the nadir time of maternal endogenous corticosteroid activity.

Lockdown with a Price: The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization classified coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) as a pandemic and recommends strict restrictions regarding most aspects of daily activities. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the pandemic has changed the prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women without COVID-19. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to describe changes in outpatient clinic visits and to compare the rates of cesarean and instrumental deliveries between two periods of time: March-April 2020 (during the COVID-19 outbreak) with March-April of the preceding year, 2019. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 outbreak, visits to obstetric triage, gynecologic triage, high-risk clinic, and ultrasound units decreased by 36.4%, 34.7%, 32.8%, and 18.1%, respectively. The medical center experienced a 17.8% drop in the total number of births (610 births) compared with March and April 2019 (742 births). During the outbreak women were more likely to be nulliparous (33.3% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.02) and present with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (7.5% vs. 4%, P = 0.005) or gestational diabetes (13% vs. 10%, P = 0.03). More epidural analgesia was used (83.1% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.006). There were more operative vaginal deliveries during the outbreak (16.7% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.01). All other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The medical facility experienced a major decline in all aspects of the routine obstetrics activities during the time of the pandemic. The higher rate of operative vaginal deliveries among nulliparous may be associated with the pandemic effect on the rate of high-risk patients.

The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A low rate of primary cesarean delivery is expected to reduce some of the major complications that are associated with a repeat cesarean delivery, such as uterine rupture, adhesive placental disorders, hysterectomy, and even maternal death. Since 2014, and in alignment with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, we changed our approach to labor dystocia, defined as abnormal progression of labor, by allowing a longer duration of the second stage of labor. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of prolonging the second stage of labor on the rate of cesarean delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a historical control group, we compared maternal and neonatal outcomes over 2 periods. Period I (9300 patients): from May 2011 until April 2014, when a prolonged second stage in nulliparous women was considered after 3 hours with regional anesthesia or 2 hours if no such anesthesia was provided. Second-stage arrest was defined in multiparous women after 2 hours with regional anesthesia or 1 hour without it. Period II (10,531 patients): from May 2014 until April 2017, allowed nulliparous and multiparous women continuing the second stage of labor an additional 1 hour before diagnosing second-stage arrest. Singleton deliveries at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation were initially considered for eligibility. We excluded women with high-risk pregnancies and known fetal anomalies. For comparing means, we used the t test. If variables were not normally distributed, we used the Mann-Whitney test instead. For comparing proportions, we used the χ2 test with continuity correction. RESULTS: The primary cesarean delivery was decreased in nulliparous women from 23.3% (819 of 3515) in period I to 15.7% (596 of 3796) in period II (relative risk [RR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74), a trend that was also significant in multiparous women (10.9%, 623 of 5785, in period I vs 8.1%, 544 of 6735, in period II; RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84). The rate of operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women was higher in period II than in period I (19.2%, 732 of 3515, vs 17.7%, 622 of 3796, P < .0001). Rates of third- and fourth-degree laceration and of shoulder dystocia were also higher in period II. The rate of arterial cord pH < 7.0 and the rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were higher in period II, but the early neurological outcome was not different when comparing the 2 periods. CONCLUSION: The new policy of labor management successfully decreased primary cesarean deliveries, with a small rise in instrumental deliveries. However, it also increased the other immediate maternal and neonatal complications. A higher rate of lower umbilical artery cord pH was the most significant finding; however, the early neurological outcome did not change. It is possible that the ongoing adjustment to the new labor protocol will avoid, in the future, maternal and neonatal complications. The long-term maternal and neonatal consequences of our new approach will be evaluated in future studies.

Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplets to twins compared with non-reduced triplets: a meta-analysis.

The current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies following multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) compared with non-reduced triplet pregnancies. All studies comparing perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies following MPR to non-reduced triplet pregnancies were considered. MEDLINE, non-indexed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science were searched for relevant published articles up to August 2016. The search yielded 653 publications of which 92 were assessed for eligibility. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the outcomes of pregnancies following MPR were better compared with expectantly managed triplets. The MPR group delivered at a later gestational age and was less likely to be delivered before 32 or 28 weeks' gestation. Newborns in the MPR group had significantly higher birthweight at delivery (mean difference 500 g [95% CI 439.95, 560.04]). Rates of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks' gestation and overall infant survival were comparable between the groups. This meta-analysis suggests that MPR of triplet pregnancies to twins is associated with improved perinatal outcome compared with non-reduced triplets. Should primary prevention of high order multiple pregnancy fail, MPR is an appropriate alternative to minimize the perinatal morbidity and mortality of triplet pregnancies.

