Constitutional and acquired genetic variants in ARID5B in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Constitutional polymorphisms in ARID5B are associated with an increased risk of developing high hyperdiploid (HeH; 51-67 chromosomes) pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP ALL). Here, we investigated constitutional and somatic ARID5B variants in 1335 BCP ALL cases from five different cohorts, with a particular focus on HeH cases. In 353 HeH ALL that were heterozygous for risk alleles and trisomic for chromosome 10, where ARID5B is located, a significantly higher proportion of risk allele duplication was seen for the SNPs rs7090445 (p = 0.009), rs7089424 (p = 0.005), rs7073837 (p = 0.03), and rs10740055 (p = 0.04). Somatic ARID5B deletions were seen in 16/1335 cases (1.2%), being more common in HeH than in other genetic subtypes (2.2% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.002). The expression of ARID5B in HeH cases with genomic deletions was reduced, consistent with a functional role in leukemogenesis. Whole-genome sequencing and RNA-sequencing in HeH revealed additional somatic events involving ARID5B, resulting in a total frequency of 3.6% of HeH cases displaying a somatic ARID5B aberration. Overall, our results show that both constitutional and somatic events in ARID5B are involved in the leukemogenesis of pediatric BCP ALL, particularly in the HeH subtype.

Distinct pattern of genomic breakpoints in CML and BCR::ABL1-positive ALL: analysis of 971 patients.

BACKGROUND: The BCR::ABL1 is a hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and is also found in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Most genomic breaks on the BCR side occur in two regions - Major and minor - leading to p210 and p190 fusion proteins, respectively. METHODS: By multiplex long-distance PCR or next-generation sequencing technology we characterized the BCR::ABL1 genomic fusion in 971 patients (adults and children, with CML and ALL: pediatric ALL: n = 353; pediatric CML: n = 197; adult ALL: n = 166; adult CML: n = 255 patients) and designed "Break-App" web tool to allow visualization and various analyses of the breakpoints. Pearson's Chi-Squared test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Detailed analysis showed a non-random distribution of breaks in both BCR regions, whereas ABL1 breaks were distributed more evenly. However, we found a significant difference in the distribution of breaks between CML and ALL. We found no association of breakpoints with any type of interspersed repeats or DNA motifs. With a few exceptions, the primary structure of the fusions suggests non-homologous end joining being responsible for the BCR and ABL1 gene fusions. Analysis of reciprocal ABL1::BCR fusions in 453 patients showed mostly balanced translocations without major deletions or duplications. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data suggest that physical colocalization and chromatin accessibility, which change with the developmental stage of the cell (hence the difference between ALL and CML), are more critical factors influencing breakpoint localization than presence of specific DNA motifs.