Multifetal reduction of triplets to twins compared with non-reduced twins: a meta-analysis.

The current systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies following multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) compared with non-reduced twins. We considered all studies comparing perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies following MPR to non-reduced twin pregnancies. Our search yielded 639 publications, of which 91 were assessed for eligibility. A total of 22 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, fetal reduction of triplets to twins resulted in comparable perinatal outcomes to non-reduced twins with regards to gestational age and birthweight at delivery, pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks, as well as the development of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Of all outcomes, only the Caesarean section rate was significantly higher in the MPR group compared with the non-reduced twins group with an odds ratio of 1.95 (95% confidence interval 1.33-2.87). This meta-analysis suggests that MPR of triplet pregnancies to twins is associated with comparable perinatal outcomes to that of non-reduced twins. This information can further help in guiding, and probably reassuring, clinician and patient decision-making when faced with high-order multifetal pregnancies.

The Outcome of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins Discordant at 11 to 13+6 Weeks' Gestation.

BACKGROUND: Monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies are associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Intertwin discordances at the time of nuchal translucency (NT) screening may have a value in the prediction of fetal loss or twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. We aimed to determine the ability of intertwin NT and crown rump length (CRL) discordances among MCDA twins to predict adverse outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All MCDA twins with a documented routine ultrasound at 11 to 13+6 weeks' gestation, and known pregnancy outcome between August 2003 and August 2012 were included. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the ideal NT and CRL discordances cut-off points that maximized the ability to predict adverse outcome, which was defined as any of: death of one or both twins, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, or estimated fetal weight or birth weight discordances ≥25%. RESULTS: Of the 89 cases, 20 (22.5%) had at least one adverse outcome. NT discordance was more discriminatory of adverse outcome than was CRL discordance. The optimal values for predicting any adverse outcomes for NT were >23.7% and for CRL >3.5%. The positive predictive values for NT (52.4%) and CRL (29.8%) screening were relatively low; however, the lack of either NT or CRL discordances was more reassuring, with negative predictive values of 86.8% and 86.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NT discordance is more predictive for adverse fetal outcome in MCDA twins than CRL discordance. Neither NT nor CRL discordance are likely to modify the intensive monitoring required for these very high-risk pregnancies.

Interpregnancy interval following missed abortion and the risk for preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: Short inter-pregnancy interval (IPI) of <18 months following a live birth, has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. This study aimed to evaluate whether a short IPI following a medically treated missed abortion (MA) poses similar perinatal risks in a subsequent pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: The retrospective analysis included patients with history of an MA at up to 10 weeks of gestation, treated with misoprostol (pgE1) only, and with a documented subsequent live pregnancy (2010-2022). 1110 Patients were allocated into two groups: IPI ≤18 months and IPI >18 months. The primary outcome was the risk for a spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) <37 weeks of gestation in the consecutive pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences for Windows version 26 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). RESULTS: The cohort included 1,110 patients: 430 (38.74 %) patients with IPI <18 months and 680 (61.26 %) patients with IPI >18 months. The characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. The rates of spontaneous PTB <37 and <34 weeks of gestation were significantly higher in the short vs. long IPI cohort (16.28 % vs. 7.06 % and 6.74 % vs. 5.0 %, respectively, p < 0.05). These patients also had a higher risk for Cesarean delivery (31.63 % vs. 23.34 %, p = 0.005) and postpartum hemorrhage (4.42 % vs. 2.06 %, p = 0.029) compared to patients with IPI >18 months. The observed differences remained statistically significant even after adjusting for potential confounding variables using multiple regression analysis. No other significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes were noted. CONCLUSION: Short IPI (≤18 months) following a medical treatment MA may be associated with an increased risk of PTB, Cesarean delivery and PPH.

Exploring the Optimal Intertwin Delivery Interval for Vaginal Delivery.

The effect of prolonged intertwin delivery interval (IDI) is not well studied. This work aimed to assess the inflection point for Cesarean delivery (CD) and associated adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center. The study included women with twin pregnancies in 2010-2019 who reached the second stage of labor, and assessed the most predictive cutoff for CD using Youden J statistic and compared adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes between short and prolonged intertwin delivery intervals. A total of 461 gravidas reached the second stage of labor and were included in the study. Using the ROC curve and Youden J statistic, the IDI cutoff was set at 15 min (80% sensitivity, 75% specificity, p < 0.001), with 312 women in the short and 149 in the prolonged IDI groups. Women in the prolonged IDI group were less likely to deliver the second twin vaginally (75.8% vs. 93.3%, p < 0.001). Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (39.1% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.01), and placental abruption (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.03) were more likely to occur in the prolonged IDI group. An increased rate of neonatal acidemia and low 5-min Apgar score were also found in the prolonged IDI group (15.7% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.01, 9.7% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.008; respectively). IDIs of more than 15 min are associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. These findings should be used for counseling and managing twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery.

Delivery mode after cervical ripening among patients with no prior vaginal births.

PURPOSE: To compare mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes using cervical ripening balloon (CRB) for induction of labor (IOL) in nulliparous patients vs. those undergoing first trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including data from two tertiary medical centers. Included were all patients with a singleton pregnancy and a gestational age > 37+0 weeks and no prior vaginal birth undergoing IOL with CRB. Nulliparous patients (nulliparous group) were compared to patients with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) and no prior vaginal delivery (TOLAC group). Patients who withdrew consent for trial of labor at any time in both groups were excluded. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. RESULTS: Overall, 161 patients were included in the TOLAC group and 1577 in the nulliparous group. The rate of CD was similar in both groups and remained similar after adjusting for confounders (29.8 % vs. 28.9 %, p = 0.86, OR 1.1, 95 %, CI 0.76-1.58). CD due to fetal distress was more common in the TOLAC group (75 % vs. 56 %, p = 0.014). Other maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Comparable vaginal delivery rates may be achieved in patients with or without a previous CD attempting their first trial of labor, with a cervical ripening balloon for labor induction, without increasing adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Interpregnancy interval after vacuum delivery and subsequent perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a short interpregnancy interval (IPI) after vacuum extraction (VE), poses similar perinatal risks in a subsequent pregnancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study between 2011 and 2021. Nulliparous women with term, singleton VE deliveries and with known pregnancy outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each woman was allocated into one of two groups based on the IPI, <18 months and between 18 and 60 months. The primary outcome was the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) <37 weeks in the consecutive birth. RESULTS: We included 1094 pregnancies: 212 (19.4%) with IPI <18 months and 882 (80.6%) with IPI between 18 and 60 months following the previous VE delivery. The VE characteristics were comparable between the groups. Young maternal age was a risk factor for a short IPI (28.0 ± 4.8 vs 30.3 ± 4 years, P < 0.01). Spontaneous PTB <37 weeks was significantly higher in the IPI <18 months group with 18-60 months (7.1% vs 2.6%, P = 0.002). Polynomial regression analysis also confirmed a significantly increased risk of preterm birth <37 weeks (P < 0.01). Short IPI <18 months was also associated with an increase in the risk of low birthweight <2500 g (6.1% vs 2.8%, P = 0.02) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (6.1% vs 2.6%, P = 0.013). The incidence of recurrent VE, albeit significant (2.3% vs 4.9%, P = 0.049), was low in both groups. No differences were noted in any of the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Short IPI (<18 months) following term VE delivery is associated with higher neonatal risks, particularly PTB, in the subsequent pregnancy. These findings are particularly important when counseling women planning an optimal IPI.

Does delayed vacuum-assisted delivery harbor greater maternal or neonatal complications?

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes between early (<2 h) and delayed (>2 h) vacuum extraction (VE) deliveries. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single, university-affiliated medical center (2014-2021). We included term singleton pregnancies delivered by VE, allocated into one of two groups according to second stage duration: <2 h or >2 h. Primary outcome was maternal composite adverse outcome (included chorioamnionitis, 3-4 degree lacerations, and postpartum hemorrhage [PPH]). RESULTS: We included 2521 deliveries: 2261 (89.6%) with early VE and 260 (10.4%) with delayed VE. Study groups' characteristics were not different, except of parity. Maternal composite outcome almost reached a significance (P = 0.054) comparing between the groups. Comparing second stage length up to 2 h versus more, there was similar rate of advance maternal lacerations. However, extending the second stage to more than 3 h was associated with third degree lacerations compared to 2-3 h (9.8% vs 3%, P = 0.011). There were significantly more PPH events in the later VE group (P = 0.004), but the need for blood transfusions was similar. The rates of 5 min Apgar score ≤7 (P = 0.001) and umbilical artery pH <7.0 were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1. The effect was much more pronounced when second stage was >3 h. After conducting multiregression analysis, the results became insignificant. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that VE performed in the late second stage of labor, up to 3 h, is safe as VE performed in the early stages regarding maternal and neonatal outcomes. Extra caution is needed with extended second stage to more than 3 h.

The effect of oral probiotics on glycemic control of women with gestational diabetes mellitus-a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus should be treated adequately to avoid maternal hyperglycemia-related complications. Previously, probiotic supplements were suggested to improve fasting blood glucose in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. However, a major limitation of previous studies was that preprandial and especially postprandial glucose values, which are important predictors of pregnancy outcomes, were not studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of a mixture of probiotic strains on maternal glycemic parameters, particularly preprandial and postprandial glucose values and pregnancy outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Women newly diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus were randomly allocated into a research group, receiving 2 capsules of oral probiotic formula containing Bifidobacterium bifidum, B lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L paracasei, L rhamnosus, and Streptococcus thermophilus (>6 × 109/capsule), and a control group, receiving a placebo (2 capsules/day) until delivery. Glycemic control was evaluated by daily glucose charts. After 2 weeks, pharmacotherapy was started in case of poor glycemic control. The primary outcomes were the rate of women requiring medications for glycemic control and mean daily glucose charts after 2 weeks of treatment with the study products. RESULTS: Forty-one and 44 women were analyzed in the treatment and placebo cohorts, respectively. Mean daily glucose during the first 2 weeks in the probiotics and placebo groups was 99.7±7.9 and 98.0±9.3 mg/dL, respectively (P=.35). The rate of women needing pharmacotherapy because of poor glycemic control after 2 weeks of treatment in the probiotics and placebo groups was 24 (59%) and 18 (41%), respectively (P=.10). Mean preprandial and postprandial glucose levels throughout the study period were similar between the groups (P>.05). There were no differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes, including birthweight and adverse effect profile between the groups. CONCLUSION: The oral probiotic product tested in this study did not affect glycemic control of women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

The optimal cutoff for intertwin delivery interval: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cutoff of intertwin delivery intervals (IDIs) as a predictor for neonatal acidemia. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. Women attempting vaginal delivery of twins between 2010 and 2019 and who reached the second stage of labor were included. The cutoff point for prolonged IDI was established using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden's J statistic. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between short and prolonged IDI cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 461 women were included in the study. A cutoff time of 10 min was found to be the best predictor for neonatal acidemia (arterial cord pH ≤ 7.1), with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 59%. Second twins delivered more than 10 min after the first twin were more likely to be acidemic and to have a 5-min Apgar score of 7 or less (13.5% vs 3.3%, P = 0.01, and 8.4% vs 3.2%, P = 0.02, respectively). An IDI of more than 10 min was also associated with increased rate of cesarean delivery and placental abruption (13.5% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001, and 3.4% vs 0.8%, P = 0.047, respectively). No other adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were statistically significant between cohorts. CONCLUSION: An IDI of more than 10 min is associated with a higher risk for neonatal academia, with a low 5-min Apgar score, and higher cesarean delivery and placental abruption rates. These findings provide insights that are valuable when counseling and managing twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery. Interventions aimed at shortening the IDI should be considered to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes.

Fixed-time interval vs on-demand oral analgesia after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Scheduled administration of analgesics was proven superior to on-demand dosing following cesarean deliveries. However, this protocol was not compared after vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a fixed- vs on-demand analgesic protocol for the management of pain in the first 24 hours after a vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, prospective, controlled trial was conducted at a single tertiary medical center between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2022. Vaginally delivered patients were randomly assigned to receive oral analgesics (paracetamol 1 g + ibuprofen 400 mg) either every 6 hours for the first 24 hours postpartum (scheduled analgesia group) or as needed (on-demand group). Pain level during the first 24 hours postdelivery was measured using a 10-point visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were randomized 1:1 to the 2 cohorts. Baseline and delivery characteristics, including oxytocin augmentation, epidural anesthesia, episiotomy rate, and neonatal birthweight, were comparable between groups. Patients in the scheduled group received more paracetamol and ibuprofen doses in the first 24 hours (2.9±1.3 and 2.9±1.2 doses vs 0.8±1.1 and 0.7±1.1 doses, respectively; P<.001). Pain score was comparable between study groups (5.31±1.92 vs 5.29±1.67; P=.626) even after subanalysis for primiparity, episiotomy, and vacuum-assisted delivery (P>.05). However, patients on a fixed treatment schedule were more likely to breastfeed their baby (98% vs 88%; P=.006) as than those receiving treatment on demand. In addition, they were more satisfied with their labor and delivery experience, as evaluated by Birth Satisfaction Scale questionnaires quality control (37.9±4.7 vs 31.1±5.2; P=.0324), patient attributes (35.0±5.1 vs 30.3±6.3; P=.0453), and stress experienced (58.1±8.5 vs 50.1±8.3; P=.0398). No side effects or adverse outcomes were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: A scheduled analgesic protocol for postpartum pain management following vaginal delivery revealed similar pain scores compared with an on-demand protocol, although it was associated with higher breastfeeding rates and higher maternal satisfaction.

Late preterm delivery has a distinctive second-stage duration and characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Late preterm neonates born between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks' gestation are at increased risk for short- and long-term morbidity and mortality when compared with their term counterparts. Currently, no separate labor curve is available for late preterm births, and this group's optimal duration of the second stage of labor has never been defined separately. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the second stage duration between late preterm and term births. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study from May 2014 until May 2021. Eligible were women with a singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation, spontaneous or induced onset of labor, and those who delivered vaginally beyond 34.0 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of our study was to compare and characterize the second stage of labor duration between late preterm and term births. RESULTS: We analyzed 962 late preterm and 9476 term vaginal deliveries. Women who delivered during the late preterm period were more likely to be multiparous (52.4% vs 45.2%; P<.001) and fewer required oxytocin during labor (41.2% vs 54.4%; P<.001) or used epidural analgesia (75.2% vs 83.6%; P<.001). The overall mean duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shorter in the late preterm period than at term (1.08±1.09 hours vs 1.49±1.22 hours; P<.001). This was even more pronounced for nulliparous women (1.05±1.00 hours vs 2.10±1.17 hours; P<.001). Among multiparous women, epidural use significantly affected the duration of the second stage of labor, and the second stage was relatively longer during the late preterm period than at term in this subgroup (1.16 vs 0.5 hours; P<.001). Using a multivariate Cox regression, variables such as maternal age (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04), parity (hazard ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 3.65-4.63), preterm birth (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.10), and birthweight at delivery (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.30) shortened the second stage, whereas induction of labor (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.86) and epidural use (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.86) extended its total duration. Regardless of parity, lower rates of operative vaginal deliveries were observed in the late preterm period than at term (3.7% vs 15.5%; P<.001). This period was also associated with lower rates of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations (0.2% vs 2.2%; P<.001) but higher rates of chorioamnionitis (1.7% vs 0.1%; P<.001), Apgar score at 5 minutes <7 (1.0% vs 0.2%; P<.001), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (19.3% vs 1.0%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Women who delivered vaginally during the late preterm period had a distinctive second-stage duration. Primarily, it was shown to be significantly shorter for nulliparous and multiparous women. Future studies should further clarify the optimal duration of this stage in relation to neonatal outcomes at such a vulnerable period